Jump to content

Talk:Argentina: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Odessa/Nazis: new section
Line 85: Line 85:


I have started an overhaul of the article because it is not composed of summaries but extensive dialogues, which in some cases rival even the daughter articles. Frankly, we do not need duplicate lists of cities, or a multitude of subsections, or so many images. In a couple of hours I have reduced the article from 162,584 bytes to 146,157 bytes. It would be better to view the separate edits to get an idea of what else needs to be done. Let's be clear that there is no target size but 160K is far larger than a top-level article should be. [[User:Green Giant|Green Giant]] ([[User talk:Green Giant|talk]]) 05:36, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
I have started an overhaul of the article because it is not composed of summaries but extensive dialogues, which in some cases rival even the daughter articles. Frankly, we do not need duplicate lists of cities, or a multitude of subsections, or so many images. In a couple of hours I have reduced the article from 162,584 bytes to 146,157 bytes. It would be better to view the separate edits to get an idea of what else needs to be done. Let's be clear that there is no target size but 160K is far larger than a top-level article should be. [[User:Green Giant|Green Giant]] ([[User talk:Green Giant|talk]]) 05:36, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

== Odessa/Nazis ==

no mention of Nazis party members fleeing to argentina?why not?this is fact

Revision as of 00:34, 2 September 2009

Template:VA Template:Outline of knowledge coverage

Template:WP1.0 Template:FAOL

Infobox map

Territorial claims should not be displayed in the infobox map, but rather in an appropriate place in the article, so to keep a NPOV consensus to the article and avoid edit wars. The infobox map should display the territories under the sovereignty of that country. Sogosg (talk) 21:59, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See user:MusicInTheHouse I did bring up the map topic ages ago and no one responded so I changed the map as no one has challenged that change, except you now, in a manner which would seem to be revenge because you only reverted the change I made after you reverted my Ireland change and saw this change I had made in my edit history. Sogosg (talk) 23:55, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And today after a long period of no one challenging the matter I changed the map to a more precise map. Aogouguo (talk) 00:04, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You were challenged instantly after you inserted the map. Per WP:BRD the change should be undone and then discussion can take place. Please self revert.MITH 00:12, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion was open for ages, and you don't count because your challenge was a revenge edit for me editing the Ireland article. No one genuine has challenged the map. Aogouguo (talk) 00:19, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you refuse to accept my revert and are discounting me as an editor then some actions will need to be taken as that is a disruptive mind frame. Please self revert then discussion on the map can change.MITH 00:23, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Ok let's discuss the map Aogouguo (talk) 00:28, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I state that the map I put on this article is better than the last because (1) It is NPOV because it does not include any disputes, unlike the last, and follows the general rule of leaving disputes out of the infobox map, as disputed territories are discussed in the relevent place in the article, as is done here. (2) It is clearer and more detailed and the same used by neighbour Chile. Aogouguo (talk) 00:29, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll discuss it with you after you revert your change, per WP:BRD.MITH 00:32, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what your opinion on which map you prefer is so I don't know which version to implement, as you seem to be the only other involved editor. Aogouguo (talk) 00:35, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have reverted the map even though the preconditions were unacceptable under the circumstances. I owuld like to hear your views on the maps. Aogouguo (talk) 00:49, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Finally! I agree that the map should not have claimed territories, but the orthographic projection is far superior to the standard map as a map in general. I shall see if I can upload a new version of the map tomorrow morning without the claimed territories. That should satisfy us both.MITH 00:53, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I accept your proposed version of the map and would like to add any enhanced detail to the map would also be good, like that of the Chile article. Aogouguo (talk) 00:56, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have created the proposed map and added it to the article. Aogouguo (talk) 02:14, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/778193e4-44d8-11de-82d6-00144feabdc0.html I believe this is great article that could be of some use in this page? Jesusmariajalisco (talk) 07:44, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. That's just an editorial MBelgrano (talk) 18:21, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Several Names

Whys are there so many names? Which is the real(official) one? —Preceding unsigned comment added by NoWay555 (talkcontribs) 01:11, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All of them are real and official. However, Nación Argentina (Argentine Nation) and República Argentina (Argentine Republic) are by far the most used ones. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.19.11.238 (talk) 15:57, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

error in argentine federation

Hi, reading the article of argentina, i see one error in the constitution of federation actually they are 24 states the last one its Tierra del Fuego with the capital Ushuaia. I supose u try to correct this error pls.

TY. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanos77 (talkcontribs) 02:38, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article about Argentine economy

This site: [Argentina] has an article about Argentina's economy.Agre22 (talk) 14:42, 13 August 2009 (UTC)agre22[reply]

Article about Argentina writen in 1913

This site: [Argentina] has an article writen in 1913 about Argentina.Agre22 (talk) 00:19, 28 August 2009 (UTC)agre22[reply]

This article needs to lose some weight

I have started an overhaul of the article because it is not composed of summaries but extensive dialogues, which in some cases rival even the daughter articles. Frankly, we do not need duplicate lists of cities, or a multitude of subsections, or so many images. In a couple of hours I have reduced the article from 162,584 bytes to 146,157 bytes. It would be better to view the separate edits to get an idea of what else needs to be done. Let's be clear that there is no target size but 160K is far larger than a top-level article should be. Green Giant (talk) 05:36, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Odessa/Nazis

no mention of Nazis party members fleeing to argentina?why not?this is fact