Jump to content

Neo-Stalinism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Jacurek (talk | contribs)
9,609 edits
Undid revision 312689889 by LokiiT (talk) - it is sourced from "Stalin's new status in Russia". - good faith revert of LokiiT.
Oh, I see the problem. Someone is trying to present a single person's opinion as an absolute fact with different wording than the article. And people wonder why the POV tag is there?
Line 50: Line 50:
As of 2008, nearly half of Russians view Stalin positively, and many support restoration of his monuments dismantled in the past.<ref> [http://www.newizv.ru/news/2008-03-05/85812/ “The Glamorous Tyrant: The Cult of Stalin Experiences a Rebirth,”] by Mikhail Pozdnyaev, Novye Izvestia</ref><ref>http://www.kavkaz-uzel.ru/newstext/news/id/1208902.html.</ref> In 2005, Communist politician [[Gennady Zyuganov]] said that Russia "should once again render honor to Stalin for his role in building socialism and saving human civilization from the Nazi plague."<ref>[http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110006663 What Gulag? Russia's government shamefully refuses to face up to the horrors of communism.] by [[David Satter]]</ref>
As of 2008, nearly half of Russians view Stalin positively, and many support restoration of his monuments dismantled in the past.<ref> [http://www.newizv.ru/news/2008-03-05/85812/ “The Glamorous Tyrant: The Cult of Stalin Experiences a Rebirth,”] by Mikhail Pozdnyaev, Novye Izvestia</ref><ref>http://www.kavkaz-uzel.ru/newstext/news/id/1208902.html.</ref> In 2005, Communist politician [[Gennady Zyuganov]] said that Russia "should once again render honor to Stalin for his role in building socialism and saving human civilization from the Nazi plague."<ref>[http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110006663 What Gulag? Russia's government shamefully refuses to face up to the horrors of communism.] by [[David Satter]]</ref>


In June 2007, Russian President [[Vladimir Putin]] organized a conference for history teachers to promote a high-school teachers manual called ''A Modern History of Russia: 1945-2006: A Manual for History Teachers'' which portrays Stalin as a cruel but successful leader who "acted rationally", no matter that he executed millions of Soviet citizens, and justified his terror as an "instrument of development."<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7798497.stm Stalin's new status in Russia], By Richard Galpin, [[BBC News]], Moscow </ref><ref>"Activists Denounce Stalin in Station" 28 August 2009 By Kristina Mikulova Moscow Times</ref> Putin said at the conference that the new manual will "help instill young people with a sense of pride in Russia", and he argued that Stalin's purges pale in comparison to the United States' [[atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki]]. At a memorial for Stalin's victims, Putin said that while Russians should "keep alive the memory of tragedies of the past, we should focus on all that is best in the country."<ref>[http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&sid=anSl5jtQ1FpI&refer=europe Stalin Back in Vogue as Putin Endorses History-Book Nostalgia] by Henry Meyer, [[Bloomberg.com]], 29 November 2007</ref>
In June 2007, Russian President [[Vladimir Putin]] organized a conference for history teachers to promote a high-school teachers manual called ''A Modern History of Russia: 1945-2006: A Manual for History Teachers'', which according to [[Irina Flige]], office director of human rights organization Memorial, it portrays Stalin as a cruel but successful leader who "acted rationally", no matter that he executed millions of Soviet citizens. She claims it justifies his terror as an "instrument of development."<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7798497.stm Stalin's new status in Russia], By Richard Galpin, [[BBC News]], Moscow </ref><ref>"Activists Denounce Stalin in Station" 28 August 2009 By Kristina Mikulova Moscow Times</ref> Putin said at the conference that the new manual will "help instill young people with a sense of pride in Russia", and he argued that Stalin's purges pale in comparison to the United States' [[atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki]]. At a memorial for Stalin's victims, Putin said that while Russians should "keep alive the memory of tragedies of the past, we should focus on all that is best in the country."<ref>[http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&sid=anSl5jtQ1FpI&refer=europe Stalin Back in Vogue as Putin Endorses History-Book Nostalgia] by Henry Meyer, [[Bloomberg.com]], 29 November 2007</ref>


On 4 December 2008, the St Petersburg offices of the [[Memorial Society]] were raided by the police. The entire electronic archive of Memorial in St Petersburg, including the materials collected with British historian [[Orlando Figes]] for his book ''The Whisperers: Private Life in Stalin's Russia'', was confiscated by the authorities. Figes condemned the police raid, accusing the Russian authorities of trying to rehabilitate the Stalinist regime.<ref>http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/dec/07/russian-police-seize-archive-repression</ref> Figes organised an open protest letter to Russian President [[Dmitry Medvedev]] and other Russian leaders which was signed by several hundred leading academics from across the world.<ref>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2008/12/08/an-open-letter-to-president-medvedev</ref> On 2 March 2009, the contract to publish ''The Whisperers'' in Russia was cancelled due, according to the publisher, to financial reasons. Figes suspects that the decision was political.<ref>http://www.rferl.org/content/Trying_To_Bury_An_Inconvenient_History/1503708.html</ref> In March 20, 2009 the court of Dzerzhinsky District decided that the search in December 4, 2008 in Memorial with confiscation of 12 HDDs with information about victims of political repressions was carried out with procedural violations, and actions of law enforcement bodies were illegal. <ref name=komm2>[http://www.kommersant.ru/doc.aspx?DocsID=1142280 'Memorial' reverted the searches], Kommersant, March 21, 2008 (in Russian)</ref><ref>[http://www.fontanka.ru/2009/03/27/116/ HDDs will be returned to "Memorial" in presence of the Ombudsman], Fontanka.Ru, March 27, 2009 (in Russian)</ref><ref>[http://seansrussiablog.org/2009/03/31/memorial-vindicated-again/ Memorial Vindicated Again], by Sean Guillory, March 31, 2009</ref>
On 4 December 2008, the St Petersburg offices of the [[Memorial Society]] were raided by the police. The entire electronic archive of Memorial in St Petersburg, including the materials collected with British historian [[Orlando Figes]] for his book ''The Whisperers: Private Life in Stalin's Russia'', was confiscated by the authorities. Figes condemned the police raid, accusing the Russian authorities of trying to rehabilitate the Stalinist regime.<ref>http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/dec/07/russian-police-seize-archive-repression</ref> Figes organised an open protest letter to Russian President [[Dmitry Medvedev]] and other Russian leaders which was signed by several hundred leading academics from across the world.<ref>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2008/12/08/an-open-letter-to-president-medvedev</ref> On 2 March 2009, the contract to publish ''The Whisperers'' in Russia was cancelled due, according to the publisher, to financial reasons. Figes suspects that the decision was political.<ref>http://www.rferl.org/content/Trying_To_Bury_An_Inconvenient_History/1503708.html</ref> In March 20, 2009 the court of Dzerzhinsky District decided that the search in December 4, 2008 in Memorial with confiscation of 12 HDDs with information about victims of political repressions was carried out with procedural violations, and actions of law enforcement bodies were illegal. <ref name=komm2>[http://www.kommersant.ru/doc.aspx?DocsID=1142280 'Memorial' reverted the searches], Kommersant, March 21, 2008 (in Russian)</ref><ref>[http://www.fontanka.ru/2009/03/27/116/ HDDs will be returned to "Memorial" in presence of the Ombudsman], Fontanka.Ru, March 27, 2009 (in Russian)</ref><ref>[http://seansrussiablog.org/2009/03/31/memorial-vindicated-again/ Memorial Vindicated Again], by Sean Guillory, March 31, 2009</ref>

Revision as of 02:14, 9 September 2009

Neo-Stalinism is a political term used in various ways. According to historian Roy Medvedev the term describes rehabilitation of Joseph Stalin, identification with him and the associated political system (Stalinism), nostalgia for the Stalnist period in Russia's history, restoration of Stalinist policies, and a return to the administrative terror of the Stalnist period while avoiding some of the worst excesses.[1]

According to former General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev, described as a neo-Stalinist by some, the term refers to moderated Stalinist state, without large-scale repressions but with persecution of political opponents and total control of all political activities in the country [2][3]

History of the term

The American Trotskyist Hal Draper used "neo-Stalinism" in 1948 to refer to a a new political ideology–new development in Soviet policy, which he defined as a reactionary trend whose beginning was associated with the Popular Front period of the mid-1930s, writing that "The ideologists of neo-Stalinism are merely the tendrils shot ahead by the phenomena – fascism and Stalinism – which outline the social and political form of a neo-barbarism”[4]

Frederick Copleston, S.J. portrays neo-Stalinism as a "Slavophile emphasis on Russia and her history": "what is called neo-Stalinism is not exclusively an expression of a desire to control, dominate, repress and dragoon; it is also the expression of a desire that Russia, while making use of western science and technology, should avoid contamination by western 'degenerate' attitudes and pursue her own path."[5]

Political geographer Denis J.B. Shaw considers the Soviet Union as neo-Stalinist until the post-1985 period of transition to capitalism. He identified neo-Stalinism as a political system with planned economy and highly developed military-industrial complex[6]

During the 1960s, the CIA distinguished between Stalinism and neo-Stalinism in that "The Soviet leaders have not reverted to two extremes of Stalin's rule–one-man dictatorship and mass terror. For this reason, their policy deserves the label 'neo-Stalinist' rather than -Stalinist."[7]

Katerina Clark, describing an anti-Khrushchevite, pro-Stalin current in Soviet literary world during the 1960s, described the work of "neo-Stalinist" writers as harking back to "the Stalin era and its leaders... as a time of unity, strong rule and national honor."[8]

As regards Stalinism and anti-Stalinism

In his monograph Reconsidering Stalinism historian Henry Reichman discusses differing and evolving perspectives on the use of the term "Stalinism": "in scholarly usage 'Stalinism' describes here a movement, there an economic, political, or social system, elsewhere a type of political practice or belief-system...." He references historian Stephen Cohen's work reassessing Soviet history after Stalin as a "continuing tension between anti-Stalinist reformism and neo-Stalinist conservatism," observing that such a characterization requires a "coherent" definition of Stalinism—whose essential features Cohen leaves undefined.[9]

Alleged neo-Stalinist countries

Some socialist groups describe modern China as "neo-Stalinist."[10]

21st-century North Korea has been described by Western sources as a "neo-Stalinist state"[11], although it has completely replaced Marxism-Leninism with Juche since first adopting it as the official ideology in the 1970s, with references to Marxism-Leninism altogether scrapped from the revised state constitution in 1992.[12]

By the end of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st century, Turkmenistan’s Saparmurat Niyazov regime was sometimes considered a neo-Stalinist one[13][14] (esp. regarding his grotesque cult of personality[15]). Islam Karimov's non-communist authoritarian regime in Uzbekistan has also been widely described as "neo-Stalinist."[16][17]

Soviet Union

In February 1956, Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev denounced the cult of personality that surrounded his predecessor, Joseph Stalin, and condemned crimes committed during the Great Purge. In 1956 Khrushchev gave a four-hour speech condemning the Stalin regime, however it was criticized for fabricating information and exaggerating claims hugely. [18] Historian Robert V. Daniels holds that "neo-Stalinism prevailed politically for more than a quarter of a century after Stalin himself left the scene,"[19] Following the Trotskyist comprehension of Stalin's policies as a deviation from the path of Marxism-Leninism, George Novack described Khrushchev's politics as guided by a "neo-Stalinist line," its principle being that "the socialist forces can conquer all opposition even in the imperialist centers, not by the example of internal class power, but by the external power of Soviet example,"[20] explaining that

"Khrushchev’s innovations at the Twentieth Congress. . . made official doctrine of Stalin’s revisionist practices [as] the new program discards the Leninist conception of imperialism and its corresponding revolutionary class struggle policies."[20]

American broadcasts into Europe during the late 1950s described a political struggle between the "old Stalinists" and "the neo-Stalinist Khrushchev."[21][22][23]

In October 1964, Khrushchev was replaced by Leonid Brezhnev, who remained in office until his death in November 1982. During his reign, the truth about Stalinism was suppressed. Andres Laiapea connects this with "the exile of many dissidents, most notably Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn,"[24] though whereas Laiapea writes that "[t]he rehabilitation of Stalin went hand in hand with the establishment of a personality cult around Brezhnev,"[24] the political sociologist Victor Zaslavsky characterizes Brezhnev's period as one of "neo-Stalinist compromise," as the essentials of the political atmosphere associated with Stalin were retained without a personality cult.[25] According to Alexander Dubček, "The advent of Brezhnev’s regime heralded the advent of neo-Stalinism, and the measures taken against Czechoslovakia in 1968 were the final consolidation of the neo-Stalinist forces in the Soviet Union, Poland, Hungary, and other countries."[26] Brezhnev described the Chinese political line as "neo-Stalinist."[27] American political scientist Seweryn Bialer has described Soviet policy as turning towards neo-Stalinism after Brezhnev's death.[28]

Mikhail Gorbachev took over in March 1985. He introduced the policy of glasnost in public discussions  – in order to liberalize the Soviet system. The full scale of Stalinist repressions was soon revealed, and the Soviet Union fell apart. Still, Gorbachev admitted in 2000 that "Even now in Russia we have the same problem. It isn't so easy to give up the inheritance we received from Stalinism and Neo-Stalinism, when people were turned into cogs in the wheel, and those in power made all the decisions for them." [29] Gorbachev's domestic policies have been described as neo-Stalinist by some Western sources.[30][31][32]

Post-Soviet Russia

As of 2008, nearly half of Russians view Stalin positively, and many support restoration of his monuments dismantled in the past.[33][34] In 2005, Communist politician Gennady Zyuganov said that Russia "should once again render honor to Stalin for his role in building socialism and saving human civilization from the Nazi plague."[35]

In June 2007, Russian President Vladimir Putin organized a conference for history teachers to promote a high-school teachers manual called A Modern History of Russia: 1945-2006: A Manual for History Teachers, which according to Irina Flige, office director of human rights organization Memorial, it portrays Stalin as a cruel but successful leader who "acted rationally", no matter that he executed millions of Soviet citizens. She claims it justifies his terror as an "instrument of development."[36][37] Putin said at the conference that the new manual will "help instill young people with a sense of pride in Russia", and he argued that Stalin's purges pale in comparison to the United States' atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. At a memorial for Stalin's victims, Putin said that while Russians should "keep alive the memory of tragedies of the past, we should focus on all that is best in the country."[38]

On 4 December 2008, the St Petersburg offices of the Memorial Society were raided by the police. The entire electronic archive of Memorial in St Petersburg, including the materials collected with British historian Orlando Figes for his book The Whisperers: Private Life in Stalin's Russia, was confiscated by the authorities. Figes condemned the police raid, accusing the Russian authorities of trying to rehabilitate the Stalinist regime.[39] Figes organised an open protest letter to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and other Russian leaders which was signed by several hundred leading academics from across the world.[40] On 2 March 2009, the contract to publish The Whisperers in Russia was cancelled due, according to the publisher, to financial reasons. Figes suspects that the decision was political.[41] In March 20, 2009 the court of Dzerzhinsky District decided that the search in December 4, 2008 in Memorial with confiscation of 12 HDDs with information about victims of political repressions was carried out with procedural violations, and actions of law enforcement bodies were illegal. [42][43][44]

In 2009, it was reported that the Kremlin is drawing up plans to criminalize criticism of the Stalinist Soviet Union's actions before, during and after World War II[45] In May 2009, President Dmitry Medvedev described the Soviet Union during the war as "our country" and set up the Historical Truth Commission to counter anti-Soviet criticism.[45][46][47]

Scholar Dmitry Furman, director of the Commonwealth Of Independent States Research Center at the Russian Academy's of Sciences Institute of Europe, sees Russian neo-Stalinism as a "non-ideological Stalinism" that "seeks control for the sake of control, not for the sake of world revolution."[48]

On 3 July 2009, Russia's delegation at the OSCE’s annual parliamentary meeting stormed out after a resolution was passed equating the roles of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union in starting World War II, drafted by a delegate from the host nation and former Soviet republic Lithuania. The resolution called for a day of remembrance for victims of both Stalinism and Nazism to be marked every August 23, the date in 1939 when Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union signed the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact dividing parts of Central and Eastern Europe between their spheres of influence. Konstantin Kosachyov, head of the foreign relations committee of Russia's lower house of parliament called the resolution "nothing but an attempt to re-write the history of World War Two". Alexander Kozlovsky, the head of the Russian delegation, called the resolution an "insulting anti-Russian attack" and added that "Those who place Nazism and Stalinism on the same level forget that it is the Stalin-era Soviet Union that made the biggest sacrifices and the biggest contribution to liberating Europe from fascism."[49][50] Only eight out of 385 assembly members voted against the resolution.[51]

Neo-Stalinism in the West

Manifestations of neo-Stalinism in British healthcare include "examples of doctors being witch-hunted, bullied or disempowered and the paradoxical negative effects of the Bristol Inquiry and the Shipman report."[52]

Opposite on the spectrum, Britain's Conservative Party logo has been dubbed an icon of the neo-Stalinist fashion, the party chairman extolling it as a design to signify "clarity, strength and unity."[53] It was suggested that the Conservatives resorted to "new-Stalinist imagery in the hope of wooing disillusioned trade unionists."[53]

According to a former CIA officer–speaking on the condition of anonymity with news writer Jim Kouri–United States President Barack Obama's plans may carry "the ingredients for an oppressive, neo-Stalinist society."[54] Many observers, notes Kouri, believe that the president's CIA leader will "tear the CIA apart he will rebuild it into a secret police force for his radical boss in the White House."[54]

See also

References

  1. ^ Ferdinand Joseph Maria Feldbrugge, "Samizdat and political dissent in the Soviet Union", Brill, 1975, pg. 30, [1]
  2. ^ Outrage at revision of Stalin's legacy
  3. ^ For example, Katerine Clark defines Neo-Stalinism as praising "the Stalin era and its leaders... as a time of unity, strong rule and national honor", see The Soviet Novel: History as Ritual, By Katerina Clark, Indiana University Press, 2000, ISBN 0253337038, 9780253337030, page 236 [2].
  4. ^ Draper, Hal. "Neo-Stalinism: Notes on a New Political Ideology".
  5. ^ Copleston, Frederick, S.J. A History of Philosophy: Russian Philosophy. Continuum International Publishing Group, 2003. ISBN 0826469043, ISBN 9780826469045. P. 403.
  6. ^ Shaw identifies as features of the "political geography" of "neo-Stalinism" the following criteria:
    • 1. A well developed core-periphery structure, reflecting marked differences in levels of economic development and living standards. This is in part the product of a tendency towards 'incrementalism'–seeking to gain economies by allocating a considerable proportion of resources to those regions which have benefited most from previous investment...
    • 2. The inbuilt conservatism of the system and the bias towards heavy industry [ensuring] the continuing importance of traditional industrial regions with 'smokestack' industries, such as the Donets-Dnepr region of eastern Ukraine and the Urals.
    • 3. 'Extensive' (ie, resource-demanding) rather than 'intensive' (resource-saving) development, leading to waste of resources and environmental deterioration in the core, growing dependence of the core on the resources of the periphery and pressure to develop the latter in the cheapest and often most short-sighted manner.
    • 4. Administration of the economy by sectors and tendencies towards 'narrow departmentalism' [leading] to the development of a series of ministerial 'empires', lacking intelinkages, reducing the scope for scale economies, encouraging excessive transportation and leading to the economic overspecialization of many cities and regions, especially peripheral ones...
    • 5. The relative neglect of agriculture, transportation, consumer welfare and numerous services...
    • 6. A well developed hierarchy of well-being in the settlement structure, whereby, in general terms, the best endowed settlements were the biggest ones with major administrative and political functions...conditions [deteriorating] as they became smaller.
    • 7. The development of regional economies...greatly influenced by the 'military-industrial complex' with the progress of individual cities, groups of cities and even entire regions (including peripheral ones) very much bound up with the needs of the military machine.
    • 8. Continental and inward-looking development induced by the longstanding tendency towards economic autarky. Isolation from the world economy...Only from the 1960s were autarkic tendencies modified, encouraging further economic development along land frontiers, on coasts and at ports., see Shaw, Denis J.B. Russia in the Modern World: A New Geography. Wiley-Blackwell, 1999. ISBN 0631181342, ISBN 9780631181347. Pp. 81-84.
  7. ^ "Neo-Stalinism: Writing History and Making Policy." Intelligence Report. Central Intelligence Agency, Directorate of Intelligence. CIA Released Documents. FAQs.org.
  8. ^ Clark, Katerina. The Soviet Novel: History as Ritual Indiana University Press, 2000, ISBN 0253337038, 9780253337030, page 236 [3].
  9. ^ Reichman, Henry. "Reconsidering 'Stalinism'. Theory and Society Volume 17, Number 1. Springer Netherlands. January 1988. Pp. 57-89.
  10. ^ "Stalinist China at 50: Where is neo-Stalinist China Going?" Workers Liberty 58.
  11. ^ Working, Russel. "An Open Door to North Korea". Business Week, June 4, 2001.
  12. ^ By Sŭng-hŭm Kil, Soong Hoom Kil, Chung-in Moon. Understanding Korean Politics: An Introduction. SUNY Press, 2001. ISBN 0791448894, ISBN 9780791448892P. 275.
  13. ^ Radio Free Europe, Czech Republic, 2005
  14. ^ Freedom House, United States, 2006
  15. ^ The Independent, United Kingdom, 2006
  16. ^ Juergensmeyer, Mark. The Oxford Handbook of Global Religions. Oxford University Press US, 2006. ISBN 0195137981, ISBN 9780195137989. P. 460.
  17. ^ Thornton, William H. New world empire: civil Islam, Terrorism, and the Making of Neoglobalism. Rowman & Littlefield, 2005. ISBN 074252941X, ISBN 9780742529410. P. 134.
  18. ^ Tim Whewell (2006-02-23). "The speech Russia wants to forget". BBC. Retrieved 2009-94-29. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  19. ^ Daniels, Robert Vincent. The Rise and Fall of Communism in Russia. Yale University Press, 2007 ISBN 0300106491, ISBN 9780300106497 P. 339.
  20. ^ a b Novack, George. International Socialist Review, New York, Volume 22, No. 3, Fall 1961. Pp. 107-114. Marxists Internet Archive. 2005. Cite error: The named reference "Novack" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  21. ^ "Khrushchev's Neo-Stalinism". Records of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Research Institute (RFE/RL RI): Box-Folder-Report 55-1-222. The Open Society. Retrieved 11 May 2009.
  22. ^ "The Specter of Suslov". Records of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Research Institute (RFE/RL RI): Box-Folder-Report 55-1-296. The Open Society. Retrieved 11 May 2009.
  23. ^ "Khrushchev and the Presidium (VIII)". Records of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Research Institute (RFE/RL RI): Box-Folder-Report 56-3-307. The Open Society. Retrieved 11 May 2009.
  24. ^ a b Laiapea, Andres. "Putin's Neo-Stalinism in Historical Perspective". American Chronice. 26 Feb. 2007. Retrieved 11 May 2009.
  25. ^ Sakwa, Richard. Soviet Politics in Perspective. Routledge, 1998. ISBN 0415071534, 9780415071536P. 66.
  26. ^ Alexander Dubcek Recollections of the Crisis: Events Surrounding the Cierna nad Tisou Negotiations
  27. ^ Simonov, Vladimir. "Who are Russia's Enemies?" Russian News and Information Agency Novosti. 21 Jun. 2005. EN.RIAN.ru. Retrieved 11 May 2009.
  28. ^ Eberstadt, Nick. The Poverty of Communism. Transaction Publishers, 1990. ISBN 0887388175, ISBN 9780887388170. P. 85.
  29. ^ Mikhail Gorbachev Interview - page 3 / 3 - Academy of Achievement
  30. ^ [http://www.heritage.org/research/russiaandeurasia/bg451.cfm Tsypkin, Mikhail. "Moscow's Gorbachev: A New Leader in the Old Mold"]: Backgrounder #451–August 29, 1985. The Heritage Foundation.
  31. ^ Åslund, Anders. How Russia Became a Market Economy. Brookings Institution Press, 1995 ISBN 0815704259, ISBN 9780815704256. P. 29.
  32. ^ Pilon, Juliana Geran. "The Crisis of Marxist Ideology in Eastern Europe". National Review. 7 April 1989. ArticleArchies. Retrieved 9 August 2009.
  33. ^ “The Glamorous Tyrant: The Cult of Stalin Experiences a Rebirth,” by Mikhail Pozdnyaev, Novye Izvestia
  34. ^ http://www.kavkaz-uzel.ru/newstext/news/id/1208902.html.
  35. ^ What Gulag? Russia's government shamefully refuses to face up to the horrors of communism. by David Satter
  36. ^ Stalin's new status in Russia, By Richard Galpin, BBC News, Moscow
  37. ^ "Activists Denounce Stalin in Station" 28 August 2009 By Kristina Mikulova Moscow Times
  38. ^ Stalin Back in Vogue as Putin Endorses History-Book Nostalgia by Henry Meyer, Bloomberg.com, 29 November 2007
  39. ^ http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/dec/07/russian-police-seize-archive-repression
  40. ^ http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2008/12/08/an-open-letter-to-president-medvedev
  41. ^ http://www.rferl.org/content/Trying_To_Bury_An_Inconvenient_History/1503708.html
  42. ^ 'Memorial' reverted the searches, Kommersant, March 21, 2008 (in Russian)
  43. ^ HDDs will be returned to "Memorial" in presence of the Ombudsman, Fontanka.Ru, March 27, 2009 (in Russian)
  44. ^ Memorial Vindicated Again, by Sean Guillory, March 31, 2009
  45. ^ a b Wendle, John (8 May 2009). "Russia Moves to Ban Criticism of WWII Win". Time. Retrieved 6 June 2009.
  46. ^ "Russia panel to 'protect history'". BBC. 2009-05-19. Retrieved 2009-08-06.
  47. ^ Andrew Osborne, "Medvedev Creates History Commission", Wall Street Journal, [4]
  48. ^ Zakharovich, Yuri. "Can the U.S.-Russian Alliance Last?" TIME. 21 Dec. 2001.
  49. ^ http://www.themoscowtimes.com/article/1010/42/379276.htm
  50. ^ Russia scolds OSCE for equating Hitler and Stalin Retrieved on July 25, 2009
  51. ^ "Resolution on Stalin riles Russia". BBC News. July 3, 2009.
  52. ^ [5] Bristol Medico-Chirurgical Society. Retrieved 2 September 2009.
  53. ^ a b "Conservative Party Goes for Neo-Stalinist Look with Logo". 6 October 2004. Retrieved 2 September 2009.
  54. ^ a b "Secret Police? Obama Selects Dirty Trickster Panetta to Head the CIA". News With Views. 2 September 2009. Retrieved 2 September 2009.

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neo-Stalinism&oldid=312707101"