User talk:Favonian

Moweaqua

Only88keys (talk) 17:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC) Hey I got a bone to pick with u. I made a post on the article about Moweaqua, Illinois. You reversed it. I freakin live in Moweaqua. I know what the restaurant is called. I even gave you the freakin history of the building and why your article is wrong. I'm sittin here in Study hall next to the nephew of the lady that owns the restaurant. FILMING FOR THE INFORMANT TOOK PLACE AT "THE HOG TROUGH TOO," NOT "THE HOG TROUGH!!!!"

Thank you. I'm done now.

CHANGE THE ARTICLE!!

Unless I'm terribly mistaken, you are not a published reliable source. --King Öomie 18:01, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Nor for that matter what I would call a civil editor. Mind your language or you will be at best ignored, at worst blocked. Favonian (talk) 18:04, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Only88keys (talk) 18:03, 2 December 2009 (UTC) Here's whats gonna happen. I'm pulling out a piece of paper right now. I'm going to the "Hog Trough Too" and I'm going to get IN WRITING that the name of the restaurant is what I just said and not what the stupid article says. Jerk.

I reviewed the edit history and assuming that you are 12.23.104.66 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) it seems most of your edits involved more than just the name of some restaurant. For instance, this series involves a long (unsourced) story about who frequents the place plus an (unsourced) update of the high school enrollment from 300 to 301. I reverted this, as well as other, similar ones using the edit summary "not notable", which frankly it isn't. So in the future, stick to notable and sourced information—and provide edit summaries. Thank you! Favonian (talk) 18:21, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

I agree with Only88keys. It's the Hog Trough Too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.47.224.30 (talk) 02:11, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Neutral

How it not be neutral? Land be occupy by israel but not part of israel. Even israel admit this. How this not be neutral? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ani medjool (talk • contribs) 23:50, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Actually, according to this you used the word "illegally", at that's not so very neutral. Favonian (talk) 23:52, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Accord to this http://unispal.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/5EDA05102FDE89548525757C00655B20 by united nation, under humanitary section, it be illegal occupation, that why i include. still be pov, israel flag not belong because land not part of israel. Ani medjool (talk) 00:06, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

User:J4V4

Hi there; I just wanted to let you know I made a mistake in reverting User:J4V4's blanking of his/her talk page due to my misreading of WP:BLANKING. I notice you also reverted them, so I wanted to make sure there was not an additional reason outside of that guideline. If there is, please let me know! -kotra (talk) 22:09, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

That makes two of us on the mistaking team ;) On the other hand, I noticed that he managed to get "his" article on Aluminium borohydride deleted as a G7. Forgetting AGF for the moment, I can't help wondering if he is planning to recreate it with American spelling. Favonian (talk) 22:13, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Since he created it with the American spelling originally, and it was promptly (and justifiably) moved to the British spelling by two separate editors, I don't see what he would have to gain by trying that again. I think it's probably more likely that he would just prefer the article not exist than it use the "wrong" name... but it's probably not useful to speculate on the "why" (kotra says hypocritically). -kotra (talk) 21:27, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

You are probably right. At least he hasn't tried it yet. Let peace reign, and the world can do without an article on this particular compound. Favonian (talk) 21:29, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Or, if it can't, someone else is welcome to create it at their leisure! Happy editing. -kotra (talk) 21:31, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

help

i want have a page Pizdarije and i want to make a english version of it but i dont know how. can u help me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dzindzer (talk • contribs) 12:26, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Quite frankly I see no reason to attempt creating an article on something that would be classified as a non-notable website. Have a look at these guidelines. Favonian (talk) 12:33, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Smit

Thank you very much! Rembertbiemond (talk) 14:31, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

You are welcome! Have you had a look at the naming issue on Talk:Jörgen Smit? Favonian (talk) 14:33, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

I had a look and gave my 5 ct of thoughts on the subject —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rembertbiemond (talk • contribs) 14:49, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Okay

I didn't mean to do that its not my falut that u idoits dont understand about characters and keep lieing, but hey its not my fault.