Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser/Bugs: Difference between revisions
Magioladitis (talk | contribs) |
Magioladitis (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 837: | Line 837: | ||
*I dunno, I think this broke something else. I'm now trying to compare a list of 23528 members to one of 404 members. The results show only 300 as unique in list 1, 346 as common, and 58 as unique in list 2..,. So what happened to the other 22000+ some odd pages? =) –<font face="verdana" color="black">[[user:xeno|'''xeno''']]</font>[[user talk:xeno|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 18:06, 7 December 2009 (UTC) |
*I dunno, I think this broke something else. I'm now trying to compare a list of 23528 members to one of 404 members. The results show only 300 as unique in list 1, 346 as common, and 58 as unique in list 2..,. So what happened to the other 22000+ some odd pages? =) –<font face="verdana" color="black">[[user:xeno|'''xeno''']]</font>[[user talk:xeno|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 18:06, 7 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
::Reedy, add "lb2 |
::Reedy, add "lb2.Items.Add(a2);" after line 96. This is where the missing pages went. If after that the ListComparer is still not accurate we can rollback. -- [[User:Magioladitis|Magioladitis]] ([[User talk:Magioladitis|talk]]) 23:41, 7 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Network access error == |
== Network access error == |
Revision as of 23:42, 7 December 2009
- Home
Introduction and rules - User manual
How to use AWB - Discussion
Discuss AWB, report errors, and request features - User tasks
Request or help with AWB-able tasks - Technical
Technical documentation
AWB 4.6 is broken due to MW Changes. Feel free to download a SVN snapshots, and use 4.9.0.3. This will also help us with testing, and help us release it to you quicker!
AWB is used at Users/Bot owners discretion
Only use this page to report bugs in the current version of the software. Update to the most recent version, check to make sure your bug has not been reported already on this page, and read the FAQ before posting a bug here. See How to Report Bugs Effectively for advice on how to write bug reports.
Before posting anything related to non-Wikimedia Foundation wikis, make sure that this site has a recent SVN version of MediaWiki with enabled Bot API. Older versions of MediaWiki or without the Bot API are not supported. Be sure to mention the exact URL of your wiki.
File a new bug report |
Please check reported or fixed bugs before filing a new one! |
Any discussion can follow as normal.
This format allows the developers to keep track of bugs and to make sure the bugs are fixed as fast as possible. Once the bugs have been fixed, they will be moved to /Archive 14.
If you cannot find your Bug on this page, please check /Archive 14, as it may have been fixed.
To list a bug use the following template
{{AWB bug | status = new <!-- when fixed replace with "fixed" --> | description = <!-- Place description of the bug here -->~~~~ | duplicate = <!-- Directions to recreate the bug (i.e. what did you do that caused this bug); leave blank if unknown or not applicable --> | site = <!-- The site you were working with when the error occurred --> | OS = <!-- Your operating system (should be either Windows Vista or XP) --> | version = <!-- The version of AWB you are using --> | workaround = <!-- Any workaround for the problem --> | fix_version = <!-- Version of AWB the fix will be included in; AWB developer will complete when it's fixed --> }}
Exceptions
DirectoryNotFoundException in Updater.CopyFiles
Status | New | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description | Thread:
| ||||||
To duplicate: | Unknown | ||||||
Operating system | Microsoft Windows NT 5.1.2600 Service Pack 3 | ||||||
.NET FW Version | Unknown | ||||||
AWB version | updater 2.0.0.0 / 2.0.0.2 | ||||||
Workaround | None | ||||||
Fixed in version | Unknown |
ArgumentException in MainForm.MainForm_FormClosing
Status | New | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description |
| ||||||
To duplicate: | Delete config file before loging out! | ||||||
Site URL: | http://en.wikipedia.org | ||||||
Operating system | Microsoft Windows NT 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 | ||||||
.NET FW Version | Unknown | ||||||
AWB version | 4.9.0.1, revision 5386 (2009-09-17 22:23:20) / 4.9.0.2, revision 5528 (2009-10-08 23:32:19) | ||||||
Workaround | |||||||
Fixed in version |
It happened again. I think the config file was unaccessible and AWB couldn't write on it. -- Magioladitis (talk) 17:58, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
ConfigurationErrorsException in Settings.get_WindowLocation
Status | New | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description |
| ||||||||||||
To duplicate: | Delete you config file before loging in! | ||||||||||||
Site URL: | http://en.wikipedia.org | ||||||||||||
Operating system | Microsoft Windows NT 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 | ||||||||||||
.NET FW Version | Unknown | ||||||||||||
AWB version | 4.9.0.3, revision 5715 (2009-12-02 01:36:48) | ||||||||||||
Workaround | |||||||||||||
Fixed in version |
NullReferenceException in AsyncApiEdit.CallEvent
Status | New | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description |
- Jarry1250 [ In the UK? Sign the petition! ] 18:01, 3 September 2009 (UTC) | ||||||
To duplicate: | Unknown | ||||||
Site URL: | http://en.wikipedia.org | ||||||
Operating system | Microsoft Windows NT 6.0.6001 Service Pack 1 | ||||||
.NET FW Version | Unknown | ||||||
AWB version | 4.9.0.1, revision 5314 (2009-09-01 12:12:27) | ||||||
Workaround | |||||||
Fixed in version |
In answer to MaxSem's question, I think it popped up when I changed profiles (or possibly on pressing Start or Save shortly thereafter). - Jarry1250 [ In the UK? Sign the petition! ] 18:51, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
I think it was to do with problems in connecting to server. I got it after failing connecting to server to get redirects of WPBiography. -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:12, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
NullReferenceException in MainForm.launchListSplitterToolStripMenuItem_Click
Status | New | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description |
| ||||||
To duplicate: | Unknown | ||||||
Site URL: | http://fr.wikipedia.org / http://en.wikipedia.org | ||||||
Operating system | Microsoft Windows NT 5.1.2600 Service Pack 3 | ||||||
.NET FW Version | Unknown | ||||||
AWB version | 4.9.0.2, revision 5504 (2009-10-02 22:15:23) /4.9.0.3, revision 5715 (2009-12-02 01:36:48) | ||||||
Workaround | |||||||
Fixed in version |
Any idea how did that happen? I tried a lot of stuff to duplicate it but without success. -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:35, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Bug while disambiguating / NotImplementedException
Status | New | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description |
| ||||||
To duplicate: | [encountered while processing page [1]] | ||||||
Site URL: | http://en.wikipedia.org | ||||||
Operating system | Microsoft Windows NT 6.0.6000; Wine 1.1.31 on Ubuntu 9.04 | ||||||
.NET FW Version | Unknown | ||||||
AWB version | 4.9.0.2, revision 5528 (2009-10-08 23:32:19) | ||||||
Workaround | |||||||
Fixed in version |
- Thats a WINE bug... Is it using Mono? —Reedy 12:33, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
ApiBlankException in ApiEdit.CheckForErrors
Status | New | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description | Thread: InvokerThread (Open)
| ||||||
To duplicate: | Unknown | ||||||
Site URL: | http://en.wikipedia.org | ||||||
Operating system | Microsoft Windows NT 5.1.2600 Service Pack 3 | ||||||
.NET FW Version | Unknown | ||||||
AWB version | 4.9.0.2, revision 5504 (2009-10-02 22:15:23) | ||||||
Workaround | |||||||
Fixed in version |
- Hmm, we should really report URL's in api errors tbh... —Reedy 12:37, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
- This happens if you lose your internet connection. I think we should just go into the restart timer rather than throwing the exception. Rjwilmsi 07:32, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
XmlException in ApiEdit.CheckForErrors
Status | New | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description |
| ||||||
To duplicate: | Unknown | ||||||
Site URL: | http://en.wikipedia.org | ||||||
Operating system | Microsoft Windows NT 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 | ||||||
.NET FW Version | Unknown | ||||||
AWB version | 4.9.0.2, revision 5528 (2009-10-08 23:32:19) | ||||||
Workaround | |||||||
Fixed in version |
Can you reproduce it on demand? -- Magioladitis (talk) 16:56, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
ArgumentOutOfRangeException in AsyncApiEdit.CallEvent
Status | New | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description |
Rubin16 (talk) 20:35, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
| ||||||||||||
To duplicate: | Unknown | ||||||||||||
Site URL: | http://ru.wikipedia.org | ||||||||||||
Operating system | Microsoft Windows NT 5.1.2600 Service Pack 3 / Microsoft Windows NT 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 | ||||||||||||
.NET FW Version | Unknown | ||||||||||||
AWB version | 4.9.0.1, revision 5263 (2009-08-20 21:57:43) / 4.9.0.3, revision 5715 (2009-12-02 01:36:48) | ||||||||||||
Workaround | None | ||||||||||||
Fixed in version | Unknown |
- The first report in English: "The value of "-1" is unacceptable for the "index"". -- Magioladitis (talk) 15:32, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Okay, my actions:
- Created a list with "Wikisearch (text)" parameter. picture
- Wiki searched the phrase "Date of birth unknown", then made list and filtered by Content (only included pages in the main space).
- Filled "add category" parameter with auto-adding category "Date of birth unknown". picture
- Used "Skip" parameter to skip all pages, which already contain this category. picture
- Started the process. picture. The message I get periodically: picture -- deerstop. 14:59, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
NullReferenceException in Go3636
Status | New | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description |
| ||||||
To duplicate: | [encountered while processing page [2]] | ||||||
Site URL: | http://en.wikipedia.org | ||||||
Operating system | Microsoft Windows NT 5.1.2600 Service Pack 3 | ||||||
.NET FW Version | Unknown | ||||||
AWB version | 4.9.0.2, revision 5504 (2009-10-02 22:15:23) | ||||||
Workaround | |||||||
Fixed in version |
This is a Microsoft .NET bug. Please update and probably the bug won't occur. -- Magioladitis (talk) 11:40, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- But if it starts happening continuously, by many users, theres presumably a regex on a specific page thats causing it to barf. —Reedy 11:52, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- This error only happens when I try to edit pages that link to "Pro Wrestling NOAH". I have edited hundreds of pages in the last few days using AWB, but I didn't get an error until I started editing some that link to Pro Wrestling NOAH. I don't even get the error with every page that links to it, just some. TJ Spyke 17:07, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- I didn't manage to crash AWB (in neither rev 4902_5609 nor 4903_5636) with the following settings: general cleanup, autotagging, replacement of Pro Wrestling NOAH with Pro Wrestling Noah and Regex typo scan turned on. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:33, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- This error only happens when I try to edit pages that link to "Pro Wrestling NOAH". I have edited hundreds of pages in the last few days using AWB, but I didn't get an error until I started editing some that link to Pro Wrestling NOAH. I don't even get the error with every page that links to it, just some. TJ Spyke 17:07, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Additional info: Editor was using normal substitution to change "KENTA" to "Kenta". -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
KeyNotFoundException
Status | New | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description |
| ||||||
To duplicate: | [encountered while processing page [3]] | ||||||
Site URL: | http://pt.wikipedia.org | ||||||
Operating system | Microsoft Windows NT 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 | ||||||
.NET FW Version | Unknown | ||||||
AWB version | 4.9.0.3, revision 5646 (2009-11-17 00:34:12) | ||||||
Workaround | |||||||
Fixed in version |
The problem in in pt.wiki. I thought MaxSem did something to avoid this bug. -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:16, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
When trying to login to a "custom wiki" : KeyNotFoundException in ImageFileLinksListProvider.get_UserInputTextBoxText
Is there a work around for this problem, I was trying to login a custom server. Thanks -Will
Status | New | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description |
| ||||||
To duplicate: | Unknown | ||||||
Site URL: | http://www.peacecorpswiki.org/ | ||||||
Operating system | Microsoft Windows NT 5.1.2600 Service Pack 3 | ||||||
.NET FW Version | Unknown | ||||||
AWB version | 4.9.0.3, revision 5690 (2009-11-26 13:36:15) | ||||||
Workaround | |||||||
Fixed in version |
thanks Mappc (talk) 18:56, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- [4] - God knows where your API is, for a start... —Reedy 00:24, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Plugins
Kingbotk in not handling blp parameter in {{WPBS}}
Status | New |
---|---|
Description | Check this one and this one as example. I was tagging people as dead with AWB/Kingbok plugin. Living parameter was correctly changing from yes to no. But blp=yes was supposed to be removed as well. I had the same problem for the other direction as well: When I am marking people as alive, Kingbotk doesn't add blp=yes in {{WPB}} nor {{WPBS}} if they are present. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:44, 19 June 2009 (UTC) |
To duplicate: | Examples given above |
Site URL: | en.wiki |
Operating system | XP SP2 |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | At least since 4.5.3.3. (rev 4537) + KingbotK plugin |
Workaround | |
Fixed in version |
Moreover... it crashed before this edit (if |1=
exists then there is no problem). (The return of the nightmare!) In the past was crashing if |1=
as missing now if |blp=
is present and |1=
is missing. -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:51, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Here are the rules that should be applied:
- If
|1=
is missing from {{WPBS}} then add it. - If
|living=
yes in WPBiography then add|blp=
yes to {{WPBS}} - If
|living=
no in WPBiography then remove|blp=
(whether yes or no) from {{WPBS}}
-- Magioladitis (talk) 09:59, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
KingbotK counts pages skipped by AWB as tagged
Status | New |
---|---|
Description | KingbotK counts pages skipped by AWB as tagged -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC) |
To duplicate: | |
Site URL: | en.wiki |
Operating system | XP SP2 + IE 8 |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | 4.9.0.3, revision 5715 (2009-12-02 01:36:48) + KingbotK plugin 2.2.1.0 |
Workaround | |
Fixed in version |
Current situation: Tagged in KingbotK statistics = Skipped by AWB + real tags, Skipped = Skipped by KingbotK plugin.
Aim: Tagged in KingbotK statistics = Tagged by plugin, Skipped = Skipped by plugin + Skipped by AWB. -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
AWB + "kingbotplugin + WP:India tagging" hangs
Status | New |
---|---|
Description | AWB + "kingbotplugin + WP:India tagging" hangs while parsing WikiProject Template that has lots of variables/comments tags inside ? Example page |
To duplicate: | |
Site URL: | en.wiki |
Operating system | Windows XP |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | 4.5.3.3 SVN 4340 5/19 |
Workaround | End task and start all over again. ( rm the erring Template ofcourse) |
Fixed in version |
Kingbotk plugin not assessing in SVN version
Status | New |
---|---|
Description | The plugin isn't working when in assessment mode. It will load the article into the window, with the talk page in the queue, but as soon as you hit the preview or ignore button the talkpage is dropped from the queue, and the next article is loadedHiding T 13:12, 22 September 2009 (UTC) |
To duplicate: | Set up the plugin to assess using generic template, using {{comicsproj}} and redirects. Comicsproj allows importance, cat and template fields. I've left the xml at User:Hiding/AWB, hope that helps. |
Site URL: | en.wiki |
Operating system | Windows Vista |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | SVN 4.9.0.2 SVN 5413 Kingbotk version 2.2.0.0 |
Workaround | None, just not using it to assess. Appreciate this is not a release, but I offer the bug in case you aren't aware of it. |
Fixed in version |
- I've just tried assessing WP:BIO articles and it isn't working for me, I still have the same issue, it won't load the talk page. Although I have never used anything but the generic template. Has anything changed with the plugin and the way it is setup since version 4.6 of AWB? Hiding T 22:05, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
[5]. I am tagging right now. Can you enter IRC to discuss it? -- Magioladitis (talk) 22:08, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Ah. You are tagging, not assessing. I am referring to doing this. Where in irc do you wish to meet, I'll see if I can remember how to do it. Hiding T 22:12, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- In the AWB forum. Login using the button on the header above. -- Magioladitis (talk) 22:15, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- I should clarify that after discussion me and Magioladitis came to the conclusion that you can tag just fine, but you can't assess, so I think this bug is still open (if low in the priority queue)? Hiding T 16:18, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
- The WP:Plugin++ has been unfortunately underdeveloped as of late due to Kingboy's withdrawl from the project. We need to find a programmer who knows VB and can pick up the torch. –xenotalk 16:24, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
- I know VB, i just don't like working with the plugin ;P —Reedy 19:37, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
- Have you mentioned it at all to Kingboyk? I only ask based on this diff, which indicates he may or may not help? My programming skills are non-existent. What's VB, and how long does it take to learn? Hiding T 20:01, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
- ...hence my qualifier "and can pick up the torch". You're like that guy who put out the Olympic torch! ;p –xenotalk 23:19, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- I know VB, i just don't like working with the plugin ;P —Reedy 19:37, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
- The WP:Plugin++ has been unfortunately underdeveloped as of late due to Kingboy's withdrawl from the project. We need to find a programmer who knows VB and can pick up the torch. –xenotalk 16:24, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
- I should clarify that after discussion me and Magioladitis came to the conclusion that you can tag just fine, but you can't assess, so I think this bug is still open (if low in the priority queue)? Hiding T 16:18, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
- I just want to throw in there that assessing is not working for me either, using the same SVN version as you. I'm using the generic part of the plugin to assess WikiProject Metalworking articles. Wizard191 (talk) 16:51, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Start the process button
Status | New |
---|---|
Description | Load Kingbotk plugin and a list. Press start the process before loggin in. The login window won't pop up. In the case of the normal start button everything works fine. -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:54, 9 November 2009 (UTC) |
To duplicate: | |
Site URL: | en.wiki |
Operating system | XP SP2 |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | SVN 4.9.0.2 SVN 5609 Kingbotk version 2.2.0.0 |
Workaround | |
Fixed in version |
KingbotK doesn't remove duplicated blp entries
Status | New |
---|---|
Description | [6] -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:06, 12 November 2009 (UTC) |
To duplicate: | |
Site URL: | en.wiki |
Operating system | XP SP2 |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | SVN 4.9.0.2 SVN 5609 Kingbotk version 2.2.0.0 |
Workaround | |
Fixed in version |
KingbotK needs urgent update to support new priority parameters
Status | New |
---|---|
Description | KingbotK plugin seems to be removing the work group priority parameter in Template:WPBiography and replacing it with a general priority parameter instead (see [7][8]). The documentation for Template:WPBiography no longer mentions a general priority parameter, but it does identify a work group-specific priority parameter for each work group. -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:06, 7 December 2009 (UTC) |
To duplicate: | |
Site URL: | en.wiki |
Operating system | XP SP2 |
.NET FW Version | |
AWB version | 4903_rev5724 with Kingbotk AWB Plugin 2.2.1.0 |
Workaround | |
Fixed in version |
I summarise a bit here. This is a to-do list. TO DO:
- Support new priority parameters i.e. don't remove them and don't add empty priority parameters is one of the new ones exist
- If priority parameter is missing, keep adding the generic priority parameter
- In the future: If a work-group exists and the corresponding priority parameter is missing, add it
- In the future: If a work-group exists and a generic priority parameter exists, replace it with the one corresponding to the work-group.
- If living parameter is missing, add an empty living field unless class=dab
- If listas parameter is missing, add an empty listas field
-- Magioladitis (talk) 14:06, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Other bugs
Moar <br>
Status | New |
---|---|
Description | [9]. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 17:49, 12 July 2008 (UTC) |
To duplicate: | Sandbox |
Operating system | any |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | head |
Workaround | bang! |
Fixed in version | Unknown |
- Wasn't this fixed by improving the articles formatting? There's almost always better ways to format than using <br>. Kirkburn (talk) 14:34, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
And <p>[10]. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 16:06, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Link simplification too greedy - eating spaces
Status | Need more information |
---|---|
Description | James I of England replaced with James I of England in this diff. It happens to be OK here but the general rule should be not to do it. Rich Farmbrough, 00:21 27 August 2008 (GMT). |
To duplicate: | [11] |
Operating system | V |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | 4.3.2.0 / 4.9.0.3_5715 |
Workaround | |
Fixed in version | Unknown |
Hmm, does anyone have an example of inappropriate change using that feature? MaxSem(Han shot first!) 18:07, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- I've left a message on Rich's talk page asking for more information. Rjwilmsi 20:10, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- I don't. It seems to me that if the editor explicitly wants to link only part of the phrase they should be able to. For example "Henry IV and James I of England. " Rich Farmbrough, 20:34 14 February 2009 (UTC).
For info, the logic is in Parers.StickyLinks(). Rjwilmsi 20:36, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Scroll bar slider does not work correctly with a large list
Status | New |
---|---|
Description | I just created a list of almost 600,000 articles and then sorted them alphabetically. Saving the list to a file works fine. Clicking on an item in the list and hitting end, home, pageup, and pagedown all work correctly. Repeatedly clicking on the scroll bar at the right works correctly. Dragging the scroll bar slider however results in the same 65536 or so articles repeated over and over.Pascal666 22:29, 19 June 2009 (UTC) |
To duplicate: | Create a large list of articles, sort alphabetically, drag the slider down through the list and look for the numbered articles at the top of the list to start displaying again. |
Site URL: | en.wiki |
Operating system | Vista sp1 |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | rev 4426 |
Workaround | Use any method other than the slider to scroll through the list. |
Fixed in version |
- Presumably thats a problem with the actual control that MS make.. —Reedy 22:35, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- Appears to be a Vista issue. Listed workaround is to use DataGridView instead of Listbox. --Pascal666 18:34, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Cheers for doing the research. Typical MS saying we cant help, even though its one of their products also.. I use vista, so can duplicate it.. And look at fixing it.. ListView or DataGridView... —Reedy 20:26, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Appears to be a Vista issue. Listed workaround is to use DataGridView instead of Listbox. --Pascal666 18:34, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Since the last official release of AWB I noticed that when I use in the editfield the scrollbar, to drag the thumb downwards to see a lower part of the article, the dragging suddenly stops, takes a few seconds, and then continues. All other functions seems to work normal. It mostly occurs with longer pages. Romaine (talk) 20:45, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
- This user is also using Vista; the bug might coincide with the use of the rich edit control. ClickRick (talk) 20:49, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
AWB netbook fail
Status | New |
---|---|
Description | As this screenshot indicates, AWB is inexplicably cut off because my screen resolution is too small. —harej (talk) (cool!) 18:48, 9 July 2009 (UTC) |
To duplicate: | Use AWB on a screen with resolution 1024 by 600. |
Site URL: | Immaterial |
Operating system | Windows XP, but that is probably immaterial |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | 4.6.0.0 / 4.9.0.3 |
Workaround | Using my netbook's VGA output to plug this computer into a larger monitor. |
Fixed in version |
- Yup, know about that.... I've tried to fix it, but with no luck so far. —Reedy 08:58, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
- Rather than maximise the app, what happens if you try to manually resize it down to fit your screen? I've just tried resizing AWB here and it would certainly get down to be small enough, but then again I'm starting off with a 1600×1200 screen. ClickRick (talk) 23:56, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- I would do that if I could reach the bottom handles of the screen, which I cannot because AWB is too large to fit on my screen. —harej (talk) (cool!) 17:11, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Can you resize from the top left, then move the window up and left? --NE2 23:29, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Or Alt+Space to bring down the system menu, then S to select Size, then use the arrow keys. ClickRick (talk) 20:09, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
- Can you resize from the top left, then move the window up and left? --NE2 23:29, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- I would do that if I could reach the bottom handles of the screen, which I cannot because AWB is too large to fit on my screen. —harej (talk) (cool!) 17:11, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Rather than maximise the app, what happens if you try to manually resize it down to fit your screen? I've just tried resizing AWB here and it would certainly get down to be small enough, but then again I'm starting off with a 1600×1200 screen. ClickRick (talk) 23:56, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
The problem with the above remedies is that it does not expose more of what's on the bottom -- it just increases the size of what is already visible proportionally. —harej (talk) (cool!) 18:36, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Just stating the obvious: This bug still occurs in 4.9.0.3 -- Magioladitis (talk) 16:55, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Database scanner bugs II
Status | Bug currently being investigated/fixed |
---|---|
Description | ...
I think these were all the same weeks ago, but for reference purposes I'm using 4.9.0.1 (r4812), trunk built from source. - Jarry1250 [ humorous – discuss ] 18:37, 18 July 2009 (UTC) |
To duplicate: | |
Site URL: | en.wiki |
Operating system | |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | |
Workaround | |
Fixed in version |
- No 1 works fine on the small dump i downloaded from Category:2009 deaths —Reedy 21:29, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- No 2, rev 4920. Made some changes, but it hasn't sorted it (on my test 2200 articles, though i was just filtering simply by ns) —Reedy 22:15, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- No 1 works fine on the small dump i downloaded from Category:2009 deaths —Reedy 21:29, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- I've finally got #1 sussed. Basically, if you look to scan the entire en database, but have to stop half-way through, you can't resume half-way through. Instead, the scanner summarily scans the first half of the articles looking for your given start point, but doesn't record any results until it finds it (hence my assumption that no results were ever going to be returned), so it's not a great deal quicker than just starting from scratch. Would be good if a percentage could be input maybe, to give the scanner a hand? Maybe a more informative status update? - Jarry1250 [ In the UK? Sign the petition! ] 16:30, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- rev 5084 might help a bit —Reedy 19:21, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Replacing underscores in URLs
Status | Bug currently being investigated/fixed |
---|---|
Description | The URL http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/264/264.F2d.445.12430_1.html is replaced with http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/264/264.F2d.445.12430 1.html . |
To duplicate: | Run general fixes on Joliet and Chicago Railroad (follow redirects off). |
Site URL: | enwiki |
Operating system | XP |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | 4.6.0.0 |
Workaround | |
Fixed in version |
- I suggest you move the comment to be outside of the category, and all will be well. Rjwilmsi 06:54, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
- No it won't; AWB then tries to move it above the categories. --NE2 16:18, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- It used to do that. I fixed that for the 4.6.0.0 release.
- rev 5113 underscores in comments beside a category will now be left alone. More unit tests.
- If the comment is moved beside the category all will be well. Rjwilmsi 18:54, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- No it won't; AWB then tries to move it above the categories. --NE2 16:18, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Find doesn't always find all of the terms the first scan through
Status | Need more information |
---|---|
Description | For certain articles that have a medium amount of the given search term (say 5 to 15) it will not find all of the terms on the first search. It will find 3 or 4 of them and then jump back to the beginning of the article (signaling that its found all of the terms), but if you search through the article again it will find all of them the second time around. Wizard191 (talk) 17:52, 13 August 2009 (UTC) |
To duplicate: | Make a list of what links to "green sand" and then searched for the term "green". On the sand casting article it did the above problem both times I tried it. |
Site URL: | Wikipedia |
Operating system | Windows XP SP3 |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | Build 5112 |
Workaround | |
Fixed in version |
- Did you have the 'highlight unbalanced brackets if found' option set – on that article an unbalanced bracket is found, so a search begins at that point in the article. After finding all those matches and returning to the top, the new search starts from the top of the article. Rjwilmsi 21:29, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- To be honest I don't know. I went through and tried to make it screw up again without the 'highlight unbalanced brackets if found'. I would expect that the find function would always start the search at the top and go from there, no matter what options I have selected, so can we fix that? Perhaps that was the problem from the beginning. Wizard191 (talk) 22:40, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- I would expect that the find function would always start the search at the top: We'd better keep the option to allow the user to start the search some way through the text. Rjwilmsi 23:07, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Really? I always assumed that it started at the top until I accidentally hit the search button one too many times and found that it went to the top and I found more hits than I saw the first time around. That's just my take on it...if others think it's reasonable to start in the middle then this bug can be closed. Wizard191 (talk) 13:45, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- I would expect that the find function would always start the search at the top: We'd better keep the option to allow the user to start the search some way through the text. Rjwilmsi 23:07, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- To be honest I don't know. I went through and tried to make it screw up again without the 'highlight unbalanced brackets if found'. I would expect that the find function would always start the search at the top and go from there, no matter what options I have selected, so can we fix that? Perhaps that was the problem from the beginning. Wizard191 (talk) 22:40, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Orphan tags part III
Status | New |
---|---|
Description | AWB places the orphan template on too many pages. Snowman (talk) 21:05, 24 September 2009 (UTC) |
To duplicate: | Apply AWB to Premier Kelso Hurdle, which has two links to it and one redirect. |
Site URL: | en wiki |
Operating system | Windows Vista |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | 5438 |
Workaround | Need to view the page then click "what links here" to assess. |
Fixed in version |
Premier Kelso Hurlde is an orphan then. It must have at least 3 non-redirect links. Don't worry for an article being tagged as an orphan. This doesn't mean it'll be deleted. It means that editors have to link it with more articles. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:08, 24 September 2009 (UTC) From WP:ORPHAN: Orphan: An article with fewer than three incoming links which meet the criteria for linking below. For the purposes of the strict definition, the following pages do not count toward the three incoming links: Disambiguation pages, Redirects, Soft redirects, Discussion pages of articles, Wikipedia pages outside of article space. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:11, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- Perhaps, the "Coventry and Bedworth Urban Area" article is a better example. After AWB added the orphan template JL-Bot removed it. This article has a few redirects, but more than about 20 links go to one of the redirects. Snowman (talk) 21:23, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- OK. This IS a bug. This article is not orphan. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:29, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- Per WP:ORPHAN as cited above, the article is an orphan. So... no, this is not a bug. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 21:28, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- So, the definition has to change to "when an article, or its redirects, have less than 3 incoming links... -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:29, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- The definition seems fine to me; the redirects themselves don't count (there could be 20 redirects and no other links, and the article would be an orphan), but if there were no direct links to the article but redirects to it were linked 20 times, then it wouldn't be orphaned. The links to redirects are still links to that article, there's just one more step in the process. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 21:31, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- So, we don't disagree. This article has only one redirect linking to it but this redirect is linked by 20 articles. Thus, it's not orphan. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:33, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- Here is another article to think about "Verreaux's Monal-Partridge" - I have not wikilinked it here in case it affects the link count. At the present time AWB will add an orphan template, and I expect JL-Bot will remove it again, as it has already done twice. It seems that JL-Bot is doing something different to AWB 5438. Snowman (talk) 21:42, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- Same case as above. I'll ask JL-Bot to see. Seems it handles orphans better. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:44, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- JL-Bot has been busy recently; see JL-Bot's contributions. Snowman (talk) 22:02, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- (@ Magioladitis, a few posts ago)... but the redirect isn't linked to from any articles. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:07, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- Obviously, we are talking for different articles. The first one (Premier Kelso Hurlde) is orphan, the second one (Coventry and Bedworth Urban Area) is not. -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:59, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- (@ Magioladitis, a few posts ago)... but the redirect isn't linked to from any articles. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:07, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- JL-Bot has been busy recently; see JL-Bot's contributions. Snowman (talk) 22:02, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- Same case as above. I'll ask JL-Bot to see. Seems it handles orphans better. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:44, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- Here is another article to think about "Verreaux's Monal-Partridge" - I have not wikilinked it here in case it affects the link count. At the present time AWB will add an orphan template, and I expect JL-Bot will remove it again, as it has already done twice. It seems that JL-Bot is doing something different to AWB 5438. Snowman (talk) 21:42, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- So, we don't disagree. This article has only one redirect linking to it but this redirect is linked by 20 articles. Thus, it's not orphan. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:33, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- The definition seems fine to me; the redirects themselves don't count (there could be 20 redirects and no other links, and the article would be an orphan), but if there were no direct links to the article but redirects to it were linked 20 times, then it wouldn't be orphaned. The links to redirects are still links to that article, there's just one more step in the process. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 21:31, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- So, the definition has to change to "when an article, or its redirects, have less than 3 incoming links... -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:29, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- Per WP:ORPHAN as cited above, the article is an orphan. So... no, this is not a bug. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 21:28, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- OK. This IS a bug. This article is not orphan. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:29, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
A comment not to forget: If articles has the any disamb template then it should not be tagged as orphan. -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:59, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- J-L states that "it uses the Adopted Orphans toolserver report to determine which tags to remove". I don't know if AWB could use this. This would slow things down. At least right now the "remove tag" can be ~100% accurate (if we adopt my disamb check). The "add tag" is highly inaccurate. -- Magioladitis (talk) 19:08, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- rev 5468 Test to prove that orphan not added if a disambig template is present. Rjwilmsi 21:58, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- Disamb(ig|iguation)|Dab. These are the four cases. At least for start. We of course have human disamb, etc. -- Magioladitis (talk) 22:24, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- rev 5636 fixed one more related bug. -- Magioladitis (talk) 11:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Disamb(ig|iguation)|Dab. These are the four cases. At least for start. We of course have human disamb, etc. -- Magioladitis (talk) 22:24, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- rev 5468 Test to prove that orphan not added if a disambig template is present. Rjwilmsi 21:58, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Issues with Template:Xxxx/doc pages
Status | Bug currently being investigated/fixed |
---|---|
Description | Template:Xxxx/doc pages need special treatment. # Header levels seem to be one deeper. # {PAGENAME} needs to not be subst'ed # Defaultsort needs to override the value set by "template documentation" template- it has a defaultsort parameter - or maybe we should just take it out of the template.Rich Farmbrough, 17:18, 26 September 2009 (UTC). 17:18, 26 September 2009 (UTC) |
To duplicate: | |
Site URL: | en.wp |
Operating system | V |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | 4.9 |
Workaround | |
Fixed in version |
- As usual I'm torn between this being a bug or a feature request. Since it is WP's call to behave in unpredictable ways, and ours not to break it, I've gone with bug. But the existing behaviour is totally reasonable, just wrong. Rich Farmbrough, 17:18, 26 September 2009 (UTC).
- rev 5472 only apply heading level fix on mainspace pages. Rjwilmsi 17:30, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Adding in only some non-breaking spaces
Status | Bug currently being investigated/fixed |
---|---|
Description | 1700 m (5600 ft) to this 1700 m (5600 ft). Should be able to recognise the space between a number and m when it is followed by (5600 ft.) or (5600 ft) and so on. Also does not detect "340 gm" and "weigh 80 g". Recognises "(22-24 in)" and adds a nbsp, but does not change the hyphen to an endash. Snowman (talk) 10:05, 7 October 2009 (UTC) |
To duplicate: | Use AWB on Golden-collared Macaw for "m". Orange-winged Amazon for "gm", and Orange-fronted Parakeet for "weigh 80 g". See "Palm Cockatoo" for "(22-24 in)" |
Site URL: | en wiki |
Operating system | Vista Sp2 |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | 5504 |
Workaround | manual |
Fixed in version |
- Okay, so 4 issues here:
- 1700 m (5600 ft) – rev 5520 Fixed in this limited case only. Rjwilmsi 15:01, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- 340 gm – not a valid unit. Should AWB correct it, I don't know.
- weight 80 g – don't believe AWB should do this one due to false positives with "Oracle 10g server" etc.
- (22-24 in) – rev 5521 Fixed that one Rjwilmsi 15:21, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- Other similar problems:
- 40 g (1.4 oz) not recognized; see Corvidae. Snowman (talk) 15:32, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- "8-20 g in weight" not recognized. Also "19-20 days" only changes the hyphen without adding nbsp; see Sittella. Snowman (talk) 15:44, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- Should "14-22g" be changed? see "New Zealand wren". Snowman (talk) 15:47, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- Should (16-19") be changed? see "Oilbird". Snowman (talk) 15:49, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- "5-6 meters" not recognized; see Pelagornithidae. Snowman (talk) 15:52, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- "120 grams" not recognized; see Grebe. Snowman (talk) 15:57, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- "Pp. 350-377" which is quite a common error with page numbers. I think AWB could change it to "pp. 350-377" and also fix the hypen; see Gnatcatcher Snowman (talk) 16:00, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- Not all hyphens converted to endashes; see Shoebill. Snowman (talk) 16:13, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- Terms where a numeral is adjacent to a non-whitespace character ("22g") should not be changed. In case of a false positive on something like "50 m", no real harm is done because all that changes is where a line ends. Changing "22g" to "22 g" potentially changes the meaning, or at least creates incorrect punctuation.
- Also, it may be unwise to use non-breaking spaces when unit names are spelled out, because compound unit names can be long enough to create awkward line endings. --Jc3s5h (talk) 16:04, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- Fair enough for a unit with many letters. Perhaps I have indicated some things that can be changed when these regexes are reviewed. I think I will stop adding to the list and wait for the new version to test. Snowman (talk) 16:13, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- I think that a check that AWB also completes the partial fixed that AWB has made is needed. I think that some improvements are still needed - I have left enough examples to work on for now. Snowman (talk) 20:12, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- Fair enough for a unit with many letters. Perhaps I have indicated some things that can be changed when these regexes are reviewed. I think I will stop adding to the list and wait for the new version to test. Snowman (talk) 16:13, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- Also, it may be unwise to use non-breaking spaces when unit names are spelled out, because compound unit names can be long enough to create awkward line endings. --Jc3s5h (talk) 16:04, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Keyboard language switch bugs happens again
Status | New |
---|---|
Description | I have installed two keyboard languages (English as default and Greek). Sometimes while editing AWB switches from English to Greek. When I try to switch back AWB switches again. Some time ago Reedy fixed this one (somewhere before rev 5150) and was working fine but the problem reappeared. Magioladitis (talk) 10:02, 25 October 2009 (UTC) |
To duplicate: | |
Operating system | XP SP2 with FF 3.5 and IE 8 |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | rev 5528 |
Workaround | None |
Fixed in version |
- The original fix was by MaxSem under rev 5082. Code is still there, can't see why it would have stopped working. Rjwilmsi 10:19, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- You are faster than me. I jsut came to update my comment. :) -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:20, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Problem usually occurs after switching from bot mode to manual. -- Magioladitis (talk) 13:12, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Disambig errors
Status | New |
---|---|
Description | I tried disambig on a paragraph in which the same link appears three times. Changing the first one is fine. Changing either of the other two causes the disambig to be applied to both of them. Attempting to change both of them causes an additional, messed up fourth one to appear. (I removed the redundant links from the original article, but AWB should be able to handle it correctly anyways.) MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 04:40, 5 November 2009 (UTC) |
To duplicate: | On User:Mandarax/AWB Sandbox, disambig the 2nd and/or 3rd Figurative links to Figurative art |
Site URL: | en.wiki |
Operating system | XP |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | 4.9.0.2, SVN 5565 |
Workaround | |
Fixed in version |
A rare bug
Status | New |
---|---|
Description | I am reporting this one, in case someone has any idea how to fix it. I think it's a rare bug and not worth spending much time on it. -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:25, 6 November 2009 (UTC) |
To duplicate: | |
Site URL: | en |
Operating system | XP SP2 |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | 4.9.0.2 rev 5587 |
Workaround | |
Fixed in version |
- There's an outstanding feature request over converting these external links that are really interwiki links into proper links. That would cover this one. Rjwilmsi 12:47, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Cannot remove "Canada – Costa Rica Free Trade Agreement" from ListMaker by skipping
Status | New |
---|---|
Description | As per RJW on skype, you cannot remove "Canada – Costa Rica Free Trade Agreement" by skipping, it says the list doesnt contain that. —Reedy 15:56, 7 November 2009 (UTC) |
To duplicate: | |
Operating system | |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | |
Workaround | |
Fixed in version |
- Space after - on the Article.Equals is not the same. —Reedy 16:17, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Make list display becomes somewhat garbled when scrolling fast
Status | New |
---|---|
Description | When quickly scrolling up and down through a large list in the make list window (by clicking and dragging the slider in the scroll bar), some of the entries overwrite each other in terms of how they are displayed. The entries themselves are fine; however, some of the article titles have the names of the articles that were above them listed on top of them. For example, one of the entries of the list I have open right now is for New York State Route 470. It should read just "New York State Route 470"; however, the displayed text is "New York State Route 470" with the words "New York State Route 446" (the article above it in the list) overlaid on top. – TMF 19:22, 16 November 2009 (UTC) |
To duplicate: | Make a large list (the list I noticed this on was 215 entries long) and scroll up and down using the method described above |
Operating system | Windows 7 |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | 4.9.0.3 rev5636, but this issue existed in the last snapshot I used (I think it was around rev5580 or so) as well. |
Workaround | 1) Ignore the garbled text and use AWB as usual. 2) Clicking on the garbled entry (highlighting it) will correct the displayed text. 3) Scrolling slower (using the arrows and/or by clicking in the scroll bar) doesn't seem to cause this issue. |
Fixed in version |
This may be related to this bug, but I don't think it's the same exact issue. – TMF 19:25, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'd be inclined to agree. I think i have seen it also, but marked it as the controls fault, rather than AWB's. —Reedy 10:52, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
defaultsort capitalization
Status | Reopened |
---|---|
Description | When AWB inserts a DEFAULTSORT template line, it ignores the capitalization of the article name and uses its own (and very non-standard) capitalization scheme. AWB should use the article name. Hmains (talk) 20:46, 27 November 2009 (UTC) |
To duplicate: | Use AWB with general fixes turned on against any article with multiple words in its name and lacks a DEFAULTSORT line |
Site URL: | Wikipedia |
Operating system | XP |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | 4.9.0.1 |
Workaround | manual correction |
Fixed in version |
An example? -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:08, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
- If I make another change to AWB's defaultsort capitalisation logic it will be to remove it entirely, and only correct spacing and diacritics errors in the defaultsort. There are 101 different policies in Wikipedia on the defaultsort and AWB cannot meet all of them, let alone most of them. Do we think that is the best way forward? Rjwilmsi 23:54, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
- I would expect that anyone doing defaultsort would just type the article name 'as it exists' and not alter it. What reason would there be for alteration? It is the 'default' after all. Hmains (talk) 00:12, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- It's the default for sorting. So it should have not diacritics and not capitals in the middle because these things change the expected order. For more information check WP:SORT. -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:15, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- So what is the resolution? Continue to have AWB capitalize the first letter of each word in the name and lower case all other letters even if they are an initialism of some kind? If so, it is not a resolution, just a perpetuation of error Hmains (talk) 06:16, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- This is not for AWB to decide. Read the rules in WP:SORT please.
- So what is the resolution? Continue to have AWB capitalize the first letter of each word in the name and lower case all other letters even if they are an initialism of some kind? If so, it is not a resolution, just a perpetuation of error Hmains (talk) 06:16, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- Do not begin a sort key with a lower case letter unless you want the article to appear on the category page separate from articles sorted with an upper case letter, under a lower case letter heading.
- A case-insensitive sort can be achieved by following the convention that initial letters of words are capitalized in the sort key, but other letters are lower case. For example, use "Dubois" in sort keys rather than "DuBois".
- If you disagree please start a discussion there. -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:02, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- You misunderstand. If the name of the article is 'Infantry divisions in WWII by country', AWB creates a defaultsort template with 'Infantry Divisions In Wwii By Country'. It is AWB that is in wrong; there is nothing wrong or in question with WP:SORT. Hmains (talk) 22:16, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Disambig function improperly skips
Status | New |
---|---|
Description | Seemingly random articles are skipped when processing disambiguations. Wizard191 (talk) 22:07, 1 December 2009 (UTC) |
To duplicate: | Create a list of what links to embossing. Link to disambiguation: "embossing". Select "skip page when do disambiguations made". AWB will skip until debit card even though the previous articles contain a link to embossing. |
Site URL: | en.wikipedia.org |
Operating system | XP SP3 |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | SVN 5703 |
Workaround | |
Fixed in version |
List Comparer needs to be run twice for accurate unique list to be achieved
Status | Fixed in the next release |
---|---|
Description | The list comparer needs to be run twice... On the first run it reports an inaccurate "Unique in list 1". –xenotalk 16:02, 3 December 2009 (UTC) |
To duplicate: | Add to list from category of links on Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/Bot Category List, compare to Category:WikiProject Chicago articles - note unique in list 1 upwards of 4000. Clear ListMaker 1, move unique in list 1 to Listmaker1, clear all, compare again, note unique in List 1 figure drops radically. |
Site URL: | en.wiki |
Operating system | Vista/XP |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | 4903.5715 |
Workaround | Run it twice, as described |
Fixed in version | rev 5721 |
- Seems some of the recent attempts at optimisation have messed it up. Magioladitis! ;P —Reedy 18:03, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- I am marking as fixed but I would like xeno to confirm it. -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:27, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- I dunno, I think this broke something else. I'm now trying to compare a list of 23528 members to one of 404 members. The results show only 300 as unique in list 1, 346 as common, and 58 as unique in list 2..,. So what happened to the other 22000+ some odd pages? =) –xenotalk 18:06, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Reedy, add "lb2.Items.Add(a2);" after line 96. This is where the missing pages went. If after that the ListComparer is still not accurate we can rollback. -- Magioladitis (talk) 23:41, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Network access error
Status | New |
---|---|
Description | About every three or four edits I get an exception box, title = "Network access error", text = "The underlying connection was closed: A connection that was expected to be kept alive was closed by the server." I'm a new user, this may well not be a bug, but I've gotten it four times on Commons, have never seen it on Wikipedia. Thanks. . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 16:33, 4 December 2009 (UTC) |
To duplicate: | adding multiple categories to a list of images |
Site URL: | Commons |
Operating system | Windows 2000, Version 5.0 build 2195 SP4 |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | 4.9.0.2 |
Workaround | Hitting "START" gets AWB going again, but the edit in process is ignored. |
Fixed in version |
This is certainly in Category:Minor Pain in the Ass, rather than of real importance, unless it indicates more serious problems.. . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 17:12, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure this is WMF problem. However it would be great to have the software do something smarter than stop forever. Rich Farmbrough, 14:47, 6 December 2009 (UTC).
Unoauthorized change
Status | New |
---|---|
Description | AWB make unoauthorized change. See 3rd change in diff. All automatic changes in Options were off. Alex Spade (talk) 17:37, 7 December 2009 (UTC) |
To duplicate: | |
Site URL: | Ru-Wikipedia |
Operating system | Windows XP SP 3 |
.NET FW Version | Unknown |
AWB version | 4.9.0.3 rev. 5646 |
Workaround | |
Fixed in version |