Talk:SMS Scharnhorst: Difference between revisions
DYKadminBot (talk | contribs) |
→Were their survivors or not?: new section |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
:I reworded it slightly, is it more clear now? [[User:Parsecboy|Parsecboy]] ([[User talk:Parsecboy|talk]]) 02:16, 17 December 2009 (UTC) |
:I reworded it slightly, is it more clear now? [[User:Parsecboy|Parsecboy]] ([[User talk:Parsecboy|talk]]) 02:16, 17 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
::It's fine now.--[[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]) 04:10, 17 December 2009 (UTC) |
::It's fine now.--[[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]) 04:10, 17 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Were their survivors or not? == |
|||
In the '''Outcome''' section of the [[Battle of the Falkland Islands]], it states: |
|||
<blockquote> |
|||
'''Out of the 765 officers and men from the Scharnhorst, only 7 survived.''' |
|||
</blockquote> |
|||
Which clearly conflicts with this article and the DYK mention out front. Who's right?--Cantthinkofausername 07:23, 27 December 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:23, 27 December 2009
SMS Scharnhorst is currently a War and military good article nominee. Nominated by Parsecboy (talk) at 14:15, 17 December 2009 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer.
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SMS Scharnhorst article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from SMS Scharnhorst appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 December 2009 (check views). A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/December. |
Intro
The lead paragraph is rather confusing; I'd delete the first mention of Gneisenau as it is easy to think that the latter was the lead ship of the class. Just move the link to the next mention of Gneisenau.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:07, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
- I reworded it slightly, is it more clear now? Parsecboy (talk) 02:16, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
- It's fine now.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:10, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
Were their survivors or not?
In the Outcome section of the Battle of the Falkland Islands, it states:
Out of the 765 officers and men from the Scharnhorst, only 7 survived.
Which clearly conflicts with this article and the DYK mention out front. Who's right?--Cantthinkofausername 07:23, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees on review
- B-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- B-Class military history articles
- B-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- B-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- B-Class German military history articles
- German military history task force articles
- B-Class World War I articles
- World War I task force articles
- Start-Class Germany articles
- Low-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- Start-Class Shipwreck articles
- Unknown-importance Shipwreck articles
- WikiProject templates with unknown parameters
- Start-Class South America articles
- Unknown-importance South America articles
- Start-Class Falkland Islands articles
- Unknown-importance Falkland Islands articles
- Falkland Islands articles
- WikiProject South America articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles