Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Vote/Ronline: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:14, 9 January 2006

Ronline

Hi! I'm candidating for the ArbCom because I believe in justice in Wikipedia and think I can bring about positive change as to the fairness of arbitration procedures. I have worked in mediation in the past (in real life), and also in various cases at both the English and Romanian Wikipedias. If I become an arbitrator, my most important consideration will be to look at both sides impartially and to guarantee that the rights of the accused are always upheld in the fairest way. I am a firm believed in dialogue, and I always aim to make sure that both sides understand very well what the dispute is about, since I believe that alienation and misunderstanding is the most significant and most dangerous root of conflict. It is only through true justice and transparency that we can bring about a better, more stable and more trustworthy Wikipedia community. Feel free to ask any questions on the questions page below. Thanks, Ronline ✉ 09:34, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

Support

Support according to me, he would be a good arbiter --Angelo 01:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. New blood good and has good principles. --Dogbreathcanada 02:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Dogbreathcanada does not have suffrage; his first edit was at 19:56, 30 October 2005 (UTC) and he had only 144 edits as of 00:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC). —Cryptic (talk) 04:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ~~How could the account be created December 28? Edits go back before then.~~. (Confusion on my part:voter's account, not candidate's). Strong edit history, good statement.--ragesoss 03:51, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support can't find anything wrong with this user. Grue 06:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support A user that I highly respect. --Mihai -^talk 08:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support warpozio 08:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Danny Yee 09:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Kefalonia 09:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dan100 (Talk) 11:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --AdiJapan 12:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Good experiences with this user on Wikinews. I trust him on a Wikimedia level, and that's enough for me to trust him on a Wikipedia level.--Eloquence * 14:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Very Strong Support - I trust Ronline to be one of the best and good member of ArbCom. He is one of the most dedicated contributor to mediation conflicts. He is by far the best of them with a very warm, friendly attitude towards people. We trust him to be one of the best and fit for this position. Bonaparte talk 14:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Michael Snow 00:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, questions. See my voting rationale. Talrias (t | e | c) 00:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Zach ^{(Smack Back) Fair use policy} 00:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Ambi 00:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose policy. David | explanation | Talk 00:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Cryptic (talk) 00:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
—Kirill Lok s hin 00:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. --GraemeL ^(talk) 00:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. --Interiot 00:49, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
--Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 00:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great behavior in disputes, but I believe more experience may be necessary. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 00:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, policy. Carbonite | Talk 01:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
-- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 01:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Potential to be an excellent dispute-resolver, but needs a bit more experience. Batmanand 01:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 02:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 02:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - inexperience - Wikipedical (talk) 21:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Account too new (created December 28, 2005 [1]). — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 03:36, Jan. 9, 2006
Oppose. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 04:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Bobet 04:34, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose 172 04:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Crunch 05:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. android 79 06:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose--cj | talk 06:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. --Daniel 07:34, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I like ronline, but he's basically new to the English wiki. From my experience with him 2 months ago, he didn't know how DR even worked. So. No. --Woohookitty^{(cat scratches)} 11:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Would really like to support, but I'm afraid the lack of XP keeps me from doing so. Weakly, very weakly oppose. —Nightstallion (?) 12:44, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry but I must oppose. ALKIVAR™ 13:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 #'''Support'''. --[[User:AdiJapan|AdiJapan]] 12:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 #'''Support.''' Good experiences with this user on Wikinews. I trust him on a ''Wikimedia'' level, and that's enough for me to trust him on a ''Wikipedia'' level.--[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]][[User:Eloquence/CP|*]] 14:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
+#'''Very Strong Support''' - I trust Ronline to be one of the best and good member of ArbCom. He is one of the most dedicated contributor to mediation conflicts. He is by far the best of them with a very warm, friendly attitude towards people. We trust him to be one of the best and fit for this position. [[User:Bonaparte|<font color="#FFFFFF" style="background: maroon;"> Bonaparte </font>]] [[User talk:Bonaparte|<small>talk</small>]] 14:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 ==Oppose==