LEED: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tag: references removed |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
LEED began in 1993 spearheaded by [[Natural Resources Defense Council]] (NRDC) senior scientist [[Robert K. Watson]] who, as founding chairman of the LEED Steering Committee until 2006, led a broad-based consensus process which included non-profit organizations, government agencies, [[architect]]s, [[engineer]]s, [[developer]]s, [[builder]]s, product manufacturers and other industry leaders. Early LEED committee members also included [[USGBC]] co-founder Mike Italiano, architects Bill Reed and Sandy Mendler, builder Gerard Heiber, builder Myron Kibbe and engineer Richard Bourne. As interest in LEED grew, in 1996, engineers Tom Paladino and Lynn Barker co-chaired the newly formed LEED technical committee. |
LEED began in 1993 spearheaded by [[Natural Resources Defense Council]] (NRDC) senior scientist [[Robert K. Watson]] who, as founding chairman of the LEED Steering Committee until 2006, led a broad-based consensus process which included non-profit organizations, government agencies, [[architect]]s, [[engineer]]s, [[developer]]s, [[builder]]s, product manufacturers and other industry leaders. Early LEED committee members also included [[USGBC]] co-founder Mike Italiano, architects Bill Reed and Sandy Mendler, builder Gerard Heiber, builder Myron Kibbe and engineer Richard Bourne. As interest in LEED grew, in 1996, engineers Tom Paladino and Lynn Barker co-chaired the newly formed LEED technical committee. |
||
From 1994 to 2006, LEED grew from one standard for new construction to a comprehensive system of six |
From 1994 to 2006, LEED grew from one standard for new construction to a comprehensive system of six standards covering all aspects of the development and construction process. LEED also has grown from six volunteers on one committee to more than 200 volunteers on nearly 20 committees and over 200 professional staff in Washington, DC. |
||
LEED was created to accomplish the following: |
LEED was created to accomplish the following: |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
*Transform the building market |
*Transform the building market |
||
LEED consists of a suite of rating systems for the design, construction and operation of buildings and neighborhoods. That suite currently consists of: |
|||
Green Building Council members, representing every sector of the building industry, developed and continue to refine LEED. The rating system addresses six major areas: |
|||
*[[Sustainability|Sustainable]] sites |
|||
'''Green Building Design & Construction''' |
|||
*[[Water efficiency]] |
|||
*LEED for New Construction and Major Renovations |
|||
*Energy and atmosphere |
|||
*LEED for Core & Shell Development |
|||
*Materials and resources |
|||
*LEED for Schools |
|||
*Indoor environmental quality |
|||
*LEED for Retail New Construction(planned 2010) |
|||
*Innovation and design process |
|||
'''Green Interior Design & Construction''' |
|||
*LEED for Commercial Interiors |
|||
*LEED for Retail Interiors (planned 2010) |
|||
'''Green Building Operations & Maintenance''' |
|||
*LEED for Existing Buildings: Operations & Maintenance |
|||
'''Green Neighborhood Development''' |
|||
*LEED for Neighborhood Development |
|||
'''Green Home Design and Construction''' |
|||
*LEED for Homes |
|||
Green Building Council members, representing every sector of the building industry, developed and continue to refine LEED. The rating systems addresses six major areas: |
|||
*Location and Planning |
|||
*Sustainable Sites |
|||
*Water Efficiency |
|||
*Energy and Atmosphere |
|||
*Materials and Resources |
|||
*Indoor Environmental Quality |
|||
*Innovation and Design Process |
|||
*Regional Priority |
|||
==Benefits and disadvantages== |
==Benefits and disadvantages== |
||
Line 145: | Line 169: | ||
===USGBC LEED v2.2=== |
===USGBC LEED v2.2=== |
||
LEED for New Construction and Major Renovations version 2.2 contained the same credits as the new NCv2009, but had fewer points. There are 69 possible points and buildings can qualify for four levels of certification: |
|||
*'''Certified''' - 26-32 points |
*'''Certified''' - 26-32 points |
||
*'''Silver''' - 33-38 points |
*'''Silver''' - 33-38 points |
||
*'''Gold''' - 39-51 points |
*'''Gold''' - 39-51 points |
||
*'''Platinum''' - 52-69 points |
*'''Platinum''' - 52-69 points |
||
====Point rating==== |
|||
Points have been distributed as follows. Required "prerequisites" in each category receive no points.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.usmd.edu/usm/sustainability/docs/UMB-LEED.ppt|title=LEED 2.2 for New Construction/LEED 2.0 for Existing Buildings |author=Ron Brown (UMB AEC)}}</ref><ref name=AISC>{{cite web|url=http://www.aisc.org/Template.cfm?Section=Technical_Answers&template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=25766|title=Structural steel contributions toward obtaining a LEED rating}} May 2003 (rev. 2/04) Modern Steel Construction</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ncmbc.us/docs/TheLEEDRatingSystem-ShelleyMcPhatter.pdf|format=PDF|title=The LEED rating system|first=Alan |last=Jones}}</ref> |
|||
'''Sustainable sites (14 points total)''' |
|||
*Construction Activity Pollution Prevention Plan (required) |
|||
*Site selection (1 pt) |
|||
*Development density and community connectivity (1 pt) |
|||
*Brownfield redevelopment (1 pt) |
|||
*Alternative transportation availability: |
|||
**Public transportation access (1 pt) |
|||
**Bicycle storage and changing rooms (1 pt) |
|||
**Low-emitting and fuel-efficient vehicles (1 pt) |
|||
**Parking capacity and carpooling (1 pt) |
|||
*Reduced site disturbance: |
|||
**Protect or restore open space (1 pt) |
|||
**Development footprint (1 pt) |
|||
*Stormwater management: |
|||
**Rate and quantity (1 pt) |
|||
**Treatment (1 pt) |
|||
*Reduce heat islands: |
|||
**Roof (1 pt) |
|||
**Non-roof (1 pt) |
|||
*Light pollution reduction (1 pt) |
|||
'''Water efficiency (5 points total)''' |
|||
*Water efficient landscaping: |
|||
**Reduce by 50% (1 pt) |
|||
**No potable use or no irrigation (1 pt) |
|||
*Innovative wastewater technologies (1 pt) |
|||
*Water use reduction: |
|||
** (20%) (1 pt) |
|||
** (30%) (1 pt) |
|||
'''Energy and atmosphere (17 points total)''' |
|||
*Fundamental [[Building Commissioning|commissioning]] (required) |
|||
*Minimum (code) energy performance (required) |
|||
*Fundamental Refrigerant Management (required) |
|||
*Optimize energy performance (10 pts; 2 required as of June 26, 2007) |
|||
*On-site renewable energy/Green Power (4 pts) |
|||
*Enhanced Commissioning (1 pt) |
|||
*Enhanced Refrigeration Management (1 pt) |
|||
*Measurement and verification (1 pt) |
|||
'''Materials and resources (13 points total)''' |
|||
*Storage and collection of recyclables (required) |
|||
*Building reuse: |
|||
**maintain 75% of existing walls, floors & roof (1 pt) |
|||
**maintain 95% of existing walls, floors & roof (1 pt) |
|||
**maintain 50% of interior non-structural elements (1 pt) |
|||
*Construction waste management: |
|||
**50% diversion (1 pt) |
|||
**75% diversion (1 pt) |
|||
*Reuse of existing materials: |
|||
**5% salvaged or refurbished materials (1 pt) |
|||
**10% salvaged or refurbished materials (1 pt) |
|||
*Recycled content: |
|||
**10% recycled content (1 pt) |
|||
**Additional 10% (1 pt) |
|||
*Use of local materials: |
|||
**Manufacture within and Extraction within {{convert|500|mi|km}} of building site, 10% (1 pt) |
|||
**Additional 10% (1 pt) |
|||
*Rapidly renewable materials (1 pt) |
|||
*Certified Wood (1 pt) |
|||
'''Indoor environmental quality (15 points total)''' |
|||
*Minimum indoor air quality (required) |
|||
*Environmental tobacco smoke control (required) |
|||
*Outdoor air delivery monitoring (1 pt) |
|||
*Increased ventilation (1 pt) |
|||
*Construction indoor air quality management (2 pt) |
|||
*Indoor chemical and pollutant source control (1 pt) |
|||
*Controllability of systems (2 pt) |
|||
*Thermal comfort (2 pt) |
|||
*Daylight and views (2 pt) |
|||
'''Innovation and design process (5 points total)''' |
|||
*One point for having a LEED AP as a principal participant on the project. |
|||
*Additional points for this category are awarded above and beyond the core 64 points, and are described as rewarding strategies that go above and beyond the criteria for those points. Examples for up to four design points using steel construction include structure as finish, structure as plumbing, lightweight materials, recyclability, and potential for disassembly. (up to 4 pts) |
|||
===Process=== |
===Process=== |
Revision as of 21:39, 20 February 2010
The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System, developed by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), provides a suite of standards for the environmentally sustainable design, construction and operation of buildings and neighborhoods. Since its inception in 1998, LEED has grown to encompass more than 14,000 projects in the United States and 30 countries covering 1.062 billion square feet (99 km²) of development area.[1] The hallmark of LEED is that it is an open and transparent process where the technical criteria proposed by the LEED committees are publicly reviewed for approval by the more than 10,000 membership organizations that currently constitute the USGBC.
Individuals recognized for their knowledge of the LEED rating system are permitted to use the LEED Accredited Professional (AP) acronym after their name, indicating they have passed the accreditation exam given by the Green Building Certification Institute (a third-party organization that handles accreditation for the USGBC).
History
LEED began in 1993 spearheaded by Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) senior scientist Robert K. Watson who, as founding chairman of the LEED Steering Committee until 2006, led a broad-based consensus process which included non-profit organizations, government agencies, architects, engineers, developers, builders, product manufacturers and other industry leaders. Early LEED committee members also included USGBC co-founder Mike Italiano, architects Bill Reed and Sandy Mendler, builder Gerard Heiber, builder Myron Kibbe and engineer Richard Bourne. As interest in LEED grew, in 1996, engineers Tom Paladino and Lynn Barker co-chaired the newly formed LEED technical committee.
From 1994 to 2006, LEED grew from one standard for new construction to a comprehensive system of six standards covering all aspects of the development and construction process. LEED also has grown from six volunteers on one committee to more than 200 volunteers on nearly 20 committees and over 200 professional staff in Washington, DC.
LEED was created to accomplish the following:
- Define "green building" by establishing a common standard of measurement
- Promote integrated, whole-building design practices
- Recognize environmental leadership in the building industry
- Stimulate green competition
- Raise consumer awareness of green building benefits
- Transform the building market
LEED consists of a suite of rating systems for the design, construction and operation of buildings and neighborhoods. That suite currently consists of:
Green Building Design & Construction
- LEED for New Construction and Major Renovations
- LEED for Core & Shell Development
- LEED for Schools
- LEED for Retail New Construction(planned 2010)
Green Interior Design & Construction
- LEED for Commercial Interiors
- LEED for Retail Interiors (planned 2010)
Green Building Operations & Maintenance
- LEED for Existing Buildings: Operations & Maintenance
Green Neighborhood Development
- LEED for Neighborhood Development
Green Home Design and Construction
- LEED for Homes
Green Building Council members, representing every sector of the building industry, developed and continue to refine LEED. The rating systems addresses six major areas:
- Location and Planning
- Sustainable Sites
- Water Efficiency
- Energy and Atmosphere
- Materials and Resources
- Indoor Environmental Quality
- Innovation and Design Process
- Regional Priority
Benefits and disadvantages
LEED certified buildings are supposed to use resources more efficiently when compared to conventional buildings which are simply built to code. LEED certified buildings often provide healthier work and living environments, which contributes to higher productivity and improved employee health and comfort. The USGBC has compiled a long list of benefits of implementing a LEED strategy which ranges from improving air and water quality to reducing solid waste, benefiting owners, occupiers, and society as a whole.[citation needed]
Often when a LEED rating is pursued, this will increase the cost of initial design and construction. One reason for the higher cost is that sustainable construction principles may not be well understood by the design professionals undertaking the project. This could require time to be spent on research. Some of the finer points of LEED (especially those which demand a higher-than-industry-standard level of service from the construction team) could possibly lead to misunderstandings between the design team, construction team, and client, which could result in delays. [citation needed] Also, there may be a lack of abundant availability of manufactured building components which meet LEED standards. Pursuing LEED certification for a project is an added cost in itself as well. This added cost comes in the form of USGBC correspondence, LEED design-aide consultants, and the hiring of the required Commissioning Authority (CxA) - all of which would not necessarily be included in an environmentally responsible project unless it were also seeking a LEED rating.[citation needed]
However, these higher initial costs can be effectively mitigated by the savings incurred over time due to the lower-than-industry-standard operational costs which are typical of a LEED certified building. Additional economic payback may come in the form of employee productivity gains incurred as a result of working in a healthier environment. Studies have suggested that an initial up-front investment of 2% extra will yield over ten times the initial investment over the life cycle of the building.[2]
Although the deployment of the LEED standard has raised awareness of green building practices, its scoring system is skewed toward the ongoing use of fossil fuels.[neutrality is disputed] More than half of the available points in the standard support efficient use of fossil fuels, while only a handful are awarded for the use of sustainable energy sources. Further, the USGBC has stated support for the Architecture 2030, an effort that has set a goal of using no fossil-fuel, greenhouse gas-emitting energy to operate by 2030.[3]
In addition to focusing on efficient use of fossil fuels, LEED focuses on the end product. For example, because leather does not emit VOCs they are deemed healthy for environments, disregarding the use of extremely harmful chemicals in the process of tanning leather. Other products that do not use harmful chemicals and focus on more sustainable production do not earn any additional points for their attention to environmental concerns.
LEED is a measurement tool and not a design tool. It is also not yet climate-specific, although the newest version hopes to address this weakness partially. Because of this, designers may make materials or design choices that garner a LEED point, even though they may not be the most site or climate-appropriate choice available.
LEED has been innovative in reuse of reclaimed building materials, such as the reusing of asbestos as the insulation in water heaters, and re-casting used copper pipes into copper fittings. This is estimated to have saved close to 5000KW/h's in the United States alone.
Incentive Programs
Some areas have implemented or are considering incentives for LEED-certified buildings.
The city of Cincinnati, Ohio adopted a measure providing an automatic 100% real property tax exemption of the assessed property value for newly-constructed or rehabilitated commercial or residential properties that earn a minimum of LEED Certified.[4]
In the state of Nevada construction materials for a qualifying LEED building are exempt from local taxes. Pieces of construction that are deemed "inseparable" parts, such as concrete or Sheetrock, qualify.[5]
The state of Michigan is considering tax-based incentives for LEED buildings.[6]
Many local governments have adopted LEED incentive programs. Program incentives include tax credits, tax breaks, density bonuses, reduced fees, priority or expedited permitting, free or reduced-cost technical assistance, grants and low-interest loans.[7][8]
Certification
Different LEED versions have varied scoring systems based on a set of required "prerequisites" and a variety of "credits" in the six major categories listed above.
USGBC LEED 2009 (v3)
In LEED 2009 there are 100 possible base points plus an additional 6 points for Innovation in Design and 4 points for Regional Priority. Buildings can qualify for four levels of certification:
- Certified - 40 - 49 points
- Silver - 50 - 59 points
- Gold - 60 - 79 points
- Platinum - 80 points and above
- Note that the LEED for Homes rating system is much different than LEED v3, with different point categories and thresholds that reward efficient residential design
Point rating
Points have been distributed as follows for the New Construction Rating System. Prerequisites in each category receive no points and are mandatory for all projects.
Sustainable Sites - 26 Possible Points
- Prerequisite 1: Construction Activity Pollution Prevention
- Credit 1: Site Selection
- Credit 2: Development Density and Community Connectivity
- Credit 3: Brownfield Redevelopment
- Credit 4.1: Alternative Transportation—Public Transportation Access
- Credit 4.2: Alternative Transportation—Bicycle Storage and Changing Rooms
- Credit 4.3: Alternative Transportation—Low-Emitting and Fuel-Efficient Vehicles
- Credit 4.4: Alternative Transportation—Parking Capacity
- Credit 5.1: Site Development—Protect or Restore Habitat
- Credit 5.2: Site Development—Maximize Open Space
- Credit 6.1: Stormwater Design—Quantity Control
- Credit 6.2: Stormwater Design—Quality Control
- Credit 7.1: Heat Island Effect—Nonroof
- Credit 7.2: Heat Island Effect—Roof
- Credit 8: Light Pollution Reduction
Water Efficiency - 10 Possible Points
- Prerequisite 1: Water Use Reduction
- Credit 1: Water Efficient Landscaping
- Credit 2: Innovative Wastewater Technologies
- Credit 3: Water Use Reduction
Energy and Atmosphere - 35 Possible Points
- Prerequisite 1: Fundamental Commissioning of Building Energy Systems
- Prerequisite 2: Minimum Energy Performance
- Prerequisite 3: Fundamental Refrigerant Management
- Credit 1: Optimize Energy Performance
- Credit 2: On-site Renewable Energy
- Credit 3: Enhanced Commissioning
- Credit 4: Enhanced Refrigerant Management
- Credit 5: Measurement and Verification
- Credit 6: Green Power
Materials and Resources - 14 Possible Points
- Prerequisite 1: Storage and Collection of Recyclables
- Credit 1.1: Building Reuse—Maintain Existing Walls, Floors and Roof
- Credit 1.2: Building Reuse—Maintain Existing Interior Nonstructural Elements
- Credit 2: Construction Waste Management
- Credit 3: Materials Reuse
- Credit 4: Recycled Content
- Credit 5: Regional Materials
- Credit 6: Rapidly Renewable Materials
- Credit 7: Certified Wood
Indoor Environmental Quality - 15 Possible Points
- Prerequisite 1: Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance
- Prerequisite 2: Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control
- Credit 1: Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring
- Credit 2: Increased Ventilation
- Credit 3.1: Construction Indoor Air Quality Management Plan—During Construction
- Credit 3.2: Construction Indoor Air Quality Management Plan—Before Occupancy
- Credit 4.1: Low-Emitting Materials—Adhesives and Sealants
- Credit 4.2: Low-Emitting Materials—Paints and Coatings
- Credit 4.3: Low-Emitting Materials—Flooring Systems
- Credit 4.4: Low-Emitting Materials—Composite Wood and Agrifiber Products
- Credit 5: Indoor Chemical and Pollutant Source Control
- Credit 6.1: Controllability of Systems—Lighting
- Credit 6.2: Controllability of Systems—Thermal Comfort
- Credit 7.1: Thermal Comfort—Design
- Credit 7.2: Thermal Comfort—Verification
- Credit 8.1: Daylight and Views—Daylight
- Credit 8.2: Daylight and Views—Views
Innovation in Design - 6 Possible Points
- Credit 1: Innovation in Design (5 available)
- Credit 2: LEED Accredited Professional
Regional Priority - 4 Possible Points
- Credit 1: Regional Priority
USGBC LEED v2.2
LEED for New Construction and Major Renovations version 2.2 contained the same credits as the new NCv2009, but had fewer points. There are 69 possible points and buildings can qualify for four levels of certification:
- Certified - 26-32 points
- Silver - 33-38 points
- Gold - 39-51 points
- Platinum - 52-69 points
Process
LEED certification is obtained after submitting an application documenting compliance with the requirements of the rating system as well as paying registration and certification fees. Certification is granted solely by the Green Building Certification Institute responsible for the third party verification of project compliance with LEED requirements.
Recently the application process for new construction certification has been streamlined electronically, via a set of active PDFs that automates the process of filing the documentation.
LEED Green Associate
In order to get a certification to become a LEED Green Associate the requirements are 15 hours in the biennial Credential Maintenance Program with a minimum of 3 hours centered on LEED. The exam you take covers the main aspects and key points of the LEED rating and certification process. This process includes information on: energy credits, tax incentives and complex environmental design ratios. The LEED Green Associate certification is there for people who want to show their dedication to building practices that are in line with green standards, but do not feel obligated to have direct involvement in LEED projects. This title should be more appealing to nontechnical professionals, such as people in marketing for design firms or possibly lawyers who have become a part of real estate development deals.[9]
Directory of LEED-certified projects
The Green Building Council provides an online directory of LEED-certified projects.[10]
LEED versions
Different versions of the rating system are available for specific project types:[11]
- LEED for New Construction: New construction and major renovations (the most commonly applied-for LEED certification)[12]
- LEED for Existing Buildings: Existing buildings seeking LEED certification
- LEED for Commercial Interiors: Commercial interior fitouts by tenants
- LEED for Core and Shell: Core-and-shell projects (total building minus tenant fitouts)
- LEED for Homes: Homes
- LEED for Neighborhood Development: Neighborhood development
- LEED for Schools: Recognizes the unique nature of the design and construction of K-12 schools
- LEED for Retail: Consists of two rating systems. One is based on New Construction and Major Renovations version 2.2. The other track is based on LEED for Commercial Interiors version 2.0.
LEED has evolved since its original inception in 1998 to more accurately represent and incorporate emerging green building technologies. LEED-NC 1.0 was a pilot version. These projects helped inform the USGBC of the requirements for such a rating system, and this knowledge was incorporated into LEED-NC 2.0. The present version of LEED for new construction is LEED-NC v2.2. LEED also forms the basis for other sustainability rating systems such as the Environmental Protection Agency's Labs21.
LEED is a measurement tool for green building in the United States and it is developed and continuously modified by workers in the green building industry, especially in the ten largest metro areas in the U.S.; however, LEED certified buildings have been slower to penetrate small and mid-major markets.[13] Also, some criticism suggests that the LEED rating system is not sensitive and does not vary enough with regard to local environmental conditions. For instance, a building in Maine would receive the same credit as a building in Arizona for water conservation, though the principle is more important in the latter case. Another complaint is that its certification costs require money that could be used to make the building in question even more sustainable.Many critics have noted that compliance and certification costs have grown faster than staff support from the USGBC.
In 2003, the Canada Green Building Council received permission to create its own version of LEED based upon LEED-NC 2.0, now called LEED Canada-NC v1.0.[14]
For existing buildings LEED has developed LEED-EB. Recent research has demonstrated that buildings which can achieve LEED-EB equivalencies can generate a tremendous ROI. In a recent white paper by the Leonardo Academy comparing LEED-EB buildings vs. data from BOMA’s Experience Exchange Report 2007 demonstrated LEED-EB certified buildings achieved superior operating cost savings in 63% of the buildings surveyed ranging from $4.94 to $15.59 per square foot of floor space, with an average valuation of $6.68 and a median valuation of $6.07.[15]
In addition the overall cost of LEED-EB implementation and certification ranged from $0.00 to $6.46 per square foot of floor space, with an average of $2.43 per square foot demonstrating that implementation is not expensive, especially in comparison to cost savings. These costs should be significantly reduced if automation and technology are integrated into the implementation.[15]
LEED and carbon trading
It is expected that LEED-NC 3.0 will include a requirement for a carbon footprint (carbon building print) and a significant reduction of GHG (green-house gases) beyond a baseline level. The reduction in carbon dioxide must be measured based on the direct and indirect carbon dioxide and equivalent reductions. These include emissions related to the consumption of grid delivered electricity, on-site combustion of fossil fuels, and fugitive refrigerant emissions.
The efforts to quantify emission and reductions in emissions will be in an effort to monetize the climate change externality in the same way that a Kyoto Clean Development Project (carbon project) does. ITC Hotel Sonar Bangla Sheraton & Towers in Kolkata, India is the only green building project in the world to monetize the reductions that acts as the main precedent for this type of project.
Professional accreditation
Green building professionals can become LEED accredited. This accreditation enables an individual to facilitate the rating of buildings with the various LEED systems. Since January 2008, professional accreditation is administered by the Green Building Certification Institute. Between 2001 and June 2009, LEED accreditation required that candidates only pass one exam to earn their LEED Accredited Professional designation. After June 2009, LEED accreditation has three tiers and requires candidates to pass a series of LEED exams. The LEED v3 2009 accreditation process changes were made to mirror the various LEED Building Certification Rating Systems.[16] The first tier exam is called LEED Green Associate. The second tier exam is called LEED Accredited Professional with specialty and has five separate exams to allow for individual specialization. The third tier standards have not yet been determined or released[17]. The Green Building Certification Institute has an education provider program that provide seminars and lectures to prepare candidates to take and pass the LEED Exams.
International initiatives
With many countries either having, or being in the process of developing domestic assessment methods, international exchanges and coordination have being increasingly evident.
In 1997, for example, the International Organization for Standardization’s Technical Committee 59 (ISO TC59) - Building Construction resolved to establish an ad hoc group to investigate the need for standardized tools within the field of sustainable building. This subsequently evolved and was formalized as Sub-Committee ISO T59/SC17 – Sustainability in building construction – the scope of which includes the issues that should be taken into account within building environmental assessment methods.
In Europe, under European Committee for Standardization's TC350 -Sustainability of Construction Works, a consensus-building process that relates to other standards (ISO) and harmonizes existing approaches was launched. These standards shall enable the exchange of sustainability information related to internationally traded products and services.
Facts
It is estimated that the value of green building construction is projected to increase to $60 billion by 2010. By 2009, 82% of corporate America is expected to be greening at least 16% of their real estate portfolios; of these corporations, 18% will be greening more than 60% of their real estate portfolios. The green building market is estimated to be worth $30–$40 billion annually by the year 2010. By 2010, approximately 10% of commercial construction starts are projected to be green. According to a 2006 McGraw-Hill Smart Market report, every business day, $464 million worth of construction registers with LEED.
Since 2000, USGBC's membership has more than quadrupled. Currently, there are 19,957 member organizations including corporations, government agencies, non-profits and others from throughout the industry. Over 5 billion square feet of commercial building space is involved with LEED green building certification system. Construction yields an annual output of U.S. $4.6 trillion, contributing to 8-10% of the global GDP encompassing a workforce of 120 million people and billions of transactions each day. Comprises 13.4% of $13.2 trillion US GDP. This includes all commercial, residential and infrastructure construction. Commercial and residential building construction constitutes 6.1% of GDP.
Buildings represent 38.9% of US primary energy use. Building are one of the heaviest consumers of natural resources and account for a significant portion of the greenhouse gas emissions that effect climate change. In the US, buildings account for 38% of all CO2 emissions. Building represent 72% of US consumption. Building use 13.6% of all potable water, or 15 trillion gallons per year. Buildings use 40% of raw materials globaly (3 billion tons annually).
EPA estimates that 136 million tons of building related construction and demolition debris was generated in the US in a single year. Compare that to 254 million tons of municipal solid waste generated in the same year. The three largest segments for non-residential green building construction - office, education and healthcare will account for more than 80% of total non-residential construction.
See also
- Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
- Design for Environment
- Design Impact Measures
- EcoHomes
- Ecological footprint
- Energy conservation
- EnOcean
- Environmental design
- General Services Administration
- Geosolar
- Geothermal heat pump
- Green Globe
- Greensburg, Kansas - the first city to (re)build from scratch to LEED Platinum standards
- High-Performance Green Buildings
- Passive house
- Permaculture
- Renewable energy
- Sustainable architecture
- Trickle vent
- Triple bottom line
- Zero energy building
- Zero carbon city
Notes
- ^ "Green Building By the Numbers". USGBC. Retrieved 2008-12-01.,
- ^ Kats, Greg (2003). "The Costs and Financial Benefits of Green Buildings: A Report to California's Sustainable Building Task Force" (PDF). Retrieved 2008-10-30.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ "The 2030 Challenge". architecture2030.org.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help)|publisher=
- ^ "LEED Initiatives in Government and Schools".
- ^ "Exemption for LEED Certified Green Buildings".
- ^ "LEED Tax Credits Coming?".
- ^ "Summary of Government LEED Incentives".
- ^ "Public Policy Search".
- ^ http://leed--certification.info/
- ^ "LEED Projects Directory - Certified Project Directory". US Green Building Council. Retrieved 20 November 2008.
- ^ U.S. Green Building Council: LEED
- ^ LEED-NC Version 2.2 Registered Project Checklist
- ^ Burr, Andrew C. (April 23, 2008). "LEED's Big Market Bias". CoStar Group. Retrieved 2008-04-27.
- ^ Canada Green Building Council: Green Building Rating System
- ^ a b Going Green....Is it the 800lb Elephant in the Room?
- ^ Chicago US Green Building Council, Exam Changes
- ^ LEED v3 2009 tiered credentialing explanation
References
- Lucuik, M., Trusty, W., Larsson, N., & Charette, R. (2005). A Business Case for Green Building in Canada: Presented to Industry Canada [Report]. United States Green Building Council.
- Kats, G., Alevantis, L., Berman, A., Mills, E., & Perlman, J. (2003). The Costs and Financial Benefeits of Green Buildings: A Report to California's Sustainable Building Task Force [Report]. United States Green Building Council.
- United States Green Building Council. (2006, August). Foundations of the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, Environmental Rating System, A Tool for Market Transformation [Policy Manual].
- Green Building Facts [Data file]. (n.d.). US Green Building Council. Retrieved June 27, 2009 .
External links
This article's use of external links may not follow Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. (May 2009) |
- LEED at the United States Green Building Council
- SB Alliance
- World Green Building Council
- Canada Green Building Council
- Sustainable Building Alliance
- UNEP-SBCI
- European Committee for Standardization
- GREENLOGIC Chantier Carbone, Care & Bio (French)
- LEED for roads
- LEED for Homes News
Other national rating systems
- South Korea: /Greening Building System
- Japan: CASBEE
- Australia: Nabers / Green Star
- Brazil: AQUA / LEED Brasil
- Canada: LEED Canada/ Green Globes
- China: GB Evaluation standard for green building
- Finland: PromisE
- France: Care & Bio, Chantier Carbone and HQE
- Germany: DGNB
- Hong Kong: HKBEAM
- India: GRIHA (national green rating) and LEED India
- Israel: SI-5281
- Italy: Protocollo Itaca
- Mexico: Consejo Mexicano de Edificación Sustentable
- Netherlands: BREEAM Netherlands
- New Zealand: Green Star NZ
- Portugal: Lider A
- Singapore: Green Mark and Construction Quality Assessment System (CONQUAS â)
- South Africa: Green Star SA
- Spain: VERDE
- Switzerland: Minergie
- United Arab Emirates: Estidama
- United States: LEED/Green Globes
- United Kingdom: BREEAM
- Taiwan: EEWH
- Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes from December 2009
- Articles with minor POV problems from December 2008
- Wikipedia external links cleanup from May 2009
- LEED certified buildings
- Sustainable building
- Sustainable building in the United States
- Low-energy building
- Environment of the United States
- Building engineering
- Energy in the United States
- Environmental design