User talk:Mikko raikkonen

zms,.nmzvmz,vmz/vm

acmz

cfml;cfma; m;flcma afml;acmkalc malhasifghafga

Welcome!

Hello, Mikko raikkonen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Midgrid(talk) 21:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cavapoo, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cavapoo was changed by Mikko raikkonen (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-01-18T23:34:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:34, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Trackball, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Trackball was changed by Mikko raikkonen (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-03-03T23:28:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:28, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Angle of incidence. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Angle of incidence was changed by Mikko raikkonen (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-03-04T02:48:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:48, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Angle of incidence. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Manway (talk) 02:52, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

You're just asking to be blocked, Mikko. We're happy to oblige. -- Jack of Oz ... speak! ... 08:07, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 08:12, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mikko raikkonen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am very sorry for causing this inconvenience. The edit i made to John Howards page was just a joke and if unblocked I will not do any unconstructive edits. As for the other vandalisms, I was experimenting with Wikipedias anti vandalism technology as part of an assignment. P.S in my electorate, the general consensus is that John Howard is a retard and some other things I won't mention.

Decline reason:

I was considering unblocking until I got to that last sentence. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 06:56, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Mikko raikkonen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

That last sentence was my personal view. It does not mean I will change the article title or any part of the article like that again. i was just giving you some background information. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=That last sentence was my personal view. It does not mean I will change the article title or any part of the article like that again. i was just giving you some background information. Sorry for the misunderstanding. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=That last sentence was my personal view. It does not mean I will change the article title or any part of the article like that again. i was just giving you some background information. Sorry for the misunderstanding. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=That last sentence was my personal view. It does not mean I will change the article title or any part of the article like that again. i was just giving you some background information. Sorry for the misunderstanding. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}