Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/April 2010: Difference between revisions
promote 1 |
pr 1 |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Featured list log}} |
{{Featured list log}} |
||
{{TOClimit|3}} |
{{TOClimit|3}} |
||
{{Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of number-one Billboard Top Latin Songs from the 1980s/archive2}} |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Viv Richards/archive1}} |
{{Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Viv Richards/archive1}} |
Revision as of 07:37, 6 April 2010
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 07:37, 6 April 2010 [1].
List of number-one Billboard Top Latin Songs from the 1980s
- Nominator(s): Jaespinoza (talk) 21:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am re-nominating this for featured list because all comments for improvement were adressed. Thanks. Jaespinoza (talk) 21:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mm40 (talk) 20:37, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Mm40 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Mm40 (talk)
This is a very nice list: appealing, engaging, and useful (despite my laundry list of issues above). I'm looking forward to supporting once these are dealt with. Cheers, Mm40 (talk) 15:57, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
Support: a nice list, well presented. Good work. Harrias (talk) 11:09, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support I copy-edited the lead a bit, but could otherwise find nothing to fix. The list meets all of the FL criteria. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:26, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 18:15, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
Resolved comments from Jujutacular T · C 21:26, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comment A weird change in verb usage in the first paragraph: "The data were compiled...", "This data is compiled..." Jujutacular T · C 19:28, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
Support Looks good. Jujutacular T · C 21:26, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 15:31, 3 April 2010 [2].
List of international cricket centuries by Viv Richards
- Nominator(s): Harrias (talk) 09:59, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because we just don't have enough cricket featured lists! Seriously though, another one of these lists of cricket centuries, modelled off those that have gone before. Harrias (talk) 09:59, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just one quick thing (I know nothing about cricket), but should "North Marine Road Ground" (in the ODI centuries table) be "North Marine Road" to match the linked article? I don't care either way, just checking if you do.Mm40 (talk) 21:03, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Done: Changed link. Harrias talk 07:42, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - all looks OK to me -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:04, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 13:35, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;Comments:
|
- Support Looks good. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 01:12, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 20:30, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 20:03, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:30, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – Meets FL standards. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 22:10, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment — Seeing that there is no images in the ODI section, why cant we have the number of balls faced ... I know I'm being annoying but it would be handy, probably more so than Strike rate. —Aaroncrick (talk) 08:14, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Done: added as suggested. Harrias talk 09:04, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support —Aaroncrick (talk) 10:28, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.