Jump to content

Talk:Jennifer Lopez: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Unsupported claims: here's a citation
→‎Unsupported claims: another citation - is that so hard?
Line 20: Line 20:


:::Try this: "The trade magazine ''[[Advertising Age]]'' reported that ''[[People (magazine)|People]]'' magazine was prepared to negotiate between $4 million and $6 million for exclusive U.S. rights to the first photos of the expected twins." Source: Ives, Nat. [http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=125139 "How Much for That Baby on the Cover?"], ''[[Advertising Age]]'' February 18, 2008 -- [[Special:Contributions/207.237.230.157|207.237.230.157]] ([[User talk:207.237.230.157|talk]]) 20:49, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
:::Try this: "The trade magazine ''[[Advertising Age]]'' reported that ''[[People (magazine)|People]]'' magazine was prepared to negotiate between $4 million and $6 million for exclusive U.S. rights to the first photos of the expected twins." Source: Ives, Nat. [http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=125139 "How Much for That Baby on the Cover?"], ''[[Advertising Age]]'' February 18, 2008 -- [[Special:Contributions/207.237.230.157|207.237.230.157]] ([[User talk:207.237.230.157|talk]]) 20:49, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

:::::And here's a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] citation for ''Glee'' -- from Warner Bros. TV itself: [http://extratv.warnerbros.com/2010/01/jennifer_lopez_star_glee_ryan_murphy.php "Jennifer Lopez to Guest-Star on 'Glee'"], ExtraTV.WarnerBros.com, January 18, 2010. --[[Special:Contributions/207.237.230.157|207.237.230.157]] ([[User talk:207.237.230.157|talk]]) 21:05, 11 April 2010 (UTC)


==Date discrepancy==
==Date discrepancy==

Revision as of 21:05, 11 April 2010

Unsupported claims

The citation for the claim that Jennifer is appearing in an episode of Glee is NOT substantiated by the citation, which says only "The 40-year-old actress - who is rumored to be appearing on an upcoming episode of Fox's Glee as the "cafeteria lady"..."

Anything can happen in terms of timing, availability and negotiations. Having this rumored appearance in a filmography -- which by definition is a factual list of appearances -- is shoddy and violates Wikipedia guidelines. -- 207.237.230.157 (talk) 18:40, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The claim that "she became the highest paid Latina actress in Hollywood history" has a citation to AskMen.com that does not say this. This article appears to be rife with unsupported claims. --207.237.230.157 (talk) 16:59, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yet another. NOTHING in the two citations for People magazine supposedly paying $6 million for baby pictures ACTUALLY SAYS THAT.
Why is this article protected? What's it being protected from? Accuracy? Citations that actually say what they claim? --207.237.230.157 (talk) 20:40, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Try this: "The trade magazine Advertising Age reported that People magazine was prepared to negotiate between $4 million and $6 million for exclusive U.S. rights to the first photos of the expected twins." Source: Ives, Nat. "How Much for That Baby on the Cover?", Advertising Age February 18, 2008 -- 207.237.230.157 (talk) 20:49, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And here's a reliable source citation for Glee -- from Warner Bros. TV itself: "Jennifer Lopez to Guest-Star on 'Glee'", ExtraTV.WarnerBros.com, January 18, 2010. --207.237.230.157 (talk) 21:05, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Date discrepancy

In the lead it says "She gained her first regular high-profile job as a "Fly Girl" dancer on the television comedy program In Living Color in 1990.

In the filmography, it says 1991-1993. --207.237.230.157 (talk) 16:40, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]