User talk:Coasterlover1994

Welcome to my talk page. Feel free to place any concerns with any of the edits I have made at the bottom of the page, and I will get back to you in a short time. For an archive of past discussions, please see here.Coasterlover1994^{Leave your mark!}

Thanks...

...for reverting my user page. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 22:38, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

• No problem. I've had my user page vandalized at least twice a day for the past week, so I know what it feels like. Reverting vandalism has its downside... Coasterlover1994^{Leave your mark!} 00:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

M-A92

M-A92 apparently tried to leave a talk message to you on your guestbook. It's all in French, but looks like he might have a valid explanation for what he's been doing with Dalton McGuinty. Bart133 ^{t c @} 05:38, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

• He just moved it to the talk page of your guestbook - looks like he's trying to be constructive. Bart133 ^{t c @} 05:42, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Dalton McGuinty

Bonsoir, j'ai tiens a vous dire que pourquoi? j'ai copier-coller la même page de Dalton McGuinty dans la page Dalton McGuinty, Jr., le saviez-vous que il y a 2 noms Dalton McGuinty, celui qu'il est un ancien député provinciale de la circonscription de Ottawa-South de 1987 à sa mort en 1990 Dalton McGuinty, Sr., dont que, celui vient remplacer son propre en 1990 qu'il vient d'être un nouveau député provinciale de l'Ontario de la circonscription de Ottawa-Sud alors qui devient un chef du Parti libéral de l'Ontario depuis 1996 et il devenit un premier ministre de l'Ontario qui remporte son élection ontarienne depuis 2003 est notamment Dalton McGuinty, Jr.. Dont la page Dalton McGuinty devenit une page de homonymie peut désigner des personnes du même nom et peut'être pendant quelques jours je vais faire une nouvelle page de la biographie Dalton McGuinty (père) sur Wikipedia en francais et vous pouvez voir la page de Discussion Dalton McGuinty (père) seulement en francais.M-A92 (d) 16 juillet 2010 à 00:34 (CEST).Je ne sais pas ecrit in english.

(Translation) Hello, I would like to tell you why? I copy and paste the same page of Dalton McGuinty in the Dalton McGuinty, Jr., did you know that there are two names Dalton McGuinty, that he is a former MLA for the constituency of Ottawa-South from 1987 until his death in 1990 , Dalton McGuinty, Sr., which is that it replaces its own in 1990 it has been a New MLA Ontario riding of Ottawa South, then who becomes a leader of the Liberal Party of Ontario since 1996 and he became a Premier of Ontario who wins Ontario election since 2003 shall include Dalton McGuinty, Jr.. Dalton McGuinty whose page become a disambiguation page can appoint someone of the same name and peut'être few days I'll make a new page in the biography Dalton McGuinty (father) in Wikipedia in french and you can see the page of [ [Discussion Dalton McGuinty (father)]] only in french. A92-M ( d) July 16, 2010 at 00:34 (EST) . I do not know writing in English.

(In English) Alright, I understand what you are trying do do. There are two people named Dalton McGuinty, and searching for that name brings you to Dalton McGuinty, Jr. I started a discussion topic on Talk:Dalton McGuinty that recommends renaming the page to "Dalton McGuinty Jr.", and creating a disambiguation page called "Dalton McGuinty." Hope this will help, Coasterlover1994^{Leave your mark!} 17:23, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

(En français) Bon, je comprends ce que vous voulez faire faire. Il ya deux personnes nommées Dalton McGuinty, et la recherche de ce nom vous amène à Dalton McGuinty, Jr., j'ai commencé un sujet de discussion sur Talk: Dalton McGuinty qui recommande de renommer la page "Dalton McGuinty, Jr.", et la création d'un page d'homonymie appelé "Dalton McGuinty". Espérons que cela aidera, Coasterlover1994^{Leave your mark!} 17:23, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

(In English) Dalton McGuinty was not renamed, however, a note was placed at the top of the page directing people to Dalton  McGuinty, Sr. if they were looking for him. Thanks for bringing that up, Coasterlover1994^{Leave your mark!} 00:28, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

(En français) Dalton McGuinty n'a pas été renommé, toutefois, une note a été placée au sommet de la population de diriger la page Dalton McGuinty, Sr. s'ils étaient à sa recherche. Merci de soulever ce point, Coasterlover1994^{Leave your mark!} 00:28, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Karlosgaona

Hi there, I just saw you delivered him a warning via Huggle because he blanked a page. In that case it was totally ok, because he was the author of this new article. Authors of recently created articles may blank the page so as to request its speedy deletion. Anyway, the article NTI Corporation is up for speedy deletion for other reasons, so it didn't matter. But please be a little careful with dealing out vandalism warnings. Regards, De728631 (talk) 19:15, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

He was removing a deletion template, and I was restoring it. The thought of placing a CSD-G7 evaded me at the moment. A CSD-G4 has since been placed on the page. Sorry about any trouble, Coasterlover1994^{Leave your mark!} 00:16, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Markinch railway station East Side, Buffalo, New York Canarian wrinkly potatoes Markinch, Saskatchewan Lancaster Steiner School Salt potatoes Schwandorf Lancaster High School (Virginia) Don Mancini Shakespeare in the Park New River (Santa Fe River) Kinghorn railway station Delaware Park-Front Park System Central New York Maxine Johnson Awake and Sing! Fashion Outlets of Niagara Falls Lancaster Caramel Company Edward Brodhead Green

Cleanup Alan Lancaster Shakespeare in Delaware Park Avro 684 Merge Crisis (Marxian) University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Ann Wood Henry Add Sources Derby, New York Giant Axe The Storey (Institute) Wikify Buffalo Fire Department John Henry Morgan Windygates Expand 2008 Roses Tournament Queen City FC State University of New York at Brockport

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:00, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

T.G.I.F. Please

Explain how I might better edit the incorrect atrocities with the term "T.G.I.F." I am quite serious. I'd like to know how to best go about this correction. I've many and I do mean many years of academic research in Greek and similar mythology. I'd be delighted to include numerous journals, studies, etc ... As you so boldly accused me of vandalism and poor commenting, elucidate if you will?

The etymology of "Friday" belongs in article Friday. Please see WP:CITATION for info on how to cite sources.   — Jeff G. ツ 04:00, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

I was going to say that, but Jeff G. beat me to it. Enjoy Wikipedia, Coasterlover1994^{Leave your mark!} 04:03, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Tree (data structure) edit: Unconstructive?

I disagree with you that my edit to the article Tree (data structure) was unconstructive. I clarified the parenthetical remark, "(by convention, trees grow down, not up as they do in nature)" to "(by convention, trees grow down, not up as the plants called trees do in nature)". Perhaps you find this a little awkward (as I do) or overly precise (which I don't), but the sentence as originally written is logically weak and more awkward. Literally, it says that trees, meaning tree data structures, grow down, not up as they [tree data structures] do in nature. The logical antecedent of the pronoun "they" is tree data structures: "trees" in the same sense as it was used earlier in the sentence. In nature, tree data structures obviously do not grow at all, or even exist, since they are abstractions. Some specific identification of tree plants (the organisms with woody stems and usually green leaves that collect sunlight energy) is necessary in place of the word "they" in order to correct this literal defect. I attempted to contribute such a replacement; you rejected my contribution (but did not offer an alternative improvement).

Undoubtedly, this is a minor issue, but a high quality encyclopedia is one that pays attention to all details, not one that just avoids glaring errors and omissions. I tried to correct this glitch because it disturbed my continuity of thought and my smooth flow of reading when I came to it. In general, when I find such flaws in Wikipedia, I try to contribute quick fixes for them, as my way of contributing in return for the benefit of free use of the encyclopedia.

I have done my part in pointing out and trying to correct this error. Please either restore my edit, or make another one of your own that addresses the flaw in this sentence (or solicit someone else to do it). I would consider fully satisfactory any change that makes unambiguous, at the literal level, the fact that two completely different concepts of "tree" are being compared here. 141.158.233.114 (talk) 04:06, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Okay, I see your point. What you want to contribute is necessary to the article, but it sounds awkward (which is why I removed it). Post a message on Tree (data structure)'s discussion page that says what you want to do, and see how the community thinks it should be phrased. I apologize for any trouble, Coasterlover1994^{Leave your mark!} 04:15, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

I have to agree with 141.158.233.114 in both points: the original sentence needs improvement, and you should not revert an edit which is not clearly vandalism without an edit comment stating your reasons. In fact, you have done that at least two other times today (I didn't check older contributions), here and here. It is very frustrating when someone else reverts one's edit without giving a reason, this might even turn away new contributors, so please do not do that if it isn't vandalism. Interesting reading on this topic is WP:Reverting and WP:Revert only when necessary.

In the "Tree (data structure)"-case you shouldn't have reverted at all, since the edit didn't make the article worse. In fact, someone might have seen the new formulation and improved it, without removing information. If you find a sentence which doesn't sound good, improve it, but don't remove it only because it doesn't sound good. – Adrianwn (talk) 06:41, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Coasterlover1994, apology accepted. The talk page discussion suggestion was a good one, but no longer necessary: Adrianwn has made an alternate edit that fully satisfies my concerns, sounds not at all awkward, and is even a further improvement. I posted my comments, thanks, and a little of my relevant personal Wikipedian history (which (s)he and/or others may or not be at all interested in) on Adrianwn's talk page here

–Stephen 141.158.233.114 (talk) 10:32, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

@Adrianwn- At the time, it appeared to be unnecessary. Huggle automatically provides a prewritten edit summary, and many administrators, such as Tide rolls, have edit summaries very similar, if not exactly the same, as mine. If you don't believe me, look for yourself. I have read WP:Reverting and follow it as policy. Hope this will help, Coasterlover1994^{Leave your mark!} 22:01, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Brian Williams

Regarding an edit to Brian Williams, here, you mistakenly reverted an edit. Your reversion reintroduced vandalism. It has since been corrected. I would appreciate it if you would correct your comment attributing vandalism to 67.244.89.230 67.244.89.230 (talk) 06:32, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about that. Looks like we may have been trying to do the same thing at the same time, or I looked at the wrong diff. Coasterlover1994^{Leave your mark!} 21:40, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Gary Ablett

You contacted me about Gary Ablett. The information which I wrote about Mr. Ablett was written by me as I have a good knowledge of Gary's time in charge of Stockport County, as misguided as it was. It was not, and never will be, intended to be offensive to Mr. Ablett, I have a trememdous respect for him and have met him on several occasions, and I can assure anyone who is concerned that anyone who ever has the fortune to cross Gary's path will tell you that he is a top, top man with a heart of gold. However, with regards the content i wrote, it cannot be verified as such as all events unfolded without being well documented in an unbiased fashion, as the case almost always is in football. However, I can assure you that it was fact, not ficiton, and I am quite confident that Mr. Ablett would confirm that all content was the truth - for example his daily struggles at work due to a lack of funding and basic equipment; I haven't obtained much of this information from any other source but directly from Gary. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SCFC1883 (talk • contribs) 00:36, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

I reread the changes I reverted, and I remember why I changed it. Articles such as the one you edited have to conform to WP:BLP, and terminology such as "sacked" is not appropriate for any Wikipedia article, let alone a biography. Many other editors on this site would have done the same thing. I hope this will help, Coasterlover1994^{Leave your mark!} 00:42, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Notice

1. Stop abusing automated tools. 2. Read: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Fandraltastic/The_Avengers_%282012_film%29&action=history

Don't edit my page again without comprehension. 67.170.86.33 (talk) 03:28, 25 July 2010 (UTC)