Jump to content

Talk:Renewable energy in China: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Jimrothstein - "added: needs link to article for Energy Research Institute (China)"
Qiaochina (talk | contribs)
Line 11: Line 11:


Therefore I believe the 16% of current electricity is from renewable sources is a misleading figure. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/124.170.98.236|124.170.98.236]] ([[User talk:124.170.98.236|talk]]) 09:00, 7 October 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Therefore I believe the 16% of current electricity is from renewable sources is a misleading figure. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/124.170.98.236|124.170.98.236]] ([[User talk:124.170.98.236|talk]]) 09:00, 7 October 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

I tried the link after the statement "in 2006 17% of china's electricity came from renewable sources" also, it is broken, but if you google the title, this reference can be found: http://www.worldwatch.org/node/5491. And it does said that China obtain 17% of its electricity from renewables in 2007 -- original text is " China currently obtains 8 percent of its energy and 17 percent of its electricity from renewables—shares that are projected to increase to 15 percent and 21 percent by 2020." the 7% in the article at http://english.caijing.com.cn/2009-08-25/110229095.html(8% in the article at http://www.worldwatch.org/node/5491) is the percentage of energy (power) instead of electricity generated by renewables.


== Hydropower in China needs a main article. ==
== Hydropower in China needs a main article. ==

Revision as of 22:27, 7 December 2010

Environmental technology template

I'd like to replace the Environmental technology template with one that matches the standard navbox style, i.e. horizontal instead of vertical, collapsing and typically placed at the bottom of article pages. I've done a mock up of what this would look like at {{User:Jwanders/ET}}. Figured this was a big enough change that I should post before going ahead with it. Please discuss here--jwandersTalk 22:03, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Erroneous information.

the article said in 2006 16% of china's electricity came from renewable sources. i went to check the source, but its a broken link. I googled it and found a newspaper article at http://english.caijing.com.cn/2009-08-25/110229095.html saying 16% is only target set for 2020. As of 2006 only 7 percent of electricity are from renewable sources.

Therefore I believe the 16% of current electricity is from renewable sources is a misleading figure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.170.98.236 (talk) 09:00, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I tried the link after the statement "in 2006 17% of china's electricity came from renewable sources" also, it is broken, but if you google the title, this reference can be found: http://www.worldwatch.org/node/5491. And it does said that China obtain 17% of its electricity from renewables in 2007 -- original text is " China currently obtains 8 percent of its energy and 17 percent of its electricity from renewables—shares that are projected to increase to 15 percent and 21 percent by 2020." the 7% in the article at http://english.caijing.com.cn/2009-08-25/110229095.html(8% in the article at http://www.worldwatch.org/node/5491) is the percentage of energy (power) instead of electricity generated by renewables.

Hydropower in China needs a main article.

The "Hydropower in China" section's "Further information" link only goes to the article on hydropower in general, instead of going to a main article on hydropower in China specifically. This is inconsistent with the rest of the article. For instance, the "Wind Power in China" section does have a main article that is specifically about wind power in China, instead of wind power in general. -66.74.19.201 (talk) 16:37, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What about geothermal power?

The People's Republic of China does have some geothermal power, but also has major plans to introduce much more. This should make a very good section. -67.169.152.121 (talk) 20:02, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

China is now the largest producer of solar panels and wind turbines

Regards, -- 李博杰  | Talk contribs email 23:59, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Minor corrections

I simply corrected the news on 34,5GW planned addition to installed capacity, which was originally noted as MW 24.11.169.140 (talk) 04:20, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Needs article: Energy Research Institute (China)

The article references Energy Research Institute, which needs a section. ERI is part of Chinese National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimrothstein (talkcontribs) 04:26, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]