User talk:Active Banana: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:42, 13 January 2011

Welcome!

hi

erm i'm not good at editting, i cited the article already, why was it removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crystalfriend (talk • contribs) 16:43, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Active Banana, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Laurinavicius (talk) 15:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

For future reference

[1]

[2]

martin bormann

hullo why did you remove my martin bormann in popular culture ref

Sankurathri Foundation in need of monitoring and clean up

To do

Policy Regarding Unsourced Material

"If a claim is doubtful but not harmful, use the ^{[citation needed]} tag, which will add "citation needed," but remember to go back and remove the claim if no source is produced within a reasonable time." Please add the fact tag in the future, instead of simply undoing the changes that have been made.

You can choose to do otherwise, but the policy does suggest that you add fact tags for information that is not harmful. You're free to believe what you want, but it's hard for me to believe that being listed as an associated act is harmful to the article when the article already references that association.

Talkback

Hello, Active Banana. You have new messages at Basuupendra's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Active Banana. You have new messages at Achshar's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Malizia Clinic pics

Hi Banana. I orig. left this article for user:tnxman, thinking that he deleted the images. But actually, commonsdelinker, a bot I presume, deleted it. tnXman did not yet respond, so I'm posting this to your talk page. Thank you.

You deleted two jpg files: Malizia-clinic-CT-imaging-suite.jpg and Malizia-clinic-exterior.jpg

These files were not copyright violations. They are pics from my personal collection which were not used on the Malizia Clinic site. I am a friend of the marketing dir. at the clinic and those pics are mine. Please check again. The pics are part of that same set, but they are unpublished. If you look carefully at malizia.org, you will see that the ones I uploaded were not the same as the ones on the site. Thank you. 1weezie23 (talk) 12:13, 17 September 2010 (UTC

Reason put by u was wrong

This is in response to ur message osted on 8th october. i had no time to reply.

by the way i have no obsession with the "nickname" and moreover superstar is not a nickname but a title conferred out of respect and admiration for his varied performances given by critics.

its u who had unnecessarily edited and written he is called a superstar cause of he had maddest fan following among female fans.

the entertainment one india article is actually talking about why he still remains the biggest superstar-- for that that was cited as the reason.Read the lines from the artcile ---"Why since four long decades 'Kakaji's' superstar status is still not passed on? Because he had the biggest and the maddest fan following, especially his female fans."---http://entertainment.oneindia.in/bollywood/interviews/2009/rajesh-khanna-interview-100609.html.

but why superstar he is called for that the reason is he was called as superstar by critics for his performances beginning with aradhana and giving consecutive 15 hits, then giving critically acclaimed box office hits continuously and consistently if not consecutively!!these reasons needent be mentioned as they are covered at various places.it need not be repeated so stop raising this issue. the artcile didnt need that wrong reson as put by u. infact i had no problems with the artcile untill 8th october ....as article looks pretty good.

Re: External links

I misinterpreted the bit about other official links, I suppose. Her Twitter is linked from her MySpace, so it is findable from an official source. Plus, her Twitter is used as a reference—for one of the very limited cases where a self-published source is acceptable—so there is a link to it within the article. However, minimizing the number of external links is different from WP:ELNO, which covers links to be avoided—and that's a large part of why I re-added the link on sight. —C.Fred (talk) 00:35, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pamela Geller

Hey,

I'm monitoring this page and will help you deal with that pesky IP. NickCT (talk) 15:53, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:96.231.31.238_reported_by_User:NickCT_.28Result:_.29 NickCT (talk) 16:08, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:MissBarkley, Taylor Swift, Kanye West, and Beyonce Knowles, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MissBarkley (talk) 22:55, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Annoying Orange

I used Grapefruit just as an example. I could have said 'Knife' or 'Liam' - would you have then removed those? What is your criteria for "trivial"? Far but no Cigar (talk) 15:22, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is the evidence that 'Knife' or 'Liam' are not trivial? Again, What is your criteria for "trivial"? I can go looking for some sources, but I need to understand what the standard is, first. Far but no Cigar (talk) 15:35, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shearography

You forgot to check the Google News Archives -- plenty of stuff there. Someone else has already removed the PROD, though. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:43, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Otaki Forks Article

By the sounds of it you have not actually been to Tararua Forest Park or Otaki forks, they are differet and a seperate page for each is appropriate.

Yeah its the main way through to the Tararua Forest. The Tararua forest is a FORREST compared to Otaki Forks which is a visitor and tourist location. Have you been there? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Postitnz (talk • contribs) 01:14, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing the tone is hardly an issue and can be fixed easily. In what way is it not properly sourced? Its sourced with New Zealand goverment information, I can hardly think of a better source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Postitnz (talk • contribs) 01:22, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Although In revisting the article there is no adjectives which are relative. Only facts, about what is there. So I don't see the issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Postitnz (talk • contribs) 01:24, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Every article on Wikipedia must be based upon verifiable statements from multiple third-party reliable sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." I'm sorry but in what way does the goverment be innaccturate in its facts when it has Rangers working out there day to day updating information on the land? Postitnz (talk) 01:31, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alright ok, I don't think I can meet these standards with both my pages on Otaki Forks and Colonial Knob. HOw do i delete these pages? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Postitnz (talk • contribs) 01:52, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Put {{db-author}} at the top of the page that you want to be deleted. →♠Gƒoley↔Four♣← 01:54, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps a little gentler approach with this obviously good faith new editor would have been desirable. I think Postitnz has been thoroughly and unfairly bitten. I hope s/he has not been scared off Wikipedia forever. LadyofShalott 04:42, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see the good faith attempt now. However, the original posting of the user was asking for advice on a talkpage of a user account that was created specifically to add promotional content to Wikipedia for their paying clients. I assumed incorrectly at that point that it was a client attempting self promotion. Active Banana (^bananaphone 04:45, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So the user was punished for mistakenly asking advice from the wrong user. LadyofShalott 04:48, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that might be the case. And I hope that I will not make such incorrect assumptions in the future.Active Banana (^bananaphone 04:55, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. (I've been known to jump to the wrong conclusion before as well; I made one of the comments on my user page as a direct result of my own goof of a similar nature.) LadyofShalott 05:04, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barbie

Hello, Active Banana. You have new messages at Talk:Barbie.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Siawase (talk) 05:03, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LeShaun

I just wandered by, and it seems as if you may have missed that a 2-edit IP came and futzed with the name (in the infobox and lede) since this AfD began. I don't know if the sources I've mentioned are ones you've considered, but if you're looking for a LeShaun Thompson and not finding sources, that might be part of the reason, try LeShaun Williams or LeShaun Toreau Williams. Or perhaps, in looking through this as quickly as I have, I'm confused (quite possible, in fact!), but I figured I'd at least give you the friendly heads-up. Cheers! --j⚛e decker ^talk 07:53, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SkyCable

Why do you keep considering Channel Line-up as a program schedule, geez. G8crash3r | Talk 20:17, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you really onto it? G8crash3r | Talk 20:31, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTDIR does not explictly states channels numbers. Why part of that can't you understand. G8crash3r | Talk 20:34, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

again, cut me some slack and leave the article alone. G8crash3r | Talk 20:35, 23 December 2010 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by G8crash3r (talk • contribs)

know what active banana, since you're onto it, you can just delete the article, the purpose of having those channel numbers is for informational purposes only and is being done out of good faith, if you think its improper to have it, delete the article then and i will take the article somewhere else where everyone can write anything without being judged as improper. I guess being friendly to authors has also died in Wikipedia. G8crash3r | Talk 20:44, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SB edit summaries etc.

Thanks. Rich Farmbrough, 00:22, 24 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Regine Velasquez page

Russart 1999 keeps putting back unsourced and biased claims in the article. he even sends me a warning but it's him who keeps vandalising the pages of Regine Velasquez, Regine Velasquez discography, and List of best-selling albums in the Philippines. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.201.85.147 (talk) 12:16, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up

Appears to be blocked as an IP sock puppet. I have a good idea who this is, the guy is a serial disruptive sock puppeteer. Wee Curry Monster talk 21:03, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The breaker

Hi. Questions about The Breaker (manhwa).

Why did you remove the link The official webpage of the artist Park Jin-Hwan (Kamaro). Yes, it1`s a blog, but it's also ofiialny site authors manhva, that they write news about The breaker.
Why did you remove the links The Breaker - Television Tropes and Idioms and http://thebreaker.wikia.com/wiki/The_Breaker_Wiki ?
Why did you remove "The Breaker (Part I)" and "The Breaker: New waves (Part II)"? It`s a summary. Амель (talk) 05:59, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

good day

Russart 1999 has given you a LOL ipop! This horrible pun and delicious candy promotes WikiLove and tells the world how low you will stoop for the sake of humor. Spread WikiLove by giving someone else a lollipop, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the unrelenting joy of lollipops by adding {{subst:Lollipop}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

how can i know if the sources that i put is not reliable?

Thanks

Thanks for the info. That was indeed the right rationale. Cheers.Griswaldo (talk) 16:27, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Lovejoy

Hey just a heads up, might want to be a little more careful when tagging articles. You tagged Ben Lovejoy, a professional ice hockey player in the NHL with {{notability}}. Grsz 11 02:42, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Salman Khan

Hi Active Banana. That'd be great if you can specify where citations are required so I can find and fix them. I very good with finding references. Thank you very much. Regards, Scieberking (talk) 20:28, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

12th Planet (musician)

Hi There-

The two magazine articles you are questioning use the interview with the artist himself as a resource. Any quotes or "sparkly language" were not used as resources for what is on the Sandbox page. Also, I see many other wikipedia articles for various musicians that use magazine interviews and URB.com as resources. I am simply confused as to why THESE musicians have wikipedia pages, as 12th Planet has equally as many (if not more) notability criteria, releases, etc.

I am curious to see if creating a new page as 12th Planet (musician) would work on wikipedia. That way there is no confusion with Stitchin's work, and no need to correct a redirect.

Thanks, Dambuleff (talk) 03:36, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Its Supposed to Have Seasons

It is supposed to have 2 seasons so please stop getting rid of the seasons. Gabriel Easteron 08:42 January 9, 2011. —Preceding undated comment added 19:42, 8 January 2011 (UTC).[reply]

You reverted my edit

Sir, I could not understand why "Teheleka" was not considered as a standardize published magazine by you??? The writings in Wikipedia are like in a way as if it is proved that Mr. Haji Nurul was organizing the riot..while there was not even a single FIR filed against him. Does not it affecting neutrality of page?? There are different views regarding this event and none are proved. TEHELEKA is one of the renowned magazine of India. So I request you to consider Teheleka as a standard source. Even, I did not delete other view. I kept both. Pramame (talk) 15:19, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, Sorry to say, but I think you are using unnecessary jugglery of language to deceive wiki. I doubt your neutrality. Teheleka nowhere told that they spread false news. While a page can exist in wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Fernandes just due to Teheleka stinged him, then why can't Teheleka can be taken as reference?? Pramame (talk) 15:36, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Brisbane Floods

Look, I understand you think I'm forking the page, but I'm not. To prove it, I invite you to merge the content back with the original page, and reverse the fork that way, rather than deleting the list of missing persons lists. As long as the information goes SOMEWHERE, I am happy.

159.223.28.79 (talk) 17:43, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it might appear that I'm in an edit war. So I give up.

It's your problem now.

You'll be the one on record as having deleted important information in a time of crisis. It's just a shame that tomorrow morning when people start looking for their loved ones, Wikipedia will have it's editorial integrity intact, rather than useful information about where they are. 159.223.28.79 (talk) 18:06, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you GET it? All those sites are DOWN. "Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia", we don't have to wait for it to be history. There are people dead and missing. These are facts, not opinion. I can see floodwaters out my window. The minister is saying this stuff on TV. I will get you proper academic references LATER, but for the moment all we have is the Queensland Police Twitter/Facebook feed. 159.223.28.79 (talk) 18:06, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, this above IP is now WP:DUCK blocked. DMacks (talk) 19:02, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As stated elsewere, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Not a disaster relief coordination center. Not a emergency alert system. Not a memorial site for the dead nor a social networking site to find lost people. Not therapy for you to feel like you are doing something to help while you are in what must be a difficult personal situation. You would be better off directing your efforts to enhance a site that actually is dedicated to one of those purposes rather than being repeatedly wasting your efforts attempting to turn wikipedia into something it is not. Active Banana (^bananaphone 19:32, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

George H. Moody Middle School

Thanks for the edits. It seems you more or less agree with me. --John (talk) 20:53, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And that's an end to that.

Buh-bye, Mr IP address. HalfShadow 21:46, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Protection

If you have a problem like this again, you can go directly to my user talk. I may or may not be there, but if I am I'll do it ASAP :P NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 01:28, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pooky Quesnel. Steve Dufour (talk) 16:45, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers

Thanks for the welcome Active Banana, though I'm not particularly new! Still feels nice though. --Physics is all gnomes (talk) 21:55, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IP 61.135.195.128

Hi,

Recently you posted a level 3 vandalism warning on 61.135.195.128 when I had posted a LV 3 right before that. I was wondering if you could go back and change that to a LV 4. I have a feeling this IP is gonna vandalize again and I want to get it blocked the next time that happens. Thanks! Bped1985 (talk) 22:38, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Active Banana. You have new messages at Bped1985's talk page.
Message added 23:02, 12 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

George H. Moody Middle School

This article has more problems. Many editors have already abandoned it. It needs serious help. 74.110.198.236 (talk) 02:33, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HALO

I should ask the same question to you why do u remove pictures in Hindi cinema and Telugu cinema??? and if I add a pic which is essential film during golden age of Indian cinema you remove that pic and u ask why do I remove pics??? you are a vandalism oriented user so u please stop dictating articles. (Padmalakshmisx (talk) 15:33, 13 January 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

CONTD: HALO

I am adding images which are accepted by wikipedia you are no wikipedia administrator - i have the right to call people who just delete sources or matter just because they think it is wrong i am going to put the image in golden age of indian cinema so you respect peoples borders please dont message me (Padmalakshmisx (talk) 15:42, 13 January 2011 (UTC)).[reply]