Talk:Chasing Vermeer: Difference between revisions
Glimmer721 (talk | contribs) nominating for GA |
Derild4921 (talk | contribs) →Awards section: new section |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
I'm deleting the review section, since it is not cited and was probably put up by one of the members. [[User:Mew Mitsuki|Mew Mitsuki]] ([[User talk:Mew Mitsuki|talk]]) 13:27, 5 November 2008 (UTC) |
I'm deleting the review section, since it is not cited and was probably put up by one of the members. [[User:Mew Mitsuki|Mew Mitsuki]] ([[User talk:Mew Mitsuki|talk]]) 13:27, 5 November 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Awards section == |
|||
I think that the awards section would be better organized as a table, like [[When You Reach Me#Awards and nominations|this]]. [[User:Derild4921|<span style="color:blue">Derild</span>]][[User talk:Derild4921|<span style="color:red">49</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Derild4921|<span style="color:green">21</span>]][[User:Derild4921/Guestbook|<span style="color:orange">☼</span>]] 00:11, 1 February 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:11, 1 February 2011
Chasing Vermeer is currently a Literature good article nominee. Nominated by Glimmer721 talk at 01:03, 31 January 2011 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer.
|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Chver.jpg
Image:Chver.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Review
I'm deleting the review section, since it is not cited and was probably put up by one of the members. Mew Mitsuki (talk) 13:27, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Awards section
I think that the awards section would be better organized as a table, like this. Derild4921☼ 00:11, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees on review
- B-Class novel articles
- Low-importance novel articles
- WikiProject Novels articles
- B-Class children and young adult literature articles
- Mid-importance children and young adult literature articles
- B-Class Chicago articles
- Low-importance Chicago articles
- WikiProject Chicago articles