Jump to content

User talk:Snowolf: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SuggestBot (talk | contribs)
SuggestBot recommends these articles...
Reversion: new section
Line 101: Line 101:


If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on [[User_talk:SuggestBot|SuggestBot's talk page]]. Regards from [[User:Nettrom|Nettrom]] ([[User talk:Nettrom|talk]]), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- [[User:SuggestBot|SuggestBot]] ([[User talk:SuggestBot|talk]]) 20:01, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on [[User_talk:SuggestBot|SuggestBot's talk page]]. Regards from [[User:Nettrom|Nettrom]] ([[User talk:Nettrom|talk]]), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- [[User:SuggestBot|SuggestBot]] ([[User talk:SuggestBot|talk]]) 20:01, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

== Reversion ==

? Did you read my edit summary, or the linked article? The article is engaging in [[WP:SYNTHESIS]]. [[Special:Contributions/86.26.60.18|86.26.60.18]] ([[User talk:86.26.60.18|talk]]) 02:08, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:08, 19 February 2011

Snowolf's talk page
Snowolf (talk botwiki u:space admin scout npw vp)

Important! – please read the following before reporting a mistake of mine:

  1. I do make mistakes while reverting vandalism. The following talk page will be probably full of correct complains, but please take into account the high number of reverts I make every day. It's still only a small percentage of my antivandalism work.
  2. Don't be angry. If I reverted an edit from you which I shouldn't have, I'm really sorry. If you (as I kindly ask you to) warn me of my mistake here, I'll remove my warning from your talk page and I'll be happy to present you my apologies.
  3. Please create a new section for every report (to do so, click here). It helps keep everything in order.
  4. Remember to sign your comment by adding ~~~~ (four tildes) at its end. It helps identifying who made the report.
  5. State clearly which article is the one you're talking about, if you can, a diff (link to the difference between my edit and yours) would be very helpful.
  6. I'll always reply on your talk page. That's because this page is archived every day (which means that section where the last comments is older than one day get removed). If you're an IP and you wish me to answer here, state this in your message, but remember to check the archives if you can't find my message.
  7. I'm not a bot, nor using any fully-automated tools to revert vandalism. I do assure you so.

I do read messages on this talk page as soon as they're posted, if I'm around, but I'll probably answer them later.

Your friend
User:Snowolf
Note to fellow vandalfighters: please do not revert vandalism left here, as long as it doesn't remove others' comments or break something. Thanks.


The Signpost: 7 February 2011

User:Snowolf/LO2

User:Snowolf/LO2 is showing up in a lot of article space categories.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 09:07, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 February 2011

Added template for SuggestBot

Hi,

Thanks for being one of SuggestBot's users! I hope you have found the bot's suggestions useful.

We are in the process of switching from our previous list-based signup process to using templates and userboxes, and I have therefore added the appropriate template to your user talk page. You should receive the first set of suggestions within a day, and since we'll be automating SuggestBot you will from then on continue to receive them regularly at the desired frequency.

We now also have a userbox that you can use to let others know you're using SuggestBot, and if you don't want to clutter your user talk page the bot can post to a sub-page in your userspace. More information about the userbox and usage of the template is available on User:SuggestBot/Getting Recommendations Regularly.

If there are any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch with me on my user talk page. Thanks again, Nettrom (talk) 21:04, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

speedy deletion

You have not explained why Robert Pitcairn (antiquary) fails WP:N criteria, please do that or restore the article. Robert Pitcairn (antiquary) has a notice in the DNB, as noted in the references, they are notable. cygnis insignis 13:45, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That is how they are noted in the Dictionary of National Biography, which was in the article. Restore the article and nominate it for deletion, it makes the assertion of notability and is not a valid candidate for speedy deletion. cygnis insignis 14:04, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • The DNB editor thinks he is notable as an antiquary! the article showed that and so does the abstract, your opinion of this is irrelevant. You seem to indicate he probably is notable, so you know it will pass through AfD, but take the discussion there instead if you want to waste more time on this. cygnis insignis 14:19, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Villa Giusti
Guarino da Verona
Fifth toe
Palazzo Canossa
Encyclopedia Titanica
Meg Johnson
Jim Jess
Emilio Vedova
Zlata Filipović
Byun Sung-Hwan
India Inc.
Fentiman's Curiosity Cola
Michele da Verona
Santa Maria Antica
Mazenzele
Carlo Ridolfi
Antonio Elenetti
Gale
Centropogon zamorensis
Cleanup
Barbiellini
Zack Martin
The ten families
Merge
History of American Samoa
Heaven
Song cycle
Add Sources
Alberto I della Scala
Battle of Pastrengo
House of Scaliger
Wikify
Rita Kassabian
Charles A.E. Harriss
Verona, North Carolina
Expand
Roman theatre, Verona
Historic centre of Florence
Cervia

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:01, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion

? Did you read my edit summary, or the linked article? The article is engaging in WP:SYNTHESIS. 86.26.60.18 (talk) 02:08, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]