User talk:Ynhockey: Difference between revisions
MeekSaffron (talk | contribs) |
MeekSaffron (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 429: | Line 429: | ||
A month ago you watchlisted Geography of Israel since multiple IPs were changing measurements without explanation. That article's been fine. |
A month ago you watchlisted Geography of Israel since multiple IPs were changing measurements without explanation. That article's been fine. |
||
However, 30 St Mary Axe [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=30_St_Mary_Axe&action=history (history)] has had multiple IPs removing sourced |
However, 30 St Mary Axe [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=30_St_Mary_Axe&action=history (history)] has had multiple IPs removing its sourced "erotic" nicknames with no explanation on Oct 21, Dec 9, Mar 16, 22, Apr 8, 14, and 21. On one of my reverts, my edit summary noted "rv removal without explanation again. All are reliable sources (BBC, Architectural Record (whose June 2004 magazine back issue has an article on the building), and The Spectator". There's no discussion of the subject on the article's talk page and 2 others besides me have reverted the removal over the months, which I just now realized has been going on since last year. Would you semi-protect the article for a period, should I request it from RFPP, or would you suggest another idea? [[User:MeekSaffron|MeekSaffron]] ([[User talk:MeekSaffron|talk]]) 20:49, 21 April 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:02, 21 April 2011
Welcome to my talk page. Here you can leave any messages you want for me. I don't reply on this page however, and will post a reply on your own talk page (unless you don't have one or I wish to leave a message for other readers as well). To make it easier for me, please have a talk link in your signature.
Also, while I accept or even welcome criticism (as you can see, there's some on the page and/or its archives), I will delete any personal attacks. Please don't bother.
This is Ynhockey's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
![]() |
---|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 |
When would I be able to contact you on Skype?
Hi there again. I was hoping to discuss some minor issue with you. When would you be available? TheCuriousGnome (talk) 15:58, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Pushpin map in Template:Infobox civilian attack
I tried to add this feature to that infobox with no luck. Maybe you'll succeed? TheCuriousGnome (talk) 19:30, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Bước nhảy hoàn vũ
Could you remember to help me create Bước nhảy hoàn vũ (season 2)? Please! TanPhat Nguyen talk- -contrb 04:14, 28 March 2011 (UTC).
Extended content
|
---|
{{Infobox television | show_name = Bước nhảy hoàn vũ | image = [[Image:dwts vn.jpg|250px]] | caption = Bước nhảy hoàn vũ logo | show_name_2 = | genre = [[Reality television]] | format = | creator = | developer = [[Vietnam Television|VTV]] | writer = | director = | creative_director = | presenter = [[Thanh Bạch]] & The other to be announced | starring = see below | judges = Nguyễn Quang Dũng<br/> Lê Hoàng<br/> Khánh Thy<br/> Chí Anh | voices = | narrated = | theme_music_composer = | opentheme = | endtheme = | composer = | country = {{flagcountry|Vietnam}} | language = [[Vietnamese language|Vietnamese]] | num_seasons = | num_episodes = 10 | list_episodes = | executive_producer = [[Lại Văn Sâm]] | producer = | editor = | location = | cinematography = | camera = [[multi-camera]] | runtime = 90-120 min. | company = Cát Tiên Sa Production | distributor = | channel = [[Vietnam Television|VTV3]] | picture_format = | audio_format = | first_run = | first_aired = April 17 | last_aired = July 03, 2011 | status = | preceded_by = [[Bước nhảy hoàn vũ (season 1)|Season 1]] | followed_by = | related = [[Strictly Come Dancing]]<br/> [[Dancing with the Stars]] | website = http://www.buocnhayhoanvu.com | production_website = }} '''''Bước nhảy hoàn vũ 2011''''' is the second season of ''[[Bước nhảy hoàn vũ]]'' produced by [[Vietnam Television]] and Cat Tien Sa Productions based upon the [[BBC Worldwide]]'s ''[[Dancing witht he Stars]]''. The first show is set to air on VTV3 with 10 celebrities. The judges from the previous season and Thanh Bạch will return.<ref name="TTVH's">[http://thethaovanhoa.vn/135N20110311115306540T0/buoc-nhay-hoan-vu-2011-thuy-tien-vu-thu-phuong-se-so-tai.htm"Bước nhảy hoàn vũ 2011: Thủy Tiên, Vũ Thu Phương... sẽ so tài"], ''Thể Thao & Văn Hóa'', by: Dương Vân Anh, date: 2011-03-11.</ref> Thanh Vân, however, does not return due to pregnancy and she will be soon replaced according to the producers.<ref name="ngoisao1">[http://ngoisao.net/news/hau-truong/2011/03/164258-thanh-thuy-kim-hien-thi-buoc-nhay-hoan-vu/"Thanh Thúy, Kim Hiền thi Bước nhảy hoàn vũ"], ngoisao.net, by: Hàn Quốc Việt, date: 2011-03-22.</ref> Phan Anh, Thủy Tiên, [[Vũ Thu Phương]], and Trương Ngọc Tình are the first four faces to appear in the competition,<ref name="TTVH's"/> but right later two male celebrities confirmed they are no longer joining the cast member.<ref>[http://bee.net.vn/channel/3522/201103/MC-Phan-anh-Ngoc-Tinh-lo-hen-voi-Buoc-Nhay-Hoan-Vu-1793177/"MC Phan Anh, Ngọc Tình lỡ hẹn với Bước nhảy hoàn vũ"], bee.net.vn, by: Tuấn Khoa, date: 2011-03-16.</ref> Afterwards, [[Thu Minh]], [[Huy Khánh]], [[Đại Nghĩa]], [[Phạm Anh Khoa]], Kim Hiền and Thanh Thúy are confirmed to participate.<ref name="TN's1">[http://www.thanhnien.com.vn/Pages/20110318/Buoc-nhay-hoan-vu-nong-tro-lai.aspx"Bước nhảy hoàn vũ nóng trở lại"], ''Thanh Niên Online'', by: Dạ Ly, date: 2011-03-18.</ref><ref name="ngoisao1"/> Professionals Anna Silova and Tisho Gavrilov will also return for one more season.<ref name="TN's1"/> == Couples == {| class="wikitable sortable" align=center border="2" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" style="text-align:left; font-size:95%" |- ! Celebrity ! Occupation ! Professional Partner ! Status |-align=center | {{sort|Hien, Kim|Kim Hiền}} | [[Actress]] | |bgcolor="lightblue"| Participating |-align=center | {{sort|Khanh, Huy Tran|Trần Huy Khánh}} | [[Actor]] & former [[Model]] | |bgcolor="lightblue"| Participating |-align=center | {{sort|Khoa, Anh Pham|Phạm Anh Khoa}} | Rock [[Recording artist|Recording Artist]] | |bgcolor="lightblue"| Participating |-align=center | {{sort|Minh, Thu Vu|Vũ Thu Minh}} | Dance/Pop [[Recording artist|Recording Artist]] | |bgcolor="lightblue"| Participating |-align=center | {{sort|Nghia, Dai Bui|Bùi Đại Nghĩa}} | [[Comedy|Comedic]] [[Actor]] | |bgcolor="lightblue"| Participating |-align=center | {{sort|Phuong, Thu Vu|Vũ Thu Phương}} | [[Actress]] & [[Model]] | |bgcolor="lightblue"| Participating |-align=center | {{sort|Tien, Thuy Tran|Trần Thị Thủy Tiên}} | [[Recording artist|Recording Artist]] | |bgcolor="lightblue"| Participating |-align=center | {{sort|Thuy, Thanh Le|Lê Thị Thanh Thúy}} | [[Drama|Dramatic]] [[Actress]] | |bgcolor="lightblue"| Participating |-align=center | {{sort||}} | | |bgcolor="lightblue"| Participating |-align=center | {{sort||}} | | |bgcolor="lightblue"| Participating |- |} == Scoring Chart == <!--IN ORDER OF: Lê Hoàng - Khánh Thi - Ng. Quang Dũng - Chí Anh--> {| class="wikitable sortable" align="center" ! Couples ! Place ! 1 ! 2 ! 3 ! 4 ! 5 ! 6 ! 7 ! 8 ! 9 ! 10 |-align=center | | | | | | | | | | | | |-align=center | | | | | | | | | | | | |-align=center | | | | | | | | | | | | |-align=center | | | | | | | | | | | | |-align=center | | | | | | | | | | | | |-align=center | | | | | | | | | | | | |-align=center | | | | | | | | | | | | |-align=center | | | | | | | | | | | | |-align=center | | | | | | | | | | | | |-align=center | | | | | | | | | | | | |- |} :<span style="color:red;">''Red numbers''</span> indicate the lowest score for each week. :<span style="color:green;">'''Green numbers'''</span> indicate the highest score for each week. :{{colorbox|gold}} indicates the winning couple. :{{colorbox|silver}} indicates the runner-up couple. :{{colorbox|tan}} indicates the third-place couple. :{{colorbox|#FFA6C9}} indicates the favorite couple of the week :{{colorbox|#E0B0FF}} indicates the favorite couple of the week that was in the bottom two :{{colorbox|orange}} indicates the couple eliminated that week. :{{colorbox|lightblue}} indicates the returning couple that finished in the bottom two. :{{colorbox|lightgreen}} indicates the returning couple that was the last to be called safe (they may or may have not been in the bottom two). |
Please share your knowledge in the discussion page. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 19:46, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
WikiCup 2011 March newsletter
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cd/Trophy.png)
We are half way through round two of the WikiCup, which will end on 28 April. Of the 64 current contestants, 32 will make it through to the next round; the two highest in each pool, and the 16 next highest scorers. At the time of writing, our current overall leader is Hurricanehink (submissions) with 231 points, who leads Pool H.
Piotrus (submissions) (Pool G) also has over 200 points, while 9 others (three of whom are in Pool D) have over 100 points. Remember that certain content (specifically, articles/portals included in at least 20 Wikipedias as of 31 December 2010 or articles which are considered "vital") is worth double points if promoted to good or featured status, or if it appears on the main page in the Did You Know column. There were some articles last round which were eligible for double points, but which were not claimed for. For more details, see Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring.
A running total of claims can be seen here. However, numerous competitors are yet to score at all- please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. The number of points that will be needed to reach round three is not clear- everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 01:13, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
GOCE drive newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors March 2011 backlog elimination drive report
Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors March 2011 Backlog elimination drive. Thank you for participating in the March 2011 drive! This newsletter summarizes the March drive and other recent events.
![]() There were 99 signups for the drive; of these, 70 participated. Interest was high mainly due to a link to our event from the Watchlist page. We had a record-breaking 84 articles listed on the Requests page in March; 11 of these have been promoted to Good article status so far. Several of our recent efforts have received Featured Article status as well, and the GOCE is becoming a solid resource for the Wikipedia community. Many thanks to editors who have been helping out at the Requests page and by copy editing articles from the backlog.
Remarkable progress was made in reducing the backlog this month, as we now have fewer than 500 articles remaining from 2009. We are well under the 4,000-article mark for the total number remaining in the queue. Since our backlog drives began in May 2010 with 8,323 articles, we have cleared more than 53% of the backlog. A complete list of results and barnstars awarded can be found here. Barnstars will be distributed over the next week. If you enjoyed participating in our event, you may also like to join the Wikification drives, which are held on alternate months to our drives. Their April drive has started.
On March 21, SMasters appointed Chaosdruid (talk) and Torchiest (talk) as Guild coordinators to serve in place of The Utahraptor, who recently stepped down. Please feel free to contact any coordinator if you have any questions or need assistance. Your drive coordinators – S Masters (talk), Diannaa (Talk) and Tea with toast (Talk) |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 14:40, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi
I see you have changed {{Lang-he-n}} back [1]. Since this template is intended for fixing Hebrew text on Internet Explorer, it should not affect users of other browsers. With your revert, it does again.
I have carefully set my browser to using a serif Hebrew font, but now, text in {{Lang-he-n}} disrupts my browser settings and appears in Microsoft Sans Serif, a font I do not like at all.
I understand that Kwami's merger of {{Lang-he-n}} into {{lang|he}}
was not a good idea. But how about the following:
1. Create a new class="script-hebrew-n" in {{Lang-he-n}}:
<span dir="rtl" class="script-hebrew-n" font-size:125%;' lang="he" xml:lang="he">{{{1}}}</span>{{#if:{{{lit|}}}|, ''[[literal translation|lit.]]'' {{{lit}}}}}
2. Move the explicit font definitions from {{Lang-he-n}} to MediaWiki:Common.css/WinFixes.css:
.script-hebrew-n { font-family:"SBL Hebrew", david, narkisim, "Microsoft Sans Serif"; }
Like this, nothing changes for Internet Explorer users, but users of other browsers no longer suffer from this Internet Explorer fix. -- machᵗᵃˡᵏ👍 11:54, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- I see now that the problem is not only IE, but also Firefox on Mac OS X. I have filed a bug for Firefox: Bug 648248 - Buggy Hebrew fallback font on Mac OS X (you might want to subscribe/comment/rate this bug so it gets more importance and will be fixed sooner).
- As far as I can see, Safari on Mac OS X and Chrome on Mac OS X have a correct display of Hebrew text. Is this correct? Apart from Windows browsers and Firefox on Mac OS X, are other browsers affected as well?
- In the future, when the problem of Firefox on Mac OS X is solved, the explicit font specifications should be moved to MediaWiki:Common.css/WinFixes.css so they no longer adversely affect other users (as they keep doing now).
- In the meantime, I beg you to please reinstall the class="hebrew-script" in {{Lang-he-n}}. This class, which is already present in {{script/Hebrew}} will allow users to fix the incoherent display of Hebrew text at least for themselves, while no general fix is possible. Or much better yet, delete the font list from {{Lang-he-n}} and instead include {{script/Hebrew}} within {{Lang-he-n}}!
- I do not understand why {{Lang-he-n}} and {{script/Hebrew}} have different font lists. What is the reason for that? It just leads to incoherent display of Hebrew text, which just looks plain awful. This incoherence is especially striking all four fonts of {{Lang-he-n}} reoccur in {{script/Hebrew}}, and the first three fonts in both templates are identical! So why then are the font lists different? If there is no particular reason, then I strongly recommend that the font lists be harmonized so that there no longer is inconsistent display of Hebrew text. The best thing to do would be transcluding {{script/Hebrew}} into {{Lang-he-n}}, so the font list is only configured in one place.
- An illustration for the current inconsistency of Hebrew text display:
{{lang-he-n}} Hebrew: בֵּית {{lang-he-n|בֵּית}} {{script/Hebrew}} בֵּית {{script/Hebrew|בֵּית}} no markup בֵּית בֵּית
- On Firefox on Mac OS X, this has three different fonts, Microsoft Sans Serif, Times New Roman and the buggy font Arial Hebrew:
- With regard to the font list in {{script/Hebrew}}, I don't think DejaVu Sans should precede Microsoft Sans Serif and Lucida Grande, since it is less complete (I don't know about David, Narkisim, Ezra SIL SR or FrankRuehl). -- machᵗᵃˡᵏ👍 14:08, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- Font size is not an issue here. {{Lang-he-n}} and {{script/Hebrew}} specify exactly the same font size.
- The issue is that Hebrew text display is inconsistent. This is because {{lang-he-n}} does not use the same font list like {{script/Hebrew}}. The best way to fix this is by changing {{lang-he-n}} so it no longer defines any fonts by itself, but uses the fonts from {{script/Hebrew}}. I think that in this case, transclusion is clearly preferrable. By transcluding {{script/Hebrew}} within {{lang-he-n}}, we minimize the risk of future inconsistent Hebrew display. For the transclusion, {{lang-he-n}} has to be changed to the following:
[[Hebrew language|Hebrew]]: {{script/Hebrew|{{{1}}}}}{{#if:{{{lit|}}}|, ''[[literal translation|lit.]]'' {{{lit}}}}}<includeonly>[[Category:Articles containing Hebrew language text]]</includeonly><noinclude>{{pp-template|small=yes}} {{doc}} {{merge|Template:Lang-he}} </noinclude>
- I don't know about the display on MSIE. MSIE's inability to correctly choose an appropriate font is well known though. What I didn't know before is that Firefox falls back to a buggy font. -- machᵗᵃˡᵏ👍 15:14, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- As far as I can see, it works perfectly fine, and it solves the inconsistency of Hebrew text:
Template:CYchar {{CYchar|בְּרֵאשִׁית, בָּרָא אֱלֹהִים, אֵת הַשָּׁמַיִם, וְאֵת הָאָרֶץ.}}
בְּרֵאשִׁית, בָּרָא אֱלֹהִים, אֵת הַשָּׁמַיִם, וְאֵת הָאָרֶץ. {{script/Hebrew|בְּרֵאשִׁית, בָּרָא אֱלֹהִים, אֵת הַשָּׁמַיִם, וְאֵת הָאָרֶץ.}}
- Please do any testing on {{CYchar}} as you please and then copy the code to {{lang-he-n}}. I cannot do this on my own because I am no administrator. It would be great if the display of Hebrew text were no longer as inconsistent as it currently is. -- machᵗᵃˡᵏ👍 17:18, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- If you do not feel comfortable about creating a template transclusion, I can ask Kwami to do it. I hope you have no objections at the proposed change?? It is really an improvement because it makes {{lang-he-n}} use the same fonts as {{script/Hebrew}}, so Hebrew text is no longer displayed inconsistently. -- machᵗᵃˡᵏ👍 16:17, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- It looks like there is progress on the Firefox Bug 648248 - Buggy Hebrew fallback font on Mac OS X! Jonathan Kew has taken an interest in it; I have tried creating a patch. I have proposed the following three fonts as new default fallback fonts for Hebrew text: Lucida Grande, Times New Roman, and Courier New. Do you think these fonts are OK? -- machᵗᵃˡᵏ👍 16:35, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Ynhockey. I am here because I see on the history of several places such as Sarona and HaKirya you have edited. I have been editing some place names in Israel as well and had a concern about Wilhelma, which I put on the talk page and I have communicated the same concerns with the original author on our talk pages. He (or she) disagrees with my thinking on this and I was looking for another opinion. When you find time, will you take a look at the talk page at Wilhelma, Palestine and comment if you are so moved? Thank you. Snakeswithfeet (talk) 16:05, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 April 2011
- Recent research: Research literature surveys; drug reliability; editor roles; BLPs; Muhammad debate analyzed
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two cases closed – what does the Coanda decision tell us?
- Technology report: The Toolserver explained; brief news
Thanks
This was my mistake. Thanks for fixing it. Debresser (talk) 00:14, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 April 2011
- News and notes: Commons milestone; newbie contributions assessed; German community to decide on €200,000 budget; brief news
- In the news: Wikipedia accurate on US politics, plagiarized in court, and compared to Glass Bead Game; brief news
- WikiProject report: An audience with the WikiProject Council
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Case comes to a close after 3 weeks - what does the decision tell us?
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Multiple IPs removing sourced content from 30 St Mary Axe without explanation
Hi Ynhockey,
A month ago you watchlisted Geography of Israel since multiple IPs were changing measurements without explanation. That article's been fine.
However, 30 St Mary Axe (history) has had multiple IPs removing its sourced "erotic" nicknames with no explanation on Oct 21, Dec 9, Mar 16, 22, Apr 8, 14, and 21. On one of my reverts, my edit summary noted "rv removal without explanation again. All are reliable sources (BBC, Architectural Record (whose June 2004 magazine back issue has an article on the building), and The Spectator". There's no discussion of the subject on the article's talk page and 2 others besides me have reverted the removal over the months, which I just now realized has been going on since last year. Would you semi-protect the article for a period, should I request it from RFPP, or would you suggest another idea? MeekSaffron (talk) 20:49, 21 April 2011 (UTC)