Talk:Annapolis Conference: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{WikiProject Maryland|class=start|importance=low}} |
{{WikiProject Maryland|class=start|importance=low}} |
||
== "End of talks"? == |
|||
WHY DOES THIS PAGE NOT TELL US HOW THE TALKS ENDED? [[Special:Contributions/94.174.120.132|94.174.120.132]] ([[User talk:94.174.120.132|talk]]) 17:46, 29 April 2011 (UTC) |
WHY DOES THIS PAGE NOT TELL US HOW THE TALKS ENDED? [[Special:Contributions/94.174.120.132|94.174.120.132]] ([[User talk:94.174.120.132|talk]]) 17:46, 29 April 2011 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 17:49, 29 April 2011
Palestine Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Maryland Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
"End of talks"?
WHY DOES THIS PAGE NOT TELL US HOW THE TALKS ENDED? 94.174.120.132 (talk) 17:46, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
"Mideast"?
Who says "mideast" except American newspapers? It's the Middle East, and so the article should be at 2007 Middle East peace conference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.179.71.70 (talk) 07:59, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- I support the name Annapolis peace conference. It's most spreaded among the media.--TheFEARgod (Ч) 13:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- I think 'Annapolis Conference' or 'Annapolis Summit' would be good, but either way, the title should definitely mention the location. That would correspond with our names for previous peace conferences (e.g. Madrid Conference, Oslo Accords, Taba Summit). Terraxos (talk) 16:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Any rhyme or reason to the invitees?
Just curious...Looking at the Haaretz partial list, some of the invited countries/organizations make sense, but some have me scratching my head. Why the invite to Australia? The Vatican? Norway? Brazil? Anybody have any insight on that point?--68.38.103.203 (talk) 18:16, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- According to some analysts, it's a bid by Bush to show that his efforts are supported by lots of well-liked and important countries. —Nightstallion 18:46, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- I understand it may also have something to do with possible aid -- SAB —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.205.56.15 (talk) 23:32, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Validity of the Map
I understand China was involved, but Taiwan is also colored in, and I haven't been able to find a reference to it. Maybe I'm missing something? Or is that a mistake?
Farkeld 21:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Again, since this was deleted this the last time I asked this, who cares what Noam Chomsky has to say about this? Why is he at all relevant? -Dan Lyons, motiongraphics81 at yahoo.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.165.53.72 (talk) 22:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)