User talk:Damiens.rf

Note of reply

Hello, Damiens.rf. You have new messages at Redthoreau's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

x2

Question

Is there a reason why you when you did your mass deletions of Lost and South Park episodes that you singled out the ones uploaded by me? Or is that just a coincidence?--CyberGhostface (talk) 21:55, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Not a coincidence. I actually followed your upload log. --Damiens.rf 21:57, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

But of course, once in an article, I analyzed all images used there. --Damiens.rf 21:58, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

So is there a reason why you're following my edits? Can we expect you to go over the episode articles or do you just have an issue with me?--CyberGhostface (talk) 22:10, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

I stumbled upon one of your images and decided to take a look at your upload log. Yes, now that I know about it, I plan to do a full review on all SP episodes articles, and maybe in some other series, why not. --Damiens.rf 22:12, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

This guy has a history of disruptive editing. I recommend you take the matter to WP:ANI. The deletion nominations appear to be bad faith and in my case, retaliatory. The deletion nominations are vexatious because they have no real basis in fact. Jehochman ^Talk 21:59, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for WP:AGF. --Damiens.rf 22:01, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

In this case there is strong evidence to the contrary. Jehochman ^Talk 22:01, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Gallant_Hours-Montgomery-Halsey-Cagney.jpg

No. It's absurd to suggest that Peripitus' comment is consensus to delete. Nyttend (talk) 11:20, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2011_May_5#File:Goose_House_Doha.jpg

Please can you explain why you didn't tell me you had nominated this image for deletion? Spartaz ^Humbug! 03:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

I trust the script to do that. Maybe it failed. I'm sorry for the inconvenience. Let me know if there's something I can do to compensate you for the disturbance. --Damiens.rf 23:51, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Image relisted

Hi Damiens.rf, just a courtesy note that after some discussion Talk:Avatar_(2009_film)#Deleted_images here I've relisted File:Avatarmotioncapture.jpg at Ffd for more discussion - see Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2011_May_9#File:Avatarmotioncapture.jpg - Peripitus (Talk) 10:03, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Don't Tag My Talk Page

My talk page is not a battleground, either. Keep you damn tags to yourself. I don't want to see them. I want you to work but if you won't, I don't want to know about that, either. — Xiong熊talk* 20:32, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

It's not yours. --Damiens.rf 20:35, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

The next word out of my mouth is going to be an ugly one. Quit the assholery now. You are now randomly nominating everything you can find in my contribs. Fine. You do that. I don't much care.

Now pay careful attention:

• Do not tag my talk page -- not for any reason.
• Do not be thoughtlessly offensive to other human beings.
• Create if you can. Destroy if you must. Either way, don't bug me.

— Xiong熊talk* 09:36, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Removing images for NFCC violations

Howdy. This is just a suggestion, but in the future, you may want to comment regarding which of the criteria an image violated.--Rockfang (talk) 18:11, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Keep up the edit warring and you will be blocked. Dreadstar ☥ 04:49, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

You know that edits to enforce one of our most important polices are never edit warring. --Damiens.rf 06:52, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

And you should know by now that repeatedly reverting without reaching a consensus or even fully discussing the supposed "policy violation" in question in talk is disruptive and unproductive, to say nothing of risking being blocked for violating WP:3RR as you recently did in the 2001:A Space Odyssey(film) article.Shirtwaist (talk) 12:07, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Come on admins, he's begging to be blocked!--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 12:43, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

What do you mean by "without reaching a consensus"? What was the consensus for the non-free content review? --Damiens.rf 13:14, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Please read WP:BRD to understand where you went wrong.Shirtwaist (talk) 18:33, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

There's nothing BOLD on removing an illegal image from an article, so I think this nice essay does not apply. --Damiens.rf 18:37, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

None of what you say excuses you from WP:3RR. Keep it up and you will be blocked. I'm also considering an RFC/U to ban you from image deletions and removal of content from articles, you are abusive, rude and detrimental to the project. Dreadstar ☥ 23:46, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Enforcement of policies is excused from your 3RR traps. Please, grown up and stop posting intimidating arguments on my talk. I'm essential to the project's image deletion process. --Damiens.rf 07:32, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

There's a very high bar set for 3RR exemptions; in this case, to be exempt, it must be unquestionable that the image violates copyright law or NFCC. And it clearly was not unquestionable. I'd really refrain from edit warring if I were you. Dreadstar ☥ 18:19, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

"What was the consensus for the non-free content review?" Well, the consensus at this non-free content review and this non-free content review both resulted in KEEP decisions for the image. Aren't two separate consensuses enough for you?Shirtwaist (talk) 04:13, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

BLP ban

Damiens, you're currently under a three-month BLP topic ban, which started in April. [1] Did you appeal this, or is it still in force? If it is, you can't edit the Jessica Valenti article. SlimVirgin ^{TALK|CONTRIBS} 18:40, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

God damm, you're right! I'll restrict myself to the talk page. I hope I haven't broken anything. --Damiens.rf 18:46, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Unfortunately, as I read it, that ban includes the talkpage as well. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:48, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

As I read it, I can not edit BLP articles, and I can not add/change/remove information about people in "any page". Say, I can not go to some talk page and add "Did you know that Mr. Smith is rich?", but I believe it still leaves room for some cooperation in talk page discussions, even for BLP talk pages (this is not to say that I haven't inadvertently violated this rule before). --Damiens.rf 18:57, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Strictly speaking, I can not edit my user page to add information about myself. --Damiens.rf 18:58, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Damiens, I think it's best to observe the ban broadly interpreted and in spirit, and in the meantime make yourself very familiar with the BLP policy so that when you return to BLP editing you won't encounter problems again. SlimVirgin ^{TALK|CONTRIBS} 19:12, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Damiens, the jargon used in sanctions can be confusing, so I wanted to clarify it. Itlooks to me that your BLP ban covers all pages which would include the talk page of BLP. Look at this page for exceptions for a better idea of what it means. FloNight♥♥♥♥ 19:50, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

That is to say that I pretty much fucked it all. What happens now? --Damiens.rf 20:13, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

It's not as bad as that. :) You just have to stay away from BLPs—and posting about living persons on other pages—until July, and in the meantime read the BLP policy carefully, and you'll be fine afterwards. SlimVirgin ^{TALK|CONTRIBS} 20:16, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Right. As long as you don't come back next week and go "oops, I forgot", I don't see any need for further action here. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:18, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

• How the fuck was this ban not noticed when this editor nominated a 100 BLPS for deletion recently? Glad to know he wasted all our time with that. This editor should be permabanned for life.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 02:02, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

  Per WP:REMOVED the notice should not have been removed as the sanction was still in effect, maybe if it had not been someone would have noticed as much. Monty₈₄₅ 02:42, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

File: Bhagawan Shri Sathya Sai Baba.jpg

There is absolutely No copyright violation with this image. Hence it must not be nominated for deletion. This image is completely for free use by anyone and anywhere.

Sourav Mohanty (talk) 20:36, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Do not revert the deletion tags. This is not the proper way to dispute the nomination for deletion. --Damiens.rf 20:40, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Is this civil?

Responding to another editor who has treated you civilly by saying "What you say is a big fat lie. It's nauseating to interact with you." -Damiens.rf6:14 am, 11 May 2011, last Wednesday (3 days ago) (UTC−7) [2] is very disrespectful and not at all in keeping with WP:CIVIL, is it? You should probably watch that.Shirtwaist (talk) 00:29, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

FfD

Hi. I just noticed several FfD nominated that had all been uploaded by the same user. That does make it more difficult for them to deal with the issues presented - I'm not sure if doing that will give the best chances of quality, calm discussion and therefore the best outcomes for Wikipedia (whichever way the decisions go). To be clear, I'm 100% certain you had totally good faith in your nominations (all were very well grounded) but if I was Chesdovi, I'd feel under siege. Might be worth thinking about on a future occasion? Cheers --Dweller (talk) 16:18, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

This has been discussed before and usually there's not enough support for the idea that we should not review the upload log of image-policy challenged users. I for one see things as follows. If you have a good case for an image to be kept, you need no more that a few minutes to write it down. The 7 days given by FfD is more than enough for that. --Damiens.rf 16:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Civility please

This seems to be a totally uncalled for uncivil personal attack edit summary, please be more judicuous in your comments in the future. Dreadstar ☥ 19:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but, what the fuck? No, seriously! --Damiens.rf 19:46, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Listen, just because the article mentions one of their products, "Arrogant Bastard Ale," doesn't justify your use of the phrase "arrogant bastard" in your edit summary, especially when the content you removed had absolutely nothing to do with that product. Your use of the term in that manner can appear to be a comment directed at someone, which is why I suggested you be more judicious in your comments. Dreadstar ☥ 20:27, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

If I ask you gently here and now, would you stop to follow my contributions? You don't seem capable of doing so without generating unnecessary distress. Why did you self-elected as my tutor? Your failing as that. --Damiens.rf 20:31, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, if I see something problematic then I will take whatever action is appropriate. For instance here, you edit warred with me and you put in incorrect information. Why would I not fix it? That's just one example of many. Why don't you take my advice and be more cautious with your uncivil comments, mass taggings and unvetted deletions? I suggest you find a Mentor to assist you in these areas. Dreadstar ☥ 20:42, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

If I find a MENTOR would you stop stalking me? I'm getting frightened. Really. You're scary. You're the last one I would follow advices from, since you act as a psychologically afflicted individual. --Damiens.rf 20:47, 17 May 2011 (UTC)