Talk:Elizabeth of Russia: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:27, 17 July 2011

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance).

Russia: History B‑class Top‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.

Women's History B‑class High‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I have specified the dates as of Gregorian or Julian calendar dates as far as I can, but for some dates, I am not sure yet.--Jusjih 03:28, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia

I just saw a documentary on Catherine the Great on PBS in the USA where i learned that Elizabeth would have a weekly ball where the guests were to dress as a member of the opposite sex; the men hated that, and "The Tsarina's outfit fitted her remarkably well" (http://www.collider.com/dvd/archive_detail.asp?aid=2268&cid=3&tcid=3) --Jerome Potts 07:22, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm.... that's why she patronized Chevalier d'Eon... :) --Ghirla ^-трёп- 14:54, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why was Elisabeth so loved by the average people?

Although I don't know either way on the statement, I find it rather farfetched to claim that zero persons were executed during a span of over twenty years. Could someone provide documentation? Nyttend 21:13, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can't provide documentation. But I read somewhere that although she didn't execute people, she's not above cutting tongues, limbs or something else. As long as that person not dead. Or even exile to Siberia (a favourite pastime of the Tsars) Rad vsovereign 03:23, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup -tone

The tone of the article is excessively laudatory. More encyclopedic and less glowing language is needed. Kerowyn ^{Leave a note} 05:07, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Especially a section on [Bestuzhev] (does it really belong to the article on Elizabeth?) It's full of peacock words, such as "natural allies": what exactly made Austria and Britain "natural" allies of Russia? --Mzabaluev (talk) 16:33, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article reads like an undergraduate's history paper and not a particularly well-written one at that. The heavy reliance of four questionable sources only confirms that suspicion.—Fearlessfool (talk • contribs) 13:34, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the other comments here. The language of this article is of poor quality. I tried to clean it up a little, but the task would take quite a bit of time. Beaudoin (talk) 21:27, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 21:26, 17 July 2011 edit Beaudoin (talk \| contribs) 31 edits →Cleanup -tone ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:27, 17 July 2011 edit undo Beaudoin (talk \| contribs) 31 edits →Cleanup -tone Next edit →
Line 30:		Line 30:
	This article reads like an undergraduate's history paper and not a particularly well-written one at that. The heavy reliance of four questionable sources only confirms that suspicion.—[[User:Fearlessfool\|Fearlessfool]] ([[User talk:Fearlessfool\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Fearlessfool\|contribs]]) 13:34, 30 July 2009 (UTC)		This article reads like an undergraduate's history paper and not a particularly well-written one at that. The heavy reliance of four questionable sources only confirms that suspicion.—[[User:Fearlessfool\|Fearlessfool]] ([[User talk:Fearlessfool\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Fearlessfool\|contribs]]) 13:34, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

	I agree with the other comments here. The language of this article is of poor quality. I tried to clean it up a little, but the task would take quite a bit of time.		I agree with the other comments here. The language of this article is of poor quality. I tried to clean it up a little, but the task would take quite a bit of time. [[User:Beaudoin\|Beaudoin]] ([[User talk:Beaudoin\|talk]]) 21:27, 17 July 2011 (UTC)