User talk:RHaworth/2011 Sep 28: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:17, 6 September 2011

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Deletion of directed panspermia

Hello RHaworth, I submitted a WP page on directed panspermia and it appears to have been deleted because there is already a panspermia page. However, it concerns mostly natural panspermia, while directed panspermia is different, as it concerns the deliberate spreading of microbial life in space. Specifically, we shall soon be able to plant life in new solar systems, with basic consequences for future life on cosmological timescales. This has been the subject of peer-reviewed research articles, and is also generating popular interest, for example, a recent article in New Scientist, discussions in maganzines, on radio, and on many websites. The subject is evidently noteworthy. The article is also well documented with 28 references to scientific literature.

The subject involves technical considerations of interstellar travel including launch, propulsion and navigation; target selection; mechanisms of capture; selection of microbial payload, icluding extremophiles; and the survival of microorganisms in space and in new planetary systems; selction of microbial payload. Also signficant are ethical considerations of motivation and possible objections. These subjects are reviewed in my submitted article but far too extensive for a section in another article.

Please read the existing directed panspermia section under panspermia and the submitted artcicle, and I trust that you will agree with these arguments. Therefore, I would like to request that the submitted article should be reinstated.

I hope that this is the right way to contact you and request reinstatements. Please let me know if I need to do anything else, and if so, please explain in non-technical terms as much as possible what should I do and how to do it. Please post the answer on my user page or e-mail. Thanks, AbrahamDavidson — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbrahamDavidson (talk • contribs) 00:26, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Replied at User talk:AbrahamDavidson. — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 08:56, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

FWIW - And Of Possible Interest - The Following Was Recently Posted On The Panspermia Talk Page

Copied From Talk:Panspermia#Separate_Article_on_Directed_Panspermia

FWIW - At First Glance, And At The Moment, The Material In The Proposed Article On "Directed Panspermia" Seems To Be A *Really, Really* Excellent Academic Effort - A Worthy Contribution To Wikipedia - And - Sufficiently Substantial To Be A *Separate* Article From The Main Article On Panspermia - After All, The Present Panspermia Article Seems To Be More About "In-Coming" [to planet Earth] Whereas "Directed Panspermia" Seems To Be More About "Out-Going" [from planet Earth] Instead - A *Very* Important (seemingly neglected?) Consideration In My Opinion At The Moment - Also, The Minimal Mention Of "Panspermia#Directed_panspermia" In The Present Main Panspermia Article Does *Not* Seem Sufficient For This Very Important Topic In My Opinion - That Said - In Some Ways, The Material In The Newly Proposed "Directed Panspermia" Article Seems Similar In Basic Notions (in a much more extensive way of course) To The (less extensive?) Material In The Present Forward-contamination Article - Perhaps The Two Articles Could Be Combined In Some Way? - Perhaps The "Directed Panspermia" Article Could Be Edited Into The Present Forward-contamination Article - Or - The Material In The Forward-contamination Article Could Be Merged Into A Newly Created "Directed Panspermia" (or related title) Article - In Any Case - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 18:20, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Hope It's Ok - Please Let Me Know If Otherwise Of Course - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 19:18, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Where Is It Written That You Should Start Every Word Of A Sentence With A Capital Letter, wikilink a term every time it is used and use * instead of bold or underline for emphasis? — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 20:16, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks For Your Comments - "Artistic Freedom" And The Like - But Not For Main Articles Of Course - Incidently, I *Entirely* Agree w/ You About The XS Wikilinks - Got Carried Away w/ Trying To Be Clear - In Any Regards - Thanks Again For Your Comments - And - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 20:38, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

ALSO - Of Possible Particular Interest - And By Coincidence - A Related Earlier Discussion - In The Section "Forward-contamination" On The Astrobiology Talk Page - Occurred In March, 2011 Between Myself (User:Drbogdan) And User:BatteryIncluded On The Very Real Need For Some Of The Very Same Material That Seems To Be Well Presented In The Proposed "Directed Panspermia" Article - But Apparently "Deleted" The Previous Month (Feb, 2011) (?) - As Noted In This Astrobiology Discussion "...is there any real, and complete, assurance that there is not a single (at least potentially viable) microbe inside the Voyager spacecrafts being hurtled *out* of the solar system at this very moment? The related possible implications may be interesting to consider..." - In Any Case - Perhaps Time For A Reconsideration Of This *Very* Important Material? - And Possible Incorporation Into Wikipedia? - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 13:40, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Lwizyàn - deletion

Hello, Mr.Haworth this is of course about the deletion of my wiki article/page, The Oligarchical Republic of Louisiana (Lwizyàn). Even though i some what understand why it was deleted i would like to ask fully why this happened and for the text, i'm working on this project and well the text to me is very valuable, i would like accesses to this if possible. Only for the absolute understanding as to why my article was deleted i want to ask you, i know of a few other articles that are just like the one i created, based upon the same reason and topic, i received the idea to create my article due to this fact. Was it that my sources weren't listed, excuse me if so. With the restoration of my article i could list them in one sitting, my editing time is just some-what limited so i contentiously put that task off to add more to the article its self. Other than that factor i dont know of any other reason my article would be deleted, I saw that you listed my article as a, "G3: This includes blatant and obvious misinformation, blatant hoaxes (including images intended to misinform), and redirects created by cleanup from page-move vandalism." In my case this is not true at all, As described in my article many people from Louisiana have longed for the allowance/ opportunity to reign as their own, this is absolutely "fact" based, not only am i one of those people but as are my relatives and fellow Louisianians, entire communities might i add. The information that i posted quiet frankly came from the living source, i could list online document sources to this as well if requested. What i stated was far from a hoax, it was the true and direct listing of those that are pushing for the formation of this new country. If the article is not un-banned or re-enabled, may i have access to the material, it is needed. - Thank you. Formally; Ervyn Ademandeaux (ORLwizyan (talk · contribs))

Given the total absence of links to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources, are you surprised that Big Ben and myself assumed it was an hoax? Text e-mailed. If you really insist on pushing an article into Wikipedia, I suggest you find a "sponsor". — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 21:40, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Ok, i can understand that, may i ask for the information displayed on the page to be e-mailed to me. I would appreciate this. Though my information can not be verified through a third party and the trouble necessary to find one is quiet varying, for this act has only local and online bases further identification of our campaign will thrive else where, the information from the article would make this process easier. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ORLwizyan (talk • contribs)

I e-mailed you the text already. Have you received it? What more do you want? — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 23:19, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Do you not know/understand that i dont know if you e-mailed it to me or not unless you say you have. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ORLwizyan (talk • contribs) 23:22, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Did you see my words above "text e-mailed"? Do they suggest anything to you? Have you checked your e-mail? — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 23:26, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Aspen Network of Development Entrepreneurs

[Title width guide]

++++ delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.

Pacific Union College Church article

Hello. I'd like to move the PUC Church article draft out of SDA project space to main space. (I've been working on the Pacific Union College article and the Church should be the most important building on campus). BelloWello isn't around any more to disrupt. Can you help me do it? I almost did a cut and paste, but you probably know a better, cleaner way. Thanks. --Kenatipo ^speak! 03:49, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

You say you would "like to move", so why on earth don't you move it? Also, I find it utterly amazing that after six years you still have not learned about wikilinks. — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 09:03, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Clampco Sistemi

Hello! In order to keep the page existing, some references were added to the institutional page. I want to underline the fact that this company is a small one in Italy, that's why you couldn't find a lot of references on GNews. I think those references could be enough to justify the presence of the page from an encyclopedic point of view...and if you don't agree, I hope you would tell me how to improve it! I really think that this page should be existing, and I'm taking responsibility to improve it so it can be considered encyclopedic. Thank you for your time and all the tips you would like to give me! Mmillo (talk) 07:04, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

If it:Clampco Sistemi is marked le fonti presenti sono insufficienti, what hope for the English version? Kindly have the modesty to wait until somebody with no COI thinks your company is notable and writes about it here. — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 08:55, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- It's because of the pending deletion on the English version (and the hurry that came with it), the references were not added to the Italian version as well. I'll add the same references that were added to the English one; if you could consider those ones I'm sure you will fine them encyclopedic worthy!Mmillo (talk) 14:17, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Sid Tarrabain

I just wanted to let you know that I have removed the prod tag from Sid Tarrabain because the article's creator has objected on my talk to its deletion. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:09, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

@@ Line 51: / Line 51: @@
 [[User:Mmillo|Mmillo]] ([[User talk:Mmillo|talk]]) 07:04, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * If [[it:Clampco Sistemi]] is marked ''le fonti presenti sono insufficienti'', what hope for the English version? Kindly have the modesty to <u>wait</u> until somebody with no [[WP:COI|COI]] thinks your company is notable and writes about it here. &mdash; [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]]&nbsp;{{toolbar|separator=dot|[[::User talk:RHaworth|talk]] | [[::Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]] }} 08:55, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
+** It's because of the pending deletion on the English version (and the hurry that came with it), the references were not added to the Italian version as well. I'll add the same references that were added to the English one; if you could consider those ones I'm sure you will fine them encyclopedic worthy![[User:Mmillo|Mmillo]] ([[User talk:Mmillo|talk]]) 14:17, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 == Sid Tarrabain ==