Talk:Faraday constant: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 20:05, 1 November 2011

Physics Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemistry Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Measurement Start‑class (defunct)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Measurement, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.MeasurementWikipedia:WikiProject MeasurementTemplate:WikiProject MeasurementMeasurement articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Standard form?

Is it worth giving more prominence to the value of the constant (and putting it in standard form)? St3f 13:05, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merged

I merged the contents of Faraday (unit) into this article, and changed the former into a redirect to here. There may still need to be clean-up done on the associated talk pages. | Loadmaster (talk) 20:02, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have copied then contents of Talk:Faraday (unit) below. Physchim62 (talk) 22:11, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

redirect?

Searching for "Faraday" should take the user to Michael Faraday. A faraday is a nondescript unit that no one uses any more, much less important than the physicist after whom it is named. --141.154.55.199 11:17, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirected, page renamed "Faraday (unit)". --Saaska (talk) 12:03, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Correct conversion to coulombs?

What is the correct conversion factor from faradays to coulombs? Faraday says 96485.3415, but conversion of units says 96485.3383. Is either one of these an "accepted" conversion value? (message posted to Talk:Faraday and Talk:Conversion of units.) --bdesham 13:56, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Merged and redirected

I merged this page and changed it to redirect to Faraday constant. | Loadmaster (talk) 19:56, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Post-merge discussion

Faraday's constant HAS NOT been replaced by Coulombs. Faraday's constant IS A CONSTANT (a number), not a unit. The coulomb IS A UNIT, not a constant. Faraday's constant is 96485 Coulombs per mole!!!! How can it "replace" one its own units!

This is far too elementary a mistake even for Wikipedia.

Periololon (talk) 17:00, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't checked but maybe the sentence was mistakenly written when this article was merged into here? Anyway I fixed it now. --Steve (talk) 18:02, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Exact Vaue

The exact value is: 96 485.3399(24) according to http://www.iupac.org/publications/ci/2011/3302/ci3302preprintXcoplen_101210.pdf Can someone clarify?