Jump to content

User talk:68.8.141.156: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 62: Line 62:


::You deleted content from [[Nunchaku]] without giving a valid reason. If you wanted to change '''sportive''' to '''sport''' why didn't you just do so. I reverted because you deleted without explanation and there is no need to be offensive. If you contributed something useful instead of vandalising wikipedia I wouldn't have to check up on people like you. [[User:Denisarona|Denisarona]] ([[User talk:Denisarona|talk]]) 07:34, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
::You deleted content from [[Nunchaku]] without giving a valid reason. If you wanted to change '''sportive''' to '''sport''' why didn't you just do so. I reverted because you deleted without explanation and there is no need to be offensive. If you contributed something useful instead of vandalising wikipedia I wouldn't have to check up on people like you. [[User:Denisarona|Denisarona]] ([[User talk:Denisarona|talk]]) 07:34, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Obviously, you did not check thorough enough. Because, I changed the word and my other edits were to preserve the article to a more simpler form. One user kept posting french language sites, which is no problem if several other countries didn't have their own versions of Nunchaku.

Revision as of 07:43, 16 November 2011

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Richard Simmons has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tiderolls 00:58, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hamster, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ugly Betty. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hamster, you may be blocked from editing. --Jaellee (talk) 16:45, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ugly Betty, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. The Master of Mayhem 16:46, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JaGatalk 17:06, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Richard Simmons, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jackfork (talk) 23:31, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Simmons. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

You have been blocked for disruption of Wikipedia, because you added material that could be regarded as defamatory. See Blocking policy: Biographies of living people. You may return when the block expires. Any further attempt to restore the material will incur another block.   Will Beback  talk  23:38, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Viejas with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  – iridescent 10:19, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Viejas with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  – iridescent 10:21, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Iridescent with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.  – iridescent 10:23, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you harm Wikipedia, as you did at Kike with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Harry (talk) 10:26, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated.   Will Beback  talk  19:45, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Clanton 14, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

November 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Clanton 14, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Japanese armour, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 07:19, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Nunchaku, you may be blocked from editing. Denisarona (talk) 07:21, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted content from Nunchaku without giving a valid reason. If you wanted to change sportive to sport why didn't you just do so. I reverted because you deleted without explanation and there is no need to be offensive. If you contributed something useful instead of vandalising wikipedia I wouldn't have to check up on people like you. Denisarona (talk) 07:34, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously, you did not check thorough enough. Because, I changed the word and my other edits were to preserve the article to a more simpler form. One user kept posting french language sites, which is no problem if several other countries didn't have their own versions of Nunchaku.