User talk:CUTKD

MfD nomination of User:CUTKD/List of enemies

User:CUTKD/List of enemies, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:CUTKD/List of enemies and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:CUTKD/List of enemies during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Vicenarian ^{(T · C)} 15:23, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:CUTKD/List of enemies

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Verbal chat 15:26, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Disruptive editing, including the creation of the attack page User:CUTKD/List of enemies, copyright violations, and other disruption despite warnings. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. PeterSymonds (talk) 01:36, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CUTKD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am very sorry about some of my recent edits. I have been extremely stressed, especially when a few things didn't go my way, and whilst I appreciate that creating the "List of enemies" article was a totally reprehensible act (I know it was wrong and am very angry with myself for creating it) I did try to keep it within user space and out of the way. I hope that, upon reviewing my contributions, you see that I have been an active and willingly constructive editor most of the time, who has been prepared to perform numerous manual reverts for the better of the encyclopedia. basically, I am asking for a second chance. I know that I've done wrong, and gotten myself into a few squabbles recently, but I promise to turn that around. If unblocked, I will try to concentrate on article creation/building, especially in the area of taekwondo which I know a lot about. I would also like to continue blatant vandalism reversion, but will refrain from joining discussions for the time being, and will certainly ensure I say nothing provocative from now on.

Decline reason:

Due to how you handled the stress of editing, and being that it's the second block in appox one week; I believe you should take some time off and reflect on things. I think there will be more sympathy for an request for unblock after some time has elapsed, perhaps a few weeks. When you do ask in the future, please ensure you detail where you plan to do the article creation you speak of and give further insurance that you understand our policies on civility, copyright, etc. Nja²⁴⁷ 07:31, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That seems fair enough. Ok, consider me on a "blocked wikibreak" until 1st July. I shall use the month in between to reflect on life, and will then post another request around that time detailing my plans as an editor. Thanks! C.U.T.K.D ^{T | C} 09:20, 28 M 07:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

unblock|1=Hi everyone again. First off, a big apology for the way in which I conducted myself previously. I have had a good 40 days off wikipedia now, and I feel I have finally calmed down and am ready to resume editing if you are willing to give me a second chance. To address the points raised in the previous decline:

1. I intend to resume editing within the range of taekwondo related articles only, as my editing career began. Hopefully I won't see much controversy there. To begin with, I want to fix a few red links and grammar/layout issues such as can be seen here. Beyond that, I want to create articles about any notable contemporary athletes whom am knowlegable about, especially olympians as of 2008 Beijing. I will be particularly useful in updating their competition records and achievements. I wish to stay away from places like ANI and AIV for the time being.

2. I will be refraining from uploading any images, and certainly will not be copying and pasting material from websites. As far as copyright issues go, I am aware that I can only use images if somehow I can prove author consent, and whenver I write passages within articles, especially about contemporary athletes, I wil be sure to reference at the end any articles I have used for guidance.

Hope that clears things up, and I hope you allow me to be unblocked. I will be happy to elaborate further if required. Thanks, C.U.T.K.D ^{T | C} 09:20, 28 M 13:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

P.S:
3. Oh and a note on civility. I know that swearing, personal attacks and rudeness etc are unacceptable. Please rest assured I will not be indulging in that again.

Thanks!

First off, thanks for giving me a second chance, it is much appreciated. Secondly, {{adminhelp}}

can I ask for IP exemption back please, as per this previous request? I would be very grateful as I am often editing from shared institutional IP's which have a habit of getting blocked. Oh, and whilst you're at it, I don't think my talk page needs protection anymore (well I hope not anyway!). Cheers, C.U.T.K.D ^{T | C} 09:20, 28 M 11:42, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

As a non-administrator, I cannot fulfill your request, however I've changed your template above, and will hand it on to an administrator for review. Cheers, — Deon555^talk_{I'm BACK!} 12:10, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

I have done this. The same rules at WP:IPBE apply, and if they are abused, the right will be summarily removed. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 12:19, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Also on this note, I'm glad to see a case of Indefinite blocking that has been overturned. You have pledged to do the right thing, and I hope you stick to that. I was especially impressed with your patients (over a month) before submitting another {{unblock}}. Good for you, and I hope this little ordeal has started you on the road to many helpful edits. Cheers, — Deon555^talk_{I'm BACK!} 12:25, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Cheers guys! C.U.T.K.D ^{T | C} 09:20, 28 M 13:42, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Userpage protection

Hello CUTKD, I have semi-protected your userpage and talk page after a request at WP:RFPP and after looking at the page history. Threats of violence are not acceptable. If you want the protection lifted then that is your prerogative and I would be happy to do that if you wish, just leave a note on my talkpage. Regards, Woody (talk) 14:24, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

{{adminhelp}}

Resolved

for now

Thanks for sorting this all out. I have no idea who this pest is, but they're really starting to get on my nerves; can't the admins and sysops find out who it is and ban them? I would really like this page unlocked so that normal editors can talk to me as well, especially since generally speaking it will be them I shall be dealing with when I start work on taekwondo related articles. Please can you give my talk page one last shot at being unprotected, and if we can't keep this menace at bay after that I'll concede for now. Cheers, C.U.T.K.D ^{T | C} 09:20, 28 M 13:49, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Again, as a non-admin I won't remove the tag above, but your talk page is semi-protected meaning anyone except unregistered and very new editors can still use your talk page fine. As for blocking the individual, let me have a poke through the page history and I'll see if they've been warned or blocked. If you still want it totally unprotected (to allow very new editors and unregistered IP's to edit your page), just say so and I'll get it done for you. — Deon^talk_{I'm BACK!} 13:58, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Yep, he has been blocked so there shouldn't be much more, unless the user begins editing from another IP. Did you want to keep it semi-protected, or unprotect it? Cheers, — Deon^talk_{I'm BACK!} 13:59, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

As I recall, the page has been attacked from several different IP's, which is why I played "nanny" here and asked for semi-protection, which automatically puts up a wall against all IP addresses. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 14:15, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Fair enough, I don't see any problem leaving the semi-protection on. Maybe reduce it to a week though, and then if it re-occurs bump it back up to a month. — Deon^talk_{I'm BACK!} 14:23, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

No, it needs to stay long-term. The user was attacked many weeks ago with identically-themed "I'm gonna get you" messages. The user himself was off for a month, and as soon as he came back, the IP was there waiting for him. It needs to be be permanent until or if the user decides otherwise. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 14:26, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

I do a bit of work over at WP:AbRep, maybe I'll have a word to the ISP? — Deon^talk_{I'm BACK!} 14:27, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

OK, whatever. It was multiple IP addresses, and maybe even some redlinks, though I don't recall for sure. It's also possible that an admin deleted some of them. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 14:29, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I have 2 IPs close to each other (80. and 81.) and another two close to each other but far from the first. (217. and 212.) I'll get started on that. In the mean time, I'd say this is resolved. The protection stays for now, unless CUTKD requests otherwise. Cheers, — Deon^talk_{I'm BACK!} 14:55, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

{{adminhelp}} As per the above, I'd like to give this page one last shot at being totally unprotected. Hopefully even if this guy does return we can have him rangeblocked or banned somehow. Cheers. C.U.T.K.D ^{T | C} 09:20, 28 M 17:15, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Please could you request this on WP:RPP. Thanks,  Chzz  ►  17:24, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

They cannot permanently block IP addresses, and they are unlikely to give more than a very short block to a range of IP's. Semi-protection is the only way to keep that guy permanently off your page. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 18:00, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

I'd be happy to unprotect for you, but the IP has already shown up twice today repeating the same nonsense. If you'd still like to go ahead, just let me know. TNXMan 22:48, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Reprotected per this. Enigma^msg 11:59, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, CUTKD. You have new messages at Tnxman307's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TNXMan 11:47, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Ultimate Taekwondo Federation

I have nominated Ultimate Taekwondo Federation, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultimate Taekwondo Federation. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Nate^t/_c 12:55, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Wow, first time I've logged in in a long while, the above was a "new message". I know it's a year on, but looking at this article, and recalling what I wrote, I have a feeling the "Ultimate" part was a typo... this is what I was referring to :) C.U.T.K.D ^{T | C} 22:20, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Help!

I'm trying to do some counter vandalism work, but my anti vandal tools as installed at User:CUTKD/monobook.js are not working. I have buttons which crop up with diffs that offer me rolback options - is this a standard feature or did I get this specially installed at one point? Are there any extra anti-vadal tools anyone can recommend/upgrade me with? Cheers!

You don't need to manually install popups anymore. Just tick the box in the gadgets view of your preferences. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 23:57, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Caveman-ic.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Caveman-ic.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:04, 16 April 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 19:04, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Done :) C.U.T.K.D ^{T | C} 20:40, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Davoud Etminani

The article Davoud Etminani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced biography of living person, link provided in history as rationale for declining speedy leads to a paywall.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gurch (talk) 20:10, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Too bad I've been away for so long! C.U.T.K.D ^{T | C} 21:52, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

TheIrishWarden

Thanks for making me aware of that. TheIrishWarden - Irish and proud (talk) 19:57, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, CUTKD. You have new messages at TheIrishWarden's talk page.
Message added 18:13, 17 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TheIrishWarden - Irish and proud (talk) 18:13, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, CUTKD. You have new messages at TheIrishWarden's talk page.
Message added 18:20, 17 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TheIrishWarden - Irish and proud (talk) 18:20, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Coinsedence or what?

I don't know if this is a coincidence or what. EggCenitric accused you of controlling those IP accounts that attacked my page (a load of rubbish), then an hour later a randomIP starts attacking your page. Seems odd every time EggCentric and co. comments badly about a user, then a random IP appears and attacks there page. This needs to be investigated and something needs to be done, by the way what did they do to your page? I have been told to get out of this but I'm not allowing other users to be hurt by these people. TheIrishWarden - Irish and proud (talk) 20:30, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

It was just the usual threatening garbage. I'm really not fussed about it tbh, or what wild, fanciful claims Egg Centric wishes to make. But you're right, someone ought to investigate. C.U.T.K.D ^{T | C} 20:37, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

You haven't a clue what you're talking about (surprise surprise). I have known CUTKD very well for eight years now (not that I can prove this without WP:OUTing), indeed I was best man at his civil partnership. I can almost guarantee that those IPs were him, I expect him to be bragging to me about it on msn in the next couple of mintues. You may want to wonder why he had this spreadsheet. But no, instead you need to paint yourself as a victim and me as some kind of aggressor when for days I've done nothing other than try to help you. What's sad isn't so much your attempt at re-writing history, it's how many gullible tards have believed you. Egg Centric 20:42, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for that, I was in need of a good laugh today! C.U.T.K.D ^{T | C} 20:44, 17 July 2012 (UTC)