User talk:Jim1138

--82.209.185.111 (talk) 08:53, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Jim1138, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Notable alumni

Your removal of Tom Zionkowski is incorrect, he is an extremely notable alum who is cited as the youngest paid dance music producer in the state of illinois . Also as a touring midwestern dj and has been featured in magazines such as MIXMAG and Lets Mix. Also is a pioneer sponsored professional dj and has collaberated with the likes of LIL Jon and Ludacris on and dance anthem For the University of Wisconsin. Also noted for being featured on BBC Radio 1 with DJ Kutski. As well as a feature in the chicago sun times for his sound editing for the acclaimed revitalized version of the documentary "inquiring Nuns". Also produced the entire EP for Booshua a Chicagoan rap artist well known in the college scene. Is signed to multiple record labels with songs on Itunes beatport amazon etc. Also a Ford model, Photographer for the Badger Herald and Capitol Times (madison). And the lead singer of 'They Never Say No' (Songs on itunes and spotify) Simple googling of dj clarity brings up a plethora of articles and pictures/interviews. Please research before deletion/editing!

Incorrect correction

I attempted to update the album information on AC/DC's wiki page, as it was incorrect. I own a copy of their album T.N.T. which was the Australian release in 1975, prior to the U.S. compilation album High Voltage in 1976. I was accused of being incorrect and making "unconsstructive edits", which I take offence to. What is going on?

Hi there

pls tell me what was wrong with the redirection of Booty article

User.Yryriza/Pablo Picaso

Jim1138 is a offical wikipida faggot, as declared by the president

TY

Jim1138 is a offical wikipida faggot, as declared by the president

Image

Excuse me, Could you add image "Keke-keke-palmer-7228404-816-1222.jpg" into "Commons" section, please? It's Available only in English Wikipedia. I wanted to add This image into a Polish part of Article Keke Palmer but I couldn't. Would you help me, please? 62.121.114.109. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.121.114.109 (talk) 11:28, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Looking into it. Unfortunately, it appears to be copied without permission. The comment by the uploader specifies the source and permission as being from a site that appears to have copied the image, not the original source. Jim1138 (talk) 02:09, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Help on improving articel for Judy Ann Santos

Hi Jim1138, I have been contributing articles in Wikipedia since 2004, however, I locked my old account, as such I had to create a new one, I saw your contributions for articles concernning biographies of living persons, will it be alright if I ask for you help on improving an article for Judy Ann Santos, I figured you don't have an idea of who she is, but I wanted to contribute in improving this article with a neutral point of view, i have already started with the lead, though the body/section headings need would need to be refurbished as it is mainly of fansite content. My aim is to have it tagged as one of the featured articles. Your inputs and help will be greatly appreciated Pseud 14 (talk) 07:44, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

I would love to help, but unfortunately, I am just a lowly recent changes patroller who has been accused of being a ClueBot sock. I might be good at turning your good article into a bad article if you are interested :) Jim1138 (talk) 08:29, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Why are you removing link to my paper - please write to me on talk or E-mail me - info is on the website. I wrote following:

Hi,

Link to my paper was put here many years ago by one of the contributors (I do not even know who).

Recently Marcin Ostajewski, Ph.D. student at UMK, Torun / PAN, Warsaw removed fraudulently this link, falsely accusing me of not having Ph.D. and being a fraud. I am considering to take this matter to court and to ask that he will be removed disciplinarily from Ph.D. program. I do not know his motives. After I caught him discrediting me on several websites, he wrote to me an apologize letter which is dishonest and does not tell the truth.

Here is what Marcin Ostajewski (from Torun, Poland) originally wrote here as Panszpik: (cur | prev) 16:49, 13 June 2012‎ Panszpik (talk | contribs)‎ . . (15,164 bytes) (-305)‎ . . (/* External links */ - →‎External links: The first link leads to a webpage of pseudoscientist who tries to sell devices that "cure cancer and normalise ones aura", the other one leads to a webpage that does not exist any more.) (undo)

BTW, the drawing of the thermodynamic system was made and put here by Libb Thims and is a copyright violation of my drawing in the paper "Life on Earth - flow of Energy and Entropy": http://www.digital-recordings.com/publ/publife.html I never gave him permission to do so. Also he changed the temperatures involved (why ?). So drawing does not make any scientific sense at this moment. It should be replaced with figure No.1 and No.2 from my paper. One can also use just figure No.1 and indicate temperatures which are on figure No.2

Best regards, Dr.Marek Roland, Canada

www.digital-recordings.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.111.117.167 (talk) 08:28, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Redbox

I've requested temporary semi-protection, after the seventh introduction of the spurious edits that you're familiar with. I removed the edits again today. 842U (talk) 12:21, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

BLP issues

Hello.

On the recent BLP issue here, you issued a level one warning to the perpetrator. I issued {{blp1}} which is for obvious BLP violations. In other words, material was inserted which could be significantly damaging. In that case, given that my warning was issued, you should either issue {{blp2}} or a block, where, the blocking admin would issue {{blp3}}. Thanks. 69.155.143.96 (talk) 04:45, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Replied at my talk page. Thanks. 69.155.143.96 (talk) 04:53, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Replied again. Thanks. 69.155.143.96 (talk) 19:44, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

No idea ...

... what your entry on my talk page is about. Clarify, or I'll delete? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meduban (talk • contribs) 22:21, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Islamic honorifics

Hello User:Jim1138, I hope you are well. I also often remove culturally / religiously specific honorifics and terminology as per Wikipedia WP:MOSISLAM guidelines. Yet I'm afraid that two of your recent edits have removed honorics that are actually part of the quotes, and not honorifics added subsequently to Wikipedia by Muslim editors. If a Muslim writer calls his book, for example, The Life of the Prophet Muhammad, SAW, then that remains the title. If a Muslim says "I give all thanks to Allah subhanahu waTaala" (sometimes "swt"), then that remain the quote. Sorry to have to revert those. I really do think you are an excellent editor. Best regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 08:25, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

I am well, I hope you are as well. Thank you for your kind words. Yes, I erroneously removed the honorifics from book titles and quotes. I try to not do that; it appears I need to be more careful. Thank you for correcting my errors and letting me know. Best Regards Jim1138 (talk) 08:35, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Sally Ride

It's outrageous that you deleted "the first lesbian in space" edit from Sally Ride's bio. It's a crucial part of her biography, inspirational to millions of gay people around the world, and confirmed by press reports and her own company's death announcement today.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/23/sally-ride-first-american-woman-female-partner-_n_1696537.html

We're not in the 1960s any more. Being a lesbian - especially a pioneering lesbian - is a source of pride, not of shame. Especially when the person's own company is so open about it.

Shame on you for your bigoted deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enzuli (talk • contribs) 00:31, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Unsourced stuff like that gets deleted. Care to guess how many edits of "lesbo" and "faggot" I have deleted? Notice that I did not delete it once it was sourced? Not doing yourself any favors here. Jim1138 (talk) 00:35, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

But it was sourced - in the PERSONAL section. In any event, I added a source now. It's being discussed everywhere. And it's clearly an important part of how she lived and of her legacy. Sorry for imputing bad faith to you, but it was just upsetting to watch that part of her life be banished as though it was bad and wrong when it's the opposite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enzuli (talk • contribs) 00:42, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism to my User Page

I just wanted to thank you for undoing the vandalism to my user page. I was having a very positive experience at Wikipedia until that moment. I am most grateful for your swift action taken on my behalf. Best Regards, Snowysusan 11:17, 24 July 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snowysusan (talk • contribs)

bulldog

Hi.

You're accusing the wrong guy for edit warring, please pay better attention next time.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.209.185.111 (talk • contribs)

User: TheUserPageRecreator

Can we please forget about this whole sock puppetry thing? I am now satisfied with my progress on Wikipedia. Just delete the page and forget about it. Heymister14 (talk) 02:14, 27 July 2012 (UTC)heymister14

"Deleted" page was redirected for accuracy

The page was not deleted but intentionally redirected to Tuckahoe Marble which is the accurate and verified name for the specific stone that is being discussed. There are no sources to even validate "Westchester Marble" as being an even remotely notable name of a specific rock. Additionally most of the content used in the "Westchester Marble" is taken directly from info. taken directly from "Tuckahoe". If anything Westchester Marble can refer to the marble produced throughout different parts of the county, however, there would be nothing notable about that. The marble of recognition is specifically from the quarry at Tuckahoe, from which the entire development of the town of "Tuckahoe" is based. Tuckahoe Marble is known by name, place of origin, and physical qualities and color. Thanks --66.87.2.231 (talk) 06:59, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Westchester marble is the original article. If it needs to be moved/renamed, you should perform a move, not a copy / paste. Please see Wikipedia:Moving a page. This is to maintain the article's history. Westchester marble gets 9000 hits in google v. 13,600 for Tuckahoe Marble, so Westchester is not insignificant. I would recommend you discuss it in talk:Westchester marble given the revert history. Jim1138 (talk) 07:11, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

I do not know why the original article would have ever been Westchester Marble instead of Tuckahoe Marble. Perhaps there were two articles at first a while back? If Westchester Marble is getting more hits than Tuckahoe Marble that might merely have to do with the fact that "Westchester" is a much more widely used search term for people/places/things countywide and therefore would pull up related names/topics like "Westchester Marble" for example.The results for a google search of "Westchester Marble" are almost entirely for private stone supply retailers and contracters within the county with the exception of one result for the intial wikipedia page. A google search for "Tuckahoe Marble" results a number of links specifically related to"Tuckahoe Marble" and its notability and relevance. Additionally the sources and references used in Westchester Marble article are only relevant when in the context of Tu ources used and the need for corrections. 66.87.2.231 (talk) 08:18, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

I am not too concerned about the name of the article. I am concerned about loosing the wp:page history. It appears that you (or someone) copied the information from Westchester marble and pasted it into Tuckahoe Marble and changed the instances of "Weschester" to "Tuckahoe". Doing so would cause the page history to be lost. Please request a page move instead. BTW: there are more google hits on Tuckahoe than Westchester. I was pointing out that Westchester marble is not insignificant. Please follow Wikipedia:Moving a page to rename Weschester marble. You probably should change Tuckahoe back to a redirect to Weschester for the time being. An administrator will need to do the page move, I believe. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:28, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Joan Jett Page

Hey, I haven't editied on wikipedia for a while and I've forgotten a lot. While I was in the process of adding a citation, you reverted my first step. And someone else did the same thing moments before. Please give me a chance to FINISH what I'm doing. Thank you!!! Bradkay (talk) 07:03, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello Jim, got your note on my talk page. Thank you for your help on Jett page and the reminder of how to do refs. As above, I'm way out of practice. Thank you again. Bradkay (talk) 03:23, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Demo

I think it worked. 66.27.112.119 (talk) 00:11, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for your assistance with all the elementary school redirects the IP is not understanding. I need to get to sleep.  :)) Gtwfan52 (talk) 08:28, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your keen handling of those disrupting the encyclopedia and tireless efforts to help keep the constant influx of vandalism at bay. Thank you. Calmer Waters 05:18, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

HOT T.V.

No problem with removing my tag, I was just trying to figure out what the editor is doing. There is a duplicate article at H.O.T. TV, also created by this editor... So I think they are trying to move the article. Cheers! --Tgeairn (talk) 19:10, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Oops... I see you caught the duplicate. --Tgeairn (talk) 19:11, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

NOT A PERSONAL ATTACK

I am not gonna call u names or $hit like that, but dont you dare warn me like that again or ill get in $hit loads of trouble k? 81.108.7.13 (talk) 19:28, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Article Kashibai without any reference for 4 years

Well its beyond anyone's imagination that such articles are completely worthless, any search on google or google books or for a matter of fact that Sadashiv was issue less and further the article is without any source for over 4 years. Further the only Kashibai in Maratha history is wife of Nana Saheb(Peshwa Balaji Rao). But still you can help me to nominate this article for deletion as an article without any source for 4 years that too its a known fact that sadashiv dont have any child.ARIHANT SUB (talk) 05:01, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

But its malicious contents cannot be maintained most citation tags are their for years, not a single book or scholar mentions anything about any such women. Most probably Some Sikh editors have propped up this from their own fantasy. http://www.google.co.in/webhp?rlz=1C1RNHN_enIN478IN478&sourceid=chrome-instant&ie=UTF-8#hl=en&rlz=1C1RNHN_enIN478IN478&tbm=bks&sclient=psy-ab&q=KASHIBAI+DAUGHTER+SADASHIV&oq=KASHIBAI+DAUGHTER+SADASHIV&gs_l=serp.3...289830.300771.4.300931.40.31.8.1.2.0.211.4384.0j29j2.31.0...0.0...1c.NgtXTTXDj6Q&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=96224b27fb31dccc&biw=1280&bih=629

No such thing ever existed , infact its surprising that how such an article was maintained for 4 continous years with all the citation tags remaining as it is for years. I dont know the procedure for nominating any article for deletion but the article is completely a fantasy and nothing more than that.ARIHANT SUB (talk) 05:06, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

I am not going to contest Kashibai deletion, just use the procedures in wp:article for deletion to do so. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 05:08, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Thats what i am asking how to nominate this article for deletion. Where we have to post this issue. thnx. I am not accusing you as i said that what you said was right according to WP guidelines but that line of Salvaging an article on a Person who never existed was a wrong one. So plz help me in nominating this Ghost Article for deletion. Thnx once again.ARIHANT SUB (talk) 05:11, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

It is more tedious than anything. I'll nominate it if you add information supporting the deletion? I'll leave a link on your talk page. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:15, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Jim my mate you are not understanding their is no such Women Like Kashibai Who is daughter of Sadashiv Bhau as he dont have any child at all. Further the responsibility of providing references to claim made in Kashibai article depends on those who have created a Ghost Article on a Ghost Person who never existed in History.

http://www.google.co.in/webhp?rlz=1C1RNHN_enIN478IN478&sourceid=chrome-instant&ie=UTF-8#hl=en&rlz=1C1RNHN_enIN478IN478&tbm=bks&sclient=psy-ab&q=sadashiv+bhau+daughter&oq=sadashiv+bhau+daughter&gs_l=serp.3...41231.48305.2.48384.31.27.4.0.0.0.214.3739.0j25j1.26.0...0.0...1c.7z9Z8XFLCtU&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=96224b27fb31dccc&biw=1280&bih=629

No Kashibai reference is found in any book or by any scholar, can you see that Citation tags are as it is for Years and many editors have already raised the intention of such dubious articles. I have nominated it for deletion. ThnxARIHANT SUB (talk) 05:18, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Thnx for all your help, i have restored the article(knowing though its completely false as no such Figure ever existed), so that if anyone specially those who have been bringing shame and unreliability to wikipedia are given fair chance to provide Reliable sources to even prove this point that any such women like Kashibai ever exist who was daughter of Maratha Commander in Chief Sadashivrao Bhau(He and his wife parvatibai were childless). Thnx for guiding me through all the procedure.

ARIHANT SUB (talk) 05:51, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Sorcha Faal Page

Can you please explain why you deleted the following from the Sorcha Faal entry as i believe their are relavant. Thank you.

Sorcha Faal Report Used By Venezuela President Hugo Chávez A 14 January 2010 report by Sorcha Faal named US Quake Test Goes “Horribly Wrong”, Leaves 500,000 Dead In Haiti http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1322.htm was used http://boardreader.com/thread/Hugo_Chavez_A_U_S_Weapons_Test_Caused_Th_6o4qX7kjr.html by Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez) who accused the United States of using a earthquake “weapon” against Haiti.

References

• Précisions et aléas autour du “complot Jeb Bush”- dedefensa.org
• L’incidente Russo di Tambov, l’Artic Sea ed il volo segreto di Netanyahu a Mosca- agoravox.it
• 媒体盘点2010年十大科学谣言 千年极寒欲翻案- people.com.cn
• Global warming hysteria misplaced- News.com.au

External links

• Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation, America.gov
• "The 31 Wildest Conspiracy Theories". LIFE magazine – slideshow.
• Naomi Wolf. "Analysis of the appeal of conspiracy theories with suggestions for more accurate ad hoc internet reporting of them".
• Stuart J. Murray (2009). "Editorial Introduction: 'Media Tropes'". MediaTropes eJournal. 2 (1): i–x.
• Top 10 Right-Wing Conspiracy Theories: by Alexander Zaitchik—Southern Poverty Leadership Conference—Alternet August 15, 2010

Arzk02587k^(talk) 11:17, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Clearly explained in the edit summary and the message on your page. Leave an wp:edit summary or others can not understand your reasoning. Jim1138 (talk) 16:16, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Ok

No speack english! Absolutament no vandalism! Estou tentando arrumar o artigo Template:São Paulo highways, pois está incorreto, e está redirecionado erroneamente, tanto SP-306 como SP-85, que são rodovias paulistas, ok? Att Braz Leme (talk) 22:48, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Ok, tanks! Att! Braz Leme (talk) 22:58, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Ok, Jim! Att. Braz Leme (talk) 23:03, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Jim1138. You have new messages at Gtwfan52's talk page.
Message added 03:00, 31 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Gtwfan52 (talk) 03:00, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!

		The Userpage Shield
		Thanks for minding my user/talk page Jschnur (talk) 07:24, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Adminship

Hi Jim, have you considered running for adminship? I imagine you have, but I just saw your submission at WP:RFP and did a "I thought you already were", so I thought I'd ask. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 08:22, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	For your consistent effort to keep Wikipedia free from vandalism (etc) and vandals. Fifty seven thousand edits with Huggle is a big achievement. Congratulatons and thank you, Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 09:19, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Keansburg, New Jersey

Hi Jim1138; I don't want to be tagged for edit warring, nor have the time to pursue this now, but I think we're at the point where either a noticeboard report or request for page protection may be appropriate. I suspect a user block is inevitable. Thanks for helping, 99.137.209.191 (talk) 00:11, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

I don't know that the article is even worth it. Probably nobody reads it anyway. I am pursuing communication... Jim1138 (talk) 00:14, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello Jim, sorry for all the trouble but I believe some people in my hometown wish to censor any material that they deem unacceptable. I've noted two songs and a fictional novel that keeps getting deleted. The other stuff I've entered may very well violate your terms but as to the songs and the novel they are both notable and primary sources. Am I missing something here? I am rather fond of my hometown both the good and the bad. tiltedsun88

(Hitting head against wall) Yes, what you're missing has been explained numerous times. The information relates to non-notables, and uses unacceptable sources. I live in Connecticut, and have no idea why anyone would want to censor this--it's plain unencyclopedic. 99.137.209.191 (talk) 00:22, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

It's notable to people who live in this town so I guess keep hitting your head and maybe something will shake loose?? jokin...It's under the interesting facts section which I see as trivia that is not necessarily of historic value. Also, you are not the only one deleting things here. I'm sure there are things about your hometown that are only interesting to you. I kinda like the one song and the other is terrible but then I don't like country music so. Most people in my town pretend the novel does'nt exist so I don't think I can budge on that one in my opinion. Tiltedsun88 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiltedsun88 (talk • contribs) 00:30, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

As a longtime editor here I realize it's incumbent upon us to be patient with newcomers.....that said, this has been explained a lot of times already. It doesn't matter a lick whether you or I find the information important. It doesn't meet the encyclopedia's guidelines, which I do wish newcomers would bother reading, so as not to prolong such timesinks.... 99.137.209.191 (talk) 00:36, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

I changed your edit to English translations of the Qur'an

Jim, even if an Indian newspaper put out an article praising a particular translation, that's not a useful evaluation. It's one obscure newspaper; the article could have been written by a friend of the translator; the article could have been based on a press release. The translation list would be useless if it filled up with praise of one or another translation from possibly interested parties. It is useful to know that it was translated in South Asia and that it uses AmE. Zora (talk) 22:38, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

That's fine by me. Think what I left was bad, take a look at what came before diff I was on the fence about deleting the whole entry and left the link in an attempt to differentiate between the many different "The Qur'an" titles in the list.

Would you mind taking a look at this edit? Seems strange diff Thanks for the note. Cheers Jim1138 (talk)

I wondered about that too. It seems as if it's an attempt to attract American Muslims -- perhaps new converts. I wouldn't care if they were converts or women or Americans; I'd care if they were competent and knew their Quranic Arabic. Somehow I don't think that all of these supposed translators can be qualified scholars. I thought about reversing it and then I wasn't sure. I'd almost have to have a copy of the translation in front of me to decide what I think. P.S. I'm not a Muslima; I'm a Buddhist. But I do care a lot about careful scholarship and good translation. Zora (talk) 01:50, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Antikythera mechanism

b1 are 224 teeth, e3 is 223. this is confirmed by modern sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.24.212.2 (talk) 09:41, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Tollund Man

HI Jim1138. According to http://www.tollundman.dk/et-lig-dukker-op.asp and according to the archaeological literature Tollund Man has been found on Sathurday May 6, 1950 and the find was reported to the police on Tuesday May 8, 1950. Please check the tollundman.dk site again, you will find that the date of the police report was mentioned in figures first and the date of discovery was only mentioned as last Sathurday. Cheers --Bullenwächter (talk) 13:10, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for fixing my error. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 17:05, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Silk Road (marketplace)

Well, the article is about Silk Road. Silk Road requires registration. Should the normal .onion-url also be removed? I think it is appropriate to refrain from that rule in this case, don't you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.55.93.112 (talk) 18:30, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

I see your point. I undid my edit. Thanks for the note. I will discuss this with others. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 18:37, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Already discussed / the link stays: Notice board It would be a good idea to put [[Tor (anonymity network)|TOR]] registration required next to the links. I did not understand where it was going TOR and did not want to register. Jim1138 (talk) 18:47, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

I see. But I think the page would become a bit cluttered if [[Tor (anonymity network)|TOR]] registration required where put next to all links to Silk Road. Maybe if we moved the Onion.To and Tor2web.org links to that top-right grey info-box where the normal .onion-URL is. They're pretty darn useful to users who do not have Tor and just wants to see what it's all about. Such a user that would read a wiki-page. One could argue that they should be added to every wiki-page about a .onion-site. Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.55.93.112 (talk) 19:29, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Putting everything together sounds good. Up for doing it? Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 21:09, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Most of the links to Silk Road were 404, so I commented them out. Added the TOR comment to the link you added. Jim1138 (talk) 22:48, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

I moved the two links up to the infobox. Tor2web seems to be down right now, but they'll probably be back soon. I also put the text "requires registration" next to the text "requires tor" in the infobox, but it seems a out of place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.55.93.112 (talk) 23:26, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

sound healing

Hey - you deleted my page on sound healing about 1 minute after I posted it. You obviously didn't read it. You're not the Wiki Police, so watch your step. The article is valid. I'm an expert in the field and the original author. Maybe you should READ material before you ban it. It's a valid article, so please leave it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.161.6.24 (talk) 03:59, 4 August 2012 (UTC)