Jump to content

User talk:Kaldari: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 203: Line 203:
== [[Beastiality]] and [[female genital mutilation]] as [[sexual assault]]? ==
== [[Beastiality]] and [[female genital mutilation]] as [[sexual assault]]? ==


Hi. Is it appropriate that these[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sexual_assault&diff=498904005&oldid=498900923][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sexual_assault&diff=508322569&oldid=508163724] be classified as sexual assault, in light of how reliable sources define sexual assault? I say no, except for the cases where female genital mutilation may be carried out against a female's will. [[Special:Contributions/109.123.115.21|109.123.115.21]] ([[User talk:109.123.115.21|talk]]) 18:53, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Is it appropriate that these[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sexual_assault&diff=498904005&oldid=498900923][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sexual_assault&diff=508322569&oldid=508163724] be classified as sexual assault, in light of how reliable sources define sexual assault? I say no, except for the cases where female genital mutilation is carried out against a female's will. [[Special:Contributions/109.123.115.21|109.123.115.21]] ([[User talk:109.123.115.21|talk]]) 18:53, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:57, 24 August 2012

Thank you :)

Thanks for the barnstar. :)

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello Kaldari! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Barnstar

The Original Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

The is a test

testing

Dowry

Hello, Kaldari. You have new messages at Netha Hussain's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Change may have caused problem

Hi, someone has suggested that this change may be the cause of an edit box problem detailed at village pump. Can you comment on if this is the cause of the problems? Keith D (talk) 23:57, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Should be fixed now. Kaldari (talk) 00:21, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what the issue is, but I have reset my preferences two or three times now, and I still have the Vector edit box. At this point, I have run out of ideas for fixing this. Can you give me any advice? ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 19:22, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will see if that works. Thanks. ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 01:09, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, it has been more than 24 hours since my previous message, and nothing has changed. I am baffled and frustrated by this problem, and cannot figure out what to do to fix it. None of the steps suggested by others have worked. So, I am really wondering what to do next. ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 13:45, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I can log-in on a library computer later today, in either IE or Firefox. When I do, I will let you know what, if anything, happens. If it means anything, when the edit box opens, it is Monobook, then it switches to Vector after a few seconds. Thanks for your message. ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 17:43, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I have now logged in from two different computers --- one a Mac, the other a PC --- and used both Firefox and IE. But, in all cases, the edit bar is the same: Vector. What does that tell us? ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 16:52, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, that was the problem. I unchecked that box and everything is back to normal. Thanks for your help. It's hard to believe it was so simple. Cheers! ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 13:18, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Glad I could help. Here's a little something to spice up your talk page. See you around! Braincricket (talk) 22:06, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2012 July newsletter

We're approaching the beginning of 2012's final round. Pool A sees Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) as the leader, with 300 points being awarded for the featured article Bivalvia, and Pool B sees Conradh na Gaeilge Grapple X (submissions) in the lead, with 10 good articles, and over 35 articles eligible for good topic points. Pool A sees New York City Muboshgu (submissions) in second place with a number of articles relating to baseball, while Pool B's Minnesota Ruby2010 (submissions) follows Grapple X, with a variety of contributions including the high-scoring, high-importance featured article on the 2010 film Pride & Prejudice. Ruby2010, like Grapple X, also claimed a number of good topic points; despite this, not a single point has been claimed for featured topics in the contest so far. The same is true for featured portals.

Currently, the eighth-place competitor (and so the lowest scorer who would reach the final round right now) has scored 332, more than double the 150 needed to reach the final round last year. In 2010, however, 430 was the lowest qualifying score. In this competition, we have generally seen scores closer to those in 2010 than those in 2011. Let's see what kind of benchmark we can set for future competitions! As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail) and The ed17 (talkemail) 22:26, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Tea Leaf - Issue Five

Stop by for a tasty glass of wiki-iced tea at the Teahouse, today!

Hi! Welcome to the fifth edition of The Tea Leaf, the official newsletter of the Teahouse!

  • Guest activity increased in July. Questions are up from an average of 36 per week in June to 43 per week in July, and guest profile creation has also increased. This is likely a result of the automatic invite experiments we started near the end of month, which seeks to lessen the burden on hosts and other volunteer who manually invite editors. During the last week of July, questions doubled in the Teahouse! (But don't let that deter you from inviting editors to the Teahouse, please, there are still lots of new editors who haven't found Teahouse yet.)
  • More Teahouse hosts than ever. We had 12 new hosts sign up to participate at the Teahouse! We now have 35 hosts volunteering at the Teahouse. Feel free to stop by and see them all here.
  • Phase two update: Host sprint. In August, the Teahouse team plans to improve the host experience by developing a simpler new-host creation process, a better way of surfacing active hosts, and a host lounge renovation. Take a look at the plan and weigh in here.
  • New Teahouse guest barnstar is awarded to first recipient: Charlie Inks. Using the Teahouse barnstar designed by Heatherawalls, hosts hajatvrc and Ryan Vesey created the new Teahouse Guest Barnstar. The first recipient is Charlie Inks, for her boldness in asking questions at the Teahouse. Check out the award in action here.
  • Teahouse was a hot topic at Wikimania! The Teahouse was a hot topic at Wikimania this past month, where editor retention and interface design was heavily discussed. Sarah and Jonathan presented the Teahouse during the Wikimedia Fellowships panel. Slides can be viewed here. A lunch was also held at Wikimania for Teahouse hosts.

As always, thanks for supporting the Teahouse project! Stop by and visit us today!

You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here. Sarah (talk) 08:30, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful --

Hello Kaldari, Just a friendly message but I wanted to point out you accidentally deleted a post I made to the Mars Space Laboratory talk page, or if it wasn't accidental please let me know at my talk page. Thanks.

user:Agradman editing for the moment as 67.182.25.41 (talk) 07:25, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vice presidential edit counters

They are a really fun and clever idea, but I felt like they increased the likelihood of unneeded edits, low-quality editing, and vandalism to a number of high-profile BLPs. I apologize for not contacting you beforehand, but I felt that it was more important to remove that line of thought from the articles quickly—particularly given their greater attention following the Colbert vandalism. If you would like to restore them, please raise the issue on one of the noticeboards first. I would be glad to have my decision to remove the counters reviewed.

Like I said, very cool idea under other circumstances, and I have lots of respect for your contributions on here. This just seemed to me like a bad idea at the moment. Best, IronGargoyle (talk) 06:40, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the those articles are already semi-protected, so I'm not sure there's a big potential for increased vandalism. I was actually thinking that the charts might help us to catch COI editing, and thus protect the quality of the articles, but I'm interested in hearing your thoughts on this. Kaldari (talk) 06:49, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Arg, I didn't know about the stupid Steven Colbert thing. I wish he would quit messing with Wikipedia already. Kaldari (talk) 23:24, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Upload Folger Library images?

What's up with that? Tom Reedy (talk) 02:10, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free content review

I requested a non-free content review in connection with an image you uploaded. See the discussion at Wikipedia:Non-free_content_review#Images_of_Andrew_Wyeth_Paintings --SPhilbrick(Talk) 15:50, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kaldari. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, PageTriageProdTest, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Kaldari (talk) 19:38, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kaldari. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, PageTriageProdTest, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want PageTriageProdTest to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you need help doing so, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Kaldari (talk) 19:38, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mariana Pajon

Hey! just wanted to know the reason why you deleted Mariana's picture in the podium? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bautistajulian (talkcontribs) 18:38, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Designation list colours

I'm not even sure what this edit summary means. We spent weeks discussions to the Designation List template so that the Canadian one could be red. Now the Canadian one conflicts with the provincial one. How do we fix this?--Skeezix1000 (talk) 23:18, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't make much sense, since the template uses coloured borders, not backgrounds. Is the colour red now banned? --Skeezix1000 (talk) 23:24, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the advice and for doing your best to fix it. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 00:08, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, in my ordinary check of Category:Proposed deletions needing attention I noticed you put a prod tag on the subject page. I had tagged it with {{db-user}}, but then undid myself when I realized that you are an admin and have the ability to delete it yourself. Do you actually want this page deleted, or did you just tag it as part of whatever experimenting you were doing at the time? —KuyaBriBriTalk 20:28, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, just an experiment that I forgot to clean-up :) Kaldari (talk) 20:55, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Gotcha - thanks for clearing that up! —KuyaBriBriTalk 21:09, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A pie for you!

Testing testing!! SarahStierch (talk) 23:02, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm. No error this time so I guess I won't file the bug. I'll leave the pie with you, though. SarahStierch (talk) 23:03, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Add teahouse to welcome template?

As you were involved in a previous discussion regarding this issue, I am informing you of a new discussion proposing that the Teahouse be linked from the Welcome template(s). The discussion can be found here. KillerChihuahua?!? 23:53, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Men's rights and WP:ANI

Hi Kaldari. Please see my response to you at my talkpage, concerning this action at WP:ANI.

NoeticaTea? 01:48, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kaldari, I have read your answer there, and I have reiterated a question to you before answering your own points. Would you please answer what I have asked twice? I will assume from now on that it is not necessary to notify you here, OK?
Best wishes,
NoeticaTea? 06:12, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Womanpower deletion stuffness

Hi. Please see User_talk:SarahStierch#Womanpower_logo_deletion - I think you might be better to lend a hand at this better than I am :( SarahStierch (talk) 19:17, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Burma to Myanmar - ongoing poll

This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. I know this happened just recently but no administrator would close these frequent rm's down, so here we go again. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:58, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Bullet Tree Falls, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Ignacio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Is it appropriate that these[1][2] be classified as sexual assault, in light of how reliable sources define sexual assault? I say no, except for the cases where female genital mutilation is carried out against a female's will. 109.123.115.21 (talk) 18:53, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]