User talk:Robbieranger: Difference between revisions
→Admin?: of course |
Robbieranger (talk | contribs) →Corrupt: new section |
||
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
:Robbie - you have done four extremely poor page moves in the past few hours - some simply ill thought-out, others downright bizarre. This is getting to be disruptive. Please do not continue. If you do, I will take further action. Regards, [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 16:17, 16 October 2012 (UTC) |
:Robbie - you have done four extremely poor page moves in the past few hours - some simply ill thought-out, others downright bizarre. This is getting to be disruptive. Please do not continue. If you do, I will take further action. Regards, [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 16:17, 16 October 2012 (UTC) |
||
::Now [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship&diff=518351641&oldid=518309945 this malformed attempt at RFA]. If you need any help, please ask. [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 17:12, 17 October 2012 (UTC) |
::Now [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship&diff=518351641&oldid=518309945 this malformed attempt at RFA]. If you need any help, please ask. [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 17:12, 17 October 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Corrupt == |
|||
Certain admin on wiki starting to become corrupt. Abuse of power mainly. I have edited articles, on the st james' park article to make it correct. In doing so also providing reliable sources. But instead of helping me make the article correct, i have been slated and even threatened to be banned!! It seems some admin would rather abuse their power than to help correct wikipedia. Absolutly appalling. [[User:Robbieranger|Robbieranger]] ([[User talk:Robbieranger#top|talk]]) 20:02, 18 October 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:02, 18 October 2012
Welcome
|
Admin?
Just wondering how do you become an Admin?
Robbieranger (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi, I don't know for what reason I was blocked, I was just editing minor mistakes made on pages, can someone explain to me why I was blocked? It would be really appreciated, thanks.
Accept reason:
Already unblocked by User:Bsadowski1. Yunshui 雲水 08:36, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
It's ok now, I have another account now to continue to contribute to wikipedia, and I hope to make many constructive edits on spelling mistakes and add reliable sources to information :)
- Of course, you're only permitted to have 1 account, except under pretty rare circumstances dangerouspanda 17:46, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
SJP - SDA
That is a controversial move and, by policy,Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Requesting_controversial_and_potentially_controversial_moves MUST therefore be discussed first. It will be reverted and you should not make the move again without prior discussion. Leaky Caldron 13:11, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- It must be discussed and requested in the proper way, it doesn't matter how long it takes. Leaky Caldron 13:20, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, I've reverted the move as undiscussed and against consensus. Please continue to use the article talk page. Regards, GiantSnowman 13:22, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
October 2012
Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to New York Red Bulls because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! The club is not "New York Football Club". Don't move articles without a reason. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:12, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brazil national football team. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:14, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- Robbie - you have done four extremely poor page moves in the past few hours - some simply ill thought-out, others downright bizarre. This is getting to be disruptive. Please do not continue. If you do, I will take further action. Regards, GiantSnowman 16:17, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- Now this malformed attempt at RFA. If you need any help, please ask. GiantSnowman 17:12, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Corrupt
Certain admin on wiki starting to become corrupt. Abuse of power mainly. I have edited articles, on the st james' park article to make it correct. In doing so also providing reliable sources. But instead of helping me make the article correct, i have been slated and even threatened to be banned!! It seems some admin would rather abuse their power than to help correct wikipedia. Absolutly appalling. Robbieranger (talk) 20:02, 18 October 2012 (UTC)