Jump to content

User talk:Robbieranger: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Admin?: of course
→‎Corrupt: new section
Line 90: Line 90:
:Robbie - you have done four extremely poor page moves in the past few hours - some simply ill thought-out, others downright bizarre. This is getting to be disruptive. Please do not continue. If you do, I will take further action. Regards, [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 16:17, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
:Robbie - you have done four extremely poor page moves in the past few hours - some simply ill thought-out, others downright bizarre. This is getting to be disruptive. Please do not continue. If you do, I will take further action. Regards, [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 16:17, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
::Now [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship&diff=518351641&oldid=518309945 this malformed attempt at RFA]. If you need any help, please ask. [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 17:12, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
::Now [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship&diff=518351641&oldid=518309945 this malformed attempt at RFA]. If you need any help, please ask. [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 17:12, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

== Corrupt ==

Certain admin on wiki starting to become corrupt. Abuse of power mainly. I have edited articles, on the st james' park article to make it correct. In doing so also providing reliable sources. But instead of helping me make the article correct, i have been slated and even threatened to be banned!! It seems some admin would rather abuse their power than to help correct wikipedia. Absolutly appalling. [[User:Robbieranger|Robbieranger]] ([[User talk:Robbieranger#top|talk]]) 20:02, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:02, 18 October 2012

Welcome

Hello, Robbieranger! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 03:00, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Admin?

Just wondering how do you become an Admin?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Robbieranger (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi, I don't know for what reason I was blocked, I was just editing minor mistakes made on pages, can someone explain to me why I was blocked? It would be really appreciated, thanks.

Accept reason:


It's ok now, I have another account now to continue to contribute to wikipedia, and I hope to make many constructive edits on spelling mistakes and add reliable sources to information :)

Of course, you're only permitted to have 1 account, except under pretty rare circumstances dangerouspanda 17:46, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SJP - SDA

That is a controversial move and, by policy,Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Requesting_controversial_and_potentially_controversial_moves MUST therefore be discussed first. It will be reverted and you should not make the move again without prior discussion. Leaky Caldron 13:11, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It must be discussed and requested in the proper way, it doesn't matter how long it takes. Leaky Caldron 13:20, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I've reverted the move as undiscussed and against consensus. Please continue to use the article talk page. Regards, GiantSnowman 13:22, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to New York Red Bulls because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! The club is not "New York Football Club". Don't move articles without a reason. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:12, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brazil national football team. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:14, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Robbie - you have done four extremely poor page moves in the past few hours - some simply ill thought-out, others downright bizarre. This is getting to be disruptive. Please do not continue. If you do, I will take further action. Regards, GiantSnowman 16:17, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Now this malformed attempt at RFA. If you need any help, please ask. GiantSnowman 17:12, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Corrupt

Certain admin on wiki starting to become corrupt. Abuse of power mainly. I have edited articles, on the st james' park article to make it correct. In doing so also providing reliable sources. But instead of helping me make the article correct, i have been slated and even threatened to be banned!! It seems some admin would rather abuse their power than to help correct wikipedia. Absolutly appalling. Robbieranger (talk) 20:02, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]