User talk:89.187.142.72

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Erotic electrostimulation, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Boing! said Zebedee 11:12, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Roger I of Sicily worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 03:12, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Roger Moore. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Manway (talk) 05:04, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Roger Adams, you may be blocked from editing. Manway (talk) 05:05, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Logo of Nimbus Technical Festival

Hi, can you point to a use of this logo online? This is so that we can confirm that it is genuine. If the logo is seldom used, then we cannot use it for identification purposes. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:38, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Rabindranath Tagore

I don't take sides in the edit war over "Calcutta" vs. "Kolkata" at Rabindranath Tagore, but from your recent edit summary it seemed like maybe you didn't see who had previously edited the name of the city and why. It was 82.138.218.104, and though they did not heed the request to discuss the issue on the talk page, it was obviously not intended as a vandalism edit, as their edit summary shows -- they did have a rationale. Perhaps, if you would like to encourage discussion on the talk page of this issue instead of the inevitable slow-motion edit war, you could start the discussion there yourself. A cogent argument would also give other editors something to point to when giving preference to one version over another. AtticusX (talk) 19:22, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

I'd agree: 89.187.142.72 among others need to relax and stop controlling the wiki spheres with so much venom. If a talk page is needed, it should be clearly accessible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.102.27.234 (talk) 20:48, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Ignoring for the moment the post above by 81.102.27.234, who agrees with something I didn't say, while perpetuating the edit war at Rabindranath Tagore...

The standard for birthplaces whose names have changed which you described on my talk page sounds reasonable to me, 89.187.142.72, and I have seen the same rule of thumb applied in other articles' infoboxes. But I've noticed that some of those articles have similar edit wars from time to time. I wondered, have you run across this placename standard spelled out in the Manual of Style or a Wikipedia project page, etc., or is it more of an unwritten guideline as far as you know? If it were spelled out officially somewhere that could save a lot of time and edit wars! AtticusX (talk) 00:54, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

June 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Documenta. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. freshacconci talktalk 20:34, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Documenta. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. freshacconci talktalk 02:17, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ankit Fadia, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Fraggle81 (talk) 13:06, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Indian Institute of Information Technology, Design and Manufacturing, Jabalpur. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Anbu121 (talk me) 13:45, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Meningococcal vaccine, you may be blocked from editing. You continue adding the same unsourced material despite its removal by other editors. This constitutes vandalism. You are warned. kashmiri 22:50, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.iri

Kashmiri: a) The material is not only sourced and reference is provided but the facts have been proven. b) Please be aware that we have secured the previous unreserved recommendation for MenAfriVac which Wikipedia/you had placed there despite better knowledge and thereby mislead people to believe that this vaccine (MenAfriVac) under the CTC scheme would be safe. c) Though you have changed now the text which you insist should be the only one placed there, you are still withholding crucial information about the fact that the vaccine can not be considered safe and actually has not even a full licence. d) By continuously removing the text we placed on Wikipedia you render yourself as well as Wikipedia itself liable and will possibly be held responsible for further incidences. e) Please note that - by having earlier recommended this vaccination unconditionally and by persistently refusing to have a warning posted - Wikipedia/you might have to be ensued in a pending lawsuit against those who vaccinated the children in Chad and caused the harm there as well as concerning other, upcoming cases. You have been warned

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Meningococcal vaccine, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. kashmiri 10:41, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 18:10, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

I have extended this to a week in light of the legal threats you made above. Daniel Case (talk) 18:13, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

89.187.142.72 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

your reason here

All is factual and if user Kashmiri believes that removing the referenced proper sources helps his warring (or maybe he is paid by bigPharma) then he is wrong. AFP, a Prime Minister video etc. don't lie]:

However, in 2010, when the new conjugate MenAfriVac vaccine jab (out of traditional cold chain) was given to 356,532 young people in Filingué, Niger, already 87 AEFI (Adverse Events Following Immunisation) were observed between September 21 and November 11, 2010, and one person died at the health centre of "unclassifiable" cause. 10 cases with severe convulsions were back then brushed aside as possibly "coincidental Malaria", though the EU report placed a big question mark on these findings.

Starting on December 11, 2012, around 500 young people, aged between 1 and 29 years, as well as babies below one year were forcefully vaccinated with the MenAfriVac vaccine at the small village of Gouro in the North of the Republic of Chad, which has a total population of below one thousand inhabitants, is located in the remote North of the country and far outside the so-called Meningitis Belt.

106 of the inoculated young persons fell immediately sick with severe physical implications like paralysis, extremely strong, uncontrollable convulsions, moaning, excessive salivation, vomiting, headaches, coma-like collapse etc. 56 cases were immediately transported to the regional hospital in Faya. The cases were at first confirmed by a governmental delegation sent to Faya and then by the Health Minister.

The investigation is ongoing, while 38 of the most severe cases were evacuated onwards to the capital N'Djamena as well as seven - without the knowledge or consent of the parents - to a private hospital in Tunis, the capital of Tunisia. After the seriously ill and incapacitated vaccine-victims were visited by the Prime Minister of the Republic of Chad in their hospital in N'Djamena the MenAfriVac vaccination project in Chad was halted.

Two month on many of the young patients have not recovered, but all were sent back to the remote village near the border with Libya, where no medical doctor is available.

Until the incident is completely, independently and transparently investigated the MenAfriVac vaccine, which is not fully licensed anyway, should not be considered as safe and any vaccination using MenAfriVac under the CTC scheme should be stopped.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=your reason here All is factual and if user Kashmiri believes that removing the referenced proper sources helps his warring (or maybe he is paid by bigPharma) then he is wrong. AFP, a Prime Minister video etc. don't lie]: However, in 2010, when the new conjugate MenAfriVac vaccine jab (out of traditional cold chain) was given to 356,532 young people in Filingué, Niger, already 87 AEFI (Adverse Events Following Immunisation) were observed between September 21 and November 11, 2010, and one person died at the health centre of "unclassifiable" cause. 10 cases with severe convulsions were back then brushed aside as possibly "coincidental Malaria", though [http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/ESCAIDE/Materials/Presentations/ESCAIDE2011_Session_18_1_Chaibou.pdf the EU report placed] a big question mark on these findings. Starting on December 11, 2012, around 500 young people, aged between 1 and 29 years, as well as babies below one year were forcefully vaccinated with the MenAfriVac vaccine at the small village of Gouro in the North of the Republic of Chad, which has a total population of below one thousand inhabitants, is located in the remote North of the country and far outside the so-called Meningitis Belt. 106 of the inoculated young persons [http://www.unocha.org/aggregator/sources/60?page=3 fell immediately sick] with severe physical implications like paralysis, extremely strong, uncontrollable convulsions, moaning, excessive salivation, vomiting, headaches, coma-like collapse etc. 56 cases were immediately transported to the regional hospital in Faya. The cases were at first confirmed by a governmental delegation sent to Faya and then by the [http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-01-children-hospitalised-meningitis-shot-chad.html Health Minister]. The investigation is ongoing, while 38 of the most severe cases were evacuated onwards to the capital N'Djamena as well as seven - without the knowledge or consent of the parents - to a private hospital in Tunis, the capital of Tunisia. After the seriously ill and incapacitated vaccine-victims were [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEBGG7KFQpU visited by the Prime Minister of the Republic of Chad] in their hospital in N'Djamena the MenAfriVac vaccination project in Chad was halted. Two month on many of the young patients have not recovered, but all were sent back to the remote village near the border with Libya, where no medical doctor is available. Until the incident is completely, independently and transparently investigated the MenAfriVac vaccine, which is not fully licensed anyway, should not be considered as safe and any vaccination using MenAfriVac under the CTC scheme should be stopped. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here All is factual and if user Kashmiri believes that removing the referenced proper sources helps his warring (or maybe he is paid by bigPharma) then he is wrong. AFP, a Prime Minister video etc. don't lie]: However, in 2010, when the new conjugate MenAfriVac vaccine jab (out of traditional cold chain) was given to 356,532 young people in Filingué, Niger, already 87 AEFI (Adverse Events Following Immunisation) were observed between September 21 and November 11, 2010, and one person died at the health centre of "unclassifiable" cause. 10 cases with severe convulsions were back then brushed aside as possibly "coincidental Malaria", though [http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/ESCAIDE/Materials/Presentations/ESCAIDE2011_Session_18_1_Chaibou.pdf the EU report placed] a big question mark on these findings. Starting on December 11, 2012, around 500 young people, aged between 1 and 29 years, as well as babies below one year were forcefully vaccinated with the MenAfriVac vaccine at the small village of Gouro in the North of the Republic of Chad, which has a total population of below one thousand inhabitants, is located in the remote North of the country and far outside the so-called Meningitis Belt. 106 of the inoculated young persons [http://www.unocha.org/aggregator/sources/60?page=3 fell immediately sick] with severe physical implications like paralysis, extremely strong, uncontrollable convulsions, moaning, excessive salivation, vomiting, headaches, coma-like collapse etc. 56 cases were immediately transported to the regional hospital in Faya. The cases were at first confirmed by a governmental delegation sent to Faya and then by the [http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-01-children-hospitalised-meningitis-shot-chad.html Health Minister]. The investigation is ongoing, while 38 of the most severe cases were evacuated onwards to the capital N'Djamena as well as seven - without the knowledge or consent of the parents - to a private hospital in Tunis, the capital of Tunisia. After the seriously ill and incapacitated vaccine-victims were [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEBGG7KFQpU visited by the Prime Minister of the Republic of Chad] in their hospital in N'Djamena the MenAfriVac vaccination project in Chad was halted. Two month on many of the young patients have not recovered, but all were sent back to the remote village near the border with Libya, where no medical doctor is available. Until the incident is completely, independently and transparently investigated the MenAfriVac vaccine, which is not fully licensed anyway, should not be considered as safe and any vaccination using MenAfriVac under the CTC scheme should be stopped. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here All is factual and if user Kashmiri believes that removing the referenced proper sources helps his warring (or maybe he is paid by bigPharma) then he is wrong. AFP, a Prime Minister video etc. don't lie]: However, in 2010, when the new conjugate MenAfriVac vaccine jab (out of traditional cold chain) was given to 356,532 young people in Filingué, Niger, already 87 AEFI (Adverse Events Following Immunisation) were observed between September 21 and November 11, 2010, and one person died at the health centre of "unclassifiable" cause. 10 cases with severe convulsions were back then brushed aside as possibly "coincidental Malaria", though [http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/ESCAIDE/Materials/Presentations/ESCAIDE2011_Session_18_1_Chaibou.pdf the EU report placed] a big question mark on these findings. Starting on December 11, 2012, around 500 young people, aged between 1 and 29 years, as well as babies below one year were forcefully vaccinated with the MenAfriVac vaccine at the small village of Gouro in the North of the Republic of Chad, which has a total population of below one thousand inhabitants, is located in the remote North of the country and far outside the so-called Meningitis Belt. 106 of the inoculated young persons [http://www.unocha.org/aggregator/sources/60?page=3 fell immediately sick] with severe physical implications like paralysis, extremely strong, uncontrollable convulsions, moaning, excessive salivation, vomiting, headaches, coma-like collapse etc. 56 cases were immediately transported to the regional hospital in Faya. The cases were at first confirmed by a governmental delegation sent to Faya and then by the [http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-01-children-hospitalised-meningitis-shot-chad.html Health Minister]. The investigation is ongoing, while 38 of the most severe cases were evacuated onwards to the capital N'Djamena as well as seven - without the knowledge or consent of the parents - to a private hospital in Tunis, the capital of Tunisia. After the seriously ill and incapacitated vaccine-victims were [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEBGG7KFQpU visited by the Prime Minister of the Republic of Chad] in their hospital in N'Djamena the MenAfriVac vaccination project in Chad was halted. Two month on many of the young patients have not recovered, but all were sent back to the remote village near the border with Libya, where no medical doctor is available. Until the incident is completely, independently and transparently investigated the MenAfriVac vaccine, which is not fully licensed anyway, should not be considered as safe and any vaccination using MenAfriVac under the CTC scheme should be stopped. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}