Jump to content

Talk:Ruthenian nobility: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 8: Line 8:


[[Belarusian nobility]] article was such a mess that it was [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belarusian nobility|deleted]]. This article was created instead. As I said in the AfD, the concept of Belarusian nobility may be notable - but please use reliable sources while discussing it. OR and nationalist pov pushing is not welcome. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</font>]]</sub> 05:48, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
[[Belarusian nobility]] article was such a mess that it was [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belarusian nobility|deleted]]. This article was created instead. As I said in the AfD, the concept of Belarusian nobility may be notable - but please use reliable sources while discussing it. OR and nationalist pov pushing is not welcome. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</font>]]</sub> 05:48, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
:First of all, I looked at the discussion and I didn't see a majority for deleting the article, but whatever. Second, this article does include a lot of important information and I think the best thing is to edit it. I don't see any nationalism in there, and I agree it should be referenced and partly re-written.

Revision as of 15:30, 21 March 2013

WikiProject iconBelarus Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconPoland Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUkraine Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconRussia Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia.
To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please don't add unreferenced content about the "Belarusian nobility"

Belarusian nobility article was such a mess that it was deleted. This article was created instead. As I said in the AfD, the concept of Belarusian nobility may be notable - but please use reliable sources while discussing it. OR and nationalist pov pushing is not welcome. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:48, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I looked at the discussion and I didn't see a majority for deleting the article, but whatever. Second, this article does include a lot of important information and I think the best thing is to edit it. I don't see any nationalism in there, and I agree it should be referenced and partly re-written.