User talk:TParis: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 19:35, 12 April 2013

This is TParis's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17

If you have come here to change my opinion, be ready to also change yours.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by .

Burnout

Given the past year, you have went through a lot. If you ever feel close to burnout, please let me know.—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 18:12, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bump. Methinks you missed this.—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 02:49, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, didn't miss it. I just don't want to answer the question right now. We can talk on IRC or email.--v/r - T P 16:43, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Breakfast

Hello, TParis. You are invited to join WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of breakfast-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:30, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Every other entry has external links why not this one?

Hi there,

I am the one who inserted EVERY SINGLE REFERENCE in this entry for Roman polytheistic reconstructionism - if you go through the edit history you will see that for yourself. I am not a spammer and my edit history speaks for itself. I am very concerned you are pushing a Christian agenda here ...

Regards, Ragnii — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ragnii (talk • contribs) 21:59, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The book sources are great, I'm not challenging those. The personal websites are not, though, and the end result of this mess is going to be the removal of those links. You just simply are not following the right policies on this. That's not my problem and not my fault if you were not aware of what the policies were. I've linked them to you several times (WP:UGC and WP:ELNO) so it's just not my concern that you have an issue. If you want to keep working on these articles, I suggest letting those links go because they are going to result in your block.--v/r - T P 02:45, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to you let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You do not need to participate however, you are invited to help find a resolution. The thread is "Roman reconstructionist pagan". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 01:19, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've closed this as unsuitable for two reasons (and just thought of a third):

The opener wanted a review of your conduct and threats (which were all good from what I saw)
The sources are extremely obviously not RS, and even then DRN isn't for RS, RSN is
Not a whole lot of discussion I could find that the OP took part in with an open mind, a requirement for a DRN case.

I'd support an AN(/I) posting if he continues btw, just my 2cents. So... I guess that's all I had to say. Sorry for the message and the statement you had to take the time to make :) gwickwire^talk_editing 02:49, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help!

Hi TParis. I just need your help, because my Edit Counter says I don't exist. What do I do? The Wikimon (talk) 12:19, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

<Ched waves at Wikimon o/> (talk page stalker) .. Is this not accurate? — Ched : ? 16:53, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have a bad habit of ignoring things I know will work themselves out. When The Wikimon used the script, there must have been a problem contacting the toolserver database. If the query times out, rather than returning a connect error or a no results error, it tends to incorrectly say that a user couldn't be found. The problem eventually worked itself out when the database response time became quicker and that's why it works for us now.--v/r - T P 16:56, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhh .. ok. Yep, I get those "timed out" things often. I figure it's usually "teh Internetz" telling me "you don't need to know this right now". And to steal from your sig. ... v/r :) — Ched : ? 17:01, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake guys... Sorry... Sheepish look on my face! Wave back at Ched! The Wikimon (talk) 17:13, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Project for RfA nominators

Hi -- I notice you've been active in nominating at RfA over the past year, and would like to invite you to join the WikiProject for Nominators, which aims to support editors interested in nominating there. We'd be glad of your expertise in getting this new project off the ground. Apologies for the talk-page spamming if you've already seen this message a dozen times. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 00:01, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Somehow I ended up at this page (not the sort of place that I normally hang out in) and saw your name there and was intrigued by the concept of asking the admin who banned me (from only one article, for which I am grateful) to shepherd me through the process. However that fantasy passed quickly and I am returning to working on my, "Why I Am an Anarchist" manifesto. Life. What a place to live. EInar akaCarptrash (talk) 03:25, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Muséparc Vanier Museopark

Why did you delete this page? It is a museum in Ottawa, Ontario...absolutely notable! I haven't finished with it yet! It is featured in many other places on Wiki. Look up Vanier, Ontario. Is there a chance I could get a Canadian or Ontarian admin who can be in charge of this instead?! Herecomestheslaughter (talk) 19:01, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you put down there was no explanation of significance! The whole article explained that. It is part of the Museum Network of Ottawa, Ontario. How can that not be significant? Herecomestheslaughter (talk) 19:03, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is no claim to notability. Why is this museum any different from any other antique shop down the street? Anybody with some old crap and a few extra dollars to spend can charge admission and call it a museum. The article needs to explain it's significance. Being a museum alone does not make it so. The article needs to spell that out. And it needs reliable tertiary sources that are about the subject.--v/r - T P 19:05, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.ottawamuseums.com/vanier-museopark.aspx— Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter (talk • contribs)

Is a primary source.--v/r - T P 19:10, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.museumsontario.ca/museum/Museoparc-Vanier-Museopark

This is a real museum part of the City of Ottawa— Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter (talk • contribs)

Being real doesn't matter. Being significant does. Read WP:N.--v/r - T P 19:13, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. How is it not significant? Most museums in Ottawa have Wiki Pages, so what makes this one so different? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter (talk • contribs) 19:14, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Has this museum been noted by the media? Was the media coverage significant and about the museum specifically? If so, where are those sources? If not, then if the media hasn't taken notice than why should Wikipedia?--v/r - T P 19:16, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia already has taken notice. Like I said, look up the page for Vanier, Ontario. I just did the press review for 2012, I could send you links all day

http://www.expressottawa.ca/Actualites/2012-05-16/article-2981042/Rendez-vous-aux-Cafes-citoyens/1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter (talk • contribs) 19:21, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Press releases are primary sources. Where are the independent sources?--v/r - T P 19:22, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this one is an article, not a press release

http://www.emcottawaeast.ca/20130314/News/Vanier+sugar+shack+getting+ready+for+maple+festival%2C+New+activities%2C+programs+for+all+ages — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter (talk • contribs) 19:24, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good as an independent source, but lacks significant coverage. Read over WP:IRS and WP:42.--v/r - T P 19:27, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very popular French news source: http://www3.tfo.org/videos/00190852/soiree-benerfice-au-profit-du-museoparc-vanier-et-hommage-a-mme-meilleur

http://www.radio-canada.ca/sujet/visuel/2012/11/02/001-nouveau-cadre-vanier.shtml (This is a BIG one in terms of news sources) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter (talk • contribs) 19:29, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's not about the museum. Have you read WP:IRS and WP:42?--v/r - T P 19:32, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This one is: http://www.racontemoiottawa.com/en/37

@@ Line 108: / Line 108: @@
 http://www.radio-canada.ca/sujet/visuel/2012/11/02/001-nouveau-cadre-vanier.shtml   (This is a BIG one in terms of news sources)  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Herecomestheslaughter|Herecomestheslaughter]] ([[User talk:Herecomestheslaughter|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Herecomestheslaughter|contribs]]) 19:29, 12 April 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 :That's not ''about'' the museum.  Have you read [[WP:IRS]] and [[WP:42]]?--v/r - [[User:TParis|T]][[User_talk:TParis|P]] 19:32, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
+This one is: http://www.racontemoiottawa.com/en/37