User talk:RHaworth/2013 Jul 22: Difference between revisions
big data in R and Floridian fotos |
Jprogers21 (talk | contribs) →Deleted my sandbox: new section |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
I saw you deleted this photo for copy-vio, and I vaguely remember seeing it prior to deletion. Was that the same photo as [[:file:Old School house Muesum circa1885.JPG]]. If so, that one also needs to be deleted and the uploader has many other files that are similarly edited ([[Special:ListFiles/Indietop20]]) if this one is older than the copy vio source, this may be the original location. Thanks, -- [[User:ТимофейЛееСуда|'''Тимофей''']][[User_talk:ТимофейЛееСуда|'''<font color="#00f00ff">ЛееСуда</font>''']]. 02:53, 27 June 2013 (UTC) |
I saw you deleted this photo for copy-vio, and I vaguely remember seeing it prior to deletion. Was that the same photo as [[:file:Old School house Muesum circa1885.JPG]]. If so, that one also needs to be deleted and the uploader has many other files that are similarly edited ([[Special:ListFiles/Indietop20]]) if this one is older than the copy vio source, this may be the original location. Thanks, -- [[User:ТимофейЛееСуда|'''Тимофей''']][[User_talk:ТимофейЛееСуда|'''<font color="#00f00ff">ЛееСуда</font>''']]. 02:53, 27 June 2013 (UTC) |
||
* [[:File:Fort meade school house.jpg]] was a low res (500×375) version of [[:file:Old School house Muesum circa1885.JPG]] allegedly copied from [http://www.visitcentralflorida.org/destinations/fort-meade-historical-museum this page]. But the image on that page is only 610×458 and [[:File:Old School house Muesum circa1885.JPG]] is much bigger and still has the EXIF metadata still in place. So I would say that unless you can find copies of these images at their original resolution out on the web, don't bother to take any action. The uploader {{user|Indietop20}} seems to be inactive but an e-mail might get some explanation, eg. that visitcentralflorida.org have ripped off the image from here - it has been up for more than five years. But I would have no objection to you nominating for deletion Indietop20's images such as the one on the right with its watermark and ridiculous shadowing. — [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 12:20, 27 June 2013 (UTC) |
* [[:File:Fort meade school house.jpg]] was a low res (500×375) version of [[:file:Old School house Muesum circa1885.JPG]] allegedly copied from [http://www.visitcentralflorida.org/destinations/fort-meade-historical-museum this page]. But the image on that page is only 610×458 and [[:File:Old School house Muesum circa1885.JPG]] is much bigger and still has the EXIF metadata still in place. So I would say that unless you can find copies of these images at their original resolution out on the web, don't bother to take any action. The uploader {{user|Indietop20}} seems to be inactive but an e-mail might get some explanation, eg. that visitcentralflorida.org have ripped off the image from here - it has been up for more than five years. But I would have no objection to you nominating for deletion Indietop20's images such as the one on the right with its watermark and ridiculous shadowing. — [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 12:20, 27 June 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Deleted my sandbox == |
|||
10:56, 25 June 2013 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page [[User:Jprogers21/sandbox]] ([[G3]]: Blatant [[hoax]]) |
|||
Hey, I put an article about Paul Ritter Day up for submission and it got deleted. It was not a hoax. What happens to my article after it's deleted? I'd like to resubmit or appeal or something, but I don't want to have to start from scratch. |
|||
Thanks, |
|||
James |
Revision as of 14:34, 27 June 2013
This is an archive of past discussions about User:RHaworth. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archives
Slovenly is a word I find myself using quite a bit at the moment. Slovenly is what I think of anybody who leaves a message here about an article and fails to provide a wikilink to the article. How do you expect me to read the article if you don't link to it?
I reserve the right to ignore any message which does not provide links where appropriate or has not been signed with ~~~~. Even if the article has been deleted, you should still link to it.
And if that sounds like a grumpy old man, it's because I am ...
The Knowledge Centre for Agriculture Deletion
[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]
Problems with gun articles
Hi, RHaworth. It appears Special:Contributions/Skrunyak has returned as Special:Contributions/Uayoa and a few other WP:SPA accounts. I prodded the most problematic of his contribs, but someone mass reverted that after a discussion at WT:MILHIST. The [incorrect] inference of a manufacturer's citizenship based on his name is a tell-tale sign this is the same editor—compare Union Automatic Revolver with Storle machine gun, as is his creation of articles based solely on patents. He keeps doing that despite your warning to him [1] years ago. 86.121.18.17 (talk) 05:36, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
An account with interest in that area (automatic revolvers) was blocked by check-user User:AGK [2]. The same article was then edited by Special:Contributions/Uoayo; note name similarity with Uayoa. 86.121.18.17 (talk) 09:21, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
- In general, I do not talk to IP addresses. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:10, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
- Since when has it been acceptable for administrators not to talk to unregistered users? If you are not prepared to comply with WP:ADMIN#Accountability then you should resign from your admin position. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:19, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
- As they say in diplomatic circles, I am still considering my response to the last comment. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:20, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
How is a knighthood not an indication of importance/significance? Phil Bridger (talk) 21:06, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
- It just is not! Has anyone ever proposed a Wikipedia policy that knighthoods confer automatic notability. Even at the level of knighthoods, the Crown does not hand them out for notability but usually for "services to …" and these are in many cases in quite obscure areas. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:18, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
- Don't you, as a long term admin, even know that WP:CSD#A7 is not about notability? DRV it is then. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:21, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
- The DRV discussion. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:35, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
well done! Thank you for the help to delete Programming with Big Data in R (pbdR), but please keep Programming with Big Data in R alive. Would you mind to check the new version again? If this is still no evidence of notability, please let me know. I will do my best to edit this page. Wccsnow (talk) 02:23, 27 June 2013 (UTC) |
- There is no need to award me a barnstar just to ask me a question. Will you please ensure that you are always logged in when you edit articles. So which of the links you have added actually constitutes significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:20, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
I saw you deleted this photo for copy-vio, and I vaguely remember seeing it prior to deletion. Was that the same photo as file:Old School house Muesum circa1885.JPG. If so, that one also needs to be deleted and the uploader has many other files that are similarly edited (Special:ListFiles/Indietop20) if this one is older than the copy vio source, this may be the original location. Thanks, -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:53, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
- File:Fort meade school house.jpg was a low res (500×375) version of file:Old School house Muesum circa1885.JPG allegedly copied from this page. But the image on that page is only 610×458 and File:Old School house Muesum circa1885.JPG is much bigger and still has the EXIF metadata still in place. So I would say that unless you can find copies of these images at their original resolution out on the web, don't bother to take any action. The uploader Indietop20 (talk · contribs) seems to be inactive but an e-mail might get some explanation, eg. that visitcentralflorida.org have ripped off the image from here - it has been up for more than five years. But I would have no objection to you nominating for deletion Indietop20's images such as the one on the right with its watermark and ridiculous shadowing. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:20, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted my sandbox
10:56, 25 June 2013 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page User:Jprogers21/sandbox (G3: Blatant hoax)
Hey, I put an article about Paul Ritter Day up for submission and it got deleted. It was not a hoax. What happens to my article after it's deleted? I'd like to resubmit or appeal or something, but I don't want to have to start from scratch.
Thanks, James