User talk:Gary Dee

Unnecessary disambiguation?

Hi, I see you've been moving some creek articles by adding qualifiers. Why? Per WP:PRECISION, an article title should be "only as precise as is needed". I'm probably going to move these back, unless you were planning on making some disambiguation pages. Let me know! Thanks, --JaGa^talk 00:09, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi, i`m sorry for that. I will create some disambiguation pages out of them. But i will wait until the GNIS website will be back online, as they`re down for maintenance until monday. In case i should not reply here until the end of next week, please feel free to moveèm back. Thanks Gary Dee (talk) 12:14, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Sounds good. Thanks, --JaGa^talk 15:04, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Please give me time untill Sunday. Thanks --Gary Dee (talk) 20:13, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

No problem. --JaGa^talk 16:03, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi. Think its done. If i forgot one, please let me know. Thx --Gary Dee (talk) 13:40, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Unnecessary disambiguation

Please don't create disambiguation pages until there's something to disambiguate. Disam pages are to list articles with similar names, where there could be confusion. If there's no article about either (or any) of the items, there's nothing to confuse. If you are planning to create articles on these items, that would probably be very welcome - but the disam page can be created then when it's needed, i.e. when there are two or more articles of similar importance with possibly confusing names. I'm not trying to put you off editing - just trying to divert your talents into what could be a more productive area, and explaining why people are tagging your disams for deletion. Article creation (of valid subjects, of course, not something about Flossie the Poodle at No 39 Back St, Clogthorpe) is a prized thing at Wikipedia. Peridon (talk) 19:00, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Thx for notifying. The rules in different WP-Projects are always different. Will try to remember this one although for the future. -- Gary Dee (talk) 19:06, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

I have to remind myself of that when I go visiting, usually looking for references and not finding any... En-wiki seems rather stricter than the others I've been to so far (couldn't really say about the Marathi one where I just popped in and put an en-wiki link on something - can't read that one...). Peridon (talk) 19:16, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

;-) -- Gary Dee (talk) 19:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! -129.49.72.78 (talk) 18:57, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Thx too. ;) --Gary Dee (talk) 19:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to R. Budd Dwyer, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 21:35, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

NOW it is. --Gary Dee 21:45, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Puffin with this edit. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you, Katieh5584 (talk) 21:52, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Same back. Look at his [1] diskpage. Regards --Gary Dee 21:53, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

_:In other words:

== STOP! Gary Dee! Please do no edit other peoples messages or add abusive messages to my talk page. Thanks :) == What the hell is that for a invitation message if someone wants to post something on your discussion page ???? Clear affronting. Bye --[[User:Gary Dee|'''<span style="color:#00F5FF">Gary'''</span>]] [[User talk:Gary Dee|'''<span style="color:#00868B">Dee'''</span>]] 21:51, 1 July 2011 (UTC) --Gary Dee 21:57, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

EOD --Gary Dee 22:09, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:31, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

SNEPMusique

Please initiate a discussion at WP:CHARTS and get a consensus there that it is indeed malicious. A robot can do the job instead of you having to do it manually. Please do this asap if you believe there is a threat with the link. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 18:02, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Thx for notifying. I will get back to this. --Gary Dee 09:27, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Alleged malware link in the Laurie Penny article

For reasons I indicate on the talk page I believe you have made a mistake in removing a link to what you believe is malware. Given the potential seriousness if it myself who has made an error, I have asked for a third opinion at Wikipedia:Help desk#Alleged malware link in the Laurie Penny article. Philip Cross (talk) 10:00, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Thx for notifying. I do not believe that this is a FP. I Will analyse this, and let you know whats right. With REFERENCES ! --Gary Dee 12:45, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Or otherwise, may i be wrong: :) --Gary Dee 12:49, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Replied. --Gary Dee 16:15, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Malicious links

Hi. Concerning your edit to Neuregulin 1, please note that there was two parts to this citation. The lay summary link to dailygalaxy.com may very well be malicious, but the rest of the citation to Psychological Science (PMID 19594860) certainly is not. Hence please be a little more selective in the links that you are removing. Thanks. Boghog (talk) 18:53, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

HI. Sorry. Thx for notifying. If there might be a mistake, i would like you to notice, that NOTHING is perfect. In case you recognize something like that what you mentioned, it is far more productive to just correct it, with a note to IT, and go on. It takes less (important) Time to the Project, as it does give time to improuve the Project. Once more: Thanks for mentioning, and a nice helping to devolop the Project. Never There is a 100% Guarantee. Thanks --Gary Dee 20:29, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Gary Dee. You have new messages at Talk:Saturn.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I Strongly agree with the link removal. Thanks for being bold and removing them.--Anderson I'm Willing To Help 21:43, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

For your malware edits particularly Huge-LQG Martin451 (talk) 21:57, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Thanks for removing the malicious links from Saturn. Anderson I'm Willing To Help 21:59, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

dailygalaxy.com

What evidence do you have that dailygalaxy.com has malware that is of sufficent nature that warrents it's blanking from all refereces on the wiki? Is there some official decision to do this or is your actions unilateral? The links you pasted on an article I watch shows nothing more then some confused scanners confused by obscuficated code in an Adsense script. Got anything more then that? Got any evidence it's not an issue with their advertisers and not the website, got any evidence it's not temporary and won't be fixed once the offending AD is removed from the AD network? These things happen a lot in some of the lower end AD serving companies, and it's not the websites fault. So where is the official decision that this warrants removal as a source from all these pages? — raekyt 12:57, 22 July 2013 (UTC)