User talk:Ukexpat: Difference between revisions
EdwardsBot (talk | contribs) →The Signpost: 31 July 2013: new section |
→Angels Den: new section |
||
| Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
</div> |
</div> |
||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0589 --> |
<!-- EdwardsBot 0589 --> |
||
== Angels Den == |
|||
Hi ukexpat! |
|||
You have recently added two banners on my article on Angels Den. The first concern of yours is the way the referencing is made. Unfortunately, this is my first article and I merely thought that adding website URLs would suffice; I was obviously wrong. However, What sort of referencing style do I ought to use- oxford, MLA? And more importantly how do I do that? As, I have tried to edit the referencing section, but was rather unsuccessful. |
|||
You also have added a banner saying that this article might not be notable enough. I must contest this claim. I am a student of Finance in the UK, and you cannot mention angels Investing without mentioning Angels Den. I would like to know your thoughts on that matter and to know what made you think that, so I can ameliorate this. |
|||
Thank you Very Much, |
|||
--[[User:Rhamusker|Rhamusker]] ([[User talk:Rhamusker|talk]]) 16:05, 2 August 2013 (UTC)-- |
|||
Revision as of 16:05, 2 August 2013
|
Welcome to ukexpat's talkpage |
· userpage · |
Tuesday 12
November |
|
| This is Ukexpat's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
TUSC token 4ca061685a490899d158b1bcf22d9087
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Help Project newsletter : Issue 6
 |
Issue VI - April 2013 |
|
Open Help Conference The Open Help Conference will be taking place June 15-19 in Cincinnati Ohio, USA. The conference includes two days of presentations and open discussions, followed by team "sprints" - collaborative efforts to write and improve documentation. It has been suggested to send a team from Wikipedia/Wikimedia: to share our own knowledge about help, learn from others in the open source community working on similar problems, and to carry out a sprint to improve some aspect of Wikipedia's help. There may be support available for volunteers to attend from the Participation Support program (and your editor is certainly hoping to be there!) Please join the discussion in Meta's IdeaLab if you're interested, and/or have suggestions about what we could work on. |
Other news
|
|
If you don't wish to receive this newsletter on your talk page in future then just edit the participants page and add "no newsletter" next to your name. Suggestions for future issues are welcome at Wikipedia:Help Project/Newsletter. | |
2013 Philadelphia Wiki-Picnic: Saturday, June 22
|
Philadelphia's Great American Wiknic at Penn Park | 
|
| You are invited to the Philadelphia edition of the Great American Wiknic taking place in Penn Park, on Saturday, June 22, 2013! We would love to see you there!--User:Ocaasi (talk)|}} |
Welcome thanks
hey, thanks :)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Highspiritswow (talk • contribs)
The Signpost: 24 July 2013
- In the media: Wikipedia flamewars
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Religion
- Discussion report: Partially disambiguated page names, page protection policy, and more
- Traffic report: Gleeless
- Featured content: Engineering and the arts
- Arbitration report: Infoboxes case opens
Re: Thanks
Not a problem. ProtossPylon 02:51, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Surreal Barnstar |
| Thanks for the dedication, diplomacy and enlightenment you provide to the wikisphere! Market St.⧏ ⧐ Diamond Way 07:00, 27 July 2013 (UTC) |
- Thanks for that, much appreciated!--ukexpat (talk) 00:24, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Request Edit
Hi Ukexpat. I'm clearing out some of the Request Edit items.[1] I would prefer not to since I am myself a heavy user of Request Edit, but some of these are several months old and just go completely un-answered, perhaps because so many of the requests are just so awful nobody wants to deal with it. Anyways, at Talk:University_of_Texas_Medical_Branch I felt some of the suggested edits could be slight improvements, but overall they were just asking us to reword material that is already neutral and properly sourced. The editor has been waiting for a second opinion for several months now. Do you think you could take a look so we can close it out one way or another? CorporateM (Talk) 16:33, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Welcome thanks
Thanks very much for the message. I look forward to contributing more to Wiki and to spreading the word. I hate how so many view it as full of unreliable info etc.
Colinkilgour (talk) 09:41, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 July 2013
Angels Den
Hi ukexpat!
You have recently added two banners on my article on Angels Den. The first concern of yours is the way the referencing is made. Unfortunately, this is my first article and I merely thought that adding website URLs would suffice; I was obviously wrong. However, What sort of referencing style do I ought to use- oxford, MLA? And more importantly how do I do that? As, I have tried to edit the referencing section, but was rather unsuccessful.
You also have added a banner saying that this article might not be notable enough. I must contest this claim. I am a student of Finance in the UK, and you cannot mention angels Investing without mentioning Angels Den. I would like to know your thoughts on that matter and to know what made you think that, so I can ameliorate this.
Thank you Very Much, --Rhamusker (talk) 16:05, 2 August 2013 (UTC)--