Jump to content

Talk:Thérèse Coffey: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
BattyBot (talk | contribs)
m Talk page general fixes & other cleanup using AWB (9369)
Line 20: Line 20:
Since "significant" is a subjective term, i thought the deletion should be undone awaiting further discussion. Further to this: regarding the point from 217.42.57.85, even if the candidate does not become an MP, she has gained notability by her many attempts at getting elected in various locations around the UK (spread over 6 years so not a recent news story). Sincerely,
Since "significant" is a subjective term, i thought the deletion should be undone awaiting further discussion. Further to this: regarding the point from 217.42.57.85, even if the candidate does not become an MP, she has gained notability by her many attempts at getting elected in various locations around the UK (spread over 6 years so not a recent news story). Sincerely,
[[User:Matthewcgirling|Matthewcgirling]] ([[User talk:Matthewcgirling|talk]]) 23:10, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
[[User:Matthewcgirling|Matthewcgirling]] ([[User talk:Matthewcgirling|talk]]) 23:10, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

== Rename article to Thérèse Coffey ==

I propose this article should be renamed Thérèse Coffey to reflect the correct spelling of her name, and adding a redirect from Therese Coffey. [[Special:Contributions/31.55.65.236|31.55.65.236]] ([[User talk:31.55.65.236|talk]]) 15:50, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:50, 6 October 2013

Notability

As the candidate for the same party as the existing MP in a safe conservative constituency then Therese Coffey is highly likely to become an MP in the 2010 election and so is notable. 217.42.57.85 (talk) 12:21, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


This is insufficient under WP:Politician AlecStewart (talk) 18:24, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree on the basis of the exception allowed under WP:Politician section 3:

  ...although such people can still be notable if they meet the primary notability criterion of "significant
  coverage in reliable sources  that are independent of the subject of the article."

Since "significant" is a subjective term, i thought the deletion should be undone awaiting further discussion. Further to this: regarding the point from 217.42.57.85, even if the candidate does not become an MP, she has gained notability by her many attempts at getting elected in various locations around the UK (spread over 6 years so not a recent news story). Sincerely, Matthewcgirling (talk) 23:10, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rename article to Thérèse Coffey

I propose this article should be renamed Thérèse Coffey to reflect the correct spelling of her name, and adding a redirect from Therese Coffey. 31.55.65.236 (talk) 15:50, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]