Jump to content

Talk:Mughal weapons: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
{{WikiProject MILHIST|class=start|Indian=yes}}
No edit summary
Line 52: Line 52:


This article is full of bias with lack of any references or citations and many grammatical errors. Furthermore the author also seems to be praising muslim conquests in the Indian sub-continent and portraying Indian armies as weak. I would also like to point out that many of the weapons referenced in the article also originate from the indian sub-contient but have been implied as having muslim origins, with some already having been extensively used by indian armies i.e. battle-axes, bows and arrows, daggers etc upon until this point. It seems the sole purpose of this article was to insult people from the sub-continent and praise muslims. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.161.162.190|86.161.162.190]] ([[User talk:86.161.162.190|talk]]) 17:48, 1 December 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
This article is full of bias with lack of any references or citations and many grammatical errors. Furthermore the author also seems to be praising muslim conquests in the Indian sub-continent and portraying Indian armies as weak. I would also like to point out that many of the weapons referenced in the article also originate from the indian sub-contient but have been implied as having muslim origins, with some already having been extensively used by indian armies i.e. battle-axes, bows and arrows, daggers etc upon until this point. It seems the sole purpose of this article was to insult people from the sub-continent and praise muslims. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.161.162.190|86.161.162.190]] ([[User talk:86.161.162.190|talk]]) 17:48, 1 December 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

I'm not sure about prejudice, but I know that most daggers are not 22 feet or 175 inches long unless giants are using them; the entry on Khatars seems mathematically impossible.


== images from greatestbattles.iblogger.org ==
== images from greatestbattles.iblogger.org ==

Revision as of 02:01, 8 November 2013

File:M10.gif Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:M10.gif, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:21, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:M12.gif Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:M12.gif, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:22, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schlacht von Panipat.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Schlacht von Panipat.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests - No timestamp given
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:00, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Changes

This article is full of bias with lack of any references or citations and many grammatical errors. Furthermore the author also seems to be praising muslim conquests in the Indian sub-continent and portraying Indian armies as weak. I would also like to point out that many of the weapons referenced in the article also originate from the indian sub-contient but have been implied as having muslim origins, with some already having been extensively used by indian armies i.e. battle-axes, bows and arrows, daggers etc upon until this point. It seems the sole purpose of this article was to insult people from the sub-continent and praise muslims. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.161.162.190 (talk) 17:48, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure about prejudice, but I know that most daggers are not 22 feet or 175 inches long unless giants are using them; the entry on Khatars seems mathematically impossible.

images from greatestbattles.iblogger.org

iblogger.org is on the blacklist[1] so images from it should not be used. See also the whitelist discussion|[2]

Graeme374 (talk) 00:36, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Early matchlocks.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Early matchlocks.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Early matchlocks.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:14, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camel gun - pg 18 -The last voyage - Annie Brassey.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Camel gun - pg 18 -The last voyage - Annie Brassey.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Camel gun - pg 18 -The last voyage - Annie Brassey.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:46, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (It is copied from this source.[www.indianetzone.com/37/military_organization.htm Art of Mughal Warfare]) --Fatbuu1000 (talk) 05:40, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Art of Mughal Warfare at IndiaNetzone and other pages beginning in May 2010 (as confirmed by web archives). Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. CactusWriter (talk) 06:19, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]