Jump to content

User talk:Drwho16: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by Drwho16 (talk) to last version by Kuru
Drwho16 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 32: Line 32:


{{unblock reviewed | 1=I am not linked with any other accounts. | decline=As noted above, you have indeed been directly connected to other abusive accounts. [[User:Kuru|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#cd853f; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">Kuru</span>]] [[User talk:Kuru|<span style="color:#f5deb3">''(talk)''</span>]] 14:29, 8 December 2013 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed | 1=I am not linked with any other accounts. | decline=As noted above, you have indeed been directly connected to other abusive accounts. [[User:Kuru|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#cd853f; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">Kuru</span>]] [[User talk:Kuru|<span style="color:#f5deb3">''(talk)''</span>]] 14:29, 8 December 2013 (UTC)}}

{{Unblock | I have now been blocked for several days, when will this ban expire. I will have no need to create new accounts if this one is unblocked.}}

Revision as of 18:35, 10 December 2013

Drwho16, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The
Adventure
The Wikipedia Adventure guide

Hi Drwho16!! We want to invite you to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game that can help you become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey, and you'll learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there!


This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 21:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Coronation Street characters

Hi, thanks for your edits to Wikipedia. Please can you not move fictional character pages just because the characters married. We should use to most commonly known name, and in most cases it has been discussed already, and it is unlikely that any of these pages will require moving. Also, redirects are already in place. Additionally, the titles of your redirects were unnecessarily disambiguated - if you are unable to move a page to the title you want, you should request a move instead of creating unnecessary disambiguation. I've revert the moves and deleted the disambiguated redirects. Any questions, just ask. Thanks. –anemoneprojectors17:55, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts, as  Confirmed by checkuser. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:40, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect this isn't the original puppetmaster but probably something that goes back at least a few month, if not years. –anemoneprojectors10:31, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Drwho16 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not linked with any other accounts.

Decline reason:

As noted above, you have indeed been directly connected to other abusive accounts. Kuru (talk) 14:29, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Drwho16 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have now been blocked for several days, when will this ban expire. I will have no need to create new accounts if this one is unblocked.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= I have now been blocked for several days, when will this ban expire. I will have no need to create new accounts if this one is unblocked. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= I have now been blocked for several days, when will this ban expire. I will have no need to create new accounts if this one is unblocked. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= I have now been blocked for several days, when will this ban expire. I will have no need to create new accounts if this one is unblocked. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}