User talk:Solarra: Difference between revisions
→Edit to evaluative diversity page: new section |
|||
Line 172: | Line 172: | ||
[[24.212.68.230]] ([[User talk:24.212.68.230|talk]]) reverted your reverts to [[Jutsu (Naruto)]], and even made more vandalism changes! [[User:Jwoodward48wiki|Jwoodward48wiki]] ([[User talk:Jwoodward48wiki|talk]]) 13:40, 7 May 2014 (UTC) |
[[24.212.68.230]] ([[User talk:24.212.68.230|talk]]) reverted your reverts to [[Jutsu (Naruto)]], and even made more vandalism changes! [[User:Jwoodward48wiki|Jwoodward48wiki]] ([[User talk:Jwoodward48wiki|talk]]) 13:40, 7 May 2014 (UTC) |
||
== Edit to evaluative diversity page == |
|||
Hi Solarra. I think you made a mistake in removing my edits to the [[evaluative diversity]] page. I don't think I removed any content. Rather, I added content and moved some to a new section. Your changes actually removed several valuable sources regarding the history of the study of evaluative diversity. Will you please revert your change? [[Special:Contributions/165.189.37.11|165.189.37.11]] ([[User talk:165.189.37.11|talk]]) 21:25, 7 May 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:25, 7 May 2014
Template:Archive box collapsible
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:56, 24 July 2014 (UTC) LA Clippers Salebecause i heard about sterling. is it final or not yet? thank you -holiday ipapo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Holiday ipapo (talk • contribs) 12:03, 2 May 2014 (UTC) HiI have reported 173.79.177.82 to an admin. - Danger^Mouse (talk) 05:10, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Cowed on cowardiceCurious as to why you undid the edit. What, specifically, made "cowed" unconstructive? 92.24.204.65 (talk) 11:36, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Disruptive EditingI believe you sent me a warning to, and I quote, "stop your disruptive editing" to the Mao(card game) page. I am not sure if you are aware of this, but the Mao page is in flagrant violation of the Rules of Mao. The Rules expressly state that no one is allowed to tell or communicate in any way the rules to someone who does not know them. However, the Mao(card game) page does exactly that. In order to preserve the sanctity of the game of Mao, I attempted to correct this violation of the Rules. The Mao community is, for the most part, composed of extremely dedicated players. The mere thought that someone would be so uncaring about the Rules and honor code of Mao sickens us. I request that you aid my attempts to protect the ideal of the game of Mao. Dapriceofimmortality
Hello Solarra, I am preparing the english translation of the spanish article es:Mit Borrás. What is the problem? It is my subside. Best --Diana Winterbotom (talk) 13:37, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Look this isn't fairI have not donw anything wrong. I dont know what to say. Please tell me what vandalism I have done please and I am terribly sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wwemeow2 (talk • contribs) 23:00, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Why are you a nerd?It's a simple question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.168.255.153 (talk) 01:14, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Seth Rogen editsHello, Can you please tell me how stating that Seth Rogen is Jewish can be perceived as "vandalizing" a page? A response would be much appreciated, please. --The Intelligence — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.40.250.19 (talk) 01:31, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the clarification. He is indeed Jewish, and as Jews are in fact a national as well as an ethnic group, I thought it superseded his place of birth. I will go ahead and change it to your suggestion though. --The Intelligence Slovak National UprisingHello, I found your message related to my edit of the Slovak National Uprising page. Honestly, I don't remember what was the subject of my edit on that page. Can you please remind me? Maybe then I'll be able to explain my edit or to agre with you.
Correct Colour for Political partyFor the recently undone edit concerning the colour of the SNP in the 2010 uk elections. I noticed that the colour used in nearly ever article to represent the SNP was #FFFF00, therefore I thought it would be best to change it to keep continuity, avoid confusion and give a uniform look to the article. Though maybe it should've been classed as a minor edit. 90.221.44.21 (talk) 11:39, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Altered speedy deletion rationale: Draft:ParguelaaaasHello Solarra, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I deleted Draft:Parguelaaaas, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow and specific, and the process is more effective if the correct criterion is used. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:00, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
My external link at www.earningthatis.tkI put the link there.So that aspiring people get to my page.See some opportunities to earn.Since we offer services like getting customers to one that registers with us and that too in free. We just want to bestow opportunities to them who dream high. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.240.230.34 (talk) 12:15, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Undone EditHi Solara I fully understand why you would think that my addition to Kixeye's wiki page may seem unconstructive, but I feel that the general public needs to be made aware of what is going on. My comments are based on fact, as there is an online petition going around because of what they are doing. Best Regards Quintin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bonker69 (talk • contribs) 12:32, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Please allow me to addI want to help people to earn... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.203.250.84 (talk) 12:51, 7 May 2014 (UTC) CAIT page, why did you delete it?Hi, I just created a page for CAIT which is an established research centre for international relations, but I can't find it. I got your message which says you undid my edit, does that mean you have deleted the whole page? And if so why? Thanks, Ben — Preceding unsigned comment added by SussexCAIT (talk • contribs) 12:55, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Your role is more than suspect. You are 27 ? OK, I understand better your lack of objectivity and respect for others work. Vive the democracy and freedom, isn't it ? -- luxorion TrackIRI am NOT agree at all with your comments on trackIR criticism and the fact that you deleted mines to keep yours. See my Talk. First your comments are not updated (back to 2008 !!!) and refer to obsolete data. Since that time Natural point did much imrovements to its line of products. The fact to delete my comments, proof that you are not objective. Here are comments I added in the TrackIR Talks: This article is NOT updated. I tried to update it but a user systematically delete my comments !!! Comments refer to a review published in 2008 and do not list improvements done in 2013 and 2014 !! Why to mention a criticism in the article ? It is not its place. Personally I use the ClipPro in Falcon 4 BMS 4.32 update 7 and its work perfectly, even for X, Y and Z axis. I recommend it and many users of the Benmchmarksims.org forum do as well in 2014. I updated the article with an updated link. Hope the comment will remain. Last check : The user http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Solarra delete my comments. Bravo !!:-( Solarra is not an objective user, it is realy a pity, all the more she claim that her info is relevant. She only forget it is obsolete and has not been updated ! She does not merit to be a so called moderator for wikipedia. She is rather a censor !! In these conditions, I do no more cooperate anymore on this page if her opinion prevails on objectivity. I think that your attitude will be brought to the attention of Natural Point sale team and of Benchmark sims forum because it is not acceptable. Solarra, you should read again the quality objectives defined by Wikipedia.... Bye-bye. --Luxorion He's at it again!24.212.68.230 (talk) reverted your reverts to Jutsu (Naruto), and even made more vandalism changes! Jwoodward48wiki (talk) 13:40, 7 May 2014 (UTC) Edit to evaluative diversity pageHi Solarra. I think you made a mistake in removing my edits to the evaluative diversity page. I don't think I removed any content. Rather, I added content and moved some to a new section. Your changes actually removed several valuable sources regarding the history of the study of evaluative diversity. Will you please revert your change? 165.189.37.11 (talk) 21:25, 7 May 2014 (UTC) |