Jump to content

Talk:Bridget Anne Kelly: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
BattyBot (talk | contribs)
m Added {{WikiProjectBannerShell}}, talk page general fixes & other cleanup per WP:TPL using AWB (10280)
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
::: I think that this information is important enough to be included in this article. Any thoughts? [[User:Joseph A. Spadaro|Joseph A. Spadaro]] ([[User talk:Joseph A. Spadaro|talk]]) 19:14, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
::: I think that this information is important enough to be included in this article. Any thoughts? [[User:Joseph A. Spadaro|Joseph A. Spadaro]] ([[User talk:Joseph A. Spadaro|talk]]) 19:14, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
::::It's really a detail that firmly tied her to scandal, but the scandal is the real item, and it's covered.[[User:Mattnad|Mattnad]] ([[User talk:Mattnad|talk]])
::::It's really a detail that firmly tied her to scandal, but the scandal is the real item, and it's covered.[[User:Mattnad|Mattnad]] ([[User talk:Mattnad|talk]])


== Photo ==

There must be a usable public-domain photo of her somewhere that can be added? [[Special:Contributions/2001:558:600A:63:5502:1A4F:F3C1:648|2001:558:600A:63:5502:1A4F:F3C1:648]] ([[User talk:2001:558:600A:63:5502:1A4F:F3C1:648|talk]]) 00:35, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:35, 19 August 2014

Email message: "Is it bad that I am smiling about all this?"

There was an email message that stated "Is it bad that I am smiling about all this?" (or words to that effect). Was this attributed to any specific individual? Or not as of yet? I though it was attributed to Bridget Anne Kelly, but I am not 100% sure. Does anyone know? Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 22:34, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When the (redacted) Wildstein pages first hit the public, and the "Is it wrong that I'm smiling" message was discussed, there was doubt and confusion. Gawker.com. Later it became clear that it was Kelly. NJ.com JackGavin (talk) 22:47, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 19:09, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think that this information is important enough to be included in this article. Any thoughts? Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 19:14, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It's really a detail that firmly tied her to scandal, but the scandal is the real item, and it's covered.Mattnad (talk)


Photo

There must be a usable public-domain photo of her somewhere that can be added? 2001:558:600A:63:5502:1A4F:F3C1:648 (talk) 00:35, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]