Crucifixion darkness: Difference between revisions
removed POV original research. Citations from the 1840s are not valid as representing modern scholarship. |
Jeremias19 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The '''Crucifixion darkness''' is an episode in three of the [[Canonical Gospels]] in which the sky becomes dark in daytime during the [[Crucifixion of Jesus|crucifixion]] of [[Jesus]]. |
The '''Crucifixion darkness''' is an episode in three of the [[Canonical Gospels]] in which the sky becomes dark in daytime during the [[Crucifixion of Jesus|crucifixion]] of [[Jesus]]. |
||
Christian writers in ancient and medieval times, and even those of today, treat this as a [[miracle]], and believe it to be one of the episodes from the [[New Testament]] which have been confirmed by non-Christian sources. Pagan commentators of the [[Roman era]] explained it as an [[eclipse]], although Christian writers pointed out that an eclipse during [[Passover]], when the crucifixion took place, would have been impossible; an eclipse cannot occur during a [[full moon]]. The event was also a fulfillment of an Old Testament prediction by the prophet [[Amos]], written over 800 years before the crucifixion; |
|||
''"In that day," declares the Sovereign LORD, "I will make the sun go down at noon and darken the earth in broad daylight''<ref>Amos 8:9 New International version</ref> |
|||
The sixth hour in the Jewish day is noon, and the ninth hour when the darkness finished was 3pm. This can be compared to Luke's account of the event show below. |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | Some modern scholars, noting the way in which similar accounts were associated in ancient times with the deaths of notable figures, are of the opinion that this phenomenon is a literary invention that attempts to convey a sense of the power of Jesus in the face of death, or a sign of God's displeasure with the [[Jewish people]].'' |
||
==Biblical account== |
|||
{{Gospel Jesus}} |
{{Gospel Jesus}} |
||
{{Death of Jesus}} |
{{Death of Jesus}} |
||
The |
The first New Testament reference to the crucifixion darkness is found in the [[Gospel of Mark]], written around the year 70.{{sfnp|Witherington|2001|p=31|ps=: 'from 66 to 70, and probably closer to the latter'}}{{sfnp|Hooker|1991|p=8|ps=: 'the Gospel is usually dated between AD 65 and 75.'}} In its account of the crucifixion, on the eve of [[Passover]], it says that after Jesus was crucified at nine in the morning, darkness fell over all the land, or all the world ({{lang-grc-gre|γῆν|gēn}} can mean either) from around noon ("the sixth hour") until 3 o'clock ("the ninth hour").<ref>{{bibleref2|Mark|15:33|NRSV}}</ref> It adds, immediately after the death of Jesus, that "the curtain of the temple was torn in two, from top to bottom".<ref>{{bibleref2|Mark|15:38|NRSV}}</ref> |
||
⚫ | The [[Gospel of Matthew]], written around the year 85 or 90, and using Mark as a source,{{sfnp|Harrington|1991|p=8}} has an almost identical wording: "From noon on, darkness came over the whole land [''or'', earth] until three in the afternoon."<ref>{{bibleref2|Matthew|27:45|NRSV}}</ref> The author adds some dramatic details, including an earthquake and the raising of the dead |
||
⚫ | The [[Gospel of Luke]], written around the year 90 and also using Mark as a source,{{sfnp|Davies|2004|p=xii}} has none of the details added in the Matthew version |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | The [[Gospel of Matthew]], written around the year 85 or 90, and using Mark as a source,{{sfnp|Harrington|1991|p=8}} has an almost identical wording: "From noon on, darkness came over the whole land [''or'', earth] until three in the afternoon."<ref>{{bibleref2|Matthew|27:45|NRSV}}</ref> The author adds some dramatic details, including an earthquake and the raising of the dead; ''"The earth shook, and the rocks were split. The tombs also were opened, and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised." <ref>{{bibleref2|Matthew|27:51-54|NRSV}}</ref> |
||
'' |
|||
⚫ | The [[Gospel of Luke]], written around the year 90 and also using Mark as a source,{{sfnp|Davies|2004|p=xii}} has none of the details added in the Matthew version,{{sfnp|Evans|2011|p=308}} and explains the darkness as a darkening of the sun:{{sfnp|Henige|2005|p=150}}{{sfnp|Funk|1998|pp=267–364|ps=, "Luke".}} |
||
⚫ | |||
'' |
|||
The majority of manuscripts of the Gospel of Luke have the Greek phrase "eskotisthe ho helios" ("the sun was darkened"), but the earliest manuscripts say "tou heliou eklipontos" ("the sun's light failed" or "the sun was in eclipse"), appearing to explain the event as an [[eclipse]].{{sfnp|Loader|2002|p=356}} This earlier version is likely to have been the original one, amended by later scribes to correct what they assumed was an error, since they knew that an eclipse was impossible during Passover.{{sfnp|Fitzmyer|1985|pp=1517–1518}}{{sfnp|Wallace|2004}} One early Christian commentator even suggested that the text had been deliberately corrupted by opponents of the Church to make it easier to attack.{{sfnp|Allison|2005|p=89}} |
The majority of manuscripts of the Gospel of Luke have the Greek phrase "eskotisthe ho helios" ("the sun was darkened"), but the earliest manuscripts say "tou heliou eklipontos" ("the sun's light failed" or "the sun was in eclipse"), appearing to explain the event as an [[eclipse]].{{sfnp|Loader|2002|p=356}} This earlier version is likely to have been the original one, amended by later scribes to correct what they assumed was an error, since they knew that an eclipse was impossible during Passover.{{sfnp|Fitzmyer|1985|pp=1517–1518}}{{sfnp|Wallace|2004}} One early Christian commentator even suggested that the text had been deliberately corrupted by opponents of the Church to make it easier to attack.{{sfnp|Allison|2005|p=89}} |
||
The account of the crucifixion given in the [[Gospel of John]] is very different. It takes place on the day of Passover,{{sfnp|Barclay|2001| p=340}} the crucifixion does not take place until after noon, and there is no mention of darkness, the tearing of the veil, or the raising of the dead.{{sfnp|Broadhead|1994|p=196}} |
|||
==Later versions== |
==Later versions== |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
===Ancient historians=== |
===Ancient historians=== |
||
There are several references to this darkness occurring outside the New Testament. The first was by [[Phlegon of Tralles]].<ref>Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.</ref> Phlegon of Tralles (Ancient Greek: Φλέγων) was a secular Greek writer , historian and freedman of the emperor Hadrian, who lived in the 2nd century AD, born not long after the Crucifixion. Phlegon's greatest work was the writing of a history book, called The Olympiades.<ref>Phlegon of Tralles' Book of Marvels. Translated with an introduction and commentary by William Hansen. University of Exeter Press (1996), </ref> The Olympiades can be used as a useful means of establishing a time-line, as we know when they occurred, and it seems he inadvertently dated the darkness at noon on the day of Crucifixion in his work, The Olympiades. In ancient Greece the Olympic Games were held in the July of the first year of each Olympiad, which was a 4 year period running from July to June of each succeeding year. We only have fragments left to us of this monumental work, and quotations of it from other writers. |
|||
There are no original references to this darkness outside of the New Testament; later commentators speculated about a contemporary reference that may have existed in a work by the chronicler [[Thallus (historian)|Thallus]]. In the ninth century, the Byzantine historian [[George Syncellus]] quoted from the third-century Christian historian [[Sextus Julius Africanus]], who remarked that "Thallos dismisses this darkness as a solar eclipse".<ref name=Africanus>[[George Syncellus]], ''Chronography'', [http://www.tertullian.org/rpearse/syncellus/#E1 chapter 391].</ref> It is not known when Thallus lived, and it is unclear whether he himself made any reference to the crucifixion.{{sfnp|Alexander|2005|p=225}} [[Tertullian]], in his ''[[Apologeticus]]'', told the story of the crucifixion darkness and suggested that the evidence must still be held in the Roman archives.{{sfnp|Roberts|Donaldson|Coxe|1896|loc=Volume III, "The Apology" [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf03.iv.iii.i.html chapter 21], pp. 34–36}} |
|||
One such quotation is as follows; ''"In the 4th year of the 202nd Olympiad, there was a great eclipse of the Sun, greater than had ever been known before, for at the sixth hour the day was changed into night, and the stars were seen in the heavens. An earthquake occurred in Bythinia and overthrew a great part of the city of Nicæa''''."<ref>Phlegon's 13th book quoted in Jerome's translation of Eusebius' Chronicle, 202 Olympiad</ref> |
|||
Until the Enlightenment era, the crucifixion darkness story was often used by Christian apologists because they believed it was a rare example of the biblical account being supported by non-Christian sources. When the pagan critic [[Celsus]] claimed that Jesus could hardly be a God because he had performed no great deeds, the third-century Christian commentator [[Origen]] responded, in ''[[Against Celsus]]'', by recounting the darkness, earthquake and opening of tombs. As proof that the incident had happened, he referred to a description by [[Phlegon of Tralles]] of an eclipse accompanied by earthquakes during the reign of Tiberius (probably that of 29 CE).{{sfnp|Roberts|Donaldson|Coxe|1896|loc=Volume IV, "Contra Celsum", [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf03.iv.iii.i.html Book II, chapter 23] p. 441}} |
|||
These events were still known about at the time of the early church. [[Origen]] (or Origen Adamantius) was a scholar and early Christian theologian who was born and spent the first half of his career in Alexandria, North Africa. He wrote : |
|||
In his ''Commentary on Matthew'', however, Origen offered a different approach. Answering criticisms that there was no mention of this incident in any of the many non-Christian sources, he insisted that it was local to Palestine, and therefore would have gone unnoticed outside. To suggestions it was merely an eclipse, Origen pointed out that the crucifixion took place at Passover, and so an eclipse was impossible. He suggested other explanations instead, such as heavy clouds, drawing only on the accounts given in Matthew and Mark, which make no mention of the sun.{{sfnp|Allison|2005|pp=88–89}} |
|||
"''And with regard to the eclipse in the time of Tiberius Caesar, in whose reign Jesus appears to have been crucified, and the great earthquakes which then took place . . .'' ”<ref>Origen, "Against Celsus", Book 2.33</ref> |
|||
''"Phlegon mentioned the eclipse which took place during the crucifixion of the Lord Jesus and no other (eclipse); it is clear that he did not know from his sources about any (similar) eclipse in previous times . . . and this is shown by the historical account of Tiberius Caesar.''"<ref>Phiopon, De. opif. mund. II21</ref> |
|||
The second record of this darkness event, was by Thallus (Greek: Θαλλός) [[Thallus (historian)]].<ref>Robert E. Van Voorst, Jesus outside the New Testament, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2000. pp 19–20 Google Link Africanus, in Syncellus</ref> Thallus was an early Roman historian who wrote in Koine Greek. He wrote a three-volume history of the Mediterranean world from before the Trojan War to the 167th Olympiad, c. 112-109 BC. Most of his work, like the vast majority of ancient literature, perished, but not before parts of his writings were repeated by an able historian Sextus Julius Africanus in his own ‘A History of the World’, which was written around 220.<ref>Benjamin Garstad, "Theophilus of Antioch, Pseudo-Justin and Thallus' treatment of Moses" Studia Patristica XXXVI, 207 f.</ref> Africanus, whilst noting what Thallus had said, differed in his view that it was and eclipse that caused the darkness event, but rather a ‘darkness induced by God’ and therefore miraculous. Here is the passage from Africanus: |
|||
‘''On the whole world there pressed a most fearful darkness; and the rocks were rent by an earthquake, and many places in Judea and other districts were thrown down. This darkness Thallus in the third book of his History, calls, as appears to me without reason, an eclipse of the sun. For the Hebrews celebrate the Passover on the 14th day according to the moon, and the passion of our Saviour falls on the day before the Passover; but an eclipse of the sun takes place only when the moon comes under the sun. And it cannot happen at any other time but in the interval between the first day of the new moon and the last of the old, that is, at their junction: how then should an eclipse be supposed to happen when the moon is almost diametrically opposite the sun? Let that opinion pass however; let it carry the majority with it; and let this portent of the world be deemed an eclipse of the sun, like others a portent only to the eye. Phlegon records that, in the time of Tiberius Caesar, at full moon, there was a full eclipse of the sun from the sixth hour to the ninth—manifestly that one of which we speak. But what has an eclipse in common with an earthquake, the rending of rocks, and the resurrection of the dead, and so great a perturbation throughout the universe? Surely no such event as this is recorded for a long period. But it was a darkness induced by God, because the Lord happened then to suffer’.'' |
|||
==Explanations== |
==Explanations== |
||
===Miracle=== |
===Miracle=== |
||
Because it was known in ancient and medieval times that a solar eclipse could not take place during Passover (solar eclipses require a [[new moon]] while Passover only takes place during a [[full moon]]) it was considered a miraculous sign rather than a naturally occurring event.{{sfnp|Chambers|1899|pp=129–130}} The astronomer [[Johannes de Sacrobosco]] wrote, in his [[De sphaera mundi|The Sphere of the World]], "the eclipse was not natural, but, rather, miraculous and contrary to nature".{{sfnp|Bartlett|2008|pp=68–69 |
Because it was known in ancient and medieval times that a solar eclipse could not take place during Passover (solar eclipses require a [[new moon]] while Passover only takes place during a [[full moon]]) it was considered a miraculous sign rather than a naturally occurring event.{{sfnp|Chambers|1899|pp=129–130}} The astronomer [[Johannes de Sacrobosco]] wrote, in his [[De sphaera mundi|The Sphere of the World]], "the eclipse was not natural, but, rather, miraculous and contrary to nature".{{sfnp|Bartlett|2008|pp=68–69}} |
||
===Naturalistic explanations=== |
===Naturalistic explanations=== |
||
[[File:Solar eclipse 1999 4 NR.jpg|thumbnail|right|Some commentators suggested the darkness was a [[solar eclipse]].]] |
[[File:Solar eclipse 1999 4 NR.jpg|thumbnail|right|Some commentators suggested the darkness was a [[solar eclipse]].]] |
||
Some scholars consider that the Biblical details do not accord with an eclipse: a solar eclipse could not have occurred on or near the Passover, when Jesus was crucified, and would have been too brief to account for three hours of darkness. The maximum possible duration of a natural total solar eclipse is seven minutes and 31.1 seconds.{{sfnp|Meeus|2003}} A total eclipse on 24 November 29 CE was visible slightly north of Jerusalem at 11:05 AM.{{sfn|Espenak|loc="Total Solar Eclipse of 0029 Nov 24"}} The period of totality in Nazareth and Galilee was one minute and forty-nine seconds, and the level of darkness would have been unnoticeable for people outdoors.{{sfnp|Kidger|1999|pp=68–72}} |
|||
In 1983, [[Colin Humphreys]] and W. G. Waddington, who had used astronomical methods to calculate the crucifixion date as 3 April 33,{{sfnp|Humphreys|Waddington|1983}} argued that the darkness could be accounted for by a partial ''lunar'' eclipse that had taken place on that day.{{sfnp|Humphreys|Waddington|1985}} Astronomer [[Bradley E. Schaefer]], on the other hand, pointed out that the eclipse would not have been visible during daylight hours.{{sfnp|Schaefer|1990}}{{sfnp|Schaefer|1991}} Humphreys and Waddington speculated that the reference in the Luke Gospel to a solar eclipse must have been the result of a scribe wrongly amending the text, a claim historian [[David Henige]] describes as "indefensible".{{sfnp|Henige|2005|p=150}} |
In 1983, [[Colin Humphreys]] and W. G. Waddington, who had used astronomical methods to calculate the crucifixion date as 3 April 33,{{sfnp|Humphreys|Waddington|1983}} argued that the darkness could be accounted for by a partial ''lunar'' eclipse that had taken place on that day.{{sfnp|Humphreys|Waddington|1985}} Astronomer [[Bradley E. Schaefer]], on the other hand, pointed out that the eclipse would not have been visible during daylight hours.{{sfnp|Schaefer|1990}}{{sfnp|Schaefer|1991}} Humphreys and Waddington speculated that the reference in the Luke Gospel to a solar eclipse must have been the result of a scribe wrongly amending the text, a claim historian [[David Henige]] describes as "indefensible".{{sfnp|Henige|2005|p=150}} |
||
Some writers have explained the crucifixion darkness in terms of sunstorms, heavy cloud cover, or the aftermath of a volcanic eruption.{{sfnp|Brown|1994|p=1040}} Another possible natural explanation is a [[khamsin]] dust storm that tends to occur from March to May.{{sfnp|Humphreys|2011|p=84}} |
Some writers have explained the crucifixion darkness in terms of sunstorms, heavy cloud cover, or the aftermath of a volcanic eruption.{{sfnp|Brown|1994|p=1040}} Another possible natural explanation is a [[khamsin]] dust storm that tends to occur from March to May.{{sfnp|Humphreys|2011|p=84}} |
||
One possible further explanation is that this darkness was caused by "[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013EGUGA..15.1269H Earthquake smog]", a precursor of an upcoming earthquake. A similar occurrence occurred during the [[1811–12 New Madrid earthquakes|New Madrid Earthquake]] of 1811–12. The skies turned dark during the earthquakes, so dark that lighted lamps didn’t help.<ref name=Lorenzo>[[Lorenzo Dow's Journal]], ''Published By Joshua Martin, Printed By John B. Wolff, 1849, on pages 344 - 346.p'', [http://hsv.com/genlintr/newmadrd/accnt1.htm]</ref> The air smelled bad, and it was hard to breathe. It is speculated that it was smog containing dust particles caused by the eruption of warm water into cold air. This type of event has been witnessed for thousands of years and was once thought to be the cause of Earthquakes. Aristotle describes some of the fog’s properties: |
|||
"Again, our theory is supported by the facts that the sun appears hazy and is darkened in the absence of clouds, and that there is sometimes calm and sharp frost before earthquakes at sunrise." Today, we know that these events are seen as earthquake precursors by modern science. |
|||
<ref name=Tributsch>[[Tributsch Helmut]], ''The escaping “pneuma” – gas of ancient earthquake concepts in relation to animal, atmospheric and thermal precursors'', [http://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2013/EGU2013-1269.pdf].</ref> |
|||
===Literary creation=== |
===Literary creation=== |
||
Some modern scholars are of the view that the account in the synoptic gospels is a literary creation of the gospel writers, intended to heighten the importance of what they saw as a theologically significant event. [[Burton Mack]] describes it as a fabrication by the author of the Gospel of Mark,{{sfnp|Mack|1988|p=296|ps=, 'This is the earliest account there is about the crucifixion of Jesus. It is a Markan fabrication'}} while [[G. B. Caird]] and [[Joseph Fitzmyer]] conclude that the author did not intend the description to be taken literally.{{sfnp|Caird|1980|p=186}}{{sfnp|Fitzmyer|1985|p=1513}} [[W. D. Davies]] and [[Dale Allison]] similarly conclude "It is probable that, without any factual basis, darkness was added in order to wrap the cross in a rich symbol and/or assimilate Jesus to other worthies".{{sfnp|Davies|Allison|1997|p=623}} |
|||
The image of darkness over the land would have been understood by ancient readers as a cosmic sign, a typical element in the description of the death of kings and other major figures by writers such as [[Philo]], [[Dio Cassius]], [[Virgil]], [[Plutarch]] and [[Josephus]].{{sfnp|Garland|1999|p=264}} [[Géza Vermes]] describes the darkness account as "part of the Jewish eschatological imagery of the day of the Lord. |
The image of darkness over the land would have been understood by ancient readers as a cosmic sign, a typical element in the description of the death of kings and other major figures by writers such as [[Philo]], [[Dio Cassius]], [[Virgil]], [[Plutarch]] and [[Josephus]].{{sfnp|Garland|1999|p=264}} [[Géza Vermes]] describes the darkness account as "part of the Jewish eschatological imagery of the day of the Lord. {{sfnp|Vermes|2005| pp=108–109}} |
||
==Interpretations== |
==Interpretations== |
Revision as of 22:51, 2 February 2015
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Christ_at_the_Cross_-_Cristo_en_la_Cruz.jpg/220px-Christ_at_the_Cross_-_Cristo_en_la_Cruz.jpg)
The Crucifixion darkness is an episode in three of the Canonical Gospels in which the sky becomes dark in daytime during the crucifixion of Jesus.
Christian writers in ancient and medieval times, and even those of today, treat this as a miracle, and believe it to be one of the episodes from the New Testament which have been confirmed by non-Christian sources. Pagan commentators of the Roman era explained it as an eclipse, although Christian writers pointed out that an eclipse during Passover, when the crucifixion took place, would have been impossible; an eclipse cannot occur during a full moon. The event was also a fulfillment of an Old Testament prediction by the prophet Amos, written over 800 years before the crucifixion;
"In that day," declares the Sovereign LORD, "I will make the sun go down at noon and darken the earth in broad daylight[1]
The sixth hour in the Jewish day is noon, and the ninth hour when the darkness finished was 3pm. This can be compared to Luke's account of the event show below.
Some modern scholars, noting the way in which similar accounts were associated in ancient times with the deaths of notable figures, are of the opinion that this phenomenon is a literary invention that attempts to convey a sense of the power of Jesus in the face of death, or a sign of God's displeasure with the Jewish people.
Events in the |
Life of Jesus according to the canonical gospels |
---|
![]() |
Portals: ![]() ![]() |
Part of a series on |
Death and Resurrection of Jesus |
---|
![]() |
Portals: ![]() ![]() |
The first New Testament reference to the crucifixion darkness is found in the Gospel of Mark, written around the year 70.[2][3] In its account of the crucifixion, on the eve of Passover, it says that after Jesus was crucified at nine in the morning, darkness fell over all the land, or all the world (Greek: γῆν, translit. gēn can mean either) from around noon ("the sixth hour") until 3 o'clock ("the ninth hour").[4] It adds, immediately after the death of Jesus, that "the curtain of the temple was torn in two, from top to bottom".[5]
The Gospel of Matthew, written around the year 85 or 90, and using Mark as a source,[6] has an almost identical wording: "From noon on, darkness came over the whole land [or, earth] until three in the afternoon."[7] The author adds some dramatic details, including an earthquake and the raising of the dead; "The earth shook, and the rocks were split. The tombs also were opened, and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised." [8] The Gospel of Luke, written around the year 90 and also using Mark as a source,[9] has none of the details added in the Matthew version,[10] and explains the darkness as a darkening of the sun:[11][12]
It was now about noon, and darkness came over the whole land [or, earth] until three in the afternoon, while the sun's light failed [or, the sun was eclipsed]; and the curtain of the temple was torn in two.[13]
The majority of manuscripts of the Gospel of Luke have the Greek phrase "eskotisthe ho helios" ("the sun was darkened"), but the earliest manuscripts say "tou heliou eklipontos" ("the sun's light failed" or "the sun was in eclipse"), appearing to explain the event as an eclipse.[14] This earlier version is likely to have been the original one, amended by later scribes to correct what they assumed was an error, since they knew that an eclipse was impossible during Passover.[15][16] One early Christian commentator even suggested that the text had been deliberately corrupted by opponents of the Church to make it easier to attack.[17]
Later versions
Apocryphal writers
A number of accounts in apocryphal literature build on the synoptic accounts of the crucifixion darkness. The Gospel of Peter, probably from the second century, expands on the canonical gospel accounts of the passion narrative in creative ways. As one writer puts it, "accompanying miracles become more fabulous and the apocalyptic portents are more vivid".[18] In this version, the darkness which covers the whole of Judaea leads people to go about with lamps believing it to be night.[19] The fourth century Gospel of Nicodemus describes how Pilate and his wife are disturbed by a report of what had happened, and the Judeans he has summoned tell him it was an ordinary solar eclipse.[20] Another text from the fourth century, the purported Report of Pontius Pilate to Tiberius, claimed the darkness had started at the sixth hour, covered the whole world, and during the subsequent evening the full moon resembled blood for the entire night.[21] In a fifth- or sixth-century text by Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite, the author claims to have observed a solar eclipse from Heliopolis at the time of the crucifixion.[22]
Ancient historians
There are several references to this darkness occurring outside the New Testament. The first was by Phlegon of Tralles.[23] Phlegon of Tralles (Ancient Greek: Φλέγων) was a secular Greek writer , historian and freedman of the emperor Hadrian, who lived in the 2nd century AD, born not long after the Crucifixion. Phlegon's greatest work was the writing of a history book, called The Olympiades.[24] The Olympiades can be used as a useful means of establishing a time-line, as we know when they occurred, and it seems he inadvertently dated the darkness at noon on the day of Crucifixion in his work, The Olympiades. In ancient Greece the Olympic Games were held in the July of the first year of each Olympiad, which was a 4 year period running from July to June of each succeeding year. We only have fragments left to us of this monumental work, and quotations of it from other writers.
One such quotation is as follows; "In the 4th year of the 202nd Olympiad, there was a great eclipse of the Sun, greater than had ever been known before, for at the sixth hour the day was changed into night, and the stars were seen in the heavens. An earthquake occurred in Bythinia and overthrew a great part of the city of Nicæa''."[25]
These events were still known about at the time of the early church. Origen (or Origen Adamantius) was a scholar and early Christian theologian who was born and spent the first half of his career in Alexandria, North Africa. He wrote :
"And with regard to the eclipse in the time of Tiberius Caesar, in whose reign Jesus appears to have been crucified, and the great earthquakes which then took place . . . ”[26]
"Phlegon mentioned the eclipse which took place during the crucifixion of the Lord Jesus and no other (eclipse); it is clear that he did not know from his sources about any (similar) eclipse in previous times . . . and this is shown by the historical account of Tiberius Caesar."[27]
The second record of this darkness event, was by Thallus (Greek: Θαλλός) Thallus (historian).[28] Thallus was an early Roman historian who wrote in Koine Greek. He wrote a three-volume history of the Mediterranean world from before the Trojan War to the 167th Olympiad, c. 112-109 BC. Most of his work, like the vast majority of ancient literature, perished, but not before parts of his writings were repeated by an able historian Sextus Julius Africanus in his own ‘A History of the World’, which was written around 220.[29] Africanus, whilst noting what Thallus had said, differed in his view that it was and eclipse that caused the darkness event, but rather a ‘darkness induced by God’ and therefore miraculous. Here is the passage from Africanus:
‘On the whole world there pressed a most fearful darkness; and the rocks were rent by an earthquake, and many places in Judea and other districts were thrown down. This darkness Thallus in the third book of his History, calls, as appears to me without reason, an eclipse of the sun. For the Hebrews celebrate the Passover on the 14th day according to the moon, and the passion of our Saviour falls on the day before the Passover; but an eclipse of the sun takes place only when the moon comes under the sun. And it cannot happen at any other time but in the interval between the first day of the new moon and the last of the old, that is, at their junction: how then should an eclipse be supposed to happen when the moon is almost diametrically opposite the sun? Let that opinion pass however; let it carry the majority with it; and let this portent of the world be deemed an eclipse of the sun, like others a portent only to the eye. Phlegon records that, in the time of Tiberius Caesar, at full moon, there was a full eclipse of the sun from the sixth hour to the ninth—manifestly that one of which we speak. But what has an eclipse in common with an earthquake, the rending of rocks, and the resurrection of the dead, and so great a perturbation throughout the universe? Surely no such event as this is recorded for a long period. But it was a darkness induced by God, because the Lord happened then to suffer’.
Explanations
Miracle
Because it was known in ancient and medieval times that a solar eclipse could not take place during Passover (solar eclipses require a new moon while Passover only takes place during a full moon) it was considered a miraculous sign rather than a naturally occurring event.[30] The astronomer Johannes de Sacrobosco wrote, in his The Sphere of the World, "the eclipse was not natural, but, rather, miraculous and contrary to nature".[31]
Naturalistic explanations
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c7/Solar_eclipse_1999_4.jpg/220px-Solar_eclipse_1999_4.jpg)
Some scholars consider that the Biblical details do not accord with an eclipse: a solar eclipse could not have occurred on or near the Passover, when Jesus was crucified, and would have been too brief to account for three hours of darkness. The maximum possible duration of a natural total solar eclipse is seven minutes and 31.1 seconds.[32] A total eclipse on 24 November 29 CE was visible slightly north of Jerusalem at 11:05 AM.[33] The period of totality in Nazareth and Galilee was one minute and forty-nine seconds, and the level of darkness would have been unnoticeable for people outdoors.[34]
In 1983, Colin Humphreys and W. G. Waddington, who had used astronomical methods to calculate the crucifixion date as 3 April 33,[35] argued that the darkness could be accounted for by a partial lunar eclipse that had taken place on that day.[36] Astronomer Bradley E. Schaefer, on the other hand, pointed out that the eclipse would not have been visible during daylight hours.[37][38] Humphreys and Waddington speculated that the reference in the Luke Gospel to a solar eclipse must have been the result of a scribe wrongly amending the text, a claim historian David Henige describes as "indefensible".[11]
Some writers have explained the crucifixion darkness in terms of sunstorms, heavy cloud cover, or the aftermath of a volcanic eruption.[39] Another possible natural explanation is a khamsin dust storm that tends to occur from March to May.[40]
One possible further explanation is that this darkness was caused by "Earthquake smog", a precursor of an upcoming earthquake. A similar occurrence occurred during the New Madrid Earthquake of 1811–12. The skies turned dark during the earthquakes, so dark that lighted lamps didn’t help.[41] The air smelled bad, and it was hard to breathe. It is speculated that it was smog containing dust particles caused by the eruption of warm water into cold air. This type of event has been witnessed for thousands of years and was once thought to be the cause of Earthquakes. Aristotle describes some of the fog’s properties: "Again, our theory is supported by the facts that the sun appears hazy and is darkened in the absence of clouds, and that there is sometimes calm and sharp frost before earthquakes at sunrise." Today, we know that these events are seen as earthquake precursors by modern science. [42]
Literary creation
Some modern scholars are of the view that the account in the synoptic gospels is a literary creation of the gospel writers, intended to heighten the importance of what they saw as a theologically significant event. Burton Mack describes it as a fabrication by the author of the Gospel of Mark,[43] while G. B. Caird and Joseph Fitzmyer conclude that the author did not intend the description to be taken literally.[44][45] W. D. Davies and Dale Allison similarly conclude "It is probable that, without any factual basis, darkness was added in order to wrap the cross in a rich symbol and/or assimilate Jesus to other worthies".[46]
The image of darkness over the land would have been understood by ancient readers as a cosmic sign, a typical element in the description of the death of kings and other major figures by writers such as Philo, Dio Cassius, Virgil, Plutarch and Josephus.[47] Géza Vermes describes the darkness account as "part of the Jewish eschatological imagery of the day of the Lord. [48]
Interpretations
This sequence plays an important part in the gospel's literary narrative. The author of Mark's gospel has been described as operating here "at the peak of his rhetorical and theological powers".[49] One suggestion is that the darkness is a deliberate inversion of the transfiguration;[49] alternately, Jesus's earlier discourse about a future tribulation mentions the sun being darkened,[50] and can be seen as foreshadowing this scene.[51] Striking details such as the darkening of the sky and the tearing of the temple veil may be a way of focusing the reader away from the shame and humiliation of the crucifixion; one professor of biblical theology concluded, "it is clear that Jesus is not a humiliated criminal but a man of great significance. His death is therefore not a sign of his weakness but of his power."[52]
When considering the theological meaning of the event, some authors have interpreted the darkness as a period of mourning by the cosmos itself at the death of Jesus.[53] Others have seen it as a sign of God's judgement on the Jewish people, sometimes connecting it with the destruction of the city of Jerusalem in the year 70; or as symbolising shame, fear, or the mental suffering of Jesus.[54] Fitzmyer compares the event to a contemporary description recorded in Josephus' Antiquities of the Jews,[55] which recounts "unlawful acts against the gods, from which we believe the very sun turned away, as if it too were loath to look upon the foul deed".[56]
Many writers have adopted an intertextual approach, looking at earlier texts from which the author of the Mark Gospel may have drawn. In particular, parallels have often been noted between the darkness and the prediction in the Book of Amos of an earthquake in the reign of King Uzziah of Judah: "On that day, says the Lord God, I will make the sun go down at noon, and darken the earth in broad daylight".[57] Particularly in connection with this reference, read as a prophecy of the future, the darkness can be seen as portending the end times.[58]
Another likely literary source is the plague narrative in the Book of Exodus, in which Egypt is covered by darkness for three days.[59] It has been suggested that the author of the Matthew Gospel changed the Marcan text slightly to more closely match this source.[60] Commentators have also drawn comparisons with the description of darkness in the Genesis creation narrative,[61] with a prophecy regarding mid-day darkness by Jeremiah,[62] and with an end-times prophecy in the Book of Zechariah.[63][64]
Iconography
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0d/Meister_des_Rabula-Evangeliums_002.jpg/220px-Meister_des_Rabula-Evangeliums_002.jpg)
In traditional artistic representations of the crucifixion, the sun and moon sometimes appear above and to either side of the cross, in allusion to the darkening of the skies.
Notes
- ^ Amos 8:9 New International version
- ^ Witherington (2001), p. 31: 'from 66 to 70, and probably closer to the latter'
- ^ Hooker (1991), p. 8: 'the Gospel is usually dated between AD 65 and 75.'
- ^ Mark 15:33
- ^ Mark 15:38
- ^ Harrington (1991), p. 8.
- ^ Matthew 27:45
- ^ Matthew 27:51–54
- ^ Davies (2004), p. xii.
- ^ Evans (2011), p. 308.
- ^ a b Henige (2005), p. 150.
- ^ Funk (1998), pp. 267–364, "Luke".
- ^ Luke 23:44–45
- ^ Loader (2002), p. 356.
- ^ Fitzmyer (1985), pp. 1517–1518.
- ^ Wallace (2004).
- ^ Allison (2005), p. 89.
- ^ Foster (2009), p. 97.
- ^ Roberts, Donaldson & Coxe (1896), Volume IX, "The Gospel of Peter" 5:15, p. 4.
- ^ Barnstone (2005), pp. 351, 368, 374, 378–379, 419.
- ^ Roberts, Donaldson & Coxe (1896), Volume VIII, "The Report of Pontius Pilate", pp. 462–463.
- ^ Parker (1897), pp. 148–149, 182–183.
- ^ Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- ^ Phlegon of Tralles' Book of Marvels. Translated with an introduction and commentary by William Hansen. University of Exeter Press (1996),
- ^ Phlegon's 13th book quoted in Jerome's translation of Eusebius' Chronicle, 202 Olympiad
- ^ Origen, "Against Celsus", Book 2.33
- ^ Phiopon, De. opif. mund. II21
- ^ Robert E. Van Voorst, Jesus outside the New Testament, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2000. pp 19–20 Google Link Africanus, in Syncellus
- ^ Benjamin Garstad, "Theophilus of Antioch, Pseudo-Justin and Thallus' treatment of Moses" Studia Patristica XXXVI, 207 f.
- ^ Chambers (1899), pp. 129–130.
- ^ Bartlett (2008), pp. 68–69.
- ^ Meeus (2003).
- ^ Espenak, "Total Solar Eclipse of 0029 Nov 24".
- ^ Kidger (1999), pp. 68–72.
- ^ Humphreys & Waddington (1983).
- ^ Humphreys & Waddington (1985).
- ^ Schaefer (1990).
- ^ Schaefer (1991).
- ^ Brown (1994), p. 1040.
- ^ Humphreys (2011), p. 84.
- ^ Lorenzo Dow's Journal, Published By Joshua Martin, Printed By John B. Wolff, 1849, on pages 344 - 346.p, [1]
- ^ Tributsch Helmut, The escaping “pneuma” – gas of ancient earthquake concepts in relation to animal, atmospheric and thermal precursors, [2].
- ^ Mack (1988), p. 296, 'This is the earliest account there is about the crucifixion of Jesus. It is a Markan fabrication'
- ^ Caird (1980), p. 186.
- ^ Fitzmyer (1985), p. 1513.
- ^ Davies & Allison (1997), p. 623.
- ^ Garland (1999), p. 264.
- ^ Vermes (2005), pp. 108–109.
- ^ a b Black (2005), p. 42.
- ^ Mark 13:24
- ^ Healy (2008), p. 319.
- ^ Winn (2008), p. 133.
- ^ Donahue (2002), pp. 451–452.
- ^ Allison (2005), pp. 97–102.
- ^ Fitzmyer (1985), p. 1518.
- ^ Josephus, Antiquities, Book XIV 12:3 (text at Wikisource).
- ^ Amos 8:8–9
- ^ Allison (2005), pp. 100–101.
- ^ Exodus 10:22
- ^ Allison (2005), pp. 182–83.
- ^ Genesis 1:2
- ^ Jeremiah 15:9
- ^ Zechariah 14:6–7
- ^ Allison (2005), pp. 83–84.
References
- Books
- Alexander, Loveday (2005). "The Four among pagans". In Bockmuehl, Markus; Hagner, Donald A. (eds.). The Written Gospel. Cambridge University Press. pp. 222–237. ISBN 9781139445726.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Allison, Dale C. (2005). Studies in Matthew: Interpretation Past and Present. Baker Academic. ISBN 9780801027918.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Barclay, William (2001). The Gospel of John, Volume 1. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN 9780664237806.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Barnstone, Willis, ed. (2005). "The Gospel of Nicodemus". The Other Bible. HarperCollins. ISBN 9780060815981.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Bartlett, Robert (2008). The Natural and the Supernatural in the Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521878326.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Black, C. Clifton (2005). "The Face is Familiar—I Just Can't Place It". In Gaventa, Beverley Roberts; Miller, Patrick D. (eds.). The Ending of Mark and the Ends of God: Essays in Memory of Donald Harrisville Juel. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN 9780664227395.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Broadhead, Edwin Keith (1994). Prophet, Son, Messiah: Narrative Form and Function in Mark. Continuum. ISBN 9781850754763.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Brown, Raymond E. (1994). The Death of the Messiah: a Commentary on the Passion Narratives in the Four Gospels. The Anchor Bible Reference Library. Vol. Volume 2: From Gethsemane to the Grave. Doubleday. ISBN 9780385193979.
{{cite book}}
:|volume=
has extra text (help); Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Caird, George Bradford (1980). The language and imagery of the Bible. Westminster Press. ISBN 9780664213787.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Chambers, George F. (1899). The Story of Eclipses. George Newnes, Ltd.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Davies, Stevan L. (2004). The Gospel of Thomas and Christian Wisdom. Bardic Press. ISBN 9780974566740.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Davies, William David; Allison, Dale C. (1997). Matthew: Volume 3. Continuum. ISBN 9780567085184.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Donahue, John R. (2002). The Gospel of Mark. Liturgical Press. ISBN 9780814658048.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Evans, Craig A. (2011). Luke (Understanding the Bible Commentary Series). Baker Books. ISBN 9781441236524.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Fitzmyer, Joseph A. (1985). The Gospel According to Luke, X-XXIV. The Anchor Bible Reference Library. Doubleday. ISBN 9780300139815.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Foster, Paul (2009). The Apocryphal Gospels: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780191578953.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Funk, Robert Walter (1998). The acts of Jesus: the search for the authentic deeds of Jesus. HarperSanFrancisco. ISBN 9780060629786.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Garland, David E. (1999). Reading Matthew: A Literary and Theological Commentary on the First Gospel. Smyth & Helwys Publishing. ISBN 9781573122740.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Harrington, Daniel J. (1991). The Gospel of Matthew. Liturgical Press. ISBN 9780814658031.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Healy, Mary (2008). The Gospel of Mark. Baker Academic. ISBN 9780801035869.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Henige, David P. (2005). Historical evidence and argument. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 978-0-299-21410-4.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Hooker, Morna (1991). The Gospel According to Saint Mark. Continuum. ISBN 9780826460394.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Humphreys, Colin J. (2011). The Mystery of the Last Supper: Reconstructing the Final Days of Jesus. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781139496315.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Kidger, Mark (1999). The Star of Bethlehem: An Astronomer's View. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691058238.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Loader, William (2002). Jesus' Attitude Towards the Law: A Study of the Gospels. W.B. Eerdmans Pub. ISBN 9780802849038.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Mack, Burton L. (1988). A Myth of Innocence: Mark and Christian Origins. Fortress Press. ISBN 9781451404661.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Parker, John (1897). "Letter VII. Section II. To Polycarp--Hierarch. & Letter XI. Dionysius to Apollophanes, Philosopher". The Works of Dionysius the Arepagite. London: James Parker and Co. ISBN 9781440092398.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Roberts, Alexander; Donaldson, James; Coxe, Arthur Cleveland, eds. (1896). The Ante-Nicene Fathers. T&T Clark.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Sproul, R. C., ed. (2010). The Reformation Study Bible. Ligonier Ministries. ISBN 978-1596382077.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Vermes, Géza (2005). The Passion. Penguin. ISBN 9780141021324.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Winn, Adam (2008). The Purpose of Mark's Gospel: An Early Christian Response to Roman Imperial Propaganda. Mohr Siebeck. ISBN 9783161496356.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Witherington, Ben (2001). The Gospel of Mark: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary. Eerdmans Publishing. ISBN 9780802845030.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Yieh, John Yueh-Han (2004). One Teacher: Jesus' Teaching Role in Matthew's Gospel Report. Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 9783110913330.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help)
- Journal articles
- Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1038/306743a0, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with
|doi=10.1038/306743a0
instead. - Humphreys, Colin J.; Waddington, W. Graeme (March 1985). "The Date of the Crucifixion". Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation. 37: 2–10.
{{cite journal}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Meeus, Jean (December 2003). "The maximum possible duration of a total solar eclipse". Journal of the British Astronomical Association. 113 (6): 343–348. Bibcode:2003JBAA..113..343M.
{{cite journal}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Schaefer, Bradley E. (March 1990). "Lunar Visibility and the Crucifixion". Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society. 31 (1): 53–67. Bibcode:1990QJRAS..31...53S.
{{cite journal}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1086/132865, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with
|doi=10.1086/132865
instead.
- Web sites
- Espenak, Fred. "Total Solar Eclipse of 0029 Nov 24" (PDF). NASA Eclipse Web Site. NASA. Retrieved 3 November 2013.
{{cite web}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Wallace, Daniel B. (21 June 2004). "Errors in the Greek Text Behind Modern Translations? The Cases of Matthew 1:7, 10 and Luke 23:45". Bible.org. Retrieved 12 November 2013.
{{cite web}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help)