User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise

Archives

Soren (given name)

your answer is provided in the talk page!

Happy New Year!

Dear Future Perfect at Sunrise,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--FWiW Bzuk (talk)

This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").

Is this still in effect?

Greetings. Is this topic ban, which you notified the user of, still in effect? [1] Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 20:03, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

As far as I'm aware, yes. I certainly didn't have any hand in lifting it, and it is still listed at WP:RESTRICT too. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:12, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

In that case, you might be interested in taking a look at these; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and several more. If a formal report is required, I can submit one, but given the orgy of evidence.....Vanamonde93 (talk) 22:40, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Hey, FPAS, if you're too busy to take a look at this I totally understand, but if that's the case just let me know! Vanamonde93 (talk) 2:29 pm, Yesterday (UTC−5)

(talk page stalker) I don't see any of those edits as having to do with colonialism, and "history" seems like it would not cover elections from last year for example. I suppose it depends on how broad "broad" is, but if it was intended to be a ban from all aspects of india and indian politics, it seems like that should be explicit. Gaijin42 (talk) 22:01, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

"History" may not cover last year's elections; but as I understand it, the tban was imposed chiefly for editing fairly recent topics, such as the 2002 Gujarat riots. FPAS would know better, though. Vanamonde93 (talk) 01:44, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Death Certificate for Dorothy Campbell

Thanks for deleting the death certificate I uploaded. I wasn't sure about the licensing and availability to use that. I had a funny feeling it was not free use when I could not find a suitable licensing category on the upload page dropdown box.--EditorExtraordinaire (talk) 14:52, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Well, while I have you here on my talkpage: may I remind you that I once gave you a very clear, very unambiguous warning not to re-upload File:Engineers CC - Roslyn Harbor, NY.jpg – which you have nevertheless done again, at least twice, since that time. I really ought to have blocked you now (I was actually considering doing so right this minute). You never gave any sign of understanding what it means to have a free license for this image – a permission that explicitly covers not only use of the image on Wikipedia, but free re-use by anybody else and for any purpose. Did you finally get such an improved license? I take it the initial permission you had from them was not of this kind. Do the messages you sent to permissions-en contain a fully free license? Please give me a clear answer this time, yes or no, because this is really your final chance. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:07, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

What do I need to do, Sunrise, to get approval for this image? I thought it was approved for use since I obtained written approval. It doesn't need to be in Commons, but just in the Engineers Country Club article and also in the Herbert Strong article. I am not trying to be a trouble maker, and certainly not trying to defy your instructions. Thanks.--EditorExtraordinaire (talk) 17:50, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

I told you what you need to do, several times. You need to contact the owners again and ask them for a release under more general terms, which must allow fully free re-use of the image not merely on Wikipedia, but also by anybody else for any purpose. The easiest way to grant such a permission is simply to say "I, the owner of this image, release it under the terms of the Creative Commons (attribution-sharealike) license (cc-by-sa)" or something to that effect. Ask them to send that to our permissions-en email address. Wait for the respondents at the email queue to respond and confirm they got it, then ask me or some other admin to undelete the file for you (that's preferrable to re-uploading it yet another time). Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:16, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Okay --EditorExtraordinaire (talk) 00:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Possible T-Ban violation

I am in touch with your recent actions,[2] TBAN goes on to read "on topics related to the Kashmir conflict and the history of Kashmir". Now check [3], "For Shia Muslims, the Grand Ashura Procession In Kashmir which would mark the martyrdom of Husayn ibn Ali", that red part was added by him. Also consider checking his contribution history. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 04:46, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Saw the block, thanks.

You have got up to 30 archives but your index has enlisted until 29. Kindly update, thanks again. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 06:16, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

DS log

Hello, Future,
I was looking at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/Log#India-Pakistan and it looked like you logged in at least one recent block for a year different than 2015. It's a bit confusing how the log is divided up but I can not move your entry as the page is locked for nonadmins. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 12:27, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

ANI

I have asked for an IBAN at ANI due to you continually hounding me, the discussion is here Darkness Shines (talk) 18:15, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Question

I've noticed a long-term pattern of disruption on Talk:Neil deGrasse Tyson, particularly from the User:Marteau ‎account. He also seems to be disrupting the Elizabeth Warren topic area as well, but I'm not cognizant of the specifics in that case and I've asked another user to look into it. Meanwhile, to head off the disruption on the Tyson topic, I recently archived the talk page. In response, an IP came ouf of the woodwork and reverted me.[4] Is this an already existing, registered account that refuses to login? Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 10:17, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Followup: admin attention requested.[5] Viriditas (talk) 10:28, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring notice board

There is a discussion about a user you blocked in the past, 156.61.250.250. I noticed you just reverted the user's change at "Year" (but there doesn't seem to be edit warring at "Year", only some other articles). Jc3s5h (talk) 15:46, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Greece–Italy relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Relations Refer To Relations problem

Future Perfect at Sunrise, thank you for letting me be aware of WP:Refers to. For your information, this page was the original source of the Refer-To phrase, presumably added by someone unaware of WP:Refers to, I don't know how many pages across Wikipedia are using the Refer-To phrase, but I have seen several of them before borrowing it myself into the Greece-Italy relations page. --SilentResident (talk) 12:05, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, I know, it's a rather frequent error. Thanks for your understanding though. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:07, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

The Neil deGrasse Tyson RfC

As one of the closers for this RfC, this may be of interest to you. There is a question on the Bio's for Living Persons Notice Board (under "The Federalist (website) inclusion of the Neil deGrasse Tyson "fabrication" allegation." heading at the bottom) pertaining to it's scope, namely, is the prohibition of mention of the quotes issue binding on the entire encyclopedia, or just the Tyson article. I believe your input would be of value. Thank you. Marteau (talk) 13:02, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Sr 76

Can you revoke his talk page access? His newest unblock request is similar to the previous one.[6] OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 06:58, 21 April 2015 (UTC)