User talk:Veera Narayana

The image you see here is a oil painting of a scene showing Narasimha killing Hiranyakashipu on his lap, as Prahlada watches at the left. Thanks for sparing a moment.

Missamma

Here is a page which can help you with the article. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 12:59, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

@Ssven2: Thanks a lot bro! I shall begin working on this article after a really long time, probably in late May? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:04, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

here is a book reference on the film. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 04:01, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Managed to catch the Tamil version last week, forgot to tell you earlier. Loved the portion where Savitri teaches Thangavelu to sing. "Umakku Neeye, Yemakku Yaame. Edharku thaan indha kasa musa kasa musa." ROFL. Did ANR have a similar scene in the Telugu version? — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 06:16, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

@Ssven2: Yes. Check this and this too. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Nice. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 09:53, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Mayabazar

I happened to stumble upon this recent article by M. L. Narasimhan. Use all you can to expand the wikipedia article. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 02:43, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Happened to notice that Srivin has used the same article yesterday! Really good piece of information. BTW, did you happen to notice that the material you used for reference number 9 (The Andhra Prabha info) was used by Narasimham in his article? — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 04:41, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

@Ssven2: Yes. I thanked Srivin for the same and gifted him a kitten too. Regarding the articles, yes i did observe that. You did the job, most of it. Thanks for that. But, on the Music section you wrote Rajendra Rao instead of Rajeswara Rao which i rectified. Let me see whether i can expand it further! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:31, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for noticing the typo. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:32, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

@Ssven2: Now that the info in Production section is huge, i have split it into Development, Casting and Filming respectively. Hope it looks better now. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:42, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Yes, it does look good. Gotta go, c u! — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:59, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

@Ssven2: Bye. Once again, thanks for your contributions. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:01, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Meghan Trainor discography/archive1

Would you mind leaving some comments? Thanks, All About That Bass (A word?? / Stalking not allowed...) 05:32, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

@MaranoFan: I'm not familiar with the article's subject and hence am not eligible to comment. Anyway, wish you the best possible. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:04, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Temper (film) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 18:00, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

S/O Satyamurthy

Hi Pavan. I am the same user 98.29 ..., but changed houses. I know that we haven't had a cordial relationship during the Temper stages. But, I want to congratulate you on your GA success. Also, have you seen SOS? I saw it on Friday (DVD), and the 2nd half was pretty funny.

From, 107.15.216.72 (talk) 00:30, 4 May 2015 (UTC)98.29

FLC

Would love your inputs here. Thank You.—Prashant 13:46, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

@Prashant!:  Done Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:57, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

I have adressed your comments.—Prashant 06:42, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Ramya Krishnan

Didn't know that she was a part of the film until I came across this one yesterday. She looks stunning and hot even at this age, no? :) —Vensatry _(ping) 19:31, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

@Vensatry: Yes she does :) Watching the poster, i felt she was too modern for that film's backdrop and was looking like Neelambari 2.0! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:30, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Ha, indeed she looks modern. A period film, isn't it? —Vensatry _(ping) 17:45, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

@Vensatry: Yes. It is a fictional period film set in an unspecified era. Well, next is Kalakeya. Hope it is Sathyaraj. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:32, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

May be the screenplay is on the lines of Maghadheera. The reason why I brought Ramya here is that she still looks the same even after so many years. Seems like age has only made her more beautiful. Take this song for instance. :) —Vensatry _(ping) 08:27, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

@Vensatry: Yes. She is always gorgeous. Even her co-star Akkineni Nagarjuna feels the same. Well, Baahubali is a complete period film and since it is a Rajamouli film, defenitely that modern look should have some inner meaning for sure. I saw Meena and Upendra making their true comeback to Telugu cinema recently. And, i am sure, Ramya Kreishna shall make a true comeback with Baahubali. Lets hope the best. Also, the new entrant Kalakeya the war lord (played by Prabhakar of Maryada Ramanna fame) looks terrifying. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:58, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Comeback film, really? I thought she was always active in Telugu films. —Vensatry _(ping) 16:03, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

@Vensatry: Answer this in order to understand my intention. What was the last "proper" commercial film Rajinikanth acted in? If you get its answer, you shall understand. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:09, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

I'd say Enthiran. As for Ramya, despite being a Tamil herself, her repute as a star grew in Telugu films. The last full-length role that she did in Tamil was Julie Ganapathi, way back in 2003. Considering this, I can very well say that she used to be very active in Telugu, at least till 2009-10. :) —Vensatry _(ping) 17:07, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

@Vensatry: Yes, for you it was Enthiran, for me it was ironically Chandramukhi (consider the fact that i am a Telugu person who felt that only Rajinikanth's screen presence salvaged Sivaji and he was not the quessential Rajinikanth in Enthiran). Forget mine, according to you, Rajinikanth's "proper" comeback for now is due since 2010 though he starred in Kochadaiyaan and Lingaa. Similarly, the last "proper" film of Ramya Krishnan in Telugu was Konchem Ishtam Konchem Kashtam. After that, we never saw her in a role that is worth of remembering. That is why i wait for a comeback. Simple. Why on earth would i consider Upendra making a comeback really? Because Telugu audience remember him exactly opposite of his regular breathless dialogue delivery and whacky costumes (though his dubbed films featuring him like that were super hits here). I wanted to see him powerful yet controlled, and my wish was fulfilled last month. Same in the case of Meena with 2014. That's all, a wish of a "proper" comeback. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:23, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

How on the earth can you compare Rajini or Upendra with Ramya Krishnan? Perhaps, any "ex-heroine" for that matter. She must be very lucky for having starred in quite a number of films even after crossing 30. Even if she makes a comeback, it may not necessarily be the one. —Vensatry _(ping) 17:09, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

@Vensatry: Why can't i compare them with her bro? Both of them were her co-stars once, and it is a general truth that Neelambari's character was the sole reason Padayappa's character was elevated well. Be frank, were Rajini and Upendra such a great actors when compared to her? It was their style and selection of scripts in their prime time that made them superstars. She is always a superstar for that matter then. Thus, this excitement. Anyways, thanks for initiating and participating in this discussion with me. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:54, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

I can understand your love for Neelambari, but am not sure if that can be considered a natural performance. :) It was stylized acting. I don't know about Upendra being a great actor, but Rajini used to score well as far as restrained & stylized acting is concerned. Watch Mullum Malarum, Johnny and Netrikkann to get my point. For stylized acting, see this scene (from Netrikkann), and another one (from 1:00) (from Aval Appadithan) where he totally outshines the "great" Kamal Haasan. For rage, see this one (at 2:42 and 2:57) from Murattu Kaalai. Do you think Neelambari was more ferocious than Kaalaiyan in this sequence? That said, I like Ramya Krishnan very much, but sadly she was under-utilized in Tamil before Padayappa. In Telugu, a majority of the films portrayed her as a glam doll; there were a few good roles though. As an actress, do you think she ranks in the same league as the legendary Savitri? Also, Neelambari wasn't the first female character that dominated/threatened Rajini on screen. There was Vijayashanti, who did an amazing job in Mannan. —Vensatry _(ping) 18:52, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

@Vensatry: Mullum Malarum, Johnny, Netrikkann and Aval Appadithan — All the four show Rajini's character having either shades of grey or villainy in which he always excelled. And Murattu Kaalai is indeed a great performance going by the scene and also per Haasan's acknowledgement. At this juncture, if anybody says his performance in films directed by K. Balachander were great, it was because of the latter, his mentor. Now, what is left? Rajini reached super stardom with a slew of commercial successes, most of them being masala films. Days passed by and Rajini went on to become blunt, not the same Balachander's sishyan. After Annamalai, things took a huge leap and he began focusing on style and punch dialogues rather than compelling performance. My friends say his performance as the evil robot in Enthiran reminds them of his work in Anthuleni Katha. Seriously? Well he is a lovable superstar and i always love him for the fact that i need not be moody after the film ends unlike that of a Haasan's one, Uttama Villain being the recent example. Well, how can i forget Mannan? A headstrong billionaire wife vs union leader. The only difference is that the character turns a positive one in the end at least. What made me love Neelambari is that the character remains negative even in the very last moment. I can never imagine her to be a Savitri, but i can say for sure that she was very talented compared to her colleagues. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:21, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Negative shades, so what? Mammooty won a National Award for portraying a full-length negative role in Vidheyan. It doesn't really matter if the role is positive or negative. I haven't watched Anthuleni Katha, except for a few scenes like this one. But considering that it was his first full-fledged role, I thought he gave a decent performance. Where have I denied that Ramya is a talented actress? In India, especially down south, we've hardly had actresses who continue to shine even after the age of 30-40 (post-marriage). Padmini had a prolonged career even after marriage (thanks to Raj Kapoor). We all know what Savitri was like in her final days. Ramya is no exception. :) —Vensatry _(ping) 20:52, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

@Vensatry: Yes. You are right. Even Shah Rukh Khan won his first filmfare for Baazigar (ironically the same year). Perhaps, i have developed so much love for strong female characters like Neelambari which is making me think like this. But it is my personal opinion that the evil robot in Enthiran was really not up to the mark compared to his past villainous roles. What on earth made Shankar get inspired to give him a hairstyle like that? Well, after Ramya, team Baahubali released Kalakeya the warlord played by Prabhakar, Bijjala Deva played by Nassar and today is Kattappa played by Sathyaraj. But our discussion goes on! If any friendly stalker could have joined us, i am sure we shall discuss this for a really, really long time. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:41, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Well, Baazigar was a breakthrough role for SRK, where as Enthiran and Vidheyan came much later after both Rajini and Mammooty had attained the "superstar" status. That said, Vidheyan was totally a different kind of film as it has got nothing to do with Mammooty's stardom. I agree with you on Enthiran – both Vaseegaran and Chitti were funny. Chitti was not a patch on Prasath, Ramanathan, Parattai, etc., Imagine what if Shankar had gone ahead with Kamal in the lead. Kamal as a scientist looks perfect to me: [1], although this one looks funny. The robot reminds me of Major Vijayakumar. :P Coming to Baahubali, I knew that Nasser and Sathyaraj were a part of the film long ago. Are these fictional characters? —Vensatry _(ping) 09:44, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

@Vensatry: Haasan does look better as the scientist but the robot, uh, is a bit odd. And, with all due respect and IMHO, PZ is a disaster. Well, Rana says Baahubali is a "fictional tale about warriors, kingdoms and struggle for power". All the characters were "supposed" to be fictional. Let's see what happens. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:57, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, Aishwarya Rai was a much better choice. You say fictional, but Kalakeya, I believe is a mythological figure which had some connection with Arjuna. —Vensatry _(ping) 10:21, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

@Vensatry: Kingdom's name being Mahishmathi, the Kalakeya, an abandoned child racing against destiny, Rana hinting his role being on the lines of Duryodhana, a long battle to decide the ruler — all these are making me think the film is more or less inspired from the happenings of Mahabharata. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:24, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Well, Prabhas will be Arjuna and Anushka will be Draupadi then? :) —Vensatry _(ping) 10:29, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

@Vensatry: I don't know! Prabhas plays a dual role and until 31 May, we cant get a clear idea for sure. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:33, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Edit Request

@ Pavan, Bro pls can u devolop the page KICK2  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fgyu (talk • contribs) 08:05, 11 May 2015 (UTC) 

@Fgyu: Not now, later. I'm presently working on Drushyam. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:12, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

• • thanks and ya ok bro but pls edit that page as i am not able to edit that as u edit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fgyu (talk • contribs) 08:29, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hrudaya Kaleyam poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hrudaya Kaleyam poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:08, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Uyarndha Manithan

Hello Pavanjandhyala. The article is ready for copyediting and I have made a request to the GOCE. Do you know anyone who could take the time to copyedit the article? If so, please let me know. Thank you. Thamizhan1994 (^{Appo Pesu}) 12:05, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

@Thamizhan1994: I suggest you to approach any one of RHM22, Jaguar or Veera Dheera Sooran depending on their availability. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:56, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Uyarndha Manithan has become a GA today! Thamizhan1994 (^{Appo Pesu}) 09:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Anurag Kashyap filmography

Please if you could take a look at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Anurag Kashyap filmography/archive1. Yashthepunisher (talk) 2:36, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Sure. I shall have a look soon. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:11, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

I think I have resolved all of your comments. Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:52, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Patala Bhairavi

Use all you can. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:45, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Blast from the past article by M. L. Narasimham. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 13:48, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you so much guys! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:06, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

==Tamannaah

• @ Pavan bro yes I was about to do but oka person called RedPenDoom reverted it and using some filty language as u can see it...ya I agree with ur views always.