User talk:LLArrow

LLArrow, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi LLArrow!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there! Play The Wikipedia Adventure This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 21:29, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

American Horror Story: Freak Show

I just wanted to let you know that I really appreciate your edits on American Horror Story: Freak Show. I can tell that you are very passionate about the show and the article. But I would like to respectfully ask you to stop revert correctional edits back to a previous edit that you made. An example of this would be the phrase "the world's smallest woman." Since we only live in one world, it is "world's", not "worlds". Please take this into consideration. I also would like to ask you to stop reverting character names, descriptions, and moving billed primary actors to the recurring section. The confirmation of the return of actors in previous installments basically means that as of now they belong in the main cast until stated otherwise. Thank you for all of your contributions! DantODB (talk) 14:27, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

I know there have been a lot of edits and reverts to AHS Freak Show. Drew Rin Varick is a confirmed cast member according to IMBD his character is named Toulouse and he is confirmed for 3 episodes. Is there a reason he is not on the cast list?(talk) — Preceding undated comment added 23:55, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

I have not seen any verifiable source stating his cast. If you know of such a source please let me know. LLArrow (talk) 03:28, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi. I have not been editing American Horror Story: Coven, so I did not understand why you posted a link to that article on my talk page. Regarding Freak Show, I am only trying to follow actual credits from the actual show. Thank you for all of your contributions! DantODB (talk) 12:40, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi! I just wanted to let you know that Twisty the clown killer is an incorrect way to state a character's name. It should be Twisty the Clown Killer if it is the actual name. Since all of the references for the character state simply Twisty or Twisty the clown killer, it is clear that "clown killer" is a character description. So, the right way to state this is Twisty, the "clown killer". Thank you for all of your contributions! DantODB (talk) 14:35, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi. I am getting really tired of reverting all of your edits. I don't understand why you never explain your edits, other than the previous revision being "dubious" or "unnecessary". Unfortunately, that is not explanatory enough. An example would be the addition of Gabourey Sidibe and Jamie Brewer to the Cast section. You did not provide a source for their involvement on (at least) a recurring basis, therefore they do not belong in the section. Another edit of yours being locating Patti LaBelle. It was never said that LaBelle is to be a recurring character. She is reported to be appearing in four episodes, but nothing was ever said about a recurring status. And since her name appeared on the poster, it is likely that she will be be billed as a "Special Guest Star", like Angela Bassett and Sidibe in the previous season. So, I would really appreciate it if you don't draw your own conclusions and edit the page only to your liking. Thank you for all of your contributions! DantODB (talk) 07:35, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi. I would like to point out that I specifically said that co-stars do not have recurring status. Recurring actors are always billed as guest actors. Actors that are only credited as co-stars indicate minimal involvement, hence they are not to be put under recurring. Prolific or not, Gummer appeared in Coven, which is what the sentence refers to. Worthy of header status or not, Grossman's especial involvement is already detailed in casting, making it unnecessary to especially mention it again. Poor grammar undermines the article's quality, which I am only trying to make better. DantODB (talk) 23:07, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I'm here to justify myself about my edition on American Horror Story: Freak Show page. Be aware that I'm not fluent in English yet. Firstly, you had no reason to be rude. Secondly, I kept adding actress Jamie Brewer as a recurring guest because someone had added her before and then someone else deleted it and I thought it was some person behaving inappropriate. I'm sorry about this misunderstanding, I just created this account recently. If I may ask, what kind of source should I use in this case? Israeldmo (talk) 22:59, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you and, again, I'm sorry about it. I still don't quite understand why exactly I couldn't add her if she already appeared in episode 11, Magical Thinking. I noticed user Caecae26 added her again as a recurring actress, I hope he provided a proper sourcing. Israeldmo (talk) 22:13, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Use of bold

The Manual of Style states that bold font should only be used for the subject title of the article; bold is never used to emphasize Wikilinks. Yworo (talk) 04:02, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

See WP:BOLDTITLE, WP:MOSBOLD, and Wikipedia:Superfluous bolding explained. Also, please do not accuse other editors of "bias" when they are merely removing superfluous formatting. That's a violation of our assume good faith and no personal attacks rules. Yworo (talk) 04:08, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jesse Warn

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jesse Warn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 02:38, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Jean Loring

Why do you keep wanting that added? She was never his partner.. point me to the discussion where it was decided that people wanted it in there? Someone added it awhile back and no one questioned it before is not the same as "established consensus." Point me to the issue # where she works besides him in anysort of partnership? Superman's page does not list Lois as a partner, Barry Allen does not list Iris as a partner. Your only reasoning in your edit summaries is "its been there for a long while..." that doesnt explain why it should be there. Spanneraol (talk) 00:18, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

I left a response in the Atom talk page. No, I am not impressed to find that there is no discussion which insists keeping that entry on the navbox list, even though you implied that there is one. And yes, I am completely in agreement with Spanneraol on the subject. It's a case by case basis; certain characters like Mera, Steve Trevor, Larry Lance and even Sue Dibny have an established print history of consistently working alongside the titular protagonists besides being their love interests. Lois Lane is a bit of a tricky case because she does have agency as a character and does her own thing as often as being at Superman's side, but clearly Jean Loring isn't and never was.

Keep in mind as well, consensus can change. Haleth (talk) 01:09, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Glee season changes

LLArrow, please note that the ampersands have not been used in earlier seasons when Murphy, Falchuk, and Brennan shared credits, and this has been established for a while. I will be reverting you once again, and if you really, really think they belong despite the Manual of Style's preference, please argue your case in the season 6 talk page, since to do it on all the seasons where the three of them shared credits isn't necessary. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:26, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

FYI

Here is Rswallis10's 3RR report: [1] if you want to keep an eye on it/comment. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 05:15, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Commented. Good work. Let's hope this pain is alleviated. Cheers, LLArrow (talk) 05:25, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

The page is protected, so please take the time to discuss the matter using the article discussion page. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 20:26, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Canvassing

Hey, just so you don't get accused of canvassing in the future (and I don't believe this would qualify), just post the request for comment at WP:TV, of it's an application of the guideline to WP:MOSTV. You'll get more opinions, and Favre and I will still see. Make sure the request is neutral as well. Cheers.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 12:51, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

It was a mistake to reach out to you, I apologize. It seems Wikipedia never fails to supply a regulation I am unaware of. Thanks, LLArrow (talk) 17:20, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrew Kreisberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Supergirl (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Americans, season 3, promotional image 2015.jpj.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Americans, season 3, promotional image 2015.jpj.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:15, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Once Upon a Time 2 part finale

Why remove it completely? Why not just leave it hidden on the page where it would be easy to readd when confirmed?--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 08:07, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

It had misconfigured the table. LLArrow (talk) 17:02, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Ah okay, Hadn't realised that. Thanks.--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 21:03, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Scream Queens

Do you think we should upgrade the protection to pending changes once the full protection is over? Callmemirela (talk) 17:58, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

At the current rate of editors adding in this unsourced malarkey, I say absolutely. LLArrow (talk) 20:04, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Not the last season (Devious Maids)

Hi :) I saw you added a tweet saying it was the last season of Devious Maids, on the page for the third season. Apparently, it is a problem of comprehension. You should give a look to the answers to this tweet :) https://twitter.com/TheRealAnaOrtiz/status/582621204105830400 2A02:8425:732:400:2847:3A27:C67F:F95D (talk) 15:55, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Not will be last season. Just see tweets after her tweet. 'Last' it was about second season.--Alrofficial (talk) 19:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

@Alrofficial: The tweeter asks "Are you happy for the last season of the show?", Ortiz replies, "Yes! Filming season 3 now & it's fabulous!" Later the tweeter clarifies that they were not inquiring about the last season, but that mean absolutely nothing. Ortiz had already answered the question. So she most definitely CONFIRMED it would be the last season. LLArrow (talk) 23:36, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry but this tweet is really confusing and totally unclear. You just can"t use a tweet like that as source to say it is the end of a show. Most definitely, it is not season. You just understand it like that, but it is too unclear to be used as a source. 2A02:8425:732:400:2847:3A27:C67F:F95D (talk) 00:43, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

I don't say it is definitively ending. It states "seemingly". If you can find a verifiable source stating this will NOT be the last season, then please let me know. If not, the info remains. LLArrow (talk) 01:02, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Inappropriate?

Can you explain to me how Easter eggs are inappropriate? I can't find any Wikipedia policy that says it's inappropriate. Maybe I'm missing something.Pjstar35 (talk) 19:14, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Can you find me any other examples of other series having an easter egg section?. LLArrow (talk) 21:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

So because it supossedly doesn't exist on any other series' page that makes it inappropriate? A lot of shows don't have the ability to include easter eggs since they're not related to a comic book or other material. The other shows that are related to a comic or other material maybe don't include them at all or not enough of them to really make them notable unlike with Constantine. Pjstar35 (talk) 12:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Look I realize the easter eggs may be a fun little trivia for the comic readers (I'm one myself), but it simply does not qualify as remarkable on the series Wikipedia article. LLArrow (talk) 16:58, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to Constantine (TV series)

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Happy_Attack_Dog (Throw Me a Bone) 17:29, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Scream Queens part 2

Okay,

This whole pending changes is somewhat helping, but the disruptive keeps on continuing. Whilst I am left with the only option of reverting, I am seriously thinking about a infinite semi-protection, because this is actually ridiculous. I am not sure if it is possible to have pending changes and semi-protection, but I will ask around. If so, I will request semi-protection. PS: You should really apply for pending changes reviewer here to revert changes on the article. Callmemirela (talk) 15:20, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

@Callmemirela: I think it's an inspired idea; and done. Thank you, LLArrow (talk) 17:10, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Gorilla Grodd

Can you please give me a better explanation for this edit than "Reverting bias edits"? No idea what you're talking about. That is way too much information. Most superhero articles have "fictional" in the lead too. DangerousJXD (talk) 09:18, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Are you going to say something then? Nearly every character in that game that has an article on Wikipedia mentioning them being in it, doesn't go into excessive detail. Why must it stay? If it must stay, trim it (I could easily now but I'll wait to see what you say). Why did you call my edit "bias"? Thanks for leaving "fictional" in the lead (it is the standard). Please chime in. In the end, it isn't the most important thing on Wikipedia. :) -DangerousJXD (talk) 22:01, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

@DangerousJXD: If you make any sort of major change to the information it must be agreed upon on the Talk page first. We are not allowed to enforce our opinions on Wikipedia. LLArrow (talk) 22:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the timely response but could you answer my questions please? It's not even close to a major change and it is not really my opinion (I made it clear that it wasn't just my opinion by saying "Nearly every character in that game that has an article on Wikipedia mentioning them being in it, doesn't go into excessive detail." above). There is no point taking this to the talk page because you're the only one that'll be there, (as I said above) it's not a major change, and we've already started a discussion here. —DangerousJXD (talk) 22:15, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

@DangerousJXD: The information must stay because you are the only one to ever take grievance with it. You're edit was bias because it demonstrated your opinion on the matter. It doesn't matter who you think will be commenting on this at the Talk page; it's policy to take major changes there to have them gain consensus before being implemented. My advice, make the changes you want, if they happen to be too extensive, I'm sure you'll be reverted. Thanks and cheers, LLArrow (talk) 22:26, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

I tried trimming it but it is a bit hard when none of it belongs. It is not my opinion. Don't call people biased. Don't throw around accusations please. I don't care anymore. Have the article any way you want. See ya. :) –DangerousJXD (talk) 22:42, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

@DangerousJXD: Calling an editor biased isn't derogatory, it merely means you've done something against policy. LLArrow (talk) 23:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

I did nothing against policy. I am done with the matter. –DangerousJXD (talk) 23:49, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, you did, but that's okay. It's how we learn. LLArrow (talk) 23:59, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Motive episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Karen Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Scream Queens hatnote

RE your reversion of my edit: the guidelines at WP:HAT, specifically WP:NAMB, discourage the use of hatnotes when page names are made unambiguous by parenthetical clarifiers. I'm not going to revert your edit, but if you're intent on the page having a hatnote, you ought at least to point it directly at Scream Queens (2008 TV series) instead of Scream Queens, which is the disambiguation page. Thanks, VeryCrocker (talk) 07:30, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

American Horror Story

I don't see the problem. Jessica Lange is leaving. If you don't say she is, the article is implying she's not.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:16, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

@Vchimpanzee: Not sure what you're referring to. The tidbit of Lange's departure is currently in the article. The only thing removed was the faulty source. LLArrow (talk) 22:25, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Show me where, because I looked and looked.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 23:07, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Okay, there's more history. Someone else disagreed with you and agreed with me and put it back. And there's nothing wrong with my source. I've used it a hundred times at least for Wikipedia. If it's in another source, fine, but there's nothing wrong with my source.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 23:10, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

No actually, non-U.S. sources are discouraged. LLArrow (talk) 23:55, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

There's nothing about my source which makes it "non-U.S.". The syndicated column ran in the weekly section of my local paper some years ago. When they dropped it, I went on line. It's getting harder to find the column online, but King Features still distributes it. If people want to replace the source for my information that's fine, because when I read this column I don't generally waste my time looking for better sources. Once, she did get the information wrong but it sure looked right because she said she talked to the movie's producer. But the other person and I came to an agreement and we decided she somehow got it wrong.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 15:19, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Scream Queens (2015 TV series), is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Keri (talk) 11:44, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

@Keri: Firstly, I've been a contributor to Wikipedia, on and off, for over six years, so no need to welcome me. Secondly, I am well aware of this site rules and regulations. I removed the comment do to it being malformed. It was probably a hasty decision, but I grow tired of IP's not "trying". LLArrow (talk) 17:03, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

All it lacked was a header, that is hardly "not trying". The points the user raised are also still valid. I can see how long you've been here, the welcome comes with the template, and I'm a firm believer in WP:TTR. Keri (talk) 17:11, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Well you and I have a vastly different definition of "valid".LLArrow (talk) 17:16, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

And you and I have vastly different definitions of "reliable source" and "original research" too, in that case. Keri (talk) 18:15, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

"Bad source"

This diff. Point me to the discussion where this is listed as a "bad source"; as far as I am aware, they use ratings provided by Nielsen. Keri (talk) 20:09, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

@Keri: the real numbers were just released. As I said, bad source. LLArrow (talk) 22:07, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Ah, I see; so not a "bad source" at all, then - just superceded by a later "adjusted" Nielsen release. Serious attitude problem... Keri (talk) 23:45, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

@Keri: "Attitude problem"? Me? You must not be from around these parts. It get's a lot uglier than my benevolent correction. Perhaps Wikipedia isn't for you. LLArrow (talk) 03:26, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Reported for edit warring

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:LLArrow reported by User:Gloss (Result: ). There may still be time for you to respond there. EdJohnston (talk) 16:52, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:LLArrow reported by User:Gloss (Result: Blocked). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:10, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LLArrow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please don't block me. I realize my actions may have been hasty, and I will strive to never edit war again, under any circumstances. I don't understand the vandalism rule, and am working to educate myself further on it as I write this. I'm going though a really tough time in my personal life right now, so that would explain my unacceptable actions. Please give me another chance to prove my self as a competent editor.

Decline reason:

Your block is only for 48 hours. which if anything errs towards the lenient, given that you were blocked for the same offence earlier this year. Spend the time reviewing the policy here on edit warring, and consider the link earlier on this page, referring to WP:ANI--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:26, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The ANI link that Anthony is referring to might be might be this one (28 Feb 2015). That ANI makes reference to three other AN3 cases involving LLArrow. EdJohnston (talk) 21:54, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your time. LLArrow (talk) 22:46, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Jesse Warn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jesse Warn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Warn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CookieMonster755 (talk) 05:19, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Once Upon a Time, season 4B, promo image.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Once Upon a Time, season 4B, promo image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

List of Hannibal Episodes

Hey remember me? I made an edit that there would be a new episode of Hannibal on 2 July, 2015 but you corrected me as there will be a repeat that night. Anyway, I noticed someone reverted the considerate edit you made to my erroneous information. Best. AlexanderLD (talk) 23:02, 16 June 2015 (UTC)