Once I was an avid editor of Wikipedia, but the long-lasting [[deletionist]] craze drove me away, as it has driven away other dedicated Wikipedians, and doubtless scared off many would-be Wikipedians. I maintain this profile as a commemoration of the time when Wikipedia was a growing, constructive environment for the cataloguing of all the world's knowledge, and as a protest against the arbitrary culling of that knowledge that seems to be the current fad. If you've submitted [[AfD]]'s without researching the sources and attempting to improve them yourself, if you've engaged in reflexive copyright-extremism, or made ill-defined demands for "sufficient" coverage to establish notability...you're part of the problem.
Once I was an avid editor of Wikipedia, but the long-lasting [[deletionist]] craze drove me away, as it has driven away other dedicated Wikipedians, and doubtless scared off many would-be Wikipedians. I maintain this profile as a commemoration of the time when Wikipedia was a growing, constructive environment for the cataloguing of all the world's knowledge, and as a protest against the arbitrary culling of that knowledge that seems to be the current fad. If you've submitted [[AfD]]'s without researching the sources and attempting to improve them yourself, if you've engaged in reflexive copyright-extremism, or made ill-defined demands for "sufficient" coverage to establish notability...you're part of the problem. Please consider becoming more constructive and less destructive.
</td>
</td>
<tr>
<tr>
Revision as of 22:29, 9 August 2015
Wikipedia
Nathan McKnight
This is the user page of Nathan McKnight. Please do not edit it without his consent.
Wikimedia Foundation
Once I was an avid editor of Wikipedia, but the long-lasting deletionist craze drove me away, as it has driven away other dedicated Wikipedians, and doubtless scared off many would-be Wikipedians. I maintain this profile as a commemoration of the time when Wikipedia was a growing, constructive environment for the cataloguing of all the world's knowledge, and as a protest against the arbitrary culling of that knowledge that seems to be the current fad. If you've submitted AfD's without researching the sources and attempting to improve them yourself, if you've engaged in reflexive copyright-extremism, or made ill-defined demands for "sufficient" coverage to establish notability...you're part of the problem. Please consider becoming more constructive and less destructive.
My stats...
My edit counts as tracked by Soxred93's counter (as of 3/16/2010):
First edit: Jun 10, 2006 02:10:28 |
Unique articles edited: 804 |
Average edits per page: 5.32 |
Total edits (including deleted): 4,275 |
Deleted edits: 157 |
Live edits: 4,118
This alleged user can be said to maintain an ill-defined policy or other custom of neutrality or other ambiguity-related quality on some or all issues that may be potentially controversial to some alleged people.
Citizen-Editable Law Wiki This would be a far-ranging project by which all people are invited to take part in the drafting of a legal framework online via the wiki process. The bills so written would then be introduced into various legislative bodies with the aim of establishing citizen-written, participatory law in all corners of the world.
_-_Google_Art_Project_-_edited.jpg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
