Once I was an avid editor of Wikipedia, but the long-lasting [[deletionist]] craze drove me away, as it has driven away other dedicated Wikipedians, and doubtless scared off many would-be Wikipedians. I maintain this profile as a commemoration of the time when Wikipedia was a growing, constructive environment for the cataloguing of all the world's knowledge, and as a protest against the arbitrary culling of that knowledge that seems to be the current fad. If you've submitted [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|
Once I was an avid editor of Wikipedia, but the long-lasting [[deletionist]] craze drove me away, as it has driven away other dedicated Wikipedians, and doubtless scared off many would-be Wikipedians. I maintain this profile as a commemoration of the time when Wikipedia was a growing, constructive environment for the cataloguing of all the world's knowledge, and as a protest against the arbitrary culling of that knowledge that seems to be the current fad. If you've submitted [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|
WP:PROD]]'s without researching the sources and attempting to improve them yourself, if you've engaged in reflexive copyright-extremism, or made ill-defined demands for "sufficient" coverage to establish notability...you're part of the problem. Please consider becoming more constructive and less destructive.
WP:PROD]]'s without researching the sources and attempting to improve them yourself, if you've engaged in reflexive copyright-extremism, or made ill-defined demands for "sufficient" coverage to establish notability...you're part of the problem. Please consider becoming more constructive and less destructive. If you aren't familiar with Wikipedia's deletion polices, please see [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Alternatives_to_deletion]]
</td>
</td>
<tr>
<tr>
Revision as of 22:54, 9 August 2015
Wikipedia
Nathan McKnight
This is the user page of Nathan McKnight. Please do not edit it without his consent.
Wikimedia Foundation
Once I was an avid editor of Wikipedia, but the long-lasting deletionist craze drove me away, as it has driven away other dedicated Wikipedians, and doubtless scared off many would-be Wikipedians. I maintain this profile as a commemoration of the time when Wikipedia was a growing, constructive environment for the cataloguing of all the world's knowledge, and as a protest against the arbitrary culling of that knowledge that seems to be the current fad. If you've submitted
WP:PROD's without researching the sources and attempting to improve them yourself, if you've engaged in reflexive copyright-extremism, or made ill-defined demands for "sufficient" coverage to establish notability...you're part of the problem. Please consider becoming more constructive and less destructive. If you aren't familiar with Wikipedia's deletion polices, please see [[1]]
My stats...
My edit counts as tracked by Soxred93's counter (as of 3/16/2010):
First edit: Jun 10, 2006 02:10:28 |
Unique articles edited: 804 |
Average edits per page: 5.32 |
Total edits (including deleted): 4,275 |
Deleted edits: 157 |
Live edits: 4,118
This alleged user can be said to maintain an ill-defined policy or other custom of neutrality or other ambiguity-related quality on some or all issues that may be potentially controversial to some alleged people.
Citizen-Editable Law Wiki This would be a far-ranging project by which all people are invited to take part in the drafting of a legal framework online via the wiki process. The bills so written would then be introduced into various legislative bodies with the aim of establishing citizen-written, participatory law in all corners of the world.
.svg){kind=small}
_-_Google_Art_Project_-_edited.jpg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
