Jump to content

Talk:Sociology of gender: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Reste023 (talk | contribs)
Update Basic Ideas of Sociology assignment details
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Sociology|class=Start|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Sociology|class=Start|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Gender Studies|class=start}}
{{WikiProject Gender Studies|class=start}}

{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Florida_International_University/Basic_Ideas_of_Sociology_(Spring_2016) | assignments = [[User:Reste023|Reste023]] }}


== Interested in editing this article ==
== Interested in editing this article ==

Revision as of 23:35, 1 March 2016

WikiProject iconSociology Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconGender studies Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:


Interested in editing this article

I am interested in editing this article -- finding and validating references, etc. I will get to it, time permitting. In the meantime, if you have ideas or questions, please feel free to message me. HiTrish (talk) 18:18, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious why the article states, "Violence is about power, control, and domination" and then only talks about physical violence. The article then goes on to state that the media glamorizes violence against women, which I guess is true if all power, control, or domination can only be demonstrated in a physical way. Otherwise we'd have to discuss the way in which the media reflects and glamorizes violence perpetrated against men especially in terms of divorce. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.230.63.52 (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Find some sociology articles or other reliable sources that say this about divorce, and it would be considered. I've never seen any such articles. Even if they exist, they'd be WP:FRINGE. EvergreenFir (talk) 00:24, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Antifeminist theory?

Regarding this edit: Is there an "anti-feminist theory" in sociology? If so, I've never heard of it, or its relation to gender. EvergreenFir (talk) 03:33, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Civatrope: AFAIK, "antifeminist theory" isn't a thing. You cited Harding about strong objectivity, which is what she talks about. But what you need to cite is what supposed "antifeminist theorists" say about it, not that it exists and what Harding says about it. Again, I've never ever heard of "antifeminist theory". There is no page for it on Wikipedia. You need to establish that it even exists before mentioning it here. Quite frankly, your edits appear to be your own ideas. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:48, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Interest in editing this article

I am interested in editing this article and doing further research into the sociology of gender. I have compiled a couple sources that I believe will give me insight to the information I require to conduct proper research. One of the sources I chose to use is a acamdemic journal and summary called "Theory on Gender/Feminism on Theory" [1]. With this journal and the other sources I have chosen I will be inserting factual as well as opinionated research into both sociology and gender. I will try to approach but subjects from their respective angles but ultimately diagnose the subject as a whole.

Bib:

Rosenfeld, Rachel A. "Theory on Gender/Feminism on Theory." Social Forces 72.1 (1993): 285+. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 23 Feb. 2016

Hu, Alice. "Gender equality and the United Nations: an interview with Nafis Sadik." Harvard International Review 37.1 (2015): 55+. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 23 Feb. 2016.

Neitz, Mary Jo. "Becoming Visible: Religion And Gender In Sociology." Sociology Of Religion 75.4 (2014): 511-523. Academic Search Complete. Web. 23 Feb. 2016. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reste023 (talkcontribs) 01:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Reste023: Rene, although this is a fascinating topic, I do not think you should edit the sociology of gender. As I've said several times in the course, your task is to find a stub article with very little written on it. You will have an extremely hard time adding useful content to this Wikipedia page. Please find a different topic to edit. Alfgarciamora (talk) 13:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ Rosenfeld, Rachel A. "Theory on Gender/Feminism on Theory." Social Forces 72.1 (1993): 285+. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 23 Feb. 2016