Jump to content

Talk:Safran Aircraft Engines: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Question: Reply with info
Line 25: Line 25:


:SNECMA bought the licence for the BMW 003 but as they did change it radically, it could be argued they created another engine from an existant one. To one extend, we could be asking the same question of almost if not all aircraft engine companies of the world, as they all took existant patern from a previous engine made by another company.[[Special:Contributions/90.9.154.189|90.9.154.189]] ([[User talk:90.9.154.189|talk]]) 15:24, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
:SNECMA bought the licence for the BMW 003 but as they did change it radically, it could be argued they created another engine from an existant one. To one extend, we could be asking the same question of almost if not all aircraft engine companies of the world, as they all took existant patern from a previous engine made by another company.[[Special:Contributions/90.9.154.189|90.9.154.189]] ([[User talk:90.9.154.189|talk]]) 15:24, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

::"Société nationale d'études et de construction de moteurs d'aviation" or "SNECMA" was the name given to the former [[Gnome et Rhône]] company after it was nationalised in 1945.


==Fair use rationale for Image:Snecma logo.png==
==Fair use rationale for Image:Snecma logo.png==

Revision as of 18:28, 15 May 2016

Question

I am trying to find out if SNECMA have ever designed an engine themselves. They have used WW2 German BMW designs for many military aircraft engines for decades (Atar). They partnered Bristol/RR on the Concorde's Olympus. They partnered GE on the CFM56. They bought the only real French engine company, Turbomeca. Details of the development of the M53, the engine for the Mirage 2000 and the M88, the engine for the Rafale, are nonexistent. They do not seem to live up to their name! They seem to be a State Equity Fund.

SNECMA bought the licence for the BMW 003 but as they did change it radically, it could be argued they created another engine from an existant one. To one extend, we could be asking the same question of almost if not all aircraft engine companies of the world, as they all took existant patern from a previous engine made by another company.90.9.154.189 (talk) 15:24, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"Société nationale d'études et de construction de moteurs d'aviation" or "SNECMA" was the name given to the former Gnome et Rhône company after it was nationalised in 1945.

Fair use rationale for Image:Snecma logo.png

Image:Snecma logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]