Jump to content

Talk:LSD: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 99: Line 99:
I have never heard either of any case of oral overdose outside of those contrived conditions of the labs above deliberately doing so to put their human guinea pigs at risk. The article should reflect this along with the contrived and pointless nature of both the research and the article section. [[User:Mattjs|Mattjs]] ([[User talk:Mattjs|talk]])
I have never heard either of any case of oral overdose outside of those contrived conditions of the labs above deliberately doing so to put their human guinea pigs at risk. The article should reflect this along with the contrived and pointless nature of both the research and the article section. [[User:Mattjs|Mattjs]] ([[User talk:Mattjs|talk]])
:An overdose does not have to be lethal or life-threatening. It can simply mean having too much. [[User:Sizeofint|Sizeofint]] ([[User talk:Sizeofint|talk]]) 17:50, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
:An overdose does not have to be lethal or life-threatening. It can simply mean having too much. [[User:Sizeofint|Sizeofint]] ([[User talk:Sizeofint|talk]]) 17:50, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
::Perhaps but not appoint to be overstated per: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drug_overdose].
But you have just clued me to the symptoms diagram of the upper chest: Now indeed I suspect that these symptoms may be associated only with the contrived lab overdoses above and not normal usage and dosage. If so then the diagram and related pieces of the article will have to be correctly cited/referenced or else these things WILL be removed. It seems to me that there may well be serious un-scientific anti-drug POV creeping into this article and over-stating its case by using the technique of baffling the common reader with bullshit to do so. [[Special:Contributions/121.44.104.240|121.44.104.240]] ([[User talk:121.44.104.240|talk]])


== [[LSD and schizophrenia]] ==
== [[LSD and schizophrenia]] ==

Revision as of 18:22, 13 September 2016

Former featured articleLSD is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 29, 2004.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 19, 2004Refreshing brilliant proseKept
March 22, 2006Featured article reviewKept
January 29, 2007Featured article reviewDemoted
October 8, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 16, 2004, April 16, 2005, April 16, 2006, November 16, 2008, and November 16, 2012.
Current status: Former featured article

Template:WP1.0 This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Agratian (article contribs).

Dosage conversion

Can we please use a common measurement (micrograms) for all weight references? Confusing and disjointed to use both grams and micrograms — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.253.60.5 (talk) 22:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Lysergic acid diethylamide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:05, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Overdose section lacks important details

The source provided for the overdose section of this article is the following URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1129381/

"Eight patients were seen within 15 minutes of intranasal self-administration of large amounts of pure D-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) tartrate powder." The overdose section of this article makes no mention that the fatal 1,000 to 7,000ug doses were administrated intranasally. It should be noted that this is an incredibly uncommon method of administration for LSD, as LSD is normally taken orally and that from my research at least I cannot find a single source that shows when administered orally LSD is fatal in doses above 1,000ug. In fact, I cannot find a single recorded case of any dosage at all being administered orally resulting in a fatality. There are even anecdotal reports of people taking doses that are an order of magnitude higher than what is described here, as high as 30,000 micrograms. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrimp4074 (talk • contribs) 21:19, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can not overdose on LSD because I have seen guys do like 15 tabs of LSD at once & he was just fine & is still alive to day Skrodow (talk) 22:29, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have never heard either of any case of oral overdose outside of those contrived conditions of the labs above deliberately doing so to put their human guinea pigs at risk. The article should reflect this along with the contrived and pointless nature of both the research and the article section. Mattjs (talk)

An overdose does not have to be lethal or life-threatening. It can simply mean having too much. Sizeofint (talk) 17:50, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps but not appoint to be overstated per: [1].

But you have just clued me to the symptoms diagram of the upper chest: Now indeed I suspect that these symptoms may be associated only with the contrived lab overdoses above and not normal usage and dosage. If so then the diagram and related pieces of the article will have to be correctly cited/referenced or else these things WILL be removed. It seems to me that there may well be serious un-scientific anti-drug POV creeping into this article and over-stating its case by using the technique of baffling the common reader with bullshit to do so. 121.44.104.240 (talk)

LSD and schizophrenia

Is there anything worth salvaging in that article? I think it should otherwise be redirected here; it looks to be mostly garbage. Sizeofint (talk) 02:36, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not that I'm an expert, but I don't think you have to be one to see that it's junk. Carlstak (talk) 03:34, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Junk it is. Once thought to be, turned out it wasn't. Deserves a sentence in the LSD page, and no more. And all the footnotes are blank. Never seen the like. Grammar's Li'l Helper Talk 06:43, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
My favorite is the IP editor on the talkpage who accidentally signed his post in the middle of the section header:
Article Qu46.208.166.20 (talk) 21:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)ality
This article is really shit, I tried to read it but I couldn't figure out what was going on at all. I'm laughing at how terrible this is. Cheers.
I'm with Sizeofint and Mr. IP. I can't imagine there's anything there worth salvaging. —PermStrump(talk) 07:42, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Sizeofint (talk) 07:56, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lysergic acid diethylamide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:16, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:LSD&oldid=739265897"