User talk:Orasis: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
Per [[WP:AE#Orasis]], you are banned from the [[WP:ARBPIA]] topic area, broadly construed, for 6 months. I would also suggest that continuing on in the same manner after the ban expires will rapidly lead to an indefinite ban from the topic and most likely an indefinite block as well. [[User:The Blade of the Northern Lights|The Blade of the Northern Lights]] ([[User talk:The Blade of the Northern Lights|<font face="MS Mincho" color="black">話して下さい</font>]]) 22:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC) |
Per [[WP:AE#Orasis]], you are banned from the [[WP:ARBPIA]] topic area, broadly construed, for 6 months. I would also suggest that continuing on in the same manner after the ban expires will rapidly lead to an indefinite ban from the topic and most likely an indefinite block as well. [[User:The Blade of the Northern Lights|The Blade of the Northern Lights]] ([[User talk:The Blade of the Northern Lights|<font face="MS Mincho" color="black">話して下さい</font>]]) 22:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC) |
||
{{unblock|reason=I will suck Israel's dick *not* guess it's time for another ban right, right guys? [[User:Orasis|Orasis]] ([[User talk:Orasis#top|talk]]) 06:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)}} |
Revision as of 06:57, 28 September 2016
Your recent addition of Peckerwood needs a reference to support it. If you need help with this,leave me a message here, I will be watching for it. μηδείς (talk) 03:39, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Dear Orasis, I don't understand why you put notability line above the entry. Whar criterion From the 5 notability criterions doesn't exist in this entry ? Tzahy (talk) 09:08, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Alliance Global Group for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alliance Global Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance Global Group (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:51, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
July 2016
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:Royal Rife, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. Hertz1888 (talk) 09:58, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ralph Bunche, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lehi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Please don't make up your own Commons categories, as you did with your recent edit to Lehi (group). Also, if an editor adds the {{NPOV}} template to an article, they should start a discussion on the article's talk page specifying the article's POV problems. Since you failed to do so, I removed the template. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 10:59, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
WP:ARBPIA notice
The arbitration committee has decided that editors with less than 500 edits, such as yourself, may not edit any article which is broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict , including Talk pages of such articles. You were probably not aware of this restriction when you edited Lehi (group) , so I am making you aware of it now. Please to not continue to edit there until you have accumulated 500 or more edits in other areas of the encyclopedia. Read more about the case here WP:ARBPIA3. Epson Salts (talk) 01:49, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- If you continue to edit articles where you are restricted from editing per WP:ARBPIA3, I will have an administrator enforce this via a block. Epson Salts (talk) 23:13, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Of course you will
Because you only allow Israeli views on anything related to the subject. (talk) 02:13, 28 September 2016 (UTC) Orasis (talk)
Yeah.
September 2016
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:47, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Arbitration Enforcement
Please see WP:AE#Orasis. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:24, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
September 2016
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Widr (talk) 04:34, 6 September 2016 (UTC)Topic ban
Per WP:AE#Orasis, you are banned from the WP:ARBPIA topic area, broadly construed, for 6 months. I would also suggest that continuing on in the same manner after the ban expires will rapidly lead to an indefinite ban from the topic and most likely an indefinite block as well. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 22:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Orasis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I will suck Israel's dick *not* guess it's time for another ban right, right guys? [[User:Orasis|Orasis]] ([[User talk:Orasis#top|talk]]) 06:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I will suck Israel's dick *not* guess it's time for another ban right, right guys? [[User:Orasis|Orasis]] ([[User talk:Orasis#top|talk]]) 06:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I will suck Israel's dick *not* guess it's time for another ban right, right guys? [[User:Orasis|Orasis]] ([[User talk:Orasis#top|talk]]) 06:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}