Jump to content

User talk:2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎Tag: new section
→‎Tag: new section
Line 192: Line 192:


My latest incarnation. [[Special:Contributions/2601:188:1:AEA0:8D59:807A:9698:8CCD|2601:188:1:AEA0:8D59:807A:9698:8CCD]] ([[User talk:2601:188:1:AEA0:8D59:807A:9698:8CCD|talk]]) 02:05, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
My latest incarnation. [[Special:Contributions/2601:188:1:AEA0:8D59:807A:9698:8CCD|2601:188:1:AEA0:8D59:807A:9698:8CCD]] ([[User talk:2601:188:1:AEA0:8D59:807A:9698:8CCD|talk]]) 02:05, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

== Tag ==

Newest incarnation. [[Special:Contributions/2601:188:1:AEA0:3478:AF6A:7A73:22F1|2601:188:1:AEA0:3478:AF6A:7A73:22F1]] ([[User talk:2601:188:1:AEA0:3478:AF6A:7A73:22F1|talk]]) 00:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:01, 3 October 2016

READ THIS BEFORE TEMPLATING

stop Make sure you've examined this IP's edits and edit summaries carefully before templating. --NeilN talk to me 01:04, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made to Marsha Dietlein. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

If you edit without an account, your IP address (2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Bronze2018 (talk) 16:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! — Music1201 talk 00:07, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the message left by you on my talk page

It was a warning the user blanked a AFD page.[1] I think it should be as a record on the page until the AFD is concluded FITINDIA (talk) 14:41, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is that consistent with our policies regarding WP:REMOVE? And even if you're covered, edit warring over this doesn't look good. Thanks, 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:45, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The user in question [2] thank you FITINDIA (talk) 14:59, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've seen. Bbb is nothing if not a sharp admin. Of course, this is sort of irrelevant to our discussion. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:02, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Hi, Just wanted to stop by to thank you for reverting a vandal here in Imperialism. (N0n3up (talk) 04:18, 13 June 2016 (UTC))[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Your patrolling is much appreciated! Sro23 (talk) 17:53, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Company of One Hundred Associates

Hey 99. Thanks for your revert. There is definitely COI involved. See my talk page. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:01, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63. You have new messages at OnionRing's talk page.
Message added 14:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

OnionRing (talk) 14:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Information icon Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to 2016–17 Serbian SuperLiga: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thanks for catching the vandalism edits! Marianna251TALK 20:03, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

ANI

I replied to your post there. Not sure if you're still checking that thread. --NeilN talk to me 13:48, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining to this slightly dull IP. Much appreciated, 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:53, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:User name

Our dog IP nemesis has (unfortunately) sometimes used addresses that look like yours. It would really help if you exercised your option and registered, got an account and became an identifiable regular. We are seeing a lot of each other. It is confusing at times to other users (not just me). I appreciate your devandalizing the dog articles. Kudos. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:24, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I get a bit confused by the similarities, too. But there's no harm in any of us taking the extra few seconds to be certain before reverting and warning other users--I used to enjoy the luxury of rollback privileges, and am voluntarily reconciled to working a bit more slowly now. Not a bad thing at all. Keep up the good work, 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:33, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you have a point. But it's not just about you. The other IP is persistent and appears regularly. He strikes quickly and does lots of damage. Quickly. This would really help, and it would be of little inconvenience to you. You can now be continuously signed in for 365 days. So I would ask you to give it more thought and change your mind for the greater good. But it's your choice.
So we are clear here, we are reverting at cross purposes sometimes. And I have (mistakenly) reported you to WP:AIV. Just saying that it would really be a help. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate it, and in no ways to foster ill-will, remind others that the onus is on them, as it is on me, to be circumspect in such matters. I've many times explained the rationale for editing as an IP--my history as a registered account was quite illustrious and constructive in the matter of building content rather than simply removing vandalism. That is to say, nobody here is on solid ground in imploring an IP to register; the inconveniences are greater for me than for you, but it is what I prefer for now. Until Wikipedia bans IPs from editing, please respect that. Thank you, 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:53, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Besides, it's really a bit weird to ask someone to change their name so as not to inconvenience others. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:55, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As the last several weeks have demonstrated, we can't really control the IP, short of range blocks. This is Whack a mole.
OTOH, you could help a a concrete way.
I am presuming WP:AGF that you are not a WP:Sock for the IP. You know the answer to that one.
You could make dealing with him a lot easier. It's not about you only.
You have an absolute right to continue as you are. This is not about rights. Only common sense.
I've said enough. You are on your own. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:57, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, you said too much. I have long been assisting in 'a concrete way.' The implication that I may be a sock for vandals is insulting, and has nothing to do with me. If you have any further questions, I strongly suggest you refer them to Drmies, Bbb23 or any number of associated administrators who may be familiar with me. I have, as have you, attempted to curb the 'dog' vandal, and I feel no obligation to question whether you are somehow related to him/her. We can each continue as we have, without need for you to drop by here or at other well-meaning IP's talk pages. All the best, 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:07, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Never heard of him in my life. Are you still making trouble wherever you go, 99? I'm not used to running into you on a Talk page other than mine or Drmies's. Always good to see you wherever you happen to be.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:10, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Bbb; always good to hear from you. If I delete this thread it's only because the presumption out of which it grew pisses me off no end. I once knew of a painter who shared the last name of an unrelated artist working in a similar place and style; he asked her to change her surname to avoid confusion. Anyway, I'm reading this with one eye while working on an article for publication with the other. For those I sign my real name. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:14, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck to you too, 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63. Hope we can curb the dog. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 23:03, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how or why requiring one IP editor to register should help us curb the vandalism of another. Anyone who reverts an edit should carefully judge an edit on its merits before they revert, and if they do, they'll quickly realize there is a world of difference. Please accept. Carry on, 99, and good luck with the article. I'll proofread it for you at the friends' rate. Drmies (talk) 13:53, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

rivaldox Regarding the message left by you on my talk page

Hi thanks for your message regarding my post on Berkeley holdings. I am a resident at Chelsea Bridge Wharf and the evidence I have is a alter form Wandsworth Council that the depots do not have planning permission (dated 2.8.16) and evidence of the resident petition about this (a link to the online petition). However it seems that I am not allowed to post either this doc or the link. If you can advise what the issue is with using these sources of evidence I would be grateful. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rivaldox (talk • contribs) 10:51, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • There's no evidence that this belongs in an encyclopedia--it's trivial, and doesn't appear to be supported by multiple published sources. Moreover, even if it were mentioned in a newspaper article, it's of short-term local interest, and isn't noteworthy by encyclopedic standards. I'm also concerned that you may have a dog in this fight, a WP:COI, since you added content about this twice and have admitted personal involvement. This is appropriate for a blog or an activist website, but probably not here. Thanks, 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 00:39, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for your message. Yes I have a 'dog in this fight' I am a resident. That doesn't change the fact that the council have found the depots to be in violation of planning law. You seem to have a naive view of what 'facts' are and I am afraid that you have a dog in this fight since there is not the slightest hint of criticism of Berkeley Homes on this page despite the fact that many of their developments are controversial and have often been strongly opposed locally. You are in effect acting as a censor on behalf of Berkeley Homes and that is unacceptable and against the spirit of Wikipedia. I will challenge this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rivaldox (talk • contribs) 08:01, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
For your reversal in Zillah Bell Contemporary Art; thank you! — Sam Sailor 13:09, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

It helps to add diffs. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:23, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jim1138, I've added 7 diffs to the ANI, a drop in the bucket. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:31, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've been told, in essence, that there's nothing to be done, and why give a shit? 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:42, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Hello 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63, sorry for my mistake. Best Regards --Serols (talk) 16:37, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for cleaning my page!

Thanks! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:51, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tag

The IP I've been gifted with this evening, in the aftermath of a power outage. Still the same lovable 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63. Or as Drmies and Bbb23 know me, 99. 2601:188:1:AEA0:BC62:BFD6:7849:F056 (talk) 02:29, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) I'll have a flake with that!  ;) Muffled Pocketed 08:29, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Very good. Anything concerning dessert works for me. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 12:28, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For reverting vandalism and warning disruptive users. Gulumeemee (talk) 05:12, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tag

Every time the power goes out here in, and even when it doesn't, I get a new IP. This is my latest. 2601:188:1:AEA0:9825:2A41:2ECE:E32B (talk) 03:51, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More socking, 99. ;) Muffled Pocketed 04:12, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Harbor City International School

There is no "|directors=" in Template:Infobox school only a "|director=" (singular). Please do not remove the {{reflist}} and "== References ==" header. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 03:48, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Excise the problem, don't hack it and other functional stuff out. Jim1138 (talk) 03:52, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's what I'm trying to do--don't restore dreck. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:53, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There is almost nothing in that article that belongs, even after your radical cuts. I will be snipping away some more and trying to add some reasonably referenced content. Re your request at RPP, I only see one school and no school districts in Idaho and see no relation at all to the article referenced here. Skyline will be getting some attention from me too. IP editors are more than welcome at Wikiproject Schools. Wanna join? I can promise you we won't have a picnic nor will you get a cool tshirt, but you do not ever have to wear a silly hat! John from Idegon (talk) 03:19, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, John from Idegon. Drmies deleted three school district articles because they were blatant copyright violations. NWAyeah is the primary account, and a series of similarly disruptive IPs have sprung up in support. A number of them are from the University of Idaho. 2601:188:1:AEA0:9CA8:8C33:3D8F:7E65 (talk) 04:29, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A favor? Please drop a note on my talk with the names of the district's so I can recreate them right? Unless you see a range relationship with the IPs, Harbor looks like typical private/charter school promo to me. They're up my butt readding as fast as I can revert. Not too worried about it tho as some of what they're adding is blatantly BLP violating. John from Idegon (talk) 04:46, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tag

It's raining today, so naturally the power went out. Anything meteorologically stronger than a rabbit hiccup screws up the electricity here. Latest incarnation. 2601:188:1:AEA0:30F8:873F:7608:6364 (talk) 15:49, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Information icon Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Subhash Sureshchandra Deshmukh— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:23, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Vandalizing

Hi there, I wanted to apologize. I made an edit awhile ago, but other students sharing the address kept messing with it, and I stopped trying. I just got back on and saw all the warnings being reported. I'm sorry for who ever is doing this. I'm just going to get a private account, and revert any other vandalization I spot on Idaho related pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.101.245.189 (talk) 16:59, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tag

My latest incarnation. 2601:188:1:AEA0:8D59:807A:9698:8CCD (talk) 02:05, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tag

Newest incarnation. 2601:188:1:AEA0:3478:AF6A:7A73:22F1 (talk) 00:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63&oldid=742312220"