Jump to content

Talk:Occupy movement: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Occupy movement/Archive 3) (bot
Line 103: Line 103:


[[User:Zootberg|Zootberg]] ([[User talk:Zootberg|talk]]) 20:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
[[User:Zootberg|Zootberg]] ([[User talk:Zootberg|talk]]) 20:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

== Economic statements not quite correct. ==

It doesn´t overal matter that a 1% has 99% of the paper, what does matter is if you yourself can maintain PPP=1, and that, does not depend on that 1%´s redistribution of that what that 1% would be alleged to have, but on that 1%´s using that coinage to bribe all and every congressman to maintain Ppp=1, before everyone else does them in (that 1% that is).

This form of mistake is similar to playing golf at lane 18, and swinging a hole in one, but on lane 17, but with a passion purely reserved for those that feel they have nothing much to loose.

So, overal, yes, the movement seems correct, but simply does not have enough leverage to force that 1% to comply, their overal bribery relationships being in their own nearfield, for fear of being arrested when they go to a congress in a mid or far field.

Is there a solution to this? Well, yes, but political sloganist of the anon and scientiology behavior studies have prelabelled that terrorist, in the same form and manner that during history they have coined the label communist, socialist and overal many another form of schysm through the addition of the suffix ist or ism.

Recommendation: None, if you´re not willing to start training with waepons of Warfair.

Arab spring: Big mistake, there was no apriori where the individuals within that 1% of the United States would have alotted farmers to become governance, if those farmers would not hand over the totality of the petroleum production at 10 usd/barrel.

Question therefore is: Which Anon Group would be doing the do to make certain that that petroleum would be 10 usd/barrel, and in conjunction with which 1%.

Revision as of 02:02, 6 January 2017

WikiProject iconQRpedia
WikiProject iconThe organisation featured in this article uses QRpedia. For further information, please see WikiProject QRpedia.QRpediaWikipedia:WikiProject QRpediaTemplate:WikiProject QRpediaQRpedia articles

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 32 external links on Occupy movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:05, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 6 external links on Occupy movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Occupy movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:48, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Social Media Section

I am proposing an edit to the Occupy movement page to include a section on Social Media. Social Media was highly influential for this movement, which differentiates it from previous inequality protests and is important for the reader to understand the movement better. I have written in my sandbox (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Zootberg/sandbox) if anyone is interested in proofreading what I am proposing. Please feel free to comment on my sandbox, or on this talk page here. I have a couple other edits in my sandbox and could use some peer reviewers to check them out! I will go ahead and make edits in a couple days if nobody feels strongly against this.

Zootberg (talk) 20:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Economic statements not quite correct.

It doesn´t overal matter that a 1% has 99% of the paper, what does matter is if you yourself can maintain PPP=1, and that, does not depend on that 1%´s redistribution of that what that 1% would be alleged to have, but on that 1%´s using that coinage to bribe all and every congressman to maintain Ppp=1, before everyone else does them in (that 1% that is).

This form of mistake is similar to playing golf at lane 18, and swinging a hole in one, but on lane 17, but with a passion purely reserved for those that feel they have nothing much to loose.

So, overal, yes, the movement seems correct, but simply does not have enough leverage to force that 1% to comply, their overal bribery relationships being in their own nearfield, for fear of being arrested when they go to a congress in a mid or far field.

Is there a solution to this? Well, yes, but political sloganist of the anon and scientiology behavior studies have prelabelled that terrorist, in the same form and manner that during history they have coined the label communist, socialist and overal many another form of schysm through the addition of the suffix ist or ism.

Recommendation: None, if you´re not willing to start training with waepons of Warfair.

Arab spring: Big mistake, there was no apriori where the individuals within that 1% of the United States would have alotted farmers to become governance, if those farmers would not hand over the totality of the petroleum production at 10 usd/barrel.

Question therefore is: Which Anon Group would be doing the do to make certain that that petroleum would be 10 usd/barrel, and in conjunction with which 1%.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Occupy_movement&oldid=758542381"