Jump to content

User talk:Krimuk2.0: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Krimuk2.0/Archive 21) (bot
Janu Gee (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 24: Line 24:
}}
}}
{{Collapse bottom}}
{{Collapse bottom}}
Shut up!!I will continue making good articles. You racist. I'll block you if you pinch your nose in my stuff. You wanna fuck me .. huh


==Shah Rukh Khan cameo==
==Shah Rukh Khan cameo==

Revision as of 11:56, 14 February 2017

Archives

Shut up!!I will continue making good articles. You racist. I'll block you if you pinch your nose in my stuff. You wanna fuck me .. huh

Shah Rukh Khan cameo

Hi! This time I added a reference for SRK's cameo role in Dear Zindagi, but you again removed it. You also said that every cameo roles are unnecessary to mention, like for Ae Dil Hai Mushkil, OK I accept this. But please according to reference his role in DZ was an extended cameo. Thanks! M. Billoo 17:34, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That reference was before the film's release and is wrong. He is not credited as a cameo/special appearance in the film, which is what we follow in Wikipedia. Cheers! --Krimuk2.0 (talk) 17:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Then a/c to film, Kunal Kapoor and Ali Zafar were credited at #3 and #4, and others were given "special thanks", including Aditya Roy Kapur; Angad Bedi and Ira Dubey. M. Billoo 22:59, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) Well in that case M.Billoo2000, can you please refer to the closing credits of the film where the character names and the artistes were listed? None was credited as a cameo appearance, and Khan's name is mentioned in the second place right after that of Bhatt without any specifications. If he indeed made a cameo, we would have seen something like "Special thanks to Shah Rukh Khan" before the closing credits begin. Hope that helps. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:11, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

If you have really returned to editing here regularly, then welcome back. Mridul will no longer bother you, and if he does, simply getting him ARV'ed solves it. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:29, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Kailash. I'm glad that I took a long break to get away from all the negativity. But now it's a new year and a new beginning. Let's hope for the best. How are you doing? Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:37, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I never keep new year resolutions; I always just decide not to be a dick, and this time I decided the same. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:06, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hahaha, I don't think you're a dick. :) --Krimuk2.0 (talk) 10:08, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's good to see you back. By the way JLaw is now an FAC with lots of supports and a few commentators yet to finish their reviews. Now that you're back we should include your name in the nominators' names. – FrB.TG (talk)|

Oh, that's awesome! Thank you, and I'm so happy that you continued working on the article. :) --Krimuk2.0 (talk) 10:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome back, Happy New Year, and the FAC is coming along quite well! Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:38, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Happy New Year bud! It's good to see you back. How have you been? :) -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 02:30, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Snuggums and Bollywood Dreamz. A happy new year to the both of you! :) I've been good, but drowning in work, work, work... Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! I just saw JLaw's FAC being credited to you and realised that you are back. It's so nice to see you again here. Happy New Year and Welcome back. Krish | Talk 05:53, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Krish. A very happy new year to you too. :) --Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:42, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see you back! Hope you're well. If you're still interested, Karisma Kapoor filmography is available to work on, someone needs to revamp that godawful lead. Cowlibob (talk) 19:49, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. I'll have a go later this week. --Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:24, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stupid question

Is this you? Adam9007 (talk) 17:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear God, no! The sick vandal is up to his old tricks again. Sigh! --Krimuk2.0 (talk) 19:29, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Krimuk2.0_reported_by_User:Shimlaites_.28Result:_Both_warned.29 --NeilN talk to me 14:29, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]